RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In eyes with diabetic macular edema, the relative efficacy of administering aflibercept monotherapy as compared with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept if the eye condition does not improve sufficiently (a form of step therapy) is unclear. METHODS: At 54 clinical sites, we randomly assigned eyes in adults who had diabetic macular edema involving the macular center and a visual-acuity letter score of 24 to 69 (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity; Snellen equivalent, 20/320 to 20/50) to receive either 2.0 mg of intravitreous aflibercept or 1.25 mg of intravitreous bevacizumab. The drug was administered at randomization and thereafter according to the prespecified retreatment protocol. Beginning at 12 weeks, eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy if protocol-specified criteria were met. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity over the 2-year trial period. Retinal central subfield thickness and visual acuity at 2 years and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 312 eyes (in 270 adults) underwent randomization; 158 eyes were assigned to receive aflibercept monotherapy and 154 to receive bevacizumab first. Over the 2-year period, 70% of the eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy. The mean improvement in visual acuity was 15.0 letters in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and 14.0 letters in the bevacizumab-first group (adjusted difference, 0.8 letters; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 2.5; P = 0.37). At 2 years, the mean changes in visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness were similar in the two groups. Serious adverse events (in 52% of the patients in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and in 36% of those in the bevacizumab-first group) and hospitalizations for adverse events (in 48% and 32%, respectively) were more common in the aflibercept-monotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of treatment of moderate vision loss due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula, we found no evidence of a significant difference in visual outcomes over a 2-year period between aflibercept monotherapy and treatment with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept in the case of suboptimal response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; Protocol AC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03321513.).
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Bevacizumab , Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Adulto , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Retinopatia Diabética/complicações , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Ranibizumab/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/administração & dosagem , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio VascularRESUMO
PURPOSE: This American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic Technology Assessment aims to assess the effectiveness of conventional teleretinal screening (TS) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted most recently in July 2023 to identify data published between 2006 and 2023 on any of the following elements related to TS effectiveness: (1) the accuracy of TS in detecting DR or DME compared with traditional ophthalmic screening with dilated fundus examination or 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography, (2) the impact of TS on DR screening compliance rates or other patient behaviors, and (3) cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction of TS compared with traditional DR screening. Identified studies then were rated based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system. RESULTS: Eight level I studies, 14 level II studies, and 2 level III studies were identified in total. Although cross-study comparison is challenging because of differences in reference standards and grading methods, TS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and good specificity in detecting DR; moderate to good agreement between TS and reference-standard DR grading was observed. Performance of TS was not as robust in detecting DME, although the number of studies evaluating DME specifically was limited. Two level I studies, 5 level II studies, and 1 level III study supported that TS had a positive impact on overall DR screening compliance, even increasing it by more than 2-fold in one study. Studies assessing cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction were not graded formally, but they generally showed that TS was cost-effective and preferred by patients over traditional surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional TS is an effective approach to DR screening not only for its accuracy in detecting referable-level disease, but also for improving screening compliance in a cost-effective manner that may be preferred by patients. Further research is needed to elucidate the ideal approach of TS that may involve integration of artificial intelligence or other imaging technologies in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos , Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Oftalmologia , Fotografação , Telemedicina , Humanos , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Fotografação/economia , Fotografação/métodos , Estados Unidos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify factors for meeting prespecified criteria for switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and moderate vision loss initially treated with bevacizumab in DRCR Retina Network protocol AC. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy participants with one or both eyes harboring CI-DME with visual acuity (VA) letter score of 69 to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/50-20/320). METHODS: Eligible eyes were assigned to receive intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (n = 158) or bevacizumab followed by aflibercept if prespecified criteria for switching were met between 12 weeks and 2 years (n = 154). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Meeting switching criteria: (1) at any time, (2) at 12 weeks, and (3) after 12 weeks. Associations between meeting the criteria for switching and factors measured at baseline and 12 weeks were evaluated in univariable analyses. Stepwise procedures were used to select variables for multivariable models. RESULTS: In the group receiving bevacizumab first, older participants showed a higher risk of meeting the switching criteria at any time, with a hazard ratio (HR) for a 10-year increase in age of 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.58). Male participants or eyes with worse baseline VA were more likely to switch at 12 weeks (for male vs. female: odds ratio [OR], 4.84 [95% CI, 1.32-17.81]; 5-letter lower baseline VA: OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.03-1.63]). Worse 12-week central subfield thickness (CST; 10-µm greater: HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]) was associated with increased risk of switching after 12 weeks. The mean ± standard deviation improvement in visual acuity after completing the switch to aflibercept was 3.7 ± 4.9 letters compared with the day of switching. CONCLUSIONS: The identified factors can be used to refine expectations regarding the likelihood that an eye will meet protocol criteria to switch to aflibercept when treatment is initiated with bevacizumab. Older patients are more likely to be switched. At 12 weeks, thicker CST was predictive of eyes most likely to be switched in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Bevacizumab , Retinopatia Diabética , Substituição de Medicamentos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/fisiopatologia , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the effectiveness and complications of periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitic macular edema. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in December 2021 and a post-assessment search was conducted in March 2023. The searches were limited to articles published in English and no date restrictions were imposed. The combined searches yielded 739 citations; 53 articles were selected for inclusion because the studies (1) evaluated periocular corticosteroid injection, intraocular corticosteroid injection or implant, suprachoroidal corticosteroid injection, or a combination thereof for uveitic macular edema; (2) had outcomes that included visual acuity (VA) or macular edema assessed clinically or imaged by OCT or fluorescein angiography; and (3) included more than 20 patients. RESULTS: This assessment reviewed 23 articles that provided level I or level II evidence from 18 studies on the use of periocular, suprachoroidal, and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants or inserts in noninfectious uveitic macular edema. These reports consistently demonstrated that all investigated periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies improved VA, macular structure, or both. One comparative study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and the dexamethasone intravitreal implant had effectiveness superior to that of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for these outcomes. As a group, the studies highlighted the potential for these therapies to elevate intraocular pressure and to accelerate cataract formation. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature provides high-quality evidence that periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies are effective and safe for the treatment of noninfectious uveitic macular edema. However, information on the relative effectiveness and complication rates across the different therapies is limited. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Evaluate the differences between clinical visual acuity (VA) as recorded in medical records and electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (eETDRS) protocol VA measurements and factors affecting the size of the differences. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Study and fellow eyes of participants enrolled in DRCR Retina Network Protocols AC and AE (diabetic macular edema), and W (nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy) with clinical VA recorded within 3 months before the protocol visit. METHODS: Differences and their association with patient and ocular factors were evaluated using linear mixed models with random effects for correlations within sites and participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Difference between VA letter scores measured by eETDRS during a study visit versus measured by Snellen during a regular clinical visit (Snellen fraction converted to eETDRS). RESULTS: Data from 1016 eyes (511 participants) across 74 sites were analyzed. The mean VA measurements were 68.6 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/50) at the clinical visit and 76.3 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/32) at the protocol visit, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 26 (21) days between visits. Mean (SD) protocol VA was better than clinical VA by 7.6 (9.6) letters overall, 10.7 (12.6) letters in eyes with clinical VA ≤ 20/50 (n = 376), and 5.8 (6.6) letters in eyes with clinical VA ≥ 20/40 (n = 640). On average, the difference between clinical and protocol VA was 1.3 letters smaller for every 1-line (5 letters) increase in clinical VA (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) differences by clinical correction of refractive error were 3.9 (9.0) letters with refraction, 6.9 (9.2) letters with glasses/contact lenses, 7.9 (11.5) letters with pinhole, and 9.8 (9.3) letters without correction (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: On average, clinical Snellen VA is 1 to 2 lines worse than eETDRS protocol refraction and VA testing, which may partly explain why clinical practice does not always replicate clinical trial results. Eyes with lower clinical measurements and eyes tested without clinical refraction tended to have larger differences. Considering the potential discrepancies between clinical and protocol VA measurements, refracting eyes in the clinic may benefit patients when determining treatment plans and study referrals based on vision. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade Visual , Retina , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Injeções IntravítreasRESUMO
