Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Euro Surveill ; 21(24)2016 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27336327

RESUMO

In England and Wales, meningococcal disease caused by group W has historically been associated with outbreaks of disease among travellers to high-risk countries. Following a large outbreak associated with travel to the Hajj in 2000, the number of cases declined and, in 2008, only 19 laboratory-confirmed cases were identified nationally. In 2013, in the East Midlands region of England, eight cases of meningococcal disease caused by this serogroup were recorded, compared with six from 2011 to 2012. To explore this further, data for all cases with a date of onset between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013 were collected. Data collected included geographical location, clinical presentation and outcome. Fourteen cases were identified; two died as a result of their illness and two developed long-term health problems. No commonality in terms of geographical location, shared space or activities was identified, suggesting that group W is circulating endemically with local transmission. Clinical presentation was variable. Half presented with symptoms not typical of a classical meningococcal disease, including two cases of cellulitis, which may have implications for clinicians, in terms of timely identification and treatment, and public health specialists, for offering timely antibiotic chemoprophylaxis to close contacts.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Meningocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêutico , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Viagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções Meningocócicas/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Religião e Medicina , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Infect Dis ; 211(1): 80-90, 2015 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25030060

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Administration of convalescent plasma, serum, or hyperimmune immunoglobulin may be of clinical benefit for treatment of severe acute respiratory infections (SARIs) of viral etiology. We conducted a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis to assess the overall evidence. METHODS: Healthcare databases and sources of grey literature were searched in July 2013. All records were screened against the protocol eligibility criteria, using a 3-stage process. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were undertaken. RESULTS: We identified 32 studies of SARS coronavirus infection and severe influenza. Narrative analyses revealed consistent evidence for a reduction in mortality, especially when convalescent plasma is administered early after symptom onset. Exploratory post hoc meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the pooled odds of mortality following treatment, compared with placebo or no therapy (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, .14-.45; I(2) = 0%). Studies were commonly of low or very low quality, lacked control groups, and at moderate or high risk of bias. Sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Convalescent plasma may reduce mortality and appears safe. This therapy should be studied within the context of a well-designed clinical trial or other formal evaluation, including for treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus CoV infection.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulinas/imunologia , Plasma/imunologia , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/imunologia , Humanos , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/imunologia , Risco , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/imunologia
3.
J Infect Prev ; 15(5): 182-188, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28989382

RESUMO

We audited adherence to national hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunisation policy for neonates and infants born to HBV positive mothers in two counties of England during 2007/08 to 2011/12 (n=112 in County X, n=190 in County Y). Over the five year period, 29.9% of at risk neonates in County X and 23.5% in County Y required hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) at birth. The annual median age of HBIG administration was 0.0-0.5 days. The annual median coverage and timeliness of the first (coverage range 92.3-100.0%; age of administration range 0.0-0.0 days), second (83.8-100.0%; 32.0-42.0 days), third (81.1-100.0%; 62.0-81.0 days) and fourth dose HBV immunisations (44.4-91.9%; 378.0-443.0 days) and serological testing (8.6-81.0%; 450.0-707.0 days) were calculated. Statistically significant variation was found in the coverage of third and fourth dose immunisations in County Y, age of fourth dose immunisation in County X, and the coverage and timeliness of serological testing in both counties (p < 0.05). HBIG and the first three HBV immunisations were commonly administered according to the national schedule. Fourth dose immunisations and serological tests showed poor adherence. We advocate public health interventions to improve immunisation programme outcomes and hepatitis B surface antigen testing.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA