Orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPRC5B Controls Smooth Muscle Contractility and Differentiation by Inhibiting Prostacyclin Receptor Signaling.

BACKGROUND: G protein-coupled receptors are important regulators of contractility and differentiation in vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), but the specific function of SMC-expressed orphan G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member B (GPRC5B) is unclear. METHODS: We studied the role of GPRC5B in the regulation of contractility and dedifferentiation in human and murine SMCs in vitro and in iSM-Gprc5b-KO (tamoxifen-inducible, SMC-specific knockout) mice under conditions of arterial hypertension and atherosclerosis in vivo. RESULTS: Mesenteric arteries from SMC-specific Gprc5b-KOs showed ex vivo significantly enhanced prostacyclin receptor (IP)-dependent relaxation, whereas responses to other relaxant or contractile factors were normal. In vitro, knockdown of GPRC5B in human aortic SMCs resulted in increased IP-dependent cAMP production and consecutive facilitation of SMC relaxation. In line with this facilitation of IP-mediated relaxation, iSM-Gprc5b-KO mice were protected from arterial hypertension, and this protective effect was abrogated by IP antagonists. Mechanistically, we show that knockdown of GPRC5B increased the membrane localization of IP both in vitro and in vivo and that GPRC5B, but not other G protein-coupled receptors, physically interacts with IP. Last, we show that enhanced IP signaling in GPRC5B-deficient SMCs not only facilitates relaxation but also prevents dedifferentiation during atherosclerosis development, resulting in reduced plaque load and increased differentiation of SMCs in the fibrous cap. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data show that GPRC5B regulates vascular SMC tone and differentiation by negatively regulating IP signaling.

Residency time of agonists does not affect the stability of GPCR-arrestin complexes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The interaction of arrestins with G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) desensitizes agonist-dependent receptor responses and often leads to receptor internalization. GPCRs that internalize without arrestin have been classified as "class A" GPCRs whereas "class B" GPCRs co-internalize with arrestin into endosomes. The interaction of arrestins with GPCRs requires both agonist activation and receptor phosphorylation. Here, we ask the question whether agonists with very slow off-rates can cause the formation of particularly stable receptor-arrestin complexes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The stability of GPCR-arrestin-3 complexes at two class A GPCRs, the ß2 -adrenoceptor and the µ opioid receptor, was assessed using two different techniques, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) employing several ligands with very different off-rates. Arrestin trafficking was determined by confocal microscopy. KEY RESULTS: Upon agonist washout, GPCR-arrestin-3 complexes showed markedly different dissociation rates in single-cell FRET experiments. In FRAP experiments, however, all full agonists led to the formation of receptor-arrestin complexes of identical stability whereas the complex between the µ receptor and arrestin-3 induced by the partial agonist morphine was less stable. Agonists with very slow off-rates could not mediate the co-internalization of arrestin-3 with class A GPCRs into endosomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Agonist off-rates do not affect the stability of GPCR-arrestin complexes but phosphorylation patterns do. Our results imply that orthosteric agonists are not able to pharmacologically convert class A into class B GPCRs.

Structures in G proteins important for subtype selective receptor binding and subsequent activation.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) selectively couple to specific heterotrimeric G proteins comprised of four subfamilies in order to induce appropriate physiological responses. However, structural determinants in Gα subunits responsible for selective recognition by approximately 800 human GPCRs have remained elusive. Here, we directly compare the influence of subtype-specific Gα structures on the stability of GPCR-G protein complexes and the activation by two Gq-coupled receptors. We used FRET-assays designed to distinguish multiple Go and Gq-based Gα chimeras in their ability to be selectively bound and activated by muscarinic M3 and histaminic H1 receptors. We identify the N-terminus including the αN/ß1-hinge, the ß2/ß3-loop and the α5 helix of Gα to be key selectivity determinants which differ in their impact on selective binding to GPCRs and subsequent activation depending on the specific receptor. Altogether, these findings provide new insights into the molecular basis of G protein-coupling selectivity even beyond the Gα C-terminus.

Multisite phosphorylation is required for sustained interaction with GRKs and arrestins during rapid µ-opioid receptor desensitization.

G protein receptor kinases (GRKs) and ß-arrestins are key regulators of µ-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling and trafficking. We have previously shown that high-efficacy opioids such as DAMGO stimulate a GRK2/3-mediated multisite phosphorylation of conserved C-terminal tail serine and threonine residues, which facilitates internalization of the receptor. In contrast, morphine-induced phosphorylation of MOR is limited to Ser375 and is not sufficient to drive substantial receptor internalization. We report how specific multisite phosphorylation controlled the dynamics of GRK and ß-arrestin interactions with MOR and show how such phosphorylation mediated receptor desensitization. We showed that GRK2/3 was recruited more quickly than was ß-arrestin to a DAMGO-activated MOR. ß-Arrestin recruitment required GRK2 activity and MOR phosphorylation, but GRK recruitment also depended on the phosphorylation sites in the C-terminal tail, specifically four serine and threonine residues within the 370TREHPSTANT379 motif. Our results also suggested that other residues outside this motif participated in the initial and transient recruitment of GRK and ß-arrestins. We identified two components of high-efficacy agonist desensitization of MOR: a sustained component, which required GRK2-mediated phosphorylation and a potential soluble factor, and a rapid component, which was likely mediated by GRK2 but independent of receptor phosphorylation. Elucidating these complex receptor-effector interactions represents an important step toward a mechanistic understanding of MOR desensitization that leads to the development of tolerance and dependence.