A genomewide suppressor and enhancer analysis of cdc13-1 reveals varied cellular processes influencing telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc13 binds telomeric DNA to recruit telomerase and to "cap" chromosome ends. In temperature-sensitive cdc13-1 mutants telomeric DNA is degraded and cell-cycle progression is inhibited. To identify novel proteins and pathways that cap telomeres, or that respond to uncapped telomeres, we combined cdc13-1 with the yeast gene deletion collection and used high-throughput spot-test assays to measure growth. We identified 369 gene deletions, in eight different phenotypic classes, that reproducibly demonstrated subtle genetic interactions with the cdc13-1 mutation. As expected, we identified DNA damage checkpoint, nonsense-mediated decay and telomerase components in our screen. However, we also identified genes affecting casein kinase II activity, cell polarity, mRNA degradation, mitochondrial function, phosphate transport, iron transport, protein degradation, and other functions. We also identified a number of genes of previously unknown function that we term RTC, for restriction of telomere capping, or MTC, for maintenance of telomere capping. It seems likely that many of the newly identified pathways/processes that affect growth of budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants will play evolutionarily conserved roles at telomeres. The high-throughput spot-testing approach that we describe is generally applicable and could aid in understanding other aspects of eukaryotic cell biology.

Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest.

Yeast checkpoint control genes were found to affect processing of DNA damage as well as cell cycle arrest. An assay that measures DNA damage processing in vivo showed that the checkpoint genes RAD17, RAD24, and MEC3 activated an exonuclease that degrades DNA. The degradation is probably a direct consequence of checkpoint protein function, because RAD17 encodes a putative 3'-5' DNA exonuclease. Another checkpoint gene, RAD9, had a different role: It inhibited the degradation by RAD17, RAD24, and MEC3. A model of how processing of DNA damage may be linked to both DNA repair and cell cycle arrest is proposed.

From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: a budding yeast perspective.

Eukaryotic checkpoint control genes are important for cell cycle delay, DNA repair and cell suicide after DNA is damaged. Recent studies in budding yeast show how the participation of checkpoint control proteins in DNA metabolism could lead to all three of these outcomes.

NDD1, a high-dosage suppressor of cdc28-1N, is essential for expression of a subset of late-S-phase-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

cdc28-1N mutants progress through the G1 and S phases normally at the restrictive temperature but fail to undergo nuclear division. We have isolated a gene, NDD1, which at a high dosage suppresses the nuclear-division defect of cdc28-1N. NDD1 (nuclear division defective) is an essential gene. Its expression during the cell cycle is tightly regulated such that NDD1 RNA is most abundant during the S phase. Cells lacking the NDD1 gene arrest with an elongated bud, a short mitotic spindle, 2N DNA content, and an undivided nucleus, suggesting that its function is required for some aspect of nuclear division. We show that overexpression of Ndd1 results in the upregulation of both CLB1 and CLB2 transcription, suggesting that the suppression of cdc28-1N by NDD1 may be due to an accumulation of these cyclins. Overproduction of Ndd1 also enhances the expression of SWI5, whose transcription, like that of CLB1 and CLB2, is activated in the late S phase. Ndd1 is essential for the expression of CLB1, CLB2, and SWI5, since none of these genes are transcribed in its absence. Both CLB2 expression and its upregulation by NDD1 are mediated by a 240-bp promoter sequence that contains four MCM1-binding sites. However, Ndd1 does not appear to be a component of any of the protein complexes assembled on this DNA fragment, as indicated by gel mobility shift assays. Instead, overexpression of NDD1 prevents the formation of one of the complexes whose appearance correlates with the termination of CLB2 expression in G1. The inability of GAL1 promoter-driven CLB2 to suppress the lethality of NDD1 null mutant suggests that, in addition to CLB1 and CLB2, NDD1 may also be required for the transcription of other genes whose functions are necessary for G2/M transition.

Modelling the checkpoint response to telomere uncapping in budding yeast.

