Multiple Treatment Comparisons for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus about the best choice between all the options available for large and massive rotator cuff tear (mRCTs) management. OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative effectiveness of current treatment options for management of large and mRCTs. DESIGN: Network meta-analysis. SETTING: We searched the Cochrane systematic reviews, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for all trials of adults with large and mRCTs that report preoperative and postoperative functional scores after an intervention option. PATIENTS: The network meta-analysis included 20 trials with 1233 patients with 37.24 months follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Eight treatment options for management of large and mRCTs were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary effectiveness outcome was the functional score. RESULTS: This meta-analysis did not show statistically significant differences between conservative, partial repair, patch or platelet rich plasma (PRP) augmentation, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and complete repair. Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer was ranked first for effectiveness [standardized mean difference (SMD): 2.17, 0.28-4.07] and debridement ranked last (SMD: -2.15, -3.13 to -1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Latissimus dorsi transfer seems to be most effective for management of large and mRCTs, although some heterogeneity was observed in this network meta-analysis of full text reports. The choice of the operating technique depends on the patient's general health status and his expectations. When a decision has been reached to perform surgery, a repair, even if partial, should be attempted. Procedures involving biologic augmentation (eg, PRP) seem to convey no additional benefit while introducing more risk. Debridement alone should be avoided.

Relationships between radiographic parameters and spinopelvic muscles in adult spinal deformity patients.

INTRODUCTION: While the clinical impact of coronal and sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients (pts) is established, there is a paucity of data in terms of axial plane deformity and potential association between muscle degeneration and 3D deformity. The purpose of this study was to analyze spinopelvic muscles characteristics in association with the 3D deformity of ASD patients. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study; primary lumbar scoliosis patients (Cobb > 20°) were enrolled and sustained a low-dose X-rays with 3D spinal reconstructions and a fat/water separation MRI (from C7 to the knee). Volumetric 3D reconstructions and fat infiltration (FI) of 6 muscles groups were performed. Relationships between muscular data, radiographic parameters and health-related quality of life were investigated. Patients were stratified and compared based on the SRS classification, the odontoid-hip axis (ODHA) angle (> or < 6.1°) and occurrence of rotatory subluxation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled with a mean age of 60 ± 16yo and mean body mass index of 26 ± 4 kg/m2 without differences between groups. There were a moderate sagittal malalignment and a Cobb angle of 45 ± 11° (table). Muscular volume was smaller in patients with more severe deformity (p > 0.05). Pts with ODHA > 6.1° or pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis > 10° had significantly higher FI for the 6 muscular groups, patients with pelvic tilt > 20° had significantly higher FI for erector spinae, hip flexors and extensors (p < 0.05). SF36-PCS significantly correlated with the muscular volume; SRS and Oswestry disability index correlated with the erectors spinae volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study analyzed for the first time the relationship between 3D radiographic parameters and muscular characteristics in ASD. Sagittal malalignment is associated with increased FI and decreased muscle volumes with poor outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Surgical repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears seems to be a better option than patch augmentation or débridement and biceps tenotomy: a prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study compared the outcomes after 3 different treatments for large and massive rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears were prospectively included. Patients were allocated in 3 groups: (1) arthroscopic complete repair (repair group), (2) open repair and xenograft patch augmentation (patch group), and (3) arthroscopic débridement and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps (débridement group). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was the Constant-Murley score. RESULTS: The study included 32 consecutive patients. The mean improvement in the Constant-Murley score was +29.1 for the repair group (P < .01), +32.2 for the patch group (P < .01), and +20.1 for the débridement group (P < .01) at the final follow-up examination. No differences were found between the repair and patch groups, but the difference became significant between the débridement group and the patch group (P < .001) and also between the débridement group and the repair group (P < .002) at 12 months and the final follow-up. Moreover, 5 complications occurred in 11 patients in the patch group, whereas there was only 1 complication in the repair group and no complications in the débridement group. CONCLUSION: The use of porcine dermis patches to augment repairs of massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears is not recommended because there is no benefit compared with repair without augmentation and patches result in more complications.

