Calculating parenteral feedings: a programmed instruction.

A programmed learning tool on how to calculate and use parenteral feedings is presented. The format includes a brief text (frame), then questions and answers about the text. The 42 frames provide the reader a step-by-step explanation of (a) when parenteral feedings are used; (b) the differences between central and peripheral administration; (c) the calculation of nutrient needs, including calories, protein, carbohydrate, fat, fluids, vitamins, and minerals; (d) the percent solutions of those nutrients available and their caloric value; (e) the calculation of the solution osmolarity; and (f) the integration of the nutrients needed into the composition of the parenteral solution for the patient. The programmed instruction gives readers the basic framework for beginning their use of parenteral nutrition.

Role of registered dietitians in dysphagia screening.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of registered dietitians to identify patients at risk for dysphagia and make appropriate diet/feeding recommendations in comparison with the speech-language pathologist, and to determine screening criteria for the registered dietitian to use for prediction of dysphagia risk. DESIGN: The dietitian and speech-language pathologist performed dysphagia screening on subjects independently through questioning and/or mealtime observation to identify signs and symptoms of dysphagia. Presence of dysphagia risk and diet/feeding recommendations were determined and results from the dietitian and speech-language pathologist were compared. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Thirty-four patients admitted during a 2-month period to a neuroscience unit at an urban teaching hospital were analyzed prospectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: kappa Statistics were used to assess agreement between the dietitian and speech-language pathologist. A kappa level of less than 0.4 indicated weak agreement, 0.4 to 0.7 indicated moderate agreement, and greater than 0.7 indicated strong agreement. Logistic regression methods were used to evaluate screening criteria as potential predictors of dysphagia risk. RESULTS: Moderate agreement (0.61) was found between the dietitian and speech-language pathologist in determination of dysphagia risk. The dietitian predicted the ability of the patient to consume an oral diet with strong agreement with the speech-language pathologist (1.0); various diet consistencies with moderate agreement (0.61); and the need for liquid restrictions with strong agreement (1.0). The most significant screening variables for prediction of dysphagia risk (P < .05) were age (P = .018), history of dysphagia (P = .042), difficulty swallowing solids (P = .0007), observed facial weakness (P < .0001), and a change in voice quality (P = .0007). Self-reported screening variables significantly related to dysphagia risk included drooling of liquids (P = .0009) and solids (P = .0080), facial weakness (P = .0006), change in voice quality (P = .0010), and prolonged eating time (P = .0157). APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Dietitians can effectively identify patients with dysphagia. Screening for dysphagia can be implemented as part of standard nutrition assessments and may aid in decreasing dysphagia-related complications.

Perceptions of clinical decision making by dietitians and physicians.

Role delineation is an ongoing process and must be evaluated within the health care team framework. The specific interactions between dietitians and physicians in the nutrition care of patients is one aspect that needs to be more clearly defined. This study examined selected practice issues by surveying physicians and dietitians to identify perceptions of ideal and actual performance. Role disparity was found between the responses of the dietitians and those of the physicians. Dietitian respondents identified themselves as the primary decision makers more than 50% of the time in all circumstances queried. In contrast, 10% or less of the MDs saw the dietitians as the primary decision makers in any area except selection of caloric supplements. In the ideal setting, the dietitian desired a greater degree of autonomy than the physician was willing to grant. Our findings were not explained by demographic differences. Perhaps faulty communication between the physician and the dietitian or unclear medical-legal issues may explain our findings of perceived role disparity.

Nutritional care of the terminally ill adult.

Nutrition and hydration options are based on many considerations that arise during the various phases of the dying process. This paper includes discussion of the psychological issues affecting intake, assessment techniques to determine whether nutrient intake is adequate, feeding suggestions for the caregiving family, and some guidelines for routine and complex care of the terminally ill adult. The ultimate goal is to improve quality of life for each terminally ill individual through a focus on patient benefit and patient care.

Practical aspects of implementing increased dietary fiber intake.

Two hundred twenty dietitians participated in a workshop conference on Health Implications of Dietary Fiber. They were given lectures to increase their knowledge base, and then in group sessions answered questions and wrote concensus opinions. The results are the content of this paper. The topics covered and responses are reported in four categories, diabetes and obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and coronary heart disease, gut function and gastrointestinal disease, and cancer. Specific recommendation for implementing high fiber diets are made in each category. However, the dietitians expressed caution on accepting all of the conclusions expressed in the literature on the value of fiber and believed much education and instruction is needed in order to increase dietary fiber intake.