RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Selpercatinib, a highly selective, potent RET inhibitor, has shown efficacy in advanced RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer in a phase 1-2 trial, but its efficacy as compared with approved multikinase inhibitors is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomized trial comparing selpercatinib as first-line therapy with the physician's choice of cabozantinib or vandetanib (control group). Eligible patients had progressive disease documented within 14 months before enrollment. The primary end point in the protocol-specified interim efficacy analysis was progression-free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review. Crossover to selpercatinib was permitted among patients in the control group after disease progression. Treatment failure-free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review, was a secondary, alpha-controlled end point that was to be tested only if progression-free survival was significant. Among the other secondary end points were overall response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review was not reached in the selpercatinib group and was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2 to 25.1) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.48; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 12 months was 86.8% (95% CI, 79.8 to 91.6) in the selpercatinib group and 65.7% (95% CI, 51.9 to 76.4) in the control group. Median treatment failure-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review was not reached in the selpercatinib group and was 13.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events, or death, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.42; P<0.001). Treatment failure-free survival at 12 months was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.1 to 91.0) in the selpercatinib group and 62.1% (95% CI, 48.9 to 72.8) in the control group. The overall response was 69.4% (95% CI, 62.4 to 75.8) in the selpercatinib group and 38.8% (95% CI, 29.1 to 49.2) in the control group. Adverse events led to a dose reduction in 38.9% of the patients in the selpercatinib group, as compared with 77.3% in the control group, and to treatment discontinuation in 4.7% and 26.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Selpercatinib treatment resulted in superior progression-free survival and treatment failure-free survival as compared with cabozantinib or vandetanib in patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer. (Funded by Loxo Oncology, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly; LIBRETTO-531 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04211337.).
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Piridinas , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Progressão da Doença , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-ret/genética , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/genética , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Selpercatinib is a first-in-class, highly selective and potent, central nervous system-active RET kinase inhibitor. In the phase I/II trial, selpercatinib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in heavily pre-treated and treatment-naive patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). LIBRETTO-531 (NCT04211337) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase III trial comparing selpercatinib to cabozantinib or vandetanib in patients with advanced/metastatic RET-mutant MTC. The primary objective is to compare progression-free survival (per RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review of patients with progressive, advanced, multikinase inhibitor-naive, RET-mutant MTC treated with selpercatinib versus cabozantinib or vandetanib. Key secondary objectives are to compare other efficacy outcomes (per RECIST 1.1) and tolerability of selpercatinib versus cabozantinib or vandetanib.
Selpercatinib (also known by the brand name Retevmo®/Retsevmo®) is a new treatment available in multiple countries for people with advanced or metastatic RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Thyroid cancer starts in your thyroid gland and may spread or metastasize to other parts of the body, including lungs, bones, and occasionally the brain, which means the cancer is likely to be advanced. Advanced thyroid cancer can be driven by a gene in your body, one of which is RET. This is a summary of the LIBRETTO-531 study which compares selpercatinib, which is a strong and selective inhibitor of RET, with two approved drugs, cabozantinib and vandetanib. Patients with advanced or metastatic RET-mutant MTC who have not already received treatment with kinase inhibitors are being enrolled. This trial will evaluate how long people during and after treatment live with the disease without it getting worse. Selpercatinib may affect both healthy cells and tumor cells, which can result in side effects, which will also be evaluated in this study. This study is active and currently recruiting new patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04211337 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Assuntos
Carcinoma Neuroendócrino , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Anilidas , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/genética , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-ret/genética , Pirazóis , Piridinas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/genéticaRESUMO
NTRK gene fusions are found in <1% of all cancers but are uniformly present in mammary analog secretory carcinomas (MASC) of the salivary glands. Two selective histology-agnostic tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors are currently approved for malignancies with these oncogenic fusions. Resistance to TRK inhibition has been recognized, and the mediating mechanisms are presently being studied. This report describes a patient diagnosed with an MASC of the parotid gland who after undergoing multiple lines of treatment was found to have an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and initiated TRK-targeted therapy using entrectinib. Upon disease progression, we performed tumor genetic sequencing that showed a secondary resistance mutation. The patient subsequently responded to selitrectinib, a next-generation TRK inhibitor.
Assuntos
Compostos Aza/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Secretor Análogo ao Mamário , Neoplasias das Glândulas Salivares/tratamento farmacológico , Benzamidas , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Indazóis , Carcinoma Secretor Análogo ao Mamário/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Secretor Análogo ao Mamário/genética , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Glândula Parótida/patologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias das Glândulas Salivares/genéticaRESUMO
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.LIBRETTO-001 is a registrational phase I/II, single-arm, open-label study of selpercatinib in patients with RET (REarranged during Transfection)-activated cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03157128). We present long-term safety and efficacy from LIBRETTO-001 in patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; n = 324) and RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer encompassing different histological subtypes (TC; n = 66). At the data cutoff of January 2023, the objective response rate was 82.5% among patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve MTC and 95.8% among patients with treatment-naïve TC. At a median follow-up time of 42.4 and 44.0 months in patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve and pretreated MTC, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached and 41.4 months, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 24.9 and 30.4 months in patients with treatment-naïve and pretreated TC, the median PFS was not reached and 27.4 months, respectively. Three-year PFS rates were 75.2% and 87.3% among patients with cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve MTC and treatment-naïve TC, respectively. Median PFS was similar to median duration of response for each patient group. The safety profile of selpercatinib was consistent with previous reports. With an additional follow-up of 37 months and 228 more patients from the last disclosure, selpercatinib continued to provide durable and robust responses in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with RET-mutant MTC and RET fusion-positive TC.