One of the DNA damage-response mechanisms in budding yeast is temporary cell-cycle arrest while DNA repair takes place. The DNA damage response requires the coordinated interaction between DNA repair and checkpoint pathways. Telomeres of budding yeast are capped by the Cdc13 complex. In the temperature-sensitive cdc13-1 strain, telomeres are unprotected over a specific temperature range leading to activation of the DNA damage response and subsequently cell-cycle arrest. Inactivation of cdc13-1 results in the generation of long regions of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and is affected by the activity of various checkpoint proteins and nucleases. This paper describes a mathematical model of how uncapped telomeres in budding yeast initiate the checkpoint pathway leading to cell-cycle arrest. The model was encoded in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) and simulated using the stochastic simulation system Biology of Ageing e-Science Integration and Simulation (BASIS). Each simulation follows the time course of one mother cell keeping track of the number of cell divisions, the level of activity of each of the checkpoint proteins, the activity of nucleases and the amount of ssDNA generated. The model can be used to carry out a variety of in silico experiments in which different genes are knocked out and the results of simulation are compared to experimental data. Possible extensions to the model are also discussed.

Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction.

We have developed a method that allows quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) in a sample that is primarily double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is first captured by annealing a tagging primer at low temperature. Primer extension follows to create a novel, ssDNA-dependent, tagged molecule that can be detected by PCR. Using QAOS levels of between 0.2 and 100% ssDNA can be accurately quantified. We have used QAOS to characterise ssDNA levels at three loci near the right telomere of chromosome V in budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. Our results confirm and extend previous studies which demonstrate that when Cdc13p, a telomere-binding protein, is disabled, loci close to the telomere become single stranded whereas centromere proximal sequences do not. In contrast to an earlier model, our new results are consistent with a model in which a RAD24-dependent, 5' to 3' exonuclease moves from the telomere toward the centromere in cdc13-1 mutants. QAOS has been adapted, using degenerate tagging primers, to preferentially amplify all ssDNA sequences within samples that are primarily dsDNA. This approach may be useful for identifying ssDNA sequences associated with physiological or pathological states in other organisms.

Mechanism of cytotoxicity of anticancer platinum drugs: evidence that cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and cis-diammine-(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) differ only in the kinetics of their interaction with DNA.

The kinetics of the aquation reactions of cisplatin and carboplatin and their subsequent reactions with DNA, both in vitro and in vivo, have been measured. The results have been extrapolated to indicate the expected cytotoxicity of these compounds in cells obtained from human cancer patients. Rate constants for the aquation at 37 degrees C of cisplatin and carboplatin of 8 X 10(-5) and 7.2 X 10(-7) s-1, respectively, were calculated from the half-life of these compounds in phosphate buffer, pH 7. This difference in their rate of activation was matched by their rates of binding to DNA. By use of a 14C-labeled ligand, carboplatin was shown to bind monofunctionally to DNA, after which there was a time-dependent formation of difunctional interstrand cross-links, formed from some of these initially monofunctional adducts. A similar, although faster, accumulation of cross-links was seen when cisplatin was bound to DNA. The loss of the 14C-CBDCA ligand of carboplatin was calculated to occur with a rate constant of 1.3 X 10(-5) s-1 which was similar to that for the rate of formation of interstrand cross-links and faster than that for the monofunctional reaction with DNA. It was concluded therefore that the CBDCA ligand becomes a more labile leaving group once carboplatin has been monoaquated. In contrast, both chloro-ligands of cisplatin were shown to leave at similar rates. The fact that other difunctional lesions were formed to the same extent, by equal bound doses of cisplatin or carboplatin, was indicated by the unwinding of supercoiled plasmid DNA. The effects of cisplatin and carboplatin on this DNA were the same once bound to the same extent. About a 100-fold larger dose of carboplatin was, as predicted by their rates of aquation, required to produce equivalent binding to plasmid DNA. In vivo, equal binding of the two drugs to DNA of various cell systems resulted in equal cytotoxicity. Again a much larger dose (20- to 40-fold) of carboplatin was required to produce this equal binding. In general a DNA bound platinum level of about 20 nmol/g reduced cell survival by 90%, although certain cell lines were shown to be much more sensitive to DNA bound platinum. Similar binding values, to those above, were obtained in the DNA extracted from cells of human cancer patients treated with cisplatin. It was inferred that the cytotoxic effect of this level of platinum on DNA would be (unless the cells were of a sensitive phenotype) about 90%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The effect of monofunctional or difunctional platinum adducts and of various other associated DNA damage on the expression of transfected DNA in mammalian cell lines sensitive or resistant to difunctional agents.