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is ubiquitously used to estimate survival probabilities for time-to-event data. It is nonparametric, and thus does not require specification of a survival distribution, but it does assume that the risk set at any time t consists of independent observations. This assumption does not hold for data from paired organ systems such as occur in ophthalmology (eyes) or otolaryngology (ears), or for other types of clustered data. In this article, we estimate marginal survival probabilities in the setting of clustered data, and provide confidence limits for these estimates with intra-cluster correlation accounted for by an interval-censored version of the Clayton-Oakes model. We develop a goodness-of-fit test for general bivariate interval-censored data and apply it to the proposed interval-censored version of the Clayton-Oakes model. We also propose a likelihood ratio test for the comparison of survival distributions between two groups in the setting of clustered data under the assumption of a constant between-group hazard ratio. This methodology can be used both for balanced and unbalanced cluster sizes, and also when the cluster size is informative. We compare our test to the ordinary log rank test and the Lin-Wei (LW) test based on the marginal Cox proportional Hazards model with robust standard errors obtained from the sandwich estimator. Simulation results indicate that the ordinary log rank test over-inflates type I error, while the proposed unconditional likelihood ratio test has appropriate type I error and higher power than the LW test. The method is demonstrated in real examples from the Sorbinil Retinopathy Trial, and the Age-Related Macular Degeneration Study. Raw data from these two trials are provided.
Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética , Humanos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Análise de Sobrevida , Simulação por Computador , Funções VerossimilhançaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and intravitreal corticosteroid pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Literature searches were last conducted on May 13, 2020, in the PubMed database with no date restrictions and limited to articles published in English. The combined searches yielded 230 citations, of which 108 were reviewed in full text. Of these, 31 were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: Only the 21 articles with level I evidence were included in this assessment. Seventeen articles provided level I evidence for 1 or more anti-VEGF pharmacotherapies, including ranibizumab (14), aflibercept (5), and bevacizumab (2) alone or in combination with other treatments for DME. Level I evidence was identified in 7 articles on intravitreal corticosteroid therapy for treatment of DME: triamcinolone (1), dexamethasone (4), and fluocinolone acetonide (2). CONCLUSIONS: Review of the available literature indicates that intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids are efficacious treatments for DME. Elevated intraocular pressure and cataract progression are important potential complications of corticosteroid therapy. Further evidence is required to assess the comparative efficacy of these therapies. Given the limited high-quality comparative efficacy data, choice of therapy must be individualized for each patient and broad therapeutic access for patients is critical to maximize outcomes.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Academias e Institutos/normas , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Tratamento Farmacológico , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/fisiopatologia , Oftalmologia/organização & administração , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
SIGNIFICANCE: Moderate to high uncorrected hyperopia in preschool children is associated with amblyopia, strabismus, reduced visual function, and reduced literacy. Detecting significant hyperopia during screening is important to allow children to be followed for development of amblyopia or strabismus and implementation of any needed ophthalmic or educational interventions. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of two automated screening devices to identify preschool children with moderate to high hyperopia. METHODS: Children in the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) study were screened with the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, Inc., Melville, NY) and Plusoptix Power Refractor II (Plusoptix, Nuremberg, Germany) and examined by masked eye care professionals to detect the targeted conditions of amblyopia, strabismus, or significant refractive error, and reduced visual acuity. Significant hyperopia (American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus definition of hyperopia as an amblyopia risk factor), based on cycloplegic retinoscopy, was >4.00 D for age 36 to 48 months and >3.50 D for age older than 48 months. Referral criteria from VIP for each device and from a distributor (PediaVision) for the Power Refractor II were applied to screening results. RESULTS: Among 1430 children, 132 children had significant hyperopia in at least one eye. Using the VIP referral criteria, sensitivities for significant hyperopia were 80.3% for the Retinomax and 69.7% for the Power Refractor II (difference, 10.6%; 95% confidence interval, 7.0 to 20.5%; P = .04); specificities relative to any targeted condition were 89.9 and 89.1%, respectively. Using the PediaVision referral criteria for the Power Refractor, sensitivity for significant hyperopia was 84.9%; however, specificity relative to any targeted condition was 78.3%, 11.6% lower than the specificity for the Retinomax. Analyses using the VIP definition of significant hyperopia yielded results similar to when the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus definition was used. DISCUSSION: When implementing vision screening programs for preschool children, the potential for automated devices that use eccentric photorefraction to either miss detecting significant hyperopia or increase false-positive referrals must be taken into consideration.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Hiperopia , Erros de Refração , Estrabismo , Seleção Visual , Ambliopia/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Oftalmopatias Hereditárias , Humanos , Hiperopia/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estrabismo/diagnóstico , Seleção Visual/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine effect of omega-3 supplementation on conjunctival cell HLA-DR expression and tear concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α in dry eye disease patients in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive a daily dose of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids (ω3) or refined olive oil (placebo) for 12 months. At baseline, 6 and 12 months, HLA-DR expression in conjunctival total, epithelial, and white blood cells and cytokine concentration in tears were determined. Differences in change from baseline between treatment groups were assessed using generalized estimating equations (HLA-DR) or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (cytokines). RESULTS: No differences were observed in HLA-DR expression in total, epithelial, or white blood cells between ω3 and placebo groups at 6 months (n=435) or 12 months (n=436). The median concentration percent change differed between ω3 and placebo groups at 6 months for IL-6 (-36.6 vs. 24.5%, P =0.02, n=75) and for IL-8 (3.7% vs. 72.6%, P =0.02, n=68); at 12 months, they did not differ ( P ≥0.18). No other differences between the treatment groups were detected. CONCLUSIONS: ω3 supplementation did not consistently affect ocular inflammatory status as measured by the frequency of HLA-DR expressing conjunctival cells or tear cytokines.
Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Antígenos HLA-DR , Túnica Conjuntiva/patologia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Antígenos HLA-DR/metabolismo , Humanos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease is a common chronic condition that is characterized by ocular discomfort and visual disturbances that decrease quality of life. Many clinicians recommend the use of supplements of n-3 fatty acids (often called omega-3 fatty acids) to relieve symptoms. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease to receive a daily oral dose of 3000 mg of fish-derived n-3 eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids (active supplement group) or an olive oil placebo (placebo group). The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in the score on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity), which was based on the mean of scores obtained at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included mean changes per eye in the conjunctival staining score (ranging from 0 to 6) and the corneal staining score (ranging from 0 to 15), with higher scores indicating more severe damage to the ocular surface, as well as mean changes in the tear break-up time (seconds between a blink and gaps in the tear film) and the result on Schirmer's test (length of wetting of paper strips placed on the lower eyelid), with lower values indicating more severe signs. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were assigned to the active supplement group and 186 to the placebo group; the primary analysis included 329 and 170 patients, respectively. The mean change in the OSDI score was not significantly different between the active supplement group and the placebo group (-13.9 points and -12.5 points, respectively; mean difference in change after imputation of missing data, -1.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.0 to 1.1; P=0.21). This result was consistent across prespecified subgroups. There were no significant differences between the active supplement group and the placebo group in mean changes from baseline in the conjunctival staining score (mean difference in change, 0.0 points; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.1), corneal staining score (0.1 point; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.4), tear break-up time (0.2 seconds; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.5), and result on Schirmer's test (0.0 mm; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.9). At 12 months, the rate of adherence to treatment in the active supplement group was 85.2%, according to the level of n-3 fatty acids in red cells. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with dry eye disease, those who were randomly assigned to receive supplements containing 3000 mg of n-3 fatty acids for 12 months did not have significantly better outcomes than those who were assigned to receive placebo. (Funded by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health; DREAM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02128763 .).