RESUMO
Introduction: Labor judges are subjected to productivity goals associated with a workload that does not take into consideration the complexity of their work. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between psychosocial factors, musculoskeletal problems, and presenteeism among labor judges. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 151 judges who answered a sociodemographic and occupational characterization questionnaire and the Brazilian versions of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, Health and Safety Executive - Indicator Tool, and Stanford Presenteeism Scale. The results underwent a descriptive analysis and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. Results: The psychosocial dimension of demands presented a higher risk of occupational stress, while role had a lower risk. Musculoskeletal problems in the neck, upper back, shoulders, and lower back were more common and affected almost 70% of the participants. Presenteeism was more affected by the avoiding distractions dimension. Almost all psychosocial dimensions had a significant correlation with musculoskeletal symptoms (p < 0.05), especially demands, which also was correlated with total presenteeism and the avoiding distractions dimension. Conclusions: The work overload observed among labor judges was related to the occurrence of musculoskeletal problems and to a high prevalence of presenteeism.
Introdução: Os magistrados trabalhistas estão sujeitos a metas de produtividade associadas a uma carga de trabalho que não contempla a complexidade do seu trabalho. Objetivos: Avaliar a relação entre fatores psicossociais, problemas osteomusculares e presenteísmo em magistrados trabalhistas. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversal com 151 magistrados, que responderam a um questionário de caracterização sociodemográfica e ocupacional e às versões brasileiras do Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares, do Health and Safety Executive Indicator Tool e do Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Foram utilizadas análises descritivas e teste de correlação de Spearman. Resultados: A dimensão psicossocial de demandas apresentou um risco mais elevado de estresse ocupacional, enquanto o cargo apresentou um risco mais baixo. Problemas osteomusculares em pescoço, parte superior das costas, ombros e parte inferior das costas foram mais comuns e afetaram quase 70% dos participantes. O presenteísmo foi mais afetado pela dimensão de concentração mantida. Quase todas as dimensões psicossociais apresentaram correlação significativa com os sintomas osteomusculares (p < 0,05), principalmente demandas, que também apresentou correlação com o presenteísmo total e a dimensão de concentração mantida. Conclusões: A sobrecarga de trabalho observada entre os magistrados trabalhistas foi relacionada à ocorrência de problemas osteomusculares e à elevada prevalência de presenteísmo.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and antitumour activity of regorafenib in paediatric patients with solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (aged 6 months to <18 years) with recurrent/refractory solid tumours received oral regorafenib once daily for 3 weeks on/1 week off. The starting dose (60 mg/m2) was derived from an adult physiology-based PK model and scaled to children; dose escalation was followed by safety expansion of the MTD cohort. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Regorafenib PK was evaluated using a population PK model. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (median age 13 years) received regorafenib (four cohorts: 60-93 mg/m2). Five of 23 evaluable patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 maculopapular rash, pyrexia, hypertension, and exfoliative dermatitis [each n = 1]). The MTD was defined as 82 mg/m2. The most common Grade ≥3 drug-related TEAE was thrombocytopenia (10%). The incidence and severity of hypertension, diarrhoea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot skin reaction were lower than reported in adults. Regorafenib exposure increased with dose, with substantial overlap because of moderate-to-high interpatient variability. One patient with rhabdomyosarcoma experienced an unconfirmed partial response; 15 patients had stable disease, five for >16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase 2 dose of single-agent regorafenib in paediatric patients with solid malignancies is 82 mg/m2. Regorafenib demonstrated acceptable tolerability and preliminary antitumour activity, supporting further investigation in paediatric patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02085148.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Neoplasias/patologia , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacocinética , Piridinas/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic/antiproliferative activity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, we assessed first- or second-line capecitabine with sorafenib or placebo in patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to a taxane and anthracycline and with known estrogen/progesterone receptor status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 537 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day for days 1 to 14 every 21 days with oral sorafenib 600 mg/d or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified according to hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer, and geographic region. RESULTS: Treatment with sorafenib with capecitabine, compared with capecitabine with placebo, did not prolong median PFS (5.5 vs. 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.973; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.779-1.217; P = .811) or overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs. 20.3 months; HR, 1.195; 95% CI, 0.943-1.513; P = .140); or enhance overall response rate (ORR; 13.5% vs. 15.5%; P = .515). Any grade toxicities (sorafenib vs. placebo) included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 79.2% vs. 59.6%), diarrhea (47.3% vs. 37.8%), mucosal inflammation (15.4% vs. 6.7%), and hypertension (26.2% vs. 5.6%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included PPES (15.4% vs. 7.1%), diarrhea (4.2% vs. 6.4%), and vomiting (3.5% vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of sorafenib with capecitabine did not improve PFS, OS, or ORR in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Rates of Grade 3 toxicities were higher in the sorafenib arm.