Single-use instrumentation in posterior lumbar fusion could decrease incidence of surgical site infection: a prospective bi-centric study.

PURPOSE: Single-use surgical instruments were recently introduced to improve OR efficiency and reduce infection risks. This study aimed to investigate clinical results 1 year after instrumented lumbar fusion, with the aid of single-use surgical instruments, with particular attention to surgical site infection and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHOD: This prospective bi-centric study included 21 men and 28 women, aged 61.6 ± 12.8 years, that underwent short instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease, canal stenosis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, using the SteriSpine™ PS Pedicle Screw System, available in multiple traceable sterile kits. RESULTS: Instrumented fusion was performed at one level in 31, two levels in 11, three levels in 5, and four levels in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 16.4 ± 2.1 months, during which the ODI improved by 20 or more points in 28 patients (57 %), improved by less than 20 points in 17 patients (35 %), and remained unchanged or worsened in 4 patients (8 %). Only one infection (2 %) was observed in a 60-year-old man with previous spine surgery and two additional risk factors (diabetes mellitus and BMI 38). Compared to an older series, using reusable instrumentation, performed by the same team for the same indications, the clinical outcomes were similar but the infection rate was 6 %. DISCUSSION: Single-use instrumentation could reduce the incidence of surgical site infections following lumbar fusion to acceptable levels as in hip and knee arthroplasties. The preservation of screws and rods in sterile packs until ready for insertion reduces their exposure to air-borne bacteria in the OR and eliminates their contamination through repetitive hospital sterilization. The short operation time and minimal blood loss achieved could also contribute to the reduction in infection risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective randomized bi-centric study.

Comparison of Three Grafting Options for Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective 3-Arms Case Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion achieves foraminal radicular and central medullary decompression and spinal stabilization in staged lesions. Many bone graft materials have been developed for the reconstruction of cervical lordosis and the restoration of intervertebral height after corpectomy. The PolyEtherKetoneEtherKetoneKetone (PEKEKK) is a semicrystalline thermoplastic polymer that can be reinforced with carbon fibers to create long and highly fenestrated rectangular cervical cages for corpectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological outcomes of an innovative PEKEEKK cage compared with others grafting options. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent surgery with PEKEKK cages between 2017 and 2019 at a spine institution, were matched with 15 patients with a titanium mesh cylindrical cage (TMC) and 15 patients with a tricortical structural iliac bone graft. The restoration of vertebral height and cervical lordosis postoperatively, and subsidence of the construct were evaluated. Complications were reported. RESULTS: The minimal follow-up was 5.1±2years. A better, but nonsignificant, postoperative gain in height was observed for PEKEKK (+8.1 ± 20%) and TMC cages (+8.2 ± 16%) than for iliac crest autograft reconstruction (+2.3 ± 15%, P = 0.119). The mean subsidence at the last follow-up was greater for TMC cages (-10.2 ± 13%), but was not significant, with -6.1 ± 10% for PEKEKK cages and -4.1 ± 7% for iliac crest autografts (P = 0.223). The gain in segmental cervical lordosis was significant (P < 0.001) and remained stable in all the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although an improvement in radiologic anatomical parameters can be achieved with all cage groups, the PEKEKK cage can be considered as a safe alternative for reducing subsidence.

Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) versus axillary brachial plexus block for carpal tunnel release in a French public university hospital: Care pathways and operating room costs.

INTRODUCTION: The wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is a local anesthetic technique that theoretically cuts costs and shortens surgical waiting times, but this has yet to be demonstrated in France. The main objective of this study was to assess and compare the comprehensive care pathways and costs of performing carpal tunnel release (CTR) procedures in the ambulatory surgery unit using WALANT and axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB). METHODS: A total of 72 CTRs in 66 patients were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The anesthesia was performed by an anesthesiologist after a preoperative consultation. The surgical waiting time, operating room occupancy time, total time taken off work (TOW) and the return to work rate were recorded. The estimated total direct cost per patient (TDCPP) was the sum of the specialist consultation fees, the French diagnosis-related group (DRG) rates and the minimum daily cost of TOW (€27.30/day). RESULTS: Only the total operating room occupancy time differed significantly: 27minutes for the WALANT versus 37minutes for the ABPB (p=0.004). There were no complications or reoperations in either group. The total cost for the cohort was estimated at €190,970. The mean estimated TDCPP was €2,870 for the entire cohort, €2,543 for the ABPB and €2,713 for the WALANT (p=0.791). Twenty-seven of the 45 patients returned to work after a mean TOW of 3.1 months. Fourteen CTRs were preceded by a mean preoperative TOW of 27 days, which resulted in a cost of €24,948 (13% of the total cost). There were no significant differences in TOW or revision rate between WALANT and ABPB. CONCLUSION: Although WALANT significantly reduced operating room occupancy times in our public hospital, the societal costs were the same regardless of the anesthesia technique. Reducing surgical waiting times in France could result in a theoretical saving of nearly €14 million annually. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The Anteroposterior Positioning of Viscoelastic Cervical Disc Prosthesis Does Not Alter the Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While first-generation articulated disc prostheses had an ideal positioning schematically as posterior as possible because of their geometrically determined center of rotation, the dogma may change for viscoelastic implants, whose center of rotation is free. Our hypothesis was to assess whether the anteroposterior positioning (APP) of a viscoelastic implant may influence the clinical or radiological outcomes at follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (mean age 47 years) were evaluated, with an average follow-up of 25.9 months. The primary outcome was the implants' APP on lateral radiographs. APP between 0% and 49% meant anterior centering, 50% perfect centering, and 51% to 100% posterior centering. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: anterior positioning and posterior positioning. Measurements were performed blindly to the functional outcomes. Visual analog scale for neck pain and radicular pain and the Neck Disability Index were assessed. Range of motion was measured at the last follow-up. The C2 to C7 Cobb angle and the spinocranial angle were also measured. RESULTS: The median crude offset from the vertebral endplate center was 0.4 mm (mean: 0.3 mm, Q1: -1.5 mm, Q3: 2 mm; range, -2.9 to 4 mm). The mean overall APP was 49%, 45.2% (95% CI, 43.2%-47.1%) in the anterior group, and 54.1% (95% CI, 51.4%-55.3%) in the posterior group. Fifteen patients were in the group anterior positioning and 10 in the group posterior positioning. The mean spinocranial angle was 79° preoperatively and 74° preoperatively (P = 0.04). Functional outcomes were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < 10-4). There was no significant correlation between the APP, functional outcomes, and range of motion. CONCLUSION: The APP of the CP-ESP viscoelastic disc arthroplasty does not significantly influence the clinical or radiological outcomes at follow-up. This study suggests that this type of implant tolerates greater variability in its implantation technique.

Arthroscopic approach in initial training: Study of a novice cohort using inverse direct and indirect approaches and its implication in the development of training programs.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic training includes successive stages of observation, reproduction and then repetition. Learning through simulation in 2D virtual reality makes it possible to repeat these different stages to enhance the learner's experience in complete safety and a shorter timeframe. Some procedures require inversion of the optical and instrumental approaches in the axial plane, disrupting the existing psychomotor and technical skills. The objective of this study was to compare the degree of difficulty and the distribution of results for the same exercise carried out alternately in classical holding and inverted holding of the instruments in a cohort of novice learners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two medical students, novices in arthroscopic surgery, participated in the study. Each performed an exercise consisting of grasping ten targets with arthroscopic forceps and placing them in a basket on the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator. The exercise was performed with the scope and grasping instrument pointed away from the operator, "catch the stars front" (CTSF), then directed towards the operator, "catch the stars back" (CTSB). The simulator recorded several parameters making up an overall composite score ("overall performance score", OPS) out of 120 points. Voluntary abandonment of the exercise was also collected. RESULTS: All students completed the CTSF exercise but 6 dropped out of the CTSB exercise (27%, p=0.01). In the CTSF exercise, the average OPS was higher with 45.9 points versus 22.8 points in the CTSB exercise (p<0.001). By detailing the components of the OPS score, the parameters of interest on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) module of the simulator included: the distance traveled by the scope and the grasping forceps was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the duration of the exercise was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the time spent with the instruments in the videoscopic field was significantly lower in the CTSB group (p=0.001) and finally the absence of a significant difference in the camera alignment compared to the horizontal plane between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The exercise with the instruments directed towards the operator is more difficult with a greater distribution for all the secondary criteria except for the camera alignment, which suggests that it could be more discriminating. The dropout rate is also higher. It would therefore be interesting to introduce CTSB type training in initial training programs in arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative prospective study.

Moderate relationship between function and satisfaction of total hip arthroplasty patients: a cross sectional study.

PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction regarding their hip replacement is often assumed to be directly linked to functional outcomes. We led this study to answer 2 questions: (1) what is the level of patient satisfaction, function, and quality of life after primary total hip replacement (THR); and (2) what is the relationship between patient satisfaction and functional and quality of life PROMs after THR? METHODS: We led a retrospective study using our institutional registry of prospectively and consecutively collected data on patients after primary THR undertaken between 2004 and 2017. We included 6710 patients with a complete 2-year set of follow-up data for Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (for assessing patient's function), EQ-5D (for assessing patient's quality of life) and satisfaction PROM scores. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in all OHS and EQ-5D scores from preoperative level, and the mean postoperative satisfaction score was 89/100. We found moderate positive correlations between the patients' outcome satisfaction VAS score and OHS (r = 0.665) and EQ-5D (r = 0.554). CONCLUSIONS: THR is a successful procedure generating high levels of patient function and satisfaction. Because patients' OHS and EQ-5D scores may be influenced by comorbidities, those scores are of poor predictive value in estimating patient satisfaction, and therefore should not be used as a surrogate to determine the success of the THR procedure.

Excess mortality after hip fracture during COVID-19 pandemic: More about disruption, less about virulence-Lesson from a trauma center.

To date, literature has depicted an increase in mortality among patients with hip fractures, directly related to acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and not due to underlying comorbidities. Usual orthogeriatric pathway in our Department was disrupted during the pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate early mortality within 30 days, in 2019 and 2020 in our Level 1 trauma-center. We compared two groups of patients aged >60 years, with osteoporotic upper hip fractures, in February/March/April 2020 and February/March/April 2019, in our level 1 trauma center. A total of 102 and 79 patients met the eligibility criteria in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Mortality was evaluated, merging our database with the French open database for death from the INSEE, which is prospectively updated each month. Causes of death were recorded. Charlson Comorbidity Index was evaluated for comorbidities, Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL), and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scores were assessed for autonomy. There were no differences in age, sex, fracture type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, IADL, and ADL. 19 patients developed COVID-19 infection. The 30-day survival was 97% (95% CI, 94%-100%) in 2019 and 86% (95% CI, 79%-94%) in 2020 (HR = 5, 95%CI, 1.4-18.2, p = 0.013). In multivariable Cox'PH model, the period (2019/2020) was significantly associated to the 30-day mortality (HR = 6.4, 95%CI, 1.7-23, p = 0.005) and 6-month mortality (HR = 3.4, 95%CI, 1.2-9.2, p = 0.01). COVID infection did not modify significantly the 30-day and 6-month mortality. This series brought new important information, early mortality significantly increased because of underlying disease decompensation. Minimal comprehensive care should be maintained in all circumstances in order to avoid excess of mortality among elderly population with hip fractures.

Calipered kinematic alignment technique for implanting a Medial Oxford®: A technical note.

This note describes a surgical technique to kinematically align a medial Oxford® UKA. Applying kinematic alignment principles is an alternative, personalised, physiological, and potentially clinically advantageous method for implanting the medial Oxford® UKA. Further investigations are needed to better define the reproducibility and clinical impact of this new surgical technique.

Disappointing Relationship between Functional Performance and Patient Satisfaction of UKA Patients: A Cross Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Following a Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) satisfaction is often conflated with functional outcome. Recent studies have shown that satisfaction is not linked to functional outcome. The research questions were: (1) what is the relationship between satisfaction and functional performance and quality of life (absolute and gain values) after UKA? And (2) what is the level of satisfaction, function, and quality of life after UKA? HYPOTHESIS: There is a poor relationship between functional performance and patient satisfaction following UKA. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a locally held arthroplasty register to identify patients who had undergone UKA between 2004 and 2017. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively and included EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction score (based on a visual analogue score with 0 being worst and 100 being best). Patients with a complete set of pre-operative and 2-year post-operative outcome scores were included. Patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery were excluded. 1638 patients were identified, of which 896 were eligible for inclusion. The average age was 66.7 years old, with 46.3% of patients being female. RESULTS: There was a moderate to strong correlation between the absolute or relative values for OKS and the patient satisfaction following UKA (r=0.705 and r=0.522, respectively). The average pre-operative scores improved from a median of 23 (IQR 18-28) to 43 (IQR 35-46) (p<0.001) and from a median of 0.62 (IQR 0.186-0.691) to 0.85 (IQR 0.691 - 1) (p<0.001) for OKS and EQ-5D, respectively. In terms of satisfaction with outcome, 82.6% of patients were very satisfied and 4.4% were dissatisfied (scoring ≥80% and <50%, respectively). At 2 years, the PASS was met or surpassed by 73.1% and 54.9% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively). The MCID was met or surpassed by 93% and 78% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: UKA is a successful procedure generating high levels of patient function and satisfaction. Because patients' OKS and EQ-5D scores may be influenced by comorbidities, those scores are of disappointing predictive value in estimating patient satisfaction, and therefore should not be used as a surrogate to determine the success of the UKA procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Restrospective cohort study.

Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is increasingly used to measure the success of arthroplasty. Satisfaction with the outcome of a total knee replacement (TKR) is traditionally thought to be associated with improvements in functional status and quality of life measures. This study aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the level of patient satisfaction, improvement in knee function and patient quality of life associated with mechanically aligned TKR? 2. What is the relationship between OKS, EQ-5d scores and 'outcome satisfaction'? HYPOTHESIS: TKR is associated with a significant improvement in function, satisfaction and quality of life and that there is a strong correlation between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction'. METHOD: Five thousand eight hundred and ninety six patients underwent primary TKR between January 2010 and December 2017 and had complete preoperative and 2-year follow-up data for OKS, EQ-5d and satisfaction scores. Outcomes data were collected prospectively and recorded on our institutional database. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for OKS and EQ-5d, the association between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction' was measured using regression analysis. RESULTS: The median 2-year 'outcome satisfaction' score was 90/100 with 79% of patients reporting excellent satisfaction (≥80/100) and 93.4% of patients satisfied (≥50/100). Postoperatively, median scores were 39 for OKS and 0.8 for EQ-5d. The mean increase in scores was 15.85 for OKS and 0.32 for EQ-5d. Satisfaction showed moderate positive correlation with postoperative OKS (r=0.69) and EQ-5D (0.58) scores, but weaker correlation with the change in OKS (r=0.57) and EQ-5d (r=0.32) scores from preoperative levels. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Mechanically aligned TKR is overall a successful operation responsible of fair rate of patient satisfaction. OKS and EQ-5d are imperfect predictors for satisfaction as they are significantly influenced by patients' comorbidities. This should be taken into account when evaluating the success of an operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIc; observational study (based on prospectively collected data from an institutional registry).

Treatment of lumbar canal stenosis in patients with compensated sagittal balance.