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/uso terapêutico , Ceratoconjuntivite Seca/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Azeite de Oliva/efeitos adversos , Azeite de Oliva/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of dry eye disease (DED) severity with work productivity and activity impairment. DESIGN: Longitudinal, observational study within a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: People with moderate to severe DED who enrolled in the multicenter Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study. METHODS: Participants completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire at 0, 6, and 12 months and were assessed in parallel for symptoms and signs (conjunctival and corneal staining, tear film break-up time [TBUT], and Schirmer test) of DED. Associations of work productivity and activity impairment with symptom and signs were evaluated with linear regression models using generalized estimating equations and controlling for demographics and comorbidities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Work productivity (employment, absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment) and activity impairment. RESULTS: Among 535 participants at baseline, 279 (52%) were employed, and mean activity impairment was 24.5%. Among those employed, the mean score was 2% for absenteeism, 18% for presenteeism, and 19.6% for overall work impairment. Higher Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) symptom scores were associated with greater absenteeism, presenteeism, and activity impairment. Overall work impairment and activity impairment were greater by 4.3% and 4.8%, respectively, per 10-unit difference in OSDI score (P < 0.001). Longitudinal increases (worsening) in OSDI scores were associated with increasing impairment in work and non-work-related activity: 2.0% and 3.1% per 10 units in OSDI, respectively (P < 0.01). Worse corneal staining and TBUT were associated with higher overall work impairment and activity level (P ≤ 0.04). However, longitudinal changes in these two signs were not associated with changes in work productivity or activity impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Worse symptoms of DED are associated with decreased work productivity and activity level, both cross-sectionally (interindividually) and longitudinally within person (intraindividually). Corneal staining and TBUT are associated with interindividual differences but not intraindividual changes in work productivity and activity impairment.
Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Desempenho Profissional/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Síndromes do Olho Seco/fisiopatologia , Síndromes do Olho Seco/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed at the time of cataract extraction. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing MIGS procedures may provide insight into patient selection. This study evaluates racial-ethnic and other differences in the use of MIGS in persons with cataract and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry data. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 40 years with a diagnosis of OAG and no history of MIGS or cataract surgery who were undergoing cataract extraction, with or without MIGS, during 2013 to 2017 in the United States. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variables assessed include age, sex, race-ethnicity, disease severity, insurance type, census region, comorbidity, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR). RESULTS: The odds of MIGS use was greater among patients who were aged ≥ 60 years (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]); Black (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.07-1.15]) compared with White; a Medicare recipient (OR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10-1.15]) versus privately insured; or in the Midwest (OR, 1.32 [CI, 1.28-1.36]) or Northeast (OR, 1.26 [CI, 1.22-1.30]) compared with the South. Having moderate rather than mild glaucoma (OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.04-1.11]) and a higher CDR (OR for 0.5 to 0.8 vs. <0.5, 1.24 [CI, 1.21-1.26]; OR for >0.8 to 1.0 vs. <0.5, 1.27 [CI, 1.23-1.32]) were also each associated with increased odds of MIGS use. Use of MIGS was less likely in women (OR, 0.96 [CI, 0.94-0.98]); patients taking 5 to 7 glaucoma medications (OR, 0.94 [CI, 0.90-0.99]) compared with 1 to 2 medications; and patients with severe, compared with mild, glaucoma (OR, 0.64 [CI, 0.61-0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns. Such data can be used to assess the long-term performance of MIGS and other procedures in various patient populations.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Corpo Ciliar/cirurgia , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/epidemiologia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Sistema de Registros , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) in eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with and without full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN: Two multicenter (28 sites) studies: a randomized clinical trial comparing PVL with observation (sham injection) for VMT without FTMH (Protocol AG) and a single-arm study assessing PVL for FTMH (Protocol AH). PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adults with central VMT (vitreomacular adhesion was ≤3000 µm). In Protocol AG, visual acuity (VA) was 20/32 to 20/400. In Protocol AH, eyes had a FTMH (≤250 µm at the narrowest point) and VA of 20/25 to 20/400. METHODS: Pneumatic vitreolysis using perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central VMT release at 24 weeks (Protocol AG) and FTMH closure at 8 weeks (Protocol AH). RESULTS: From October 2018 through February 2020, 46 participants were enrolled in Protocol AG, and 35 were enrolled in Protocol AH. Higher than expected rates of retinal detachment and tear resulted in early termination of both protocols. Combining studies, 7 of 59 eyes (12% [95% CI, 6%-23%]; 2 eyes in Protocol AG, 5 eyes in Protocol AH) that received PVL developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n = 6) or retinal tear (n = 1). At 24 weeks in Protocol AG, 18 of 23 eyes in the PVL group (78%) versus 2 of 22 eyes in the sham group (9%) achieved central VMT release without rescue vitrectomy (adjusted risk difference, 66% [95% CI, 44%-88%]; P< 0.001). The mean change in VA from baseline at 24 weeks was 6.7 letters in the PVL group and 6.1 letters in the sham group (adjusted difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -6.1 to 4.5]; P = 0.77). In Protocol AH, 10 of 35 eyes (29% [95% CI, 16%-45%]) achieved FTMH closure without rescue vitrectomy at 8 weeks. The mean change in VA from baseline at 8 weeks was -1.5 letters (95% CI, -10.3 to 7.3 letters). CONCLUSIONS: In most eyes with VMT, PVL induced hyaloid release. In eyes with FTMH, PVL resulted in hole closure in approximately one third of eyes. These studies were terminated early because of safety concerns related to retinal detachments and retinal tears.
