Triggers and oncologic outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy and active surveillance after focal therapy of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Due to the tissue preserving approach of focal therapy (FT), local cancer relapse can occur. Uncertainty exists regarding triggers and outcome of salvage strategies. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) after FT for localized PCa from 2011 to 2020 at eight tertiary referral hospitals in Germany that underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (S-RP), salvage radiotherapy (S-RT) or active surveillance (AS) were reported. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) changes, suspicious lesions on mpMRI and histopathological findings on biopsy were analyzed. A multivariable regression model was created for adverse pathological findings (APF) at S-RP specimen. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine oncological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 90 men were included. Cancer relapse after FT was detected at a median of 12 months (IQR 9-16). Of 50 men initially under AS 13 received S-RP or S-RT. In total, 44 men underwent S-RP and 13 S-RT. At cancer relapse 17 men (38.6%) in the S-RP group [S-RT n = 4 (30.8%); AS n = 3 (6%)] had ISUP > 2. APF (pT ≥ 3, ISUP ≥ 3, pN + or R1) were observed in 23 men (52.3%). A higher ISUP on biopsy was associated with APF [p = 0.006 (HR 2.32, 97.5% CI 1.35-4.59)] on univariable analysis. Progression-free survival was 80.4% after S-RP and 100% after S-RT at 3 years. Secondary therapy-free survival was 41.7% at 3 years in men undergoing AS. Metastasis-free survival was 80% at 5 years for the whole cohort. CONCLUSION: With early detection of cancer relapse after FT S-RP and S-RT provide sufficient oncologic control at short to intermediate follow-up. After AS, a high secondary-therapy rate was observed.

[Onabotulium toxin A detrusor injection: The "real world" of users, the "real world" of patients - Update BOTUROLOGY 2022]. / OnabotuliumtoxinA Detrusorinjektion: Die "Real World" der Anwender, die "Real World" der Patienten ­ Update BOTUROLOGY 2022.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) has been approved in Germany since 2013 for the second-line treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder in the form of a detrusor injection (OnabotA DI) after failure of anticholinergic therapy. Until 2018, however, its application lagged far behind the demand due to billing hurdles. Since the beginning of 2018, there has been an EBM (German Uniform Evaluation Standard) approval number in Germany for the transurethral application of Botox in urology. QUESTION: The aim of a survey performed in 2019 among course participants of regular injection workshops (WS-P) in our institution was to evaluate whether billability has changed user behaviour in Germany in line with the demand. A similar survey was carried out in 2021 to show the developments over the past two years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2019, 88 consecutive participants in a user workshop that had been held regularly since 2013 were asked about their OnabotA DI practice anonymously via questionnaire. The survey was repeated in 2021 in an anonymous online survey of 55 course participants in order to evaluate changes in user behaviour over the past two years. RESULTS: Evaluation 2019: Response rate 35/88 of the questionnaires (39.8%); a large majority (82%) of the WS-P attended the workshop AFTER the establishment of the EBM code. Only 54.5% of the WS-P performed two or more (12% more than 10) OnabotA DIs per quarter after the workshop. Most users (85%) always or predominantly performed the procedure on an outpatient basis, 63% always or predominantly under local anesthesia. The majority (84%) administered no or only a perioperative antibiotic treatment, 13% for one week. 89% stated that at least 70% of their patients had no or only mild symptoms under the LA. In the 2021 evaluation, the users tended to perform the procedure more often on an outpatient basis and in LA, and more often without any antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our user survey indicate that the implementation of the OnabotA DI has gained significant impetus since the EBM approval in Germany in January 2018. In most cases, the procedure can be performed easily on an outpatient basis under local anesthesia.

Follow-Up of Men Who Have Undergone Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer with HIFU-A Real-World Experience.

PURPOSE: To determine oncological and functional outcomes and side effects after focal therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 57 consecutive patients with localised PCa. Aged 18-80 with ≤2 suspicious lesions on mpMRI (PIRADS ≥ 3), PSA of ≤15 ng/mL, and an ISUP GG of ≤2. HIFU was performed between November 2014 and September 2018. All men had an MRI/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB) combined with a TRUS-guided 10-core systematic biopsy (SB) prior to focal therapy. HIFU treatment was performed as focal, partial, or hemiablative, depending on the prior histopathology. Follow-up included Questionnaires (IIEF-5, ICIQ, and IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, follow-up mpMRI, and follow-up biopsies. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 72 years (IQR 64-76), and the median PSA value before HIFU was 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.75-10.39 ng/mL). The median follow-up was 27.5 (IQR 23-41) months. At the time of the follow-up, the median PSA value was 2.5 ng/mL (IQR 0.94-4.96 ng/mL), which shows a significant decrease (p < 0.001). In 17 (29.8%) men, mpMRI revealed a suspicious lesion, and 19 (33.3%) men had a positive biopsy result. Only IIEF values significantly decreased from 16 (IQR 10.75-20.25) to 11.5 (IQR 4.5-17) (p < 0.001). The rate of post-HIFU complications was low, at 19.3% (11 patients). The limitation of this study is the lack of long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU as a therapy option for nonmetastatic, significant prostate cancer is effective in the short term for carefully selected patients and shows a low risk of adverse events and side effects.