INTRODUCTION: The need to combine fusion with decompression in patients with lumbar canal stenosis is still controversial. The aim of this study was to show that isolated decompression leads to the same outcomes as decompression plus fusion in patients who have preserved global sagittal balance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort of 110 patients who were operated for a single-level lumbar stenosis was divided into two groups based on the treatment: isolated decompression or fusion-decompression. These patients had a normal odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA) (-5° to +2°) and had no spondylolisthesis or frontal deformity. We compared the clinical outcome scores and spinal-pelvic parameters preoperatively and at 1 year of follow-up. We evaluated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) corresponding to a 12.8-point difference in the Owestry Disability Index (ODI). The analysis in each group was based on the MCID. RESULTS: The clinical outcome scores improved significantly in both groups. There was a 77% decrease in the ODI>12.8 points with no significant difference between groups. The analysis based on the MCID showed that patients with a poor clinical result at 1 year in the isolated decompression group were more likely to have lumbar pain, while the ones in the fusion-decompression group were more likely to have radicular pain. CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiological results of fusion-decompression are not superior at 1 year relative to isolated decompression for treating single-level lumbar canal stenosis in patients with compensated sagittal balance. Full-spine weight bearing radiographs are key to determining the patient's sagittal balance and to ensuring there are no radiological instability factors that may require a stabilizing procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective study of data collected prospectively.

Neck-sparing short femoral stems: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neck sparing short femoral stems are supposed to ease restoration of the proximal femoral anatomy and physiological hip biomechanics. This stem design is of particular interest as they have the potential to generate prosthetic hips that have higher functional performance with an improved lifespan, and revise more easily. Unlike previously published meta-analysis, this meta-analysis was initiated to determine if neck sparing short femoral stems compared to conventional stems: (1) resulted in improved functional performance; (2) reduced risk of thigh pain; (3) reduced risk of reoperation/revision, and 4) reduced stress shielding related bone loss in the proximal femur. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature databases were searched between 1st January 2005 and 30th March 2019. The primary search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Open Grey, Trip Pro, Evidence Search, and Cochrane. Eligible studies were assessed for homogeneity, with continuous outcomes expressed as standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval and dichotomous data as odds-ratio with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Ten randomised clinical trials were eligible; these trials included 1259 total hip arthroplasty procedures, inclusive of 616 neck sparing short stems and 643 conventional stems. We were not able to find a significant functional advantage of using neck sparing short stems based on Harris Hip scores (0.0850; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.20 [p=0.40]) and WOMAC scores (-0.0605; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.15 [p=0.87]). We found a trend in favour of neck sparing short stems to reduce the risk of thigh pain but this was non significant (odds ratio of 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.43 [p=0.178]). Neck sparing short stems were associated with similar early- to mid-term dislocation and revision rates compared to conventional stems with odds ratio of 1.435 (95% CI: 0.545 to 3.780 [p=0.968]) and of 0.581 (95% CI: 0.220 to 1.532 [p=0.972]), respectively. Neck sparing short stems were found to have less bone loss in both Gruen zones 1 and 7 (3.324; 95% CI: -7.683 to 1.036 [p<0.001], and of -4.632; 95% CI: -9682 to 0.418 [p<0.001], respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Neck sparing short femoral stems achieve excellent early to mid-term outcomes in both clinical and radiological outcome scores that are in keeping with conventional stems functionally. Hitherto, results from this meta-analysis suggest that neck-sparing stems may achieve better maintenance of bone mineral density than their conventional counterparts, in addition to fewer cases of thigh pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I; meta-analysis.