Assuntos
Fluorocarbonos/farmacologia , Acuidade Visual , Vitrectomia/métodos , Corpo Vítreo/cirurgia , Descolamento do Vítreo/cirurgia , Idoso , Meios de Contraste/farmacologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Perfurações Retinianas/diagnóstico , Perfurações Retinianas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Corpo Vítreo/diagnóstico por imagem , Descolamento do Vítreo/diagnósticoRESUMO
Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is characteristic of Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2), but less is known about SNHL in nonsyndromic autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP) and olfaction in USH2A-associated retinal degeneration. The Rate of Progression of USH2A-related Retinal Degeneration (RUSH2A) is a natural history study that enrolled 127 participants, 80 with USH2 and 47 with ARRP. Hearing was measured by pure-tone thresholds and word recognition scores, and olfaction by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). SNHL was moderate in 72% of USH2 participants and severe or profound in 25%, while 9% of ARRP participants had moderate adult-onset SNHL. Pure-tone thresholds worsened with age in ARRP but not in USH2 participants. The degree of SNHL was not associated with other participant characteristics in either USH2 or ARRP. Median pure-tone thresholds in ARRP participants were significantly higher than the normative population (p < 0.001). Among 14 USH2 participants reporting newborn hearing screening results, 7 reported passing. Among RUSH2A participants, 7% had mild microsmia and 5% had moderate or severe microsmia. Their mean (±SD) UPSIT score was 35 (±3), similar to healthy controls (34 [±3]; p = 0.39). Olfaction differed by country (p = 0.02), but was not significantly associated with clinical diagnosis, age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking status, visual measures, or hearing. Hearing loss in USH2A-related USH2 did not progress with age. ARRP patients had higher pure-tone thresholds than normal. Newborn hearing screening did not identify all USH2A-related hearing loss. Olfaction was not significantly worse than normal in participants with USH2A-related retinal degeneration.
Assuntos
Proteínas da Matriz Extracelular/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/genética , Retinose Pigmentar/genética , Síndromes de Usher/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Linhagem , Degeneração Retiniana/diagnóstico , Degeneração Retiniana/genética , Degeneração Retiniana/patologia , Retinose Pigmentar/diagnóstico , Retinose Pigmentar/patologia , Olfato/genética , Síndromes de Usher/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Usher/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine associations between beta-peripapillary atrophy (B-PPA) and incidence and growth of geographic atrophy (GA) in eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT). METHODS: We included 245 cases with incident GA and 245 controls matched by baseline demographics and characteristics associated with development of GA in the CATT. Baseline color images were graded for the type of B-PPA, defined as presence of hypopigmentation with visible choroidal vessels and sclera that is adjacent to the optic disk. Beta-peripapillary atrophy was further classified as scleral ring, sclera, sclera/choroidal blood vessels, or combination. Areas of each type of B-PPA and the circumferential extent of B-PPA were measured. RESULTS: Beta-peripapillary atrophy was present in 58% of eyes developing GA and in 52% without GA (P = 0.17). The greater circumferential extent of sclera/choroidal blood vessels B-PPA in relation to the optic disk was associated with incident GA (P = 0.02) and the GA size at first observation (P = 0.047). Beta-peripapillary atrophy was not associated with GA growth rates (P>0.05). Patients without B-PPA had a higher number of GA-associated risk alleles of ARMS2 (P = 0.0003) and HTRA1 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The extent of sclera/choroidal blood vessel B-PPA was associated with the GA incidence and size but not with the growth rate in eyes treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Beta-peripapillary atrophy and GA may share some common pathophysiologic pathways unrelated to the GA-associated risk alleles evaluated.
