Colon Involvement in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of colon involvement in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND DATA: Necrotizing pancreatitis is characterized by a profound inflammatory response with local and systemic implications. Mesocolic involvement can compromise colonic blood supply leading to ischemic complications; however, few data exist regarding this problem. We hypothesized that the development of colon involvement in necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) negatively affects morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Six hundred forty-seven NP patients treated between 2005 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with colon complications, including ischemia, perforation, fistula, stricture/obstruction, and fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis. Clinical characteristics were analyzed to identify risk factors and effect of colon involvement on morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Colon involvement was seen in 11% (69/647) of NP patients. Ischemia was the most common pathology (n = 29) followed by perforation (n = 18), fistula (n = 12), inflammatory stricture (n = 7), and fulminant C difficile colitis (n = 3). Statistically significant risk factors for developing colon pathology include tobacco use (odds ratio (OR), 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.4, P = 0.009), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; P = 0.04), and respiratory failure (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.1-26.3; P = 0.049). When compared with patients without colon involvement, NP patients with colon involvement had significantly increased overall morbidity (86% vs 96%, P = 0.03) and mortality (8% vs 19%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Colon involvement in necrotizing pancreatitis is common; clinical deterioration should prompt its evaluation. Risk factors include tobacco use, coronary artery disease, and respiratory failure. Colon involvement in necrotizing pancreatitis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality.

Biliary Stricture After Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Underappreciated Challenge.

OBJECTIVE: Biliary stricture in necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) has not been systematically categorized; therefore, we sought to define the incidence and natural history of biliary stricture caused by NP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Benign biliary stricture occurs secondary to bile duct injury, anastomotic narrowing, or chronic inflammation and fibrosis. The profound locoregional inflammatory response of NP creates challenging biliary strictures. METHODS: NP patients treated between 2005 and 2019 were reviewed. Biliary stricture was identified on cholangiography as narrowing of the extrahepatic biliary tree to <75% of the diameter of the unaffected duct. Biliary stricture risk factors and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 743 NP patients, 64 died, 13 were lost to follow-up; therefore, a total of 666 patients were included in the final cohort. Biliary stricture developed in 108 (16%) patients. Mean follow up was 3.5 ±â€Š3.3 years. Median time from NP onset to biliary stricture diagnosis was 4.2 months (interquartile range, 1.8 to 10.9). Presentation was commonly clinical or biochemical jaundice, n = 30 (28%) each. Risk factors for stricture development were splanchnic vein thrombosis and pancreatic head parenchymal necrosis. Median time to stricture resolution was 6.0 months after onset (2.8 to 9.8). A mean of 3.3 ±â€Š2.3 procedures were performed. Surgical intervention was required in 22 (20%) patients. Endoscopic treatment failed in 17% (17/99) of patients and was not associated with stricture length. Operative treatment of biliary stricture was more likely in patients with infected necrosis or NP disease duration ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: Biliary stricture occurs frequently after NP and is associated with splanchnic vein thrombosis and pancreatic head necrosis. Surgical correction was performed in 20%.

Outcomes in Endoscopic and Operative Transgastric Pancreatic Debridement.

OBJECTIVES: Select patients with anatomically favorable walled off pancreatic necrosis may be treated by endoscopic (Endo-TGD) or operative (OR-TGD) transgastric debridement (TGD). We compared our experience with these 2 approaches. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Select necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) patients are suitable for TGD which may be accomplished endoscopically or surgically. Limited experience exists contrasting these techniques exists. METHODS: Patients undergoing Endo-TGD and OR-TGD at a single, high-volume pancreatic center between 2008 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes of these 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: Among 498 NP patients undergoing necrosis intervention, 160 (32%) had TGD: 59 Endo-TGD and 101 OR-TGD. The groups were statistically similar in age, comorbidity, pancreatitis etiology, necrosis anatomy, pancreatitis severity, and timing of TGD from pancreatitis insult. OR-TGD required 1.1 ±â€Š0.5 and Endo-TGD 3.0 ±â€Š2.0 debridements/patient. Fewer hospital readmissions and repeat necrosis interventions, and shorter total inpatient length of stay were observed in OR-TGD patients. New-onset organ failure [Endo-TGD (13%); OR-TGD (13%); P = 1.0] was similar between groups. Hospital length of stay after TGD was significantly longer in patients undergoing Endo-TGD (13.8 ±â€Š20.8 days) compared to OR-TGD (9.4 ±â€Š6.1 days; P = 0.047). Mortality was 7% in Endo-TGD and 1% in OR-TGD (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Operative and endoscopic transgastric debridement achieve necrosis resolution with different temporal and procedural profiles. Clear multidisciplinary communication is essential to determine appropriate approach to individual necrotizing pancreatitis patients.

Insurance Type and Marital Status Impact Hospital Length of Stay After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of the impact of social determinants on health care and surgical outcomes is imperative to improve patient care. This study aims to examine the impact social determinants have on hospital length of stay (LOS) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients who underwent PD from 2013 to 2018. Patients were categorized by insurance type (public/private/multiple), and electronic medical record review was performed to obtain distance from home, marital status, and race. Public insurance included Medicare and Medicaid; multiple types were defined as public insurance supplemented by a private insurance. Univariable analysis was used to identify potential confounders. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were controlled for using multivariable regression models to examine the effect of variables on LOS. RESULTS: About 813 PDs were included (n = 341 public; n = 238 private; and n = 234 multiple). Patients with public insurance had significantly longer LOS than patients with private on univariate (P < 0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.021) (8 versus 7 d). Patients with multiple insurance types showed significantly increased LOS compared with patients with private on univariable (P < 0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.006) (8 versus 7 d). Single patients had significantly longer LOS compared with married patients on univariable (P = 0.012) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.005) (8 versus 7 d). Distance from home, race, gender, or age did not have a significant impact on LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Single patients and patients with public or multiple insurance types are more likely to have longer hospital LOS after PD. These findings will enable physicians to identify patients at risk and target them for enhanced recovery programming.

Routine Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Be Inadequate in the Hypercoagulable State of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of venous thromboembolism in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients and associate a degree of inflammatory marker elevation to venous thromboembolism development. DESIGN: An observational study that identified patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 between March 12, 2020, and March 31, 2020. Data reported are those available through May 6, 2020. SETTING: A multicenter study including three Indianapolis area academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Two-hundred forty consecutive patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were admitted to one of three hospitals. One-hundred nine critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients admitted to the ICU were included in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received routine subcutaneous chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study was to determine the frequency of venous thromboembolism and the degree of inflammatory and coagulation marker elevation associated with venous thromboembolism development. Descriptive statistics outlined the frequency of venous thromboembolism at any time during severe coronavirus disease 2019. Clinical course and laboratory metrics were compared between patients that developed venous thromboembolism and patients that did not develop venous thromboembolism. Hypercoagulable thromboelastography was defined as two or more hypercoagulable parameters. MAIN RESULTS: One-hundred nine patients developed severe coronavirus disease 2019 requiring ICU care. The mean (± SD) age was 61 ± 16 years and 57% were male. Seventy-five patients (69%) were discharged home, 7 patients (6%) remain in the hospital, and 27 patients (25%) died. Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed in 31 patients (28%) 8 ± 7 days after hospital admission, including two patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism at presentation to the hospital. Elevated admission D-dimer and peak D-dimer were associated with venous thromboembolism development (p < 0.05). D-dimer greater than 2,600 ng/mL predicted venous thromboembolism with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.760 (95% CI, 0.661-0.858; p < 0.0001), sensitivity of 89.7%, and specificity of 59.5%. Twelve patients (11%) had thromboelastography performed and 58% of these patients had a hypercoagulable study. The calculated coagulation index was hypercoagulable in 50% of patients with thromboelastography. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that coronavirus disease 2019 results in a hypercoagulable state. Routine chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may be inadequate in preventing venous thromboembolism in severe coronavirus disease 2019.

Operative pancreatic debridement: Contemporary outcomes in changing times.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Operative pancreatic debridement (OPD) is the historic gold standard for treating necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Recent success with minimally invasive NP treatment approaches have raised the question of which NP patients require OPD. We therefore sought to define contemporary outcomes of NP patients undergoing OPD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 116 consecutive NP patients undergoing OPD using a prospectively maintained institutional NP database between 2006 and 2018. RESULTS: 86 (74%) patients underwent open pancreatic debridement (OD) and 30 (26%) underwent open transgastric debridement (TGD). Median follow-up was 16 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8-45 months). Median age was 51 years (IQR, 43-65 years); 73 (63%) were male. Pancreatitis etiology included biliary (53%), alcohol (22%), and idiopathic/other (25%). Median time from diagnosis to OPD was 64.5 days (IQR, 32-114.5 days). Mean APACHE-II score was: admission 8.5 (standard deviation [SD], 5.9); worst 12.6 (SD, 7.9); preoperatively 7.2 (SD, 4.6). 40 patients (34%) were initially managed with minimally invasive techniques (percutaneous drain only in 24, endoscopic only in 6, combination in 10). Median postoperative length of stay was 11 days (IQR, 7-19 days). 90-day morbidity and mortality were 70% and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NP patients who require OPD are critically and chronically ill. OPD is associated with substantial morbidity, but acceptable mortality in an experienced center with multidisciplinary support. This large contemporary series demonstrates that in properly selected patients, OPD remains an important treatment for NP.

Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome predicts failure of percutaneous therapy in necrotizing pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive approaches, such as percutaneous drainage (PD), are increasingly utilized as initial treatment in necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) requiring intervention. Predictors of success of PD as definitive treatment are lacking. Our aim was to assess the application, predictors of success, and natural history of PD in NP. We hypothesized that necrosis morphology patterns and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) may predict the ability of PD to provide definitive therapy. METHODS: 714 NP patients were treated from 2005 to 2018. Patients achieving disease resolution with PD alone (PD) were compared to those requiring an escalation in intervention (Step). Outcomes were compared between groups using independent samples t-test, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson's correlation, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS: 115 patients were initially managed with PD (42 PD, 73 Step). No difference in necrosis morphology was seen between the two groups. The PD group underwent significantly more repeat percutaneous interventions (PD, 3.2; Step, 2.0; P = 0.0006) including additional drain placement and drain upsize/reposition procedures. Patients with DPDS were more likely to require an escalation in intervention (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.6; P = 0.003). The mean number of months to NP resolution was similar (PD, 5.7; Step, 5.8; P = 0.9). Mortality was similar (PD, 7%; Step 14%, P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Necrosis morphology in and of itself does not reliably predict successful definitive treatment by percutaneous drainage. However, patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome were less likely to have definitive resolution with PD alone.

Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: Spectrum of Operative Management.

BACKGROUND: Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is common after necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Surgical management may be by internal drainage or left (distal) pancreatectomy. Therapeutic decision-making must consider sinistral portal hypertension, parenchymal volume of disconnected pancreas, and timing relative to definitive management of pancreatic necrosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes after operative management for DPDS. METHODS: All patients with NP undergoing an operation for DPDS were included in the study (2005-2017). Perioperative outcomes and long-term durability were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 647 patients with NP, 299 (46%) had DPDS. Operative management was required in 202/299 (68%) patients with DPDS. Median follow-up was 30 mo (2-165). Definitive operative therapy included internal drainage (n = 111) or resection (n = 91). Time from NP diagnosis to operation was 126 d (20 d to 81 mo). Overall morbidity was 46%. Postoperative length of stay was 7 d (2-97). Readmission was required in 39 patients (19%). Mortality was 2%. Repeat pancreatic intervention was required in 23 patients (11%) at a median of 15 mo (1-98). Repeat pancreatectomy was performed in nine patients and the remaining 14 patients were managed with endoscopic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: DPDS is a common and challenging consequence of NP. Appropriate operation is durable in nearly 90% of patients.

