Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Control ; 23(2): 157-62, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27218793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interaction effects of poverty and health care insurance coverage on overall survival rates of breast cancer among women of color and non-Hispanic white women were explored. METHODS: We analyzed California registry data for 2,024 women of color (black, Hispanic, Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, or other ethnicity) and 4,276 non-Hispanic white women (Anglo-European ancestries and no Hispanic-Latin ethnic backgrounds) diagnosed with breast cancer between the years 1996 and 2000 who were then followed until 2011. The 2000 US census categorized rates of neighborhood poverty. Health care insurance coverage was either private, Medicare, Medicaid, or none. Cox regression was used to model rates of survival. RESULTS: A 3-way interaction between ethnicity, health care insurance coverage, and poverty was observed. Women of color inadequately insured and living in poor or near-poor neighborhoods in California were the most disadvantaged. Women of color adequately insured and who lived in such neighborhoods in California were also disadvantaged. The incomes of such women of color were typically lower than the incomes of non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSIONS: Women of color with or without insurance coverage are disadvantaged in poor and near-poor neighborhoods of California. Such women may be less able to bare the indirect, direct, or uncovered costs of health care for breast cancer treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Adulto , Idoso , California , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários , Estados Unidos
2.
Int J Equity Health ; 14: 109, 2015 Oct 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26511360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our research group advanced a health insurance theory to explain Canada's cancer care advantages over America. The late Barbara Starfield theorized that Canada's greater primary care-orientation also plays a critically protective role. We tested the resultant Starfield-Gorey theory by examining the effects of poverty, health insurance and physician supplies, primary care and specialists, on colon cancer care in Ontario and California. METHODS: We analyzed registry data for people with non-metastasized colon cancer from Ontario (n = 2,060) and California (n = 4,574) diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed to 2010. We obtained census tract-based socioeconomic data from population censuses and data on county-level physician supplies from national repositories: primary care physicians, gastroenterologists and other specialists. High poverty neighborhoods were oversampled and the criterion was 10 year survival. Hypotheses were explored with standardized rate ratios (RR) and tested with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Significant inverse associations of poverty (RR = 0.79) and inadequate health insurance (RR = 0.80) with survival were observed in the California, while they were non-significant or non-existent in Ontario. The direct associations of primary care physician (RRs of 1.32 versus 1.11) and gastroenterologist (RRs of 1.56 versus 1.15) supplies with survival were both stronger in Ontario than California. The supply of primary care physicians took precedence. Probably mediated through the initial course of treatment, it largely explained the Canadian advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Poverty and health insurance were more predictive in the USA, community physician supplies more so in Canada. Canada's primary care protections were greatest among the most socioeconomically vulnerable. The protective effects of Canadian health care prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) clearly suggested the following. Notwithstanding the importance of insuring all, strengthening America's system of primary care will probably be the best way to ensure that the ACA's full benefits are realized. Finally, Canada's strong primary care system ought to be maintained.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Gastroenterologia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/provisão & distribuição , California/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/economia , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Recursos Humanos
3.
BMC Womens Health ; 15: 8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25783640