The effects of introducing various DNA damage into pSV2gpt DNA on the subsequent expression of xanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (XGPRT), after its transfection into two Walker 256 cell lines, one which is inherently sensitive only to difunctional agents while the other shows a normal sensitivity, have been examined. Both the sensitive (WS) and the relatively resistant (WR) cell lines were shown to be equally capable of both ligation of DNA double-strand breaks (although the efficiency varied with the actual site of the break) introduced into pSV2gpt and homologous recombination of pSV2gpt fragments (recombination events are thought to be important in the repair of DNA-DNA interstrand crosslinks). Reacting the plasmid with either the difunctional platinum compound, Cisplatin, or the monofunctional reacting Pt(Dien) caused a dose-dependent decrease in the subsequent expression of XGPRT. This decrease was about the same with either agent in either cell line when expressed as a function of dose of drug. However, when the actual binding of platinum to DNA by these compounds was measured, a large difference (due to the higher specific binding of Pt(Dien) to DNA) in the effects of the difunctional, as opposed to the monofunctional agent, was apparent and this was a reflection of the relative cytotoxicities of these compounds towards mammalian cells. Although at doses of Cisplatin equitoxic to WS and WR cells 20-fold less Pt is bound to the DNA of WS cells, no significant difference was seen on the expression of pSV2gpt, reacted with this agent, between WS or WR cells. Based upon a knowledge of the proportions of adducts formed in DNA reacted with Cisplatin, the lesion that inactivates expression of XGPRT was probably the intrastrand crosslink and it was calculated that due to the size of the plasmid, the interstrand crosslink was unlikely to be present at these inactivating doses. It is suggested that the inherent sensitivity of WS cells only to difunctional agents is due to their response to such relatively rare lesions such as a DNA-DNA interstrand crosslink.

The Walker 256 carcinoma: a cell type inherently sensitive only to those difunctional agents that can form DNA interstrand crosslinks.

The Walker 256 rat tumour has been maintained in vivo for over 60 years and until recently was used as a primary screen for new antitumour agents. This screen was particularly useful in identifying difunctional alkylating agents as potentially useful anticancer agents and it would seem that the Walker tumour is composed of cells sensitive towards this type of agent. A cell line (WS) established from the Walker tumour retained the sensitivity of the tumour towards difunctional agents and we have examined its phenotype in comparison to a derived, resistant, cell line (WR). The response of WR cells to a range of cytotoxic agents was similar to other established cell lines whilst WS cells were much more sensitive only towards difunctional reacting agents. There were no significant differences in the binding of these agents to the DNA of WS or WR cells. All the agents towards which WS cells showed sensitivity were, without exception, capable of reacting with DNA in Walker cells and forming DNA-DNA interstrand crosslinks. WS cells were not sensitive to busulphan, BCNU, CCNU or Me-CCNU but these agents did not produce interstrand crosslinks in the DNA of either WS or WR cells. Thus WS cells are intrinsically sensitive to specific DNA damage and this is probably a DNA interstrand crosslink. Hybrid cells produced by fusion of WS with WR cells lacked the inherent sensitivity of the WS cells towards cisplatin; sensitivity was therefore a recessive characteristic. Transfection of WS cells with human DNA also gave rise to 2 cisplatin-resistant clones, although it could not be ascertained if these clones were true transfectants or revertants. The survival of these resistant clones, after treatment with cisplatin, was about the same as WR cells a finding which would be consistent with complementation by a transferred gene or reversion of a single gene defect in WS cells. In their sensitivity only to difunctional compounds and lack of an apparent DNA excision repair defect the phenotype of Walker cells strongly resembles those cells from human patients suffering from Fanconi's anaemia and also of yeast snm1 mutant cells. The mechanisms giving rise to this failure to tolerate specific DNA damage (which seems to involve the inability to recover from the initial inhibition of DNA synthesis and may involve a single defect of a gene involved in the late steps of crosslink repair), do not involve drug uptake, drug binding to DNA, cell size, cell doubling time or DNA excision repair.