Improved Outpatient Communication Decreases Unplanned Readmission in Necrotizing Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmission rates in necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) are among the highest of any medical disease (72%). Recent work has identified several potentially preventable causes of unplanned readmission in NP. We hypothesized that intensive outpatient communication would identify developing problems and decrease unplanned hospital readmission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of NP patients treated at a single institution between 2016 and 2019 compared patients 2 y before (NP-pre, 2016-2018) and 1 y after (NP-post, 2018-2019) the establishment of a dedicated pancreatitis nurse coordinator. Unplanned hospital readmission and emergency room visits were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 178 NP patients were treated-112 patients in the NP-pre group and 66 patients in the NP-post group. No differences between groups were observed in age, sex, comorbidities, pancreatitis etiology, NP severity, or mortality. A mean of 5.4 ± 0.2 outpatient communications per patient with the pancreatitis nurse coordinator was documented in the NP-post group. Unplanned readmission rates decreased significantly from 64% (NP-pre) to 45% (NP-post; P = 0.02). The frequency of readmission decreased from 1.6 readmissions per patient (NP-pre) to 0.8 readmissions per patient (NP-post; P = 0.001). Readmissions because of symptomatic necrosis, failure to thrive, nonnecrosis infection, and drain dysfunction decreased (P < 0.05). Overall disease duration was similar (NP-pre, 4.6 ± 0.3 mo; NP-post, 5.0 ± 0.3 mo; P = 0.4); however, the mean number of unplanned inpatient days decreased from 15.4 ± 2.2 d (NP-pre) to 7.8 ± 1.6 d (NP-post; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Improved outpatient communication identifies treatable problems and significantly decreases unplanned readmission in NP patients.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Causing Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Not as Rare as You Think?

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) presents a unique clinical challenge because of its complex and lengthy disease course. Pancreatic necrosis occurs in 10%-20% of acute pancreatitis cases and may result from any etiology. Scattered reports describe pancreatic tumors causing NP; however, the relationship between these disease processes is not clear. We have treated patients whose NP was caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and therefore sought to clarify the clinical outcomes of these patients. METHODS: Patients treated between 2005 and 2018 for NP caused by PDAC were identified. The relationship between NP and PDAC was examined, and the clinical courses of both disease processes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 647 patients treated for NP, seven patients (1.1%) had PDAC and NP. The mean age at NP diagnosis was 60.6 y (range, 49-66). Two patients had postprocedural pancreatitis after cancer diagnosis, and the remaining five patients had NP caused by PDAC. Median duration between diagnoses of NP and PDAC was 5.6 mo (range, 3.5-21.8). For PDAC treatment, four patients received chemotherapy alone, one received palliative radiation therapy, and one died without oncologic management. One patient underwent operative resection of PDAC. Median survival was 12.7 mo (range, 0.4-49.9). CONCLUSIONS: PDAC may be a more common cause of NP than previously considered and should be considered in patients with NP of appropriate age in whom etiology is otherwise unclear. Prompt diagnosis facilitates optimal treatment in this challenging clinical situation.

Visceral artery pseudoaneurysm in necrotizing pancreatitis: incidence and outcomes.