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many Americans diagnosed with colon cancer do not receive indicated chemotherapy. Certain unmarried women may be particularly disadvantaged. A 3-way interaction of the multiplicative disadvantages of being an unmarried and inadequately insured woman living in poverty was explored. METHODS: California registry data were analyzed for 2,319 women diagnosed with stage II to IV colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2014. Socioeconomic data from the 2000 census classified neighborhoods as high poverty (≥30% of households poor), middle (5-29%) or low poverty (<5% poor). Primary health insurance was private, Medicare, Medicaid or none. Comparisons of chemotherapy rates used standardized rate ratios (RR). We respectively used logistic and Cox regression models to assess chemotherapy and survival. RESULTS: A statistically significant 3-way marital status by health insurance by poverty interaction effect on chemotherapy receipt was observed. Chemotherapy rates did not differ between unmarried (39.0%) and married (39.7%) women who lived in lower poverty neighborhoods and were privately insured. But unmarried women (27.3%) were 26% less likely to receive chemotherapy than were married women (37.1%, RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.58, 0.95) who lived in high poverty neighborhoods and were publicly insured or uninsured. When this interaction and the main effects of health insurance, poverty and chemotherapy were accounted for, survival did not differ by marital status. CONCLUSIONS: The multiplicative barrier to colon cancer care that results from being inadequately insured and living in poverty is worse for unmarried than married women. Poverty is more prevalent among unmarried women and they have fewer assets so they are probably less able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of colon cancer care. There seem to be structural inequities related to the institutions of marriage, work and health care that particularly disadvantage unmarried women that policy makers ought to be cognizant of as future reforms of the American health care system are considered.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Pessoa Solteira/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
4.
Trop Med Int Health ; 19(1): 98-106, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24219504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine whether enrolment in the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) affects the likelihood and timing of utilising antenatal care among women in Ghana. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, a nationally representative survey collected in 2008. The study used a cross-sectional design to examine the independent effects of NHIS enrolment on two dependent variables (frequency and timing of antenatal visits) among 1610 Ghanaian women. Negative binomial and logit models were fitted given that count and categorical variables were employed as outcome measures, respectively. RESULTS: Regardless of socio-economic and demographic factors, women enrolled in the NHIS make more antenatal visits compared with those not enrolled; however, there was no statistical association with the timing of the crucial first visit. Women who are educated, living in urban areas and are wealthy were more likely to attend antenatal care than those living in rural areas, uneducated and from poorer households. CONCLUSION: The NHIS should be strengthened and resourced as it may act as an important tool for increasing antenatal care attendance among women in Ghana.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gana , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Distribuição de Poisson , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/economia , Pontuação de Propensão , Saúde da População Rural , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Meios de Transporte/economia , Saúde da População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 133, 2014 Mar 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24655931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of chemotherapy's ability to cure or comfort those with colon cancer, nearly half of such Americans do not receive it. African Americans (AA) seem particularly disadvantaged. An ethnicity by poverty by health insurance interaction was hypothesized such that the multiplicative disadvantage of being extremely poor and inadequately insured is worse for AAs than for non-Hispanic white Americans (NHWA). METHODS: California registry data were analyzed for 459 AAs and 3,001 NHWAs diagnosed with stage II to IV colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011. Socioeconomic data from the 2000 census categorized neighborhoods: extremely poor (≥ 30% of households poor), middle (5-29% poor) and low poverty (< 5% poor). Participants were randomly selected from these poverty strata. Primary health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or none. Chemotherapy rates were age and stage-adjusted and comparisons used standardized rate ratios (RR). Logistic and Cox regressions, respectively, modeled chemotherapy receipt and long term survival. RESULTS: A significant 3-way ethnicity by poverty by health insurance interaction effect on chemotherapy receipt was observed. Among those who did not live in extremely poor neighborhoods and were adequately insured privately or by Medicare, chemotherapy rates did not differ significantly between AAs (37.7%) and NHWAs (39.5%). Among those who lived in extremely poor neighborhoods and were inadequately insured by Medicaid or uninsured, AAs (14.6%) were nearly 60% less likely to receive chemotherapy than were NHWAs (25.5%, RR = 0.41). When the 3-way interaction effect as well as the main effects of poverty, health insurance and chemotherapy was accounted for, survival rates of AAs and NHWAs were the same. CONCLUSIONS: The multiplicative barrier to colon cancer care that results from being extremely poor and inadequately insured is worse for AAs than it is for NHWAs. AAs are more prevalently poor, inadequately insured, and have fewer assets so they are probably less able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of colon cancer care. Policy makers ought to be cognizant of these factors as they implement the Affordable Care Act and consider future health care reforms.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/etnologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Áreas de Pobreza , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Classe Social
6.
AIDS Behav ; 17(3): 939-50, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22223299