Assuntos
Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Atrofia Geográfica/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Seguimentos , Atrofia Geográfica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Degeneração Macular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine associations of systemic medications with the incidence and growth of geographic atrophy (GA) in participants of the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. METHODS: Participants of comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials with new untreated choroidal neovascularization in the study eye (one study eye per participant) were randomized to receive treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Participants were released from clinical trial treatment at 2 years and examined at approximately 5 years. Color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms taken at baseline, Years 1, 2, and 5 were assessed for the presence and size of GA by two masked graders. Participants were interviewed about systemic medication use at baseline. Systemic medications previously reported to be associated with age-related macular degeneration were evaluated for associations with GA incidence in study eye using univariable and multivariable Cox models and for association with the GA growth using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis of 1,011 study eyes without baseline GA, systemic medications, including cholinesterase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, aspirin, steroids, statins, hormone replacement therapy, antacids, and drugs targeting G protein-coupled receptors, were not associated with GA incidence in the study eye (all adjusted hazard ratios ≤1.86, P ≥ 0.18). In multivariable analysis of 214 study eyes with longitudinal GA size measurements, calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher GA growth rate (0.40 vs. 0.30 mm/year, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: None of the systemic medications analyzed were associated with GA incidence. However, calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher growth rate of GA in the study eye.
Assuntos
Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Atrofia Geográfica/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Atrofia Geográfica/diagnóstico , Atrofia Geográfica/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções Intravítreas , Degeneração Macular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: Omega-3 (n-3) fatty acid supplementation is used to treat systemic inflammatory diseases, but the role of n-3 in the pathophysiology and therapy of dry eye disease (DED) is not definitive. We evaluated the relationship of systemic n-3 levels with signs and symptoms at baseline in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study. METHODS: Blood samples from participants at baseline were analyzed for n-3 and n-6, measured as relative percentage by weight among all fatty acids in erythrocytes. Symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Signs including conjunctival staining, corneal staining, tear breakup time (TBUT), and Schirmer's test with anesthesia were also evaluated. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the systemic n-3 levels and DED symptoms. When the associations with signs of DED were assessed, lower DHA levels were associated with higher conjunctival staining, with mean scores of 3.31, 2.96, and 2.82 for low, medium, and high levels of DHA, respectively (linear trend P=0.007). None of the other signs were associated with DHA or the other measures of n-3. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have found varying results on the role of n-3 supplementation with the signs and symptoms of DED. Among patients with DED enrolled in the DREAM Study, lower systemic n-3 levels were not associated with worse symptoms and most signs of DED.
Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Túnica Conjuntiva , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , LágrimasRESUMO
Purpose: To review the clinical features and treatment-associated outcomes of primary orbital melanoma among cases reported in the literature and to present a case treated with orbital exenteration and post-operative radiotherapy.Methods: Case reports and case series on primary orbital melanoma published in the literature between 1980 and 2020 were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, presenting ocular symptoms, diagnostic imaging, histology, management, and outcomes.Results: Eighty-eight cases of primary orbital melanoma were reviewed. The average age at presentation was 45 years and 58% of patients were male. The most common presenting symptoms and signs were proptosis (73%), decreased visual acuity (32%), pain (14%), diplopia (15%), and palpable mass (9%). Imaging frequently showed a well-circumscribed enhancing lesion. Diagnosis was made by histology in all cases, and orbital blue nevus was identified in 42%. In the majority of cases, treatment consisted of orbital exenteration (54%) or excision (38%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 47% of cases. For the 72 patients with reported outcomes, 36% had metastases, 15% had local recurrence, and 32% died of metastatic disease. Patients who received surgery and radiotherapy had improved survival compared to those who received surgery alone (p = .01). There was no difference in survival between those who underwent orbital exenteration or excision (p = .16).Conclusions: Primary orbital melanoma is a rare malignancy and should be considered in patients with a history of unilateral proptosis and a well-defined orbital mass on imaging. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy may improve patient survival.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Nevo Azul , Neoplasias Orbitárias , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/radioterapia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Exenteração Orbitária , Neoplasias Orbitárias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Assess follow-up treatment and clinical outcomes at 5 years in eyes initially treated with anti-VEGF therapy for center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) in a 2-year randomized clinical trial. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with diabetic macular edema (DME) and visual acuity (VA) 20/32 to 20/320 enrolled in DRCR.net Protocol T with visits 5 years after randomization (3 years after Protocol T completion). METHODS: Participants were assigned randomly to aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab with protocol-defined follow-up and re-treatment for 2 years. Thereafter, participants were managed at clinician discretion and recalled for a 5-year visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, VA letter score, and central subfield thickness (CST). RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent (317/463) of eligible participants completed the 5-year visit. Between years 2 and 5, 68% (217/317) of study eyes received at least 1 anti-VEGF treatment (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 0-12). At 5 years, mean VA improved from baseline by 7.4 letters (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-9.0) but decreased by 4.7 letters (95% CI, 3.3-6.0) between 2 and 5 years. When baseline VA was 20/50 to 20/320, mean 5-year VA was 11.9 letters (95% CI, 9.3-14.5) better than baseline but 4.8 letters (95% CI, 2.5-7.0) worse than 2 years. When baseline VA was 20/32 to 20/40, mean 5-year VA was 3.2 letters (95% CI, 1.4-5.0) better than baseline but 4.6 letters (95% CI, 3.1-6.1) worse than 2 years. Mean CST decreased from baseline to 5 years by 154 µm (95% CI, 142-166) and was stable between 2 and 5 years (-1 µm; 95% CI, -12 to 9). CONCLUSIONS: Among the two-thirds of eligible Protocol T participants who completed a 5-year visit, mean VA improved from baseline to 5 years without protocol-defined treatment after follow-up ended at 2 years. Although mean retinal thickness was similar at 2 and 5 years, mean VA worsened during this period. Additional investigation into strategies to improve long-term outcomes in eyes with DME seems warranted to determine if VA can be better maintained with different management approaches.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Edema Macular/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe effects of ranibizumab and bevacizumab when administered monthly or as needed for 2 years and to describe the impact of switching to as-needed treatment after 1 year of monthly treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 1107) who were followed up during year 2 among 1185 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were enrolled in the clinical trial. INTERVENTIONS: At enrollment, patients were assigned to 4 treatment groups defined by drug (ranibizumab or bevacizumab) and dosing regimen (monthly or as needed). At 1 year, patients initially assigned to monthly treatment were reassigned randomly to monthly or as-needed treatment, without changing the drug assignment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in visual acuity. RESULTS: Among patients following the same regimen for 2 years, mean gain in visual acuity was similar for both drugs (bevacizumab-ranibizumab difference, -1.4 letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 0.8; P = 0.21). Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment (difference, -2.4 letters; 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.1; P = 0.046). The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab-as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group (drug, P = 0.0003; regimen, P < 0.0001). Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 (-2.2 letters; P = 0.03) and a lower proportion without fluid (-19%; P < 0.0001). Rates of death and arteriothrombotic events were similar for both drugs (P > 0.60). The proportion of patients with 1 or more systemic serious adverse events was higher with bevacizumab than ranibizumab (39.9% vs. 31.7%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57; P = 0.009). Most of the excess events have not been associated previously with systemic therapy targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab and bevacizumab had similar effects on visual acuity over a 2-year period. Treatment as needed resulted in less gain in visual acuity, whether instituted at enrollment or after 1 year of monthly treatment. There were no differences between drugs in rates of death or arteriothrombotic events. The interpretation of the persistence of higher rates of serious adverse events with bevacizumab is uncertain because of the lack of specificity to conditions associated with inhibition of VEGF. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.