Background: Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VA-PSA) occur in necrotizing pancreatitis; however, little is known about their natural history. This study sought to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of VA-PSA in a large cohort of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods: Data for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis who were treated between 2005 and 2017 at Indiana University Health University Hospital and who developed a VA-PSA were reviewed to assess incidence, presentation, treatment and outcomes. Results: Twenty-eight of 647 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (4.3%) developed a VA-PSA between 2005 and 2017. The artery most commonly involved was the splenic artery (36%), followed by the gastroduodenal artery (24%). The most common presenting symptom was bloody drain output (32%), followed by incidental computed tomographic findings (21%). The median time from onset of necrotizing pancreatitis to diagnosis of a VA-PSA was 63.5 days (range 1-957 d). Twenty-five of the 28 patients who developed VA-PSA (89%) were successfully treated with percutaneous angioembolization. Three patients (11%) required surgery: 1 patient rebled following embolization and required operative management, and 2 underwent upfront operative management. The mortality rate attributable to hemorrhage from a VA-PSA in the setting of necrotizing pancreatitis was 14% (4 of 28 patients). Conclusion: In this study, VA-PSA occurred in 4.3% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Percutaneous angioembolization effectively treated most cases; however, mortality from VA-PSA was high (14%). A high degree of clinical suspicion remains critical for early diagnosis of this potentially fatal problem.

Contexte: Les faux anévrismes des artères viscérales (FAAV) surviennent en présence d'une pancréatite nécrosante; on en sait cependant peu sur leur histoire naturelle. L'objectif de l'étude était d'évaluer l'incidence et les issues des FAAV dans une grande cohorte de patients atteints de pancréatite nécrosante. Méthodes: Nous avons examiné les données des patients atteints de pancréatite nécrosante traités entre 2005 et 2017 à l'Hôpital universitaire de l'Université de l'Indiana qui ont fait un FAAV afin d'évaluer l'incidence, les premiers signes, le traitement et les issues de cette affection. Résultats: Vingt-huit (4,3 %) des 647 patients atteints de pancréatite nécrosante inclus (2005­2017) ont fait un FAAV. L'artère la plus souvent touchée était l'artère splénique (36 %), suivie de l'artère gastroduodénale (24 %). Les premiers signes les plus courants étaient la présence de sang dans les liquides évacués par drainage (32 %), puis les résultats d'une tomodensitométrie effectuée pour une autre raison (21 %). Le délai médian entre l'apparition de la pancréatite nécrosante et le diagnostic de FAAV était de 63,5 jours (intervalle : 1 à 957 jours). Vingt-cinq des 28 patients ayant fait un FAAV (89 %) ont été traités avec succès par angioembolisation percutanée. Trois patients (11 %) ont dû être opérés : 2 dès le début, et le troisième parce qu'il a recommencé à saigner après l'embolisation. Le taux de mortalité par hémorragie due à un FAAV chez les personnes atteintes d'une pancréatite nécrosante était de 14 % (4 patients sur 28). Conclusion: Dans cette étude, 4,3 % des patients atteints de pancréatite nécrosante ont connu un FAAV. L'angioembolisation percutanée s'est avérée efficace dans la plupart des cas; cependant, la mortalité associée aux FAAV était élevée (14 %). Il est crucial de faire preuve d'une grande suspicion clinique afin de diagnostiquer tôt cette affection potentiellement mortelle.

Total Pancreatectomy with Percutaneous Islet Autotransplant after Remote Islet Processing: A Viable Paradigm?

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT) is important therapy for select chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients. The specialized technique of islet isolation limits widespread TPIAT use. We hypothesized that remote islet isolation provides satisfactory islet yield and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of TPIAT patients between 2020 and 2022. Islet isolation was performed off-site, with percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplant (IAT) completed the morning following pancreatectomy. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent TPIAT; median age was 43 [interquartile range 12.5] years. Operation occurred 7.5 [14.8] years after pancreatitis diagnosis. The most common pancreatitis etiology was genetic (50%). All patients underwent preoperative endoscopic therapy; three underwent prior pancreatectomy. Operative time was 236 [51] minutes; subsequent percutaneous IAT time was 87 [35] minutes. The islet equivalent (IEQ)/kilogram (kg) yield was 3,456 [3,815] IEQ/kg. Nine patients had positive islet cultures. Two thromboembolic events and one bacteremia occurred. One perihepatic hematoma occurred after percutaneous portal venous access. Median postoperative length of stay was 14.5 days, and five patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days. All patients were discharged home on insulin. No mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: Total pancreatectomy with remote islet isolation provides excellent islet yield for autotransplant and satisfactory perioperative outcomes.