RESUMO

This study examines the effects of orphanhood status on the timing of first sexual intercourse among youth in Malawi. Log-normal models were applied to survey data collected between May and August 2009 from 1,214 adolescents aged 12-18 in Mzuzu, Northern Malawi. Results of this study show that orphanhood is a significant predictor of age at first sex. Male double orphans experienced first sexual intercourse earlier than their male non-orphan peers. Similarly, female maternal and paternal orphans had their sexual debut faster than their non-orphan counterparts. The introduction of social support variables accounted for the orphanhood disadvantage. These findings suggest that in order to delay sexual initiation and reduce HIV risk among orphans in Malawi, policy efforts should focus on enhancing factual knowledge about HIV/AIDS, household food security, social support, and other measures that will strengthen existing social support networks and connectedness of surviving family members.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Crianças Órfãs/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Características da Família , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Malaui , Masculino , Apoio Social
7.
Int J Equity Health ; 12: 6, 2013 Jan 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23311824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the mediating effect of health insurance on poverty-breast cancer care and survival relationships and the moderating effect of poverty on health insurance-breast cancer care and survival relationships in California. METHODS: Registry data for 6,300 women with breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011 on stage at diagnosis, surgeries, adjuvant treatments and survival were analyzed. Socioeconomic data were obtained for residences from the 2000 census to categorize neighborhoods: high poverty (30% or more poor), middle poverty (5%-29% poor) and low poverty (less than 5% poor). Primary payers or health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or uninsured. RESULTS: Evidence of survival mediation was observed for women with node negative breast cancer. The apparent effect of poverty disappeared in the presence of Medicare or private health insurance. Women who were so insured were advantaged on 8-year survival compared to the uninsured or those insured by Medicaid (OR = 1.89). Evidence of payer moderation by poverty was also observed for women with node negative breast cancer. The survival advantaging effect of Medicare or private insurance was stronger in low poverty (OR = 1.81) than it was in middle poverty (OR = 1.57) or in high poverty neighborhoods (OR = 1.16). This same pattern of mediated and moderated effects was also observed for early stage at diagnosis, shorter waits for adjuvant radiation therapy and for the receipt of sentinel lymph node biopsies. These findings are consistent with the theory that more facilitative social and economic capital is available in low poverty neighborhoods, where women with breast cancer may be better able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of care. As for treatments, main protective effects as well as moderator effects indicative of protection, particularly in high poverty neighborhoods were observed for women with private health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: America's multi-tiered health insurance system mediates the quality of breast cancer care. The system is inequitable and unjust as it advantages the well insured and the well to do. Recent health care reforms ought to be enacted in ways that are consistent with their federal legislative intent, that high quality health care be truly available to all.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Áreas de Pobreza , Adulto , Idoso , California , Feminino , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Características de Residência , Análise de Sobrevida
8.
Environ Monit Assess ; 185(6): 4537-49, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23014924

RESUMO

Annoyance produced by air pollution has been suggested as a useful proxy for determining ambient air pollution exposure. However, most of the studies, to date, have focused on nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide, with no work done on volatile organic compounds (VOC). This study is aimed at examining the associations between odour annoyance and VOC in 'Chemical Valley', Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. Annoyance scores were extracted from a community health survey (N = 774), and exposures to VOC were estimated from respondents' six-digit alphanumeric postal codes using land use regression models. Univariate analyses were used to explore the relationships between odour annoyance and modelled pollutants, whilst multivariate ordinal logistic regression was utilized to examine the determinants of odour annoyance. The results indicate that odour annoyance is significantly associated with modelled benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene and (m + p) xylene (BTEX) pollutants. The findings also show that the determinants of odour annoyance in the context of VOC include gender, number of relatives in the community, perception of air pollution, community satisfaction, medical checkups, ability to cope with daily life demands and general symptoms. When compared, the analysis indicates that Sarnia residents respond to considerably lower BTEX concentrations than the allowable 'safe' levels in the province of Ontario. In general, the results exhibit a dose-response gradient with annoyance score increasing with rising modelled pollutant concentrations. The observed relationships suggest that odour annoyance might be a function of true exposure and may serve as a proxy for air quality and ambient air pollution monitoring. However, questionnaire-based odour annoyance scores need to be longitudinally validated across different geographical scales and pollutants if they are to be adopted at the national level.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Odorantes/análise , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análise , Poluição do Ar , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Químicos , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Ontário , Autorrelato , Dióxido de Enxofre/análise , Inquéritos e Questionários , Xilenos/análise
9.
PLoS One ; 18(11): e0293515, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37971982