A quantitative fitness analysis workflow.

Quantitative Fitness Analysis (QFA) is an experimental and computational workflow for comparing fitnesses of microbial cultures grown in parallel(1,2,3,4). QFA can be applied to focused observations of single cultures but is most useful for genome-wide genetic interaction or drug screens investigating up to thousands of independent cultures. The central experimental method is the inoculation of independent, dilute liquid microbial cultures onto solid agar plates which are incubated and regularly photographed. Photographs from each time-point are analyzed, producing quantitative cell density estimates, which are used to construct growth curves, allowing quantitative fitness measures to be derived. Culture fitnesses can be compared to quantify and rank genetic interaction strengths or drug sensitivities. The effect on culture fitness of any treatments added into substrate agar (e.g. small molecules, antibiotics or nutrients) or applied to plates externally (e.g. UV irradiation, temperature) can be quantified by QFA. The QFA workflow produces growth rate estimates analogous to those obtained by spectrophotometric measurement of parallel liquid cultures in 96-well or 200-well plate readers. Importantly, QFA has significantly higher throughput compared with such methods. QFA cultures grow on a solid agar surface and are therefore well aerated during growth without the need for stirring or shaking. QFA throughput is not as high as that of some Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA) screening methods(5,6). However, since QFA cultures are heavily diluted before being inoculated onto agar, QFA can capture more complete growth curves, including exponential and saturation phases(3). For example, growth curve observations allow culture doubling times to be estimated directly with high precision, as discussed previously(1). Here we present a specific QFA protocol applied to thousands of S. cerevisiae cultures which are automatically handled by robots during inoculation, incubation and imaging. Any of these automated steps can be replaced by an equivalent, manual procedure, with an associated reduction in throughput, and we also present a lower throughput manual protocol. The same QFA software tools can be applied to images captured in either workflow. We have extensive experience applying QFA to cultures of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae but we expect that QFA will prove equally useful for examining cultures of the fission yeast S. pombe and bacterial cultures.

G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair.

We have cloned, sequenced and disrupted the checkpoint genes RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mec3p shows no strong similarity to other proteins currently in the database. Rad17p is similar to Rec1 from Ustilago maydis, a 3' to 5' DNA exonuclease/checkpoint protein, and the checkpoint protein Rad1p from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (as we previously reported). Rad24p shows sequence similarity to replication factor C (RFC) subunits, and the S. pombe Rad17p checkpoint protein, suggesting it has a role in DNA replication and/or repair. This hypothesis is supported by our genetic experiments which show that overexpression of RAD24 strongly reduces the growth rate of yeast strains that are defective in the DNA replication/repair proteins Rfc1p (cdc44), DNA pol alpha (cdc17) and DNA pol delta (cdc2) but has much weaker effects on cdc6, cdc9, cdc15 and CDC4 strains. The idea that RAD24 overexpression induces DNA damage, perhaps by interfering with replication/repair complexes, is further supported by our observation that RAD24 overexpression increases mitotic chromosome recombination in CDC4 strains. Although RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 are not required for cell cycle arrest when S phase is inhibited by hydroxyurea (HU), they do contribute to the viability of yeast cells grown in the presence of HU, possibly because they are required for the repair of HU-induced DNA damage. In addition, all three are required for the rapid death of cdc13 rad9 mutants. All our data are consistent with models in which RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 are coordinately required for the activity of one or more DNA repair pathways that link DNA damage to cell cycle arrest.

Cell cycle checkpoints, genetic instability and cancer.