Staging accuracy in patients with clinical T2N0 gastric cancer: Implications for treatment sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Patients with clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) gastric adenocarcinoma are recommended to undergo either perioperative chemotherapy or upfront resection. If T2N0 disease is pathologically confirmed, patients may be observed without chemotherapy. These guidelines create the possibility of both systemic therapy overuse and underuse depending on clinical staging accuracy. Our objectives were to define factors associated with upstaging after upfront resection and describe the association between postoperative chemotherapy and survival. METHODS: Patients with cT2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma were identified using the National Cancer Database. Factors associated with upstaging were assessed by logistic regression. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: Of 4,076 patients undergoing upfront resection for cT2N0 gastric cancer, 1,933 (47.4%) were pathologically upstaged. Patients were more likely to be upstaged if they had >3.0-cm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.70; P < .001) or poorly differentiated tumors (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.89-2.60; P < .001). Patients were less likely to be upstaged if they had distal tumors (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93; P = .006). Of those pathologically upstaged (n = 1,933), 1,111 (57.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy that was associated with improved survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.63; P < .001). Among those not upstaged (n = 2,143), 247 (11.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy that was not associated with improved survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21; P = .54). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic upstaging after upfront resection in patients with cT2N0 gastric cancer is associated with patient and tumor characteristics. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival only in the patients upstaged at surgery. An upfront surgical approach may be preferred in select patients, especially if avoiding chemotherapy is desired.

Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty: A Visual Case Study.

BACKGROUND: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a challenging and rare clinical entity resulting in pancreatobiliary pain and stasis of bile and pancreatic juice. This problem was classically treated with surgical therapy, but as classification of the disease has changed and newer methods of endoscopic evaluation and therapy have evolved, operative transduodenal sphincteroplasty is now generally reserved as a final therapeutic option for these patients. In this video and manuscript, we describe our approach to operative transduodenal sphincteroplasty in a patient with type I Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. METHODS: A 50-year-old female with history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presented with episodic right-upper-quadrant and epigastric abdominal pain with associated documented elevations in liver chemistries. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging demonstrated dilation of her common bile duct. After multidisciplinary discussion, the decision was made to pursue operative transduodenal sphincteroplasty. RESULTS: All key operative steps of the transduodenal sphincteroplasty are demonstrated in the embedded video. Key operative steps include laparotomy, generous Kocher maneuver, and duodenotomy over the ampulla, allowing access for sequential biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies and sphincteroplasties with absorbable suture. The duodenotomy and abdominal fascia are then closed. Our patient underwent sequential diet advancement and was discharged to home on postoperative day five. At clinic follow-up, pancreatobiliary-type pain had resolved. CONCLUSION: The embedded video demonstrates a case of operative transduodenal sphincteroplasty, which can provide durable results in appropriate patient populations.

Transgastric pancreatic necrosectomy: Tricks of the trade.

Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) affects 20 % of the 300,000 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis every year. Mechanical intervention to debride necrotic and/or infected pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue is frequently required. Minimally invasive approaches to treat pancreatic necrosis have gained popularity over the last two decades, including transgastric pancreatic necrosectomy. The purpose of this report is to review the indications, surgical technique, advantages, and limitations of surgical transgastric necrosectomy.

Management of Necrotizing Pancreatitis.

Necrotizing pancreatitis affects 10% to 15% of all patients with acute pancreatitis. Despite improved understanding of this complex disease, it is still attended by up to 15% mortality. Necrotizing pancreatitis provides the clinical challenges of working in a multi-disciplinary group, determining proper timing for intervention, and identifying appropriate intervention approaches. The step-up approach consists of supportive care initially. When there is documented infected necrosis, treatment begins with antibiotics, progressing to minimally invasive mechanical necrosis intervention, and reserving surgery as the final treatment modality. However, treatment must be tailored to the individual patient. This article provides an overview of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Readmission in acute pancreatitis: Etiology, risk factors, and opportunities for improvement.