RESUMO

Area-level factors may partly explain the heterogeneity in risk factors and disease distribution. Yet, there are a limited number of studies that focus on the development and validation of the area level construct and are primarily from high-income countries. The main objective of the study is to provide a methodological approach to construct and validate the area level construct, the Area Level Deprivation Index in low resource setting. A total of 14652 individuals from 11,203 households within 383 clusters (or areas) were selected from 2016-Nepal Demographic and Health survey. The index development involved sequential steps that included identification and screening of variables, variable reduction and extraction of the factors, and assessment of reliability and validity. Variables that could explain the underlying latent structure of area-level deprivation were selected from the dataset. These variables included: housing structure, household assets, and availability and accessibility of physical infrastructures such as roads, health care facilities, nearby towns, and geographic terrain. Initially, 26-variables were selected for the index development. A unifactorial model with 15-variables had the best fit to represent the underlying structure for area-level deprivation evidencing strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). Standardized scores for index ranged from 58.0 to 140.0, with higher scores signifying greater area-level deprivation. The newly constructed index showed relatively strong criterion validity with multi-dimensional poverty index (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.77) and relatively strong construct validity (Comparative Fit Index = 0.96; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.94; standardized root mean square residual = 0.05; Root mean square error of approximation = 0.079). The factor structure was relatively consistent across different administrative regions. Area level deprivation index was constructed, and its validity and reliability was assessed. The index provides an opportunity to explore the area-level influence on disease outcome and health disparity.


Assuntos
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Humanos , Nepal , Psicometria , Inquéritos e Questionários , Demografia
10.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 897, 2012 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23092403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the mediating effects of health insurance on poverty-colon cancer care and survival relationships and the moderating effects of poverty on health insurance-colon cancer care and survival relationships among women and men in California. METHODS: We analyzed registry data for 3,291 women and 3,009 men diagnosed with colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011 on lymph node investigation, stage at diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy, wait times and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individual residences from the 2000 census to categorize the following neighborhoods: high poverty (30% or more poor), middle poverty (5-29% poor) and low poverty (less than 5% poor). Primary health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or none. RESULTS: Evidence of mediation was observed for women, but not for men. For women, the apparent effect of poverty disappeared in the presence of payer, and the effects of all forms of health insurance seemed strengthened. All were advantaged on 6-year survival compared to the uninsured: Medicaid (RR = 1.83), Medicare (RR = 1.92) and private (RR = 1.83). Evidence of moderation was also only observed for women. The effects of all forms of health insurance were stronger for women in low poverty neighborhoods: Medicaid (RR = 2.90), Medicare (RR = 2.91) and private (RR = 2.60). For men, only main effects of poverty and payers were observed, the advantaging effect of private insurance being largest. Across colon cancer care processes, Medicare seemed most instrumental for women, private payers for men. CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance substantially mediates the quality of colon cancer care and poverty seems to make the effects of being uninsured or underinsured even worse, especially among women in the United States. These findings are consistent with the theory that more facilitative social and economic capital is available in more affluent neighborhoods, where women with colon cancer may be better able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Áreas de Pobreza , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , California , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 62(11): 1335-45, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23210225

