Prognosis of hepatitis E infection in patients with chronic liver disease: A meta-analysis.

In individuals with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD), hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a potential trigger of acute-on-chronic liver failure. In this systematic review, seven electronic databases were searched. Pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. The association between death or liver failure and HEV superinfection in CLD patients was estimated by the odds ratios (OR) with a 95% CI. A total of 18 studies from 5 countries were eligible for systematic review. The prevalence of acute HEV infection in hospitalized CLD patients with clinical manifestations of hepatitis was 13.6%, which was significantly higher than that in CLD patients from the community (pooled prevalence 1.1%). The overall rates of liver failure and mortality in CLD patients with HEV superinfection were 35.8% (95% CI: 26.7%-45.6%) and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.6%-18.5%), respectively, with the rates in cirrhotic patients being approximately 2-fold and 4-fold higher than those in noncirrhotic patients, respectively. The risks of liver failure (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.5-20.1) and mortality (OR = 5.0, 95% CI: 1.9-13.3) were significantly higher in CLD patients with HEV superinfection than in those without HEV superinfection. HEV testing in hospitalized CLD patients is necessary due to the high prevalence of HEV infection observed in hospitalized CLD patients. HEV superinfection could accelerate disease progression in patients with underlying CLD and increase mortality in these patients. HEV vaccination is appropriate for patients with pre-existing CLD.

Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term antiviral treatments are associated with a significantly lower hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients by reducing HBV DNA concentrations. However, it is still controversial whether antiviral strategies affect HCC development in antiviral treatment-naïve CHB patients. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of HCC in antiviral treatment-naïve CHB patients who were treated with Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) and compare the efficacy of two treatment regimens in HCC reduction. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched until June 24, 2021. The pooled incidence and 95% confidence interval of HCC were calculated by the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. The efficacies of ETV and TDF treatments in HCC reduction were compared through a network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were identified as eligible for this systematic review. The incidence densities in the ETV and TDF treatment groups were 2.78 (95% CI: 2.21-3.40) and 2.59 (95% CI: 1.51-3.96) per 100 persons-year among patients with preexisting cirrhosis and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.32-0.68) and 0.30 (95% CI: 0.06-0.70) per 100 persons-year among patients without preexisting cirrhosis. As the proportion of CHB patients with preexisting cirrhosis increased, the incidence density of HCC also increased gradually. Compared with other Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) treatments, ETV and TDF treatments significantly lowered the risk of HCC, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.40-0.90) and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35-0.89), respectively. However, there was no difference in the incidence density of HCC between ETV and TDF treatments (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.71-1.20) regardless of preexisting cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: ETV and TDF treatments were associated with significantly lower risks of HCC than other NAs treatments. However, no difference was observed between ETV and TDF treatments in the risk of HCC development regardless of preexisting cirrhosis among treatment-naïve CHB patients.

Safety and outcome of early enteral nutrition in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the benefits and risks of early enteral nutrition (EN) in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: A single center retrospective review was performed including patients receiving ECMO for more than 24 h from May 2014 to July 2021. RESULTS: A total of sixty-five patients were enrolled, of which thirty-six patients (55.4%) received early EN. On ECMO day 3rd, 7th and 14th, the median energy intake through EN in the early EN group was 500 kcal (IQR:300, 880), 1000 kcal (IQR: 500, 1500) and 1000 kcal (500, 1500), representing 29.7%, 66.7% and 66.7% of energy target, respectively. Thirteen (36.1%) patients had EN intolerance in the early EN group, which is significantly lower than that in the delayed EN group (82.8%, P < 0.001). The most common reasons for EN intolerance were abdominal distention (22.2%), followed by elevated gastric residual volume (8.3%) in the early EN group. Forty-three (66.1%) patients successfully weaned off ECMO, with higher rate in the early EN group than in the delayed EN group (80.6% vs 48.3%, p = 0.006). Nineteen patients (52.8%) survived in the early EN group, which is also significantly higher than that in the delayed EN group (20.7%, P = 0.008). Patients receiving early enteral nutrition significantly reduced the mortality rate and the adjusted mortality hazard ratio was 0.22 (95%CI:0.10, 0.47). CONCLUSION: Early EN was safe and well-tolerated and can reduce the in-hospital mortality of patients receiving ECMO. For patients receiving ECMO, EN started with hypocaloric doses within 48 h of ECMO initiation is recommend.