Hip resurfacing generates a more physiological gait than total hip replacement: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of the constitutional joint anatomy after hip replacement favours physiological peri-articular soft-tissue tension and kinematics, and is likely to be functionally beneficial. Hip resurfacing (HR) and conventional total hip replacement (THR) are two different options for replacing degenerated hips, and are likely to result in different anatomical reconstruction. We initiated this study to investigate the differences in gait performance between these two prosthetic options, and aimed to answer the following questions: (1) does HR result in better restoration of the frontal hip anatomical parameters, (2) and generate a more physiological gait compared to THR? (3) Does the quality of the anatomical restoration after THR influence gait performance? HYPOTHESES: Our hypothesis was that a better anatomical restoration using HR versus THR would produce more physiological (symmetric) gait. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients who had unilateral primary osteoarthritis successfully treated by replacement (40 THRs and 12 HRs). Hip anatomical parameters were measured on standing pelvic radiographs on both the prosthetic and the contralateral healthy hips. Patients undertook gait assessment under both normal and stress conditions at a mean follow-up of 14 months (7 to 16 months). Gait performances were compared between HR and THR, and the relationship between gait performances and quality of frontal anatomical restoration (estimated on radiograph) were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to the native contralateral side, the HR procedure tended to decrease all independent anatomical radiographic parameters with the exception of the vertical centre of rotation offset, whilst the THR procedure tended to increase them; the difference between HR and THR was only statistically significant for femoral offset and global horizontal offset (increased after THR while reduced after HR). Only 50% of THR and 25% of HR procedures closely anatomically (±15%) recreated both global horizontal offset and global vertical offset. Under normal conditions (normal walking speed and flat ramp), the gait was fairly symmetric for both the HR and the THR patients with a symmetry index of 0.62% and 3.14% respectively. At high walking speed (stress conditions), the symmetry index degraded for both groups, but the gait remained more symmetric in the HR group (2.09%), compared to the THR group (5.74%); nevertheless, the difference remained not statistically significant (p=0.159). We were unable to detect any significant relationship between gait performances and radiographically measured hip frontal anatomical parameters. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: HR procedure is more consistent than conventional THR in generating a more physiological gait under stress conditions. Radiographic estimation of the quality of the frontal anatomical hip restoration is of poor value to predict gait performances of THR patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III - retrospective case-control study with prospective data collection.

Partial ulnar nerve transfer to the branch of the long head of the triceps to recover elbow extension in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsy.

Elbow flexion is the first goal in upper partial brachial plexus palsy treatment. However, elbow extension is essential for daily living activities. To recover this function, one fascicle of ulnar nerve can be transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps, but this procedure has been previously published in only two patients. The goal of our study is to assess a larger series of transfers of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps to help patients recover elbow extension. Ten male patients with C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus injuries underwent operation. For shoulder recovery, we transferred the spinal accessory nerve and rhomboid nerve. For elbow flexion, one fascicle of median nerve was transferred to the nerve of the biceps. For elbow extension, we transferred one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Tendon transfers were performed for wrist and finger extension. Nine patients recovered M4 elbow flexion and extension. One patient had M3 elbow extension and flexion. Average active shoulder elevation was 85° and average active shoulder external rotation was 65° All patients recovered finger and wrist extension. The classical techniques of grafts or phrenic or intercostal nerve transfers to recover elbow extension are not always reliable, according to the literature. Because the harvested ulnar nerve motor fascicle is close to the branch of the long head of the triceps, the recovery time for this procedure is shorter than that of other described nerve transfers. The isolated recovery of the reinnervated long head of the triceps muscle excludes spontaneous recovery occasionally noted in upper root plexus injuries. The transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps is reliable for active elbow extension recovery in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsies.

Correlation between students' and trainers' evaluations while learning delegated surgical procedures: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The delegation of procedures within the medical competence to the nurses can increase the effectiveness of the healthcare provided. The objectives of the study are (1) to assess the quality of training courses for delegated surgical procedures through implementation for graduate scrub nursing ("students") (2) and to evaluate the correlation between the evaluation of this training carried out by students and the self-assessment conducted by the faculty ("trainers"). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We set up a 49-h training for five groups of 10 students from July 2016 to July 2017 in our tertiary academic hospital. The course consisted mostly in simulations based on the "Zwisch" model and focused on acquiring the control of the gesture as well as on the development of critical reasoning. An evaluation of the training by the students but also a self-assessment of trainers were prospectively collected using the SFDP26 questionnaire. RESULTS: 52 active scrub nursing students and 21 trainers were included. 96% of students and 86% of trainers evaluated the training from "good" to "very good". Progress was observed for 41 (79%) of the students and 18 (86%) of the trainers, and 98% of students felt able to put their new skills into clinical practice after training. There was no difference between the total scores of students and teachers (p = 0.153). A statistically significant difference between the evaluations produced by the students and the self-evaluations produced by the trainers was observed for 8 of the 26 items of assessment. In case of inadequacy, the trainers' scores were always lower than those of the students. CONCLUSIONS: Training in performing delegated surgical procedures by mixed cognitive and motor gestures learning, based on the development of critical thinking and simulations seems to be effective, with a significant improvement in students' knowledge and skills. Expectations of students and trainers are well correlated.