Acute pancreatitis is associated with a readmission rate ranging from 7 to 34%. Readmission rates are highest among biliary (4-37%) and alcohol-induced (2-60%) acute pancreatitis. Severe acute pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis have readmission rates ranging from 20 to 75%. The most common causes of readmission include recurrent acute pancreatitis (17-45% of readmissions) and smoldering symptoms/local complications (17-38%). A number of risk scores reliably estimate risk of readmission in acute pancreatitis. Decreased rates of readmission were reported in patients that underwent same-admission cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis and alcohol cessation interventions in alcohol-induced pancreatitis. This review article discusses readmission in acute pancreatitis, including etiology, risk factors, and opportunities for improved patient care.

Contemporary Intervention in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Improved Understanding Changing Practice.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) has shifted in favor of a minimally invasive step-up approach rather than early open pancreatic debridement. We hypothesized that this paradigm shift would be reflected in the intervention, morbidity, and mortality profile of NP patients. STUDY DESIGN: Single-institution retrospective review of 767 NP patients treated between 2005 and 2019. Two eras of NP intervention were identified relative to the introduction of a minimally invasive approach to NP. Patients treated between 2005 and 2010 were classified as the "early" group and compared with patients treated between 2011 and 2019, classified as the "late" group. RESULTS: In total, 299 NP patients comprised the early group and 468 patients comprised the late group. No differences were seen in patient demographics, comorbidity profile, or NP etiology between groups. Necrosis volume, necrosis location, CT severity index (CTSI), and rates of infected necrosis were similar between groups. No difference was seen in mortality. Mechanical intervention for NP was more common in the early than the late group (86% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). Time to first intervention was similar between groups (79 ± 7d vs. 75 ± 6d). The early group had higher rates of open pancreatic debridement (72% vs. 55%, p < 0.001). Endoscopic intervention was less common in the early than the late group (7% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). NP disease duration was longer in the early than the late group (223 ± 12d vs. 179 ± 7d, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Contemporary management of necrotizing pancreatitis is marked by less frequent operative debridement and shorter disease duration.

Obesity Worsens Local and Systemic Complications of Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Prolongs Disease Course.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is epidemic in the USA. Limited data exist examining obesity's influence on necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) disease course. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of 571 adult necrotizing pancreatitis patients treated between 2007 and 2018. Patients were grouped according to body mass index (BMI) at disease onset. Patient characteristics, necrotizing pancreatitis course, and outcomes were compared between non-obese (BMI < 30) and obese (BMI > 30) patients. RESULTS: Among 536 patients with BMI data available, 304 (57%) were obese (BMI > 30), and 232 (43%) were non-obese (BMI < 30). NP etiology in the obese group was more commonly biliary (55% versus 46%, p = 0.04) or secondary to hypertriglyceridemia (10% versus 2%, p < 0.001) and less commonly alcohol (17% versus 26%, p = 0.01). Obese patients had a higher incidence of baseline comorbid disease. The CT severity index was similar between groups though obese patients had a higher rate of > 50% pancreatic gland necrosis (27% versus 19%, p = 0.02). The rates of infected necrosis and organ failure were higher among obese patients. Percutaneous drainage was more common in obese patients. Time to first necrosis intervention was earlier with increasing BMI. NP disease duration was longer in obese patients. The overall mortality rate of non-obese and obese patients did not differ. However, mortality rate increased with increasing BMI. CONCLUSION: Necrotizing pancreatitis in obese patients is characterized by a prolonged disease course, a higher risk of organ failure, infected necrosis, and the need for early necrosis-related intervention. Mortality increases with increasing BMI.