Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. RESULTS: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62-16.61, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance.

Histopathological regression grading matches excellently with local and regional spread after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer.

Histopathological regression grading has been shown to predict outcome in chemoradiated rectal cancer. Lymph node spread is still considered the most important single prognostic parameter. Therefore, we investigated the association of regression grading with tumor spread in a single center retrospective cohort. 102 consecutive patients who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Surgery was performed, including total mesorectal excision. Pathological examination included UICC staging and Dworak's five-tier tumor regression grading. Histological complete response was achieved in 16.7% of cases. Dworak's regression grading and a simplified two tier scheme both correlated excellently with ypT, ypN and UICC stage. However, cases with poor histological response were strongly represented in ypN0. Tumor regression grading is a reliable method for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but the optimal cut-off for separating good and poor response remains to be established based on clinical outcome.