Modern cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the alternative surgical techniques that consider the dynamic aspect of the acetabular orientation when aligning a cup (pelvic tilt-, lumbo-pelvic kinematics-, and spine-hip relationship-adjusted cup alignment techniques). METHOD: Eight eligible articles reported the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with alternative techniques. Clinical and radiological data were extracted. One study had a control group of patients who underwent conventional THAs (level III) while the seven other studies were level IV. Computer navigation system (CAS), Optimized Positioning System (OPS™), and manual instrumentation were used to align components in four, two, and two studies, respectively. A meta-analysis was not carried out because there was a lack of homogeneity between included articles regarding the method to position the cup and the nature of the reported data. RESULTS: THA performed with alternative techniques had an early dislocation rate ranging from 0 to 1.9%, no unexpected catastrophic failure, and acceptable radiographic cup orientations. One study compared kinematically and mechanically aligned THAs and found no dislocation in either groups, similar patient reported outcome measures (43 Oxford-12 Score for both groups), and similar proportions of cup in the Lewinnek zone (respectively 65% and 70%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Alternative methods accounting for the functional acetabular orientation seem to be clinically safe and effective in the early-term, and generate acceptable cup orientation on radiographs. Their values compare to those of more conventional techniques for cup implantation remain to be determined. We developed a classification of the multiple methods for aligning an acetabular component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Kinematic alignment technique for medial OXFORD UKA: An in-silico study.

BACKGROUND: Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) Oxford™ components are recommended to be systematically and mechanically aligned (MA) for restoring the constitutional lower-limb alignment. Good long-term clinical outcomes have been generated with the medially implanted MA Oxford™, but some sub-optimal biomechanical-related complications still remain. Kinematic Alignment (KA) is a personalised technique for anatomically and kinematically implanting components (total knee, fixed bearing partial knee, total hip) aimed at creating more physiological prosthetic joint biomechanics. Interestingly, for decades the principles for implanting fixed bearing UKA components were consistent with those promoted by the KA technique, but differently formulated. We initiated this computational study to assess the feasibility of this technique with the Oxford™ components, as we thought this more anatomical implantation may be clinically advantageous. HYPOTHESIS: We surmised that kinematically aligning the Oxford™ medial UKA would maximise the prosthesis-bone interface through maximising the implants' size used (question 1), and alter, within an acceptable limit, the components' orientation (question 2) compared to conventional mechanical alignment. METHODS: A cohort of 40 consecutive medial osteoarthritic knee patients scheduled for UKA had a preoperative CT scan that was segmented to create 3D knee bone models. MA and KA of medial UKA Oxford® components (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) were simulated. Component sizing and positioning were compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: We found no difference in component size, but significantly fewer occurrences of borderline fit with the KA simulation. KA technique oriented the femoral component 3.6° more valgus (from 1° varus to 7° valgus) and the tibial component 2.9° more varus (from 8° varus to 0°) compared to the MA technique. The tibial component slope in KA simulation was 6.4° posterior (from 0 to 12°) compared to a systematic 7° posterior for MA positioning. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Kinematic alignment of the medial Oxford™ generated a different, albeit still acceptable (Oxford group recommendations), implant orientation, in addition to a likely better shape-fit between components and the supportive bone cut, compared to the MA technique. The potential to improve the implants' interaction and to restore a more physiological bone loading makes the KA of Oxford™ an attractive, potentially clinically beneficial option. Clinical investigations are needed to assess its true value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, computational study.