RESUMO
The effects of ergot alkaloids on field potentials and unit responses produced in the upper cervical spinal cord by stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) were examined in 57 anesthetized cats. Electrical stimulation of the SSS produced field potentials and single-unit responses at latencies of 5-20 ms. Field potentials were abolished by section of the first division of the trigeminal nerve but were unaffected or increased by section of the upper cervical nerves. Field potentials were reduced or abolished by intravenous injection of ergotamine or dihydroergotamine (DHE). The evoked response of 41 units (34.4%) were suppressed by either i.v. or iontophoretic administration of ergotamine, DHE or ergometrine. The results suggest that ergot alkaloids exert an effect at a spinal cord relay centre which receives trigeminally mediated input from cranial blood vessels.
Assuntos
Cavidades Cranianas/inervação , Di-Hidroergotamina/farmacologia , Ergonovina/farmacologia , Ergotamina/farmacologia , Medula Espinal/fisiologia , Potenciais de Ação/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Gatos , Estimulação Elétrica , Potenciais Evocados/efeitos dos fármacos , Vias Neurais/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Long-chain acyl-CoAs (LCACoA) are an activated lipid species that are key metabolites in lipid metabolism; they also have a role in the regulation of other cellular processes. However, few studies have linked LCACoA content in rat and human muscle to changes in nutritional status and insulin action. Fasting rats for 18 h significantly elevated the three major LCACoA species in muscle (P < 0.001), whereas high-fat feeding of rats with a safflower oil (18:2) diet produced insulin resistance and increased total LCACoA content (P < 0.0001) by specifically increasing 18:2-CoA. The LCACoA content of red muscle from rats (4-8 nmol/g) was 4- to 10-fold higher than adipose tissue (0.4-0.9 nmol/g, P < 0.001), suggesting that any contamination of muscle samples with adipocytes would contribute little to the LCACoA content of muscle. In humans, the LCACoA content of muscle correlated significantly with a measure of whole body insulin action in 17 male subjects (r(2) = 0.34, P = 0.01), supporting a link between muscle lipid metabolism and insulin action. These results demonstrate that the LCACoA pool reflects lipid metabolism and nutritional state in muscle. We conclude that the LCACoA content of muscle provides a direct index of intracellular lipid metabolism and its links to insulin action, which, unlike triglyceride content, is not subject to contamination by closely associated adipose tissue.
Assuntos
Acil Coenzima A/metabolismo , Insulina/farmacologia , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Tecido Adiposo/metabolismo , Idoso , Animais , Glicemia/metabolismo , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Coenzima A Ligases/metabolismo , Ésteres , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Triglicerídeos/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance is closely associated with two disparate aspects of lipid storage: the intracellular lipid content of skeletal muscle and the magnitude of central adipose beds. Our aim was to determine their relative contribution to impaired insulin action. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Eighteen older (56 to 75 years of age) men were studied before elective knee surgery. Insulin sensitivity (M/Delta I) was determined by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Central abdominal fat (CF) was assessed by DXA. Skeletal muscle was excised at surgery and assayed for content of metabolically active long-chain acyl-CoA esters (LCAC). RESULTS: Significant inverse relationships were observed between LCAC and M/Delta I (R(2) = 0.34, p = 0.01) and between CF and M/Delta I (R(2) = 0.38, p = 0.006), but not between CF and LCAC (R(2) = 0.0005, p = 0.93). In a multiple regression model (R(2) = 0.71, p < 0.0001), both CF (p = 0.0006) and LCAC (p = 0.0009) were independent statistical predictors of M/Delta I. Leptin levels correlated inversely with M/Delta I (R(2) = 0.60, p = 0.0002) and positively with central (R(2) = 0.41, p = 0.006) and total body fat (R(2) = 0.63, p = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: The mechanisms by which altered lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle influences insulin action may not be related directly to those linking central fat and insulin sensitivity. In particular, it is unlikely that muscle accumulation of lipids directly derived from labile central fat depots is a principal contributor to peripheral insulin resistance. Instead, our results imply that circulating factors, other than nonesterified fatty acids or triglyceride, mediate between central fat depots and skeletal muscle tissue. Leptin was not exclusively associated with central fat, but other factors, secreted specifically from central fat cells, could modulate muscle insulin sensitivity.