RESUMO

Land use regression (LUR) models have been widely used to characterize the spatial distribution of urban air pollution and estimate exposure in epidemiologic studies. However, spatial patterns of air pollution vary greatly between cities due to local source type and distribution. London, Ontario, Canada, is a medium-sized city with relatively few and isolated industrial point sources, which allowed the study to focus on the contribution of different transportation sectors to urban air pollution. This study used LUR models to estimate the spatial distribution of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and to identify local sources influencing NO2 concentrations in London, ON. Passive air sampling was conducted at 50 locations throughout London over a 2-week period in May-June 2010. NO2 concentrations at the monitored locations ranged from 2.8 to 8.9 ppb, with a median of 5.2 ppb. Industrial land use, dwelling density, distance to highway, traffic density, and length of railways were significant predictors of NO2 concentrations in the final LUR model, which explained 78% of NO2 variability in London. Traffic and dwelling density explained most of the variation in NO2 concentrations, which is consistent with LUR models developed in other Canadian cities. We also observed the importance of local characteristics. Specifically, 17% of the variation was explained by distance to highways, which included the impacts of heavily traveled corridors transecting the southern periphery of the city. Two large railway yards and railway lines throughout central areas of the city explained 9% of NO2 variability. These results confirm the importance of traditional LUR variables and highlight the importance of including a broader array of local sources in LUR modeling. Finally, future analyses will use the model developed in this study to investigate the association between ambient air pollution and cardiovascular disease outcomes, including plaque burden, cholesterol, and hypertension.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/química , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/química , Monitoramento Ambiental , Ontário
12.
Int J Environ Health Res ; 22(3): 232-48, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22129067

RESUMO

This article presents the results of spatial analysis of breast cancer clustering in southern Ontario. Data from the Cancer Care Ontario were analyzed using the Scan Statistic at the level of county, with further analysis conducted within counties that were identified as primary clusters at the dissemination area level. The results identified five counties as primary clusters of women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1986 and 2002: Essex (relative risk [RR] =1.096-1.061; p<0.001), Lambton (RR=1.05-1.167), Chatham-Kent (RR=1.133-1.191), Niagara (RR=1.228-1.290) and Toronto (RR=1.152-1.146). The within county analysis revealed several DAs with significantly higher (RR>3, p<0.05) rates of breast cancer, and supports our hypothesis that breast cancer risk in southern Ontario may be associated with industrial and environmental (such as pesticides) pollutants. Further research is needed to verify the environmental links within the identified clusters.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Praguicidas/análise , Topografia Médica , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Fatores de Risco
13.
Am J Public Health ; 101(1): 112-9, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20299655

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We examined the differential effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer care and survival in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and San Francisco, California. METHODS: We analyzed registry data for colon cancer patients from Ontario (n = 930) and California (n = 1014), diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2006, on stage, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individuals' residences from population censuses. RESULTS: Income was directly associated with lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and survival in San Francisco but not in Toronto. High-income persons had better survival rates in San Francisco than in Toronto. After adjustment for stage, survival was better for low-income residents of Toronto than for those of San Francisco. Middle- to low-income patients were more likely to receive indicated chemotherapy in Toronto than in San Francisco. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors appear to mediate colon cancer care in urban areas of the United States but not in Canada. Improvements are needed in screening, diagnostic investigations, and treatment access among low-income Americans.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Listas de Espera
14.
Environ Health ; 10: 71, 2011 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21827645

