Non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: study protocol of an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Non-pharmacological treatments are used in the management of irritable bowel syndrome, and their effectiveness has been evaluated in multiple meta-analyses. The robustness of the results in the meta-analyses was not evaluated. We aimed to assess whether there is evidence of diverse biases in the meta-analyses and to identify the treatments without evidence of risk of bias. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus for meta-analyses that evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments. The time of publication will be limited from inception to December 2018. The credibility of the meta-analyses will be evaluated by assessing between-study heterogeneity, small-study effect and excess significance bias. The between-study heterogeneity will be assessed using the Cochrane's Q test, and the extent of the heterogeneity will be classified using the I2 statistics. The existence of a small-study effect in a meta-analysis will be evaluated using the funnel plot method and confirmed by Egger's test. Excess significance bias will be evaluated by comparing the expected number of clinical studies with positive findings with the observed number. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal ethical approval is required since we will use publicly available data. We will disseminate the findings of the umbrella review through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018111516.

Efficacy of 3 years of adefovir monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine resistance.

AIM: To study the effect of rescue monotherapy with adefovir (ADV) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed drug resistance to lamivudine (LAM). METHODS: A total of 76 treated CHB patients with resistance to LAM were enrolled in the present study. The patients' baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, blood tests and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were collected; therapy duration and the response of each patient were also recorded. ADV monotherapy was set as the observation group A. Twenty-four patients with LAM resistance, who were set as group B, accepted combined therapy with LAM + ADV. Patients were followed up at 0, 12, 24, 52, 104 and 156 wk. Hepatitis B surface antigen status, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)/anti-HBe status, HBV DNA level and biochemical indexes were monitored. Sequencer of HBV polymerase gene was performed on the ABI 3730 automated sequencer. If no desired effects had been achieved during the course of treatment, patients' choices were also taken into account. The control group was tested at the same time. RESULTS: In the two groups, 27 cases developed viral breakthrough after LAM treatment response. The remaining 49 cases underwent biochemical rebound accompanied by rtM204I/V or rtL180M mutation. In group A, 52 cases finished 156 wk of ADV monotherapy; of whom, 36 cases were HBeAg positive and 16 HBeAg negative. In patients whose baseline HBV DNAs were 10(3)-10(5) copies/mL, 88.8% of patients' HBV DNAs were lower than the lower test limit (10(3) copies/mL) after 12 to 156 wk of ADV treatment. In patients whose baseline HBV DNAs were ≥ 10(6) copies/mL, 41.1%-47.0% of patients' HBV DNAs were lower than the lower test limit after the same course of ADV therapy (χ(2) were 4.35-5.4, 41.1%-47.0% vs 88.8% group 10(3)-10(5) copies/mL, P < 0.01). In group A, seroconversion of HBeAg developed in 8 of 36 cases (22.2%). In group B, 24 cases finished 156 wk of LAM + ADV; of whom, 17 cases were HBeAg positive and 7 HBeAg negative. In patients whose baseline HBV DNAs were 10(3)-10(5) copies /mL, 81.8% of patients' HBV DNAs were lower than the lower test limit (10(3) copies/mL) after 12 to 156 wk of treatment. In the patients whose baseline HBV DNAs were ≥ 10(6) copies/mL, 46.1%-53.8% of patients' HBV DNAs were lower than the lower test limit after the same course of LAM + ADV therapy (χ(2) were 4.1-5.0, 46.1%-53.8% vs 81.8% group 10(3)-10(5) copies/mL, P < 0.05-0.01). In group B, 4 of 17 cases (23.5%) developed seroconversion of HBeAg. Treatment outcomes in groups A and B were comparable. CONCLUSION: In both group A and B, the ratios of virological response have similar efficacy in patients with lower baseline HBV DNAs.