The Effects of Computer-Based Simulation Game and Virtual Reality Simulation in Nursing Students' Self-evaluated Clinical Reasoning Skills.

Research has shown that nursing students can learn clinical reasoning skills by engaging in simulation games. However, there has been no research regarding the effects of simulation games on clinical reasoning skills when nursing students also engage in virtual reality simulations. Furthermore, by engaging in simulation games, neither game metrics nor their impact on students' self-evaluated clinical reasoning skills has been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of these two kinds of simulation games using a one-group pretest-posttest design. Forty nursing students self-evaluated their clinical reasoning skills in three phases using the Clinical Reasoning Skills scale. Furthermore, the game metrics of the simulation games were analyzed, and the results clearly showed that students' self-evaluated clinical reasoning skills were systematically improved. There was a systematic association between better playing scores and better self-evaluated clinical reasoning skills in playing both kinds of simulation games. Moreover, students engaged more time in the virtual reality simulation than the computer-based simulation game. Overall, the results suggest that the use of a combination of both kinds of simulation games is an effective way for nursing students to learn clinical reasoning skills.

Graduating nursing students' user experiences of the immersive virtual reality simulation in learning - A qualitative descriptive study.

AIM: To describe nursing students' user experiences' (UX) regarding highly immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation with head mounted display used for learning. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. METHODS: Graduating nursing students (n = 41). Individual interviews were held right after VR simulation. The usability was assessed using System Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS: User experiences emphasized three themes about the highly immersive VR simulation: nursing care in the immersive VR simulation, technology in the immersive VR simulation, and learning nursing in the immersive VR simulation. Usability was evaluated as fair (SUS score 62.3 out of 100). Scores revealed that the VR simulation was easy to use. The support of a technical person was highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports strongly the use of highly immersive VR simulation for nursing education. VR simulations should replicate the most authentic nursing care. Technical assistance is crucial when adopting new technologies in education. The results highlighted the importance of UX in an education context.

High Bleeding Incidence in Unselected Hospitalized Suspected Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Aged Under 65 Years.

High bleeding risk (HBR) is commonly encountered among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and bleeding complications are associated with worse prognosis. Data on bleeding events of patients with ACS are based almost exclusively on percutaneous coronary intervention registries. Enrolling only patients suitable for invasive procedures might have skewed the observed bleeding incidence. We sought to investigate bleeding incidence in unselected patients with ACS. Patients were retrospectively enrolled between January and June 2019 from the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. All consecutive hospitalized adults with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were included. Data was gathered by a database search and verified using electronic patient records. Bleeding risk was assessed according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) definition. The primary end point was a composite of post- discharge Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding during 1-year follow-up. Of the 209 included patients, 15 (7.2%) suffered a bleeding event. There were more bleeding events among dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) users as compared with those without DAPT (10.7% vs 3.1%, p = 0.033). Among HBR patients, 6.1% and in non-HBR patients 8.1% suffered a bleeding event (p = 0.579). Notably, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3) incidence was highest in patients <65 years and without DAPT use. In conclusion, unselected suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients aged <65 years had surprisingly high bleeding incidence, regardless of ARC-HBR status or DAPT use.

Prevalence of High Bleeding Risk among Hospitalized Suspected NSTEMI Patients.

In recent years, guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have placed more emphasis on identifying patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We set out to investigate the prevalence of HBR patients according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in hospitalized patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled between January and June 2019 from the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital. The discharge diagnosis and baseline data were manually collected using electronic patient records and database searches. Patients with non-cardiac diagnoses were excluded. Overall, 212 patients were included in the study. A total of 146 (68.9%) patients were diagnosed with NSTEMI (Type 1), 47 (22.2%) with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and 19 (9.0%) with "other." HBR was detected in 47.6% (n = 101) of all patients. Common criteria for HBR among ACS patients were age (40.4%), chronic kidney disease (33.7%), and the use of oral anticoagulation medicines (20.2%). In conclusion, nearly half of the patients hospitalized for ACS fulfilled HBR criteria. According to contemporary guidelines, the management of HBR patients differs from that of non-HBR patients, and thus, a more comprehensive screening for HBR may be considered in clinical practice.