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health impacts of poor environmental quality have been identified in studies around the world and in Canada. While many of the studies have identified associations between air pollution and mortality or morbidity, few have focused on the role of health care as a potential moderator of impacts. This study assessed the determinants of health care access and utilization in the context of ambient air pollution in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Residents of Sarnia participated in a Community Health Study administered by phone, while several ambient air pollutants including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and the volatile organic compounds benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, mp- and o-xylene (BTEX) were monitored across the city. Land Use Regression models were used to estimate individual exposures to the measured pollutants and logistic regression models were utilized to assess the relative influence of environmental, socioeconomic and health related covariates on general practitioner access and utilization outcomes. RESULTS: The results show that general practitioner use increased with levels of exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2- Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.16, p < 0.05) and sulphur dioxide (SO2- OR: 1.61, p < 0.05). Low household income was a stronger predictor of having no family doctor in areas exposed to high concentrations of NO2 and SO2. Respondents without regular care living in high pollution areas were also more likely to report travelling or waiting for care in excess of 20 minutes (OR: 3.28, p < 0.05) than their low exposure counterparts (OR: 1.11, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for inequitable health care access and utilization in Sarnia, with particular relevance to its situation as a sentinel high exposure environment. Levels of exposure to pollution appears to influence utilization of health care services, but poor access to primary health care services additionally burden certain groups in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos/análise , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos/toxicidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/toxicidade , Ontário , Características de Residência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Dióxido de Enxofre/análise , Dióxido de Enxofre/toxicidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análise , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/toxicidade , Adulto Jovem
15.
Dig Dis Sci ; 56(2): 523-31, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20521113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examined the differential effects of physician supplies on colon cancer care in Ontario and California. The associations of physician supplies with colon cancer stage at diagnosis, receipt of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, and 5-year survival were observed within each country and compared between-country. METHODS: Random samples of Ontario and California cancer registries provided 2,461 and 2,200 colon cancer cases that were diagnosed between 1996 and 2000, and followed until 2006. Both registries included data on the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, receipt of cancer-directed surgery, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival. Census tract-level data on low-income prevalence were, respectively, taken from 2001 and 2000 Canadian and United States population censuses. County-level primary care physician and gastroenterologist densities were computed for the same years. RESULTS: Significant income-adjusted, gastroenterologist density threshold effects (2.0 or more vs. less than 2.0 per 100,000 inhabitants) were observed for early diagnosis (OR = 1.57) and 5-year survival (OR = 1.63) in Ontario, but not in California. Significant incremental threshold effects of primary care physician densities on chemotherapy receipt (8.0 and 9.0 or more per 10,000 inhabitants, respective ORs of 1.79 and 2.37) were also only observed in Ontario. CONCLUSIONS: These colon cancer care findings support the theory that while personal economic resources are more predictive in America, community-level resources such as physician supplies are more predictive of health care access and effectiveness in Canada.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , California , Gastroenterologia , Humanos , Ontário , População Urbana
16.
Breast J ; 16(4): 416-9, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20443784

RESUMO

Effects of socioeconomic status on the long-term survival of 808 women with node-negative breast cancer in Canada and the United States were observed. Ontario and California samples diagnosed between 1988 and 1990 were followed until 2006. Socioeconomic data were taken from population censuses. Compared with their California counterparts, residents of low-income urban areas in Ontario experienced a significant 15-year survival advantage (RR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.00, 2.76]). In these and other vulnerable, lower-middle- to working-class neighborhoods, significantly more Ontario residents gained access to adjuvant radiation therapy (RR = 1.75 [1.21, 2.53]) which seemed associated with better long-term survival (RR = 1.36 [0.99, 1.86]). This stage-adjusted, historical cohort analysis suggests much greater cancer care equity in Canada than in the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , California/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
17.
J Public Health Res ; 9(3): 1696, 2020 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32874961

RESUMO

Background: We examined paradoxical and barrio advantaging effects on cancer care among socioeconomically vulnerable Hispanic people in California. Methods: We secondarily analyzed a colon cancer cohort of 3,877 non-Hispanic white (NHW) and 735 Hispanic people treated between 1995 and 2005. A third of the cohort was selected from high poverty neighborhoods. Hispanic enclaves and Mexican American (MA) barrios were neighborhoods where 40% or more of the residents were Hispanic or MA. Key analyses were restricted to high poverty neighborhoods. Results: Hispanic people were more likely to receive chemotherapy (RR=1.18), especially men in Hispanic enclaves (RR=1.33) who were also advantaged on survival (RR=1.20). A survival advantage was also suggested among MA men who resided in barrios (RR=1.80). Conclusions: The findings were supportive of Hispanic paradox and MA barrio advantage theories. They further suggested that such advantages are greater for men, perhaps due to their greater spousal and extended familial support.