During the cell cycle, the order of events is maintained by controls termed checkpoints. Two checkpoints are sensitive to DNA damage, one that acts before mitosis and a second that acts before DNA replication. This is relevant to cancer because checkpoint mutants show genetic instability, and such instability is characteristic of many cancers. Studies of checkpoints in normal and cancer cells suggest a mechanistic relationship to the central cell cycle control p34CDC2 and its regulators. We suggest how mutations in these genes and those with a role in DNA metabolism may affect the function of checkpoints. A further link between checkpoints and cancer may be the p53 protein, which appears to function at the G1-S checkpoint. Consideration of checkpoints may provide more effective means for cancer treatment.

A new role for MCM1 in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 transcription.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle-regulated SW15 transcription is essential for ensuring that mother and not daughter cells switch mating type. We have identified a 55-bp promoter sequence that appears to be responsible for restricting transcription to the late S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle. Two proteins, MCM1, a transcription factor described previously, and SFF (SWI five factor, a newly identified factor) bind this sequence in vitro. MCM1 binds the DNA tightly on its own, but SFF will only bind as part of a ternary complex with MCM1. We observe a strong correlation between the ability of mutated SWI5 promoter sequences to form a ternary MCM1-SFF-containing complex in vitro and to activate transcription in vivo, which suggests that efficient transcription requires that both proteins bind DNA. Through its interactions with cell type-specific coactivators and corepressors, MCM1 controls cell type-specific expression of pheromone and receptor genes. By analogy, we propose that SFF enables MCM1 to function as a part of a cell cycle-regulated transcription complex.

The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 nuclear entry.

HO encodes a site-specific endonuclease that initiates mating type switching in S. cerevisiae. It is expressed only transiently during the cell cycle of mother cells, as they undergo Start, but not in daughter cells. Since SWI5 appears to be the only HO transcription factor missing when daughter cells undergo Start, we were interested in the intracellular distribution of SWI5 at cell division. We discovered that SWI5 is found equally concentrated in the nuclei of both mother and daughter cells at the end of anaphase, suggesting that its subsequent fate must somehow differ. Prior to the end of anaphase, SWI5 accumulates in the cytoplasm and only moves into the nucleus when cells enter G1. A version of the HO promoter that has lost its dependence on Start is nevertheless still strongly cell cycle regulated and is activated when SWI5 moves into the nucleus.

A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes.

In budding yeast, meiotic recombination occurs at about 200 sites per cell and involves DNA double-strand break (DSB) intermediates. Here we provide evidence that a checkpoint control requiring the mitotic DNA-damage checkpoint genes RAD17, RAD24 and MEC1 ensures that meiotic recombination is complete before the first meiotic division (MI). First, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC1 are required for the meiotic arrest caused by blocking the repair of DSBs with a mutation in the recA homologue DMC1. Second, mec1 and rad24 single mutants (DMC1+) appear to undergo MI before all recombination events are complete. Curiously, the mitosis-specific checkpoint gene RAD9 is not required for meiotic arrest of dmc1 mutants. This shows that although mitotic and meiotic control mechanisms are related, they differ significantly. Rad17 and Rad24 proteins may contribute directly to formation of an arrest signal by association with single-strand DNA in mitosis and meiosis.

Changes in a SWI4,6-DNA-binding complex occur at the time of HO gene activation in yeast.

The yeast HO gene is transcribed transiently during G1 as cells undergo START. START-specific HO activation requires two proteins, SWI4 and SWI6, which act via a motif (CACGA4) repeated up to 10 times within the URS2 region of the HO promoter. We identified a DNA-binding activity containing SWI4 and SWI6 that recognizes the CACGA4 sequences within URS2. Two forms of SWI4,6-DNA complexes called L and U can be distinguished by their electrophoretic mobility. L complexes can be detected at all stages of the cell cycle, but U complexes are only detected in cells that have undergone START. The formation of U complexes may be the trigger of HO activation. The SWI6 protein is concentrated in the nucleus throughout G1, but at some point in S or G2 significant amounts accumulate in the cytoplasm. This change in cellular location of the SWI6 protein might contribute to the turnoff of HO transcription after cells have undergone START.