Pantoprazole in severe acid-peptic disease: the effectiveness and safety of 5 years' continuous treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This is our final report on the clinical effectiveness and safety of long-term pantoprazole in patients with severe peptic ulcer or reflux disease during continuous treatment for up to 5 years. METHODS: Patients (n= 150) with peptic ulcer or reflux erosive oesophagitis running an aggressive course or with complications, and refractory to H2-receptor antagonists, were entered into this 5-year programme. Assessment was by serial endoscopy, clinical examination, serum gastrin estimation, gastric mucosal histology and mucosal endocrine cell quantification. RESULTS: Healing results were presented earlier. The estimated rates of remission on maintenance treatment with pantoprazole (n = 115) were 82% at 1 year, 75% at 2 years, 72% at 3 years, 70% at 4 years and 68% at 5 years. Helicobacter pylori infection appeared not to influence the outcome in reflux patients, with roughly two-thirds continuing in remission irrespective of infection. Only four patients had adverse events considered to be definitely related to pantoprazole. Median gastrin levels rose by 1.5-2-fold and were higher in those with H. pylori infection; 13 patients had levels >500 ng/L on at least one occasion, but these high levels were not sustained. Histological changes were more marked in patients infected with H. pylori: chronic gastritis decreased in the antrum and increased in the corpus, which also showed atrophic changes. The total number of endocrine cells in the antrum showed little variation over 60 months but fell by around one-third in the corpus. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with pantoprazole is effective and safe.

Effects of pantoprazole on endocrine function in healthy male volunteers.

METHOD: In a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study, pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo were given orally to 12 male volunteers for 2 weeks each. There was a wash-out period of at least 1 week between the two treatment periods. The effects of pantoprazole or placebo on cortisol and testosterone (primary criteria), and tri-iodothyronine, thyroxine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyronine-binding protein, parathyroid hormone, insulin, glucagon, renin, aldosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteotrophic hormone, prolactin and somatotrophic hormone were compared. In addition, intragastric 24-h pH, 24-h H(+)-activity, and volume of nocturnal gastric juice were determined by gastric aspiration technique. RESULTS: Pantoprazole did not influence plasma levels of testosterone, circadian cortisol concentrations or plasma cortisol levels after exogenous adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation, as compared to placebo (P > 0.05, Koch's test). Furthermore, there were no clinically relevant changes with any of the other endocrine parameters. Pantoprazole significantly increased the median 24-h pH (group median 4.3 vs. 1.8; P < 0.001) and decreased 24-h H(+)-activity (4.0 vs. 22.6 mmol/L; P < 0.001). The volume of nocturnal gastric juice did not significantly differ between the two treatments. Pantoprazole was well tolerated and the frequency of adverse events was similar to placebo. No drug-related changes in laboratory values were observed. CONCLUSION: Pantoprazole did not influence endocrine function in healthy male volunteers during short-term treatment.

Clinical trial: intravenous pantoprazole vs. ranitidine for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding: a multicentre, multinational, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Controlled pantoprazole data in peptic ulcer bleeding are few. AIM: To compare intravenous (IV) pantoprazole with IV ranitidine for bleeding ulcers. METHODS: After endoscopic haemostasis, 1256 patients were randomized to pantoprazole 80 mg+8 mg/h or ranitidine 50 mg+13 mg/h, both for 72 h. Patients underwent second-look endoscopy on day 3 or earlier, if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was an overall outcome ordinal score: no rebleeding, rebleeding without/with subsequent haemostasis, surgery and mortality. The latter three events were also assessed separately and together. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in overall outcome scores (pantoprazole vs. ranitidine: S0: 91.2 vs. 89.3%, S1: 1.5 vs. 2.5%, S2: 5.4 vs. 5.7%, S3: 1.7 vs. 2.1%, S4: 0.19 vs. 0.38%, P = 0.083), 72-h clinically detected rebleeding (2.9% [95% CI 1.7, 4.6] vs. 3.2% [95% CI 2.0, 4.9]), surgery (1.9% [95% CI 1.0, 3.4] vs. 2.1% [95% CI 1.1, 3.5]) or day-3 mortality (0.2% [95% CI 0, 0.09] vs. 0.3% [95% CI 0, 1.1]). Pantoprazole significantly decreased cumulative frequencies of events comprising the ordinal score in spurting lesions (13.9% [95% CI 6.6, 24.7] vs. 33.9% [95% CI 22.1, 47.4]; P = 0.01) and gastric ulcers (6.7% [95% CI 4, 10.4] vs. 14.3% [95% CI 10.3, 19.2], P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes amongst pantoprazole and ranitidine-treated patients were similar; pantoprazole provided benefits in patients with arterial spurting and gastric ulcers.