18.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 113(3): 595-600, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18330694

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study examined whether race/ethnicity had differential effects on breast cancer care and survival across age strata and cohorts within stages of disease. METHODS: The Detroit Cancer Registry provided 25,997 breast cancer cases. African American and non-Hispanic white, older Medicare-eligible and younger non-eligible women were compared. Successive historical cohorts (1975-1980 and 1990-1995) were, respectively, followed until 1986 and 2001. RESULTS: African American disadvantages on survival and treatments increased significantly, particularly among younger women who were much more likely to be uninsured. Within node positive disease all treatment disadvantages among younger African American women disappeared with socioeconomic adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Growth of this racial divide implicates social, rather than biological, forces. Its elimination will require high quality health care for all.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Michigan/epidemiologia , Michigan/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Sobrevida , População Branca
19.
Environ Health ; 8: 16, 2009 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19371421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Land use regression (LUR) modelling is proposed as a promising approach to meet some of the challenges of assessing the intra-urban spatial variability of ambient air pollutants in urban and industrial settings. However, most of the LUR models to date have focused on nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. This study aimed at developing LUR models to predict BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m/p-xylene and o-xylene) concentrations in Sarnia, 'Chemical Valley', Ontario, and model the intra-urban variability of BTEX compounds in the city for a community health study. METHOD: Using Organic Vapour Monitors, pollutants were monitored at 39 locations across the city of Sarnia for 2 weeks in October 2005. LUR models were developed to generate predictor variables that best estimate BTEX concentrations. RESULTS: Industrial area, dwelling counts, and highways adequately explained most of the variability of BTEX concentrations (R2: 0.78 - 0.81). Correlations between measured BTEX compounds were high (> 0.75). Although most of the predictor variables (e.g. land use) were similar in all the models, their individual contributions to the models were different. CONCLUSION: Yielding potentially different health effects than nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, modelling other air pollutants is essential for a better understanding of the link between air pollution and health. The LUR models developed in these analyses will be used for estimating outdoor exposure to BTEX for a larger community health study aimed at examining the determinants of health in Sarnia.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Exposição Ambiental , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis , Humanos , Óxidos de Nitrogênio/análise , Ontário
20.
Clin Invest Med ; 32(3): E239-49, 2009 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19480739

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The demand for cancer care has increased among aging North American populations as cancer treatment innovations have proliferated. Gaps between supply and demand may be growing. This study examined whether socioeconomic status has a differential effect on waits for surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment (RT) of breast cancer in Canada and the US. METHODS: Ontario and California cancer registries provided 929 and 984 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2000 in diverse urban and rural places. Residence-based socioeconomic data were taken from censuses. Cancer care variables were reliably abstracted from health records: stage, receipt of surgery and RT, and waits from diagnosis to initial and initial to adjuvant treatment. Median waits were compared within- and between-country with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorically long, age-adjusted wait comparisons used the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. RESULTS: There were significant associations between lower socioeconomic status and longer surgical waits, lower access to adjuvant RT and to longer RT waits across diverse places in California. None were observed in Ontario. The two cohorts did not practically differ on access to surgery or on surgical waits. Compared with their counterparts in California, low-income Ontarians, particularly those in small urban places, gained greater access to RT, while high-income Americans had shorter waits for RT. CONCLUSIONS: This historical study contextualized Canada's "waiting-list problems" with evidence on breast cancer care, where lower income Americans seemed to have waited as long as similar Canadians. Many more low-income Americans seemed to experience the longest wait of all for adjuvant care. They simply did not receive it. In contrast to stark American socioeconomic inequity, this study evidenced remarkable equity in Canadian breast cancer care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Classe Social , Canadá/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Listas de Espera
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA