Strategies of Parkour practitioners for executing soft precision landings.

Parkour landing techniques differ from performances of other sports as they are practiced in urban spaces with uncontrolled surfaces and drop heights. Due to the relatively young age of the sport, few studies have tried to understand how practitioners - called traceurs - succeed at performing these dynamic performances. In this paper, we focus on the precision landing technique, which has a fundamental role in most of the Parkour motions. We analyzed the lower limbs motion of traceurs executing the precision landings from two different heights and compared their performance with untrained participants. We found that traceurs perform a soft landing extending its duration twice than untrained participants do [Formula: see text], increasing the range of motion [Formula: see text] and generating more mechanical energy [Formula: see text] to dissipate the impact. In the Parkour technique, the knee accounted for half of the energy dissipated. The peak joint torques [Formula: see text] and power [Formula: see text] were reduced in the Parkour technique. The increase of the landing height did not modify the proportion of individual joint mechanical energy contribution for dissipation. Our results could be used to enhance Parkour performance, and to understand new ways in which sport practitioners can land in order to prevent injuries.

What Makes Parkour Unique? A Narrative Review Across Miscellaneous Academic Fields.

Parkour is a growing sport that mostly involves jumping, vaulting over obstacles, and climbing in a non-dedicated setting. The authors gathered all known relevant literature across miscellaneous academic fields in order to define parkour with regard to other sports disciplines. Parkour is a lifestyle sport, and as such provides an alternative to mainstream sports, away from strict rules, standardized settings, and necessary competitions. Traceurs (parkour adepts) consider the city as a playground and as an outlet for their creativity, but they also have a strong taste for hard and individualized challenges. They usually train on non-specific structures, at ground level. Although their social background is not clear, they are mostly young and male. Traceurs are stronger than recreational athletes, especially in eccentric exercises. However, their endurance skills may be below average. One of the core specificities of parkour is its precision constraint at landing, which turns a standing long jump into a precision jump, regulated in flight so as to prepare for landing. The running precision jump follows the same landing pattern, and its flight phase contrasts with long jump techniques. Injuries, which are not more frequent than in other sports, often occur at landing and to lower limb extremities. This risk is mitigated by targeting the landing area with the forefoot instead of letting the heel hit the ground like in gymnastics, or with rolling in order to dissipate the impact. Overall, parkour focuses on adaptability to new environments, which leads to specific techniques that have not yet been extensively addressed by the literature.

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification for Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents: Development and Validation of the DESIRE Score.

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a risk score to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) occurrence during the in-hospital and long-term follow-up periods after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: This score was developed and validated in a single-center database encompassing all consecutive patients treated with DES between 2007 and 2014 (n = 4061). For the development of the score, we analyzed all patients treated between January 2007 and December 2012 (n = 2863) while the validation was conducted in a cohort treated between January 2013 and December 2014 (n = 1198). MACE was defined as the combination of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia- driven target-lesion revascularization. Different stratification models were developed for the in-hospital (logistic regression) and late follow-up score (Cox model). RESULTS: In-hospital scores ranged from 0 to 37 points and comprised: (a) age; (b) previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); (c) acute coronary syndrome; (d) peripheral vascular disease; (e) treatment of saphenous vein graft; (f) long lesions; (g) small vessels; (h) multivessel disease; and (i) thrombus. The late scores ranged from 0 to 45 points and comprised: (a) previous CABG; (b) diabetes mellitus; (c) acute coronary syndrome; (d) multivessel disease; (e) small vessels; (f) ejection fraction <40%; and (g) treatment of saphenous vein graft. Patients were stratified into low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups. Both scores had close to 70% accuracy for predicting MACE. CONCLUSION: The present score was developed and validated based on contemporary models for assessing periprocedural and long-term MACE risk post PCI, throughout the full spectrum of patient risk, and important patient subgroups.

Long-term clinical outcomes of the Drug-Eluting Stents in the Real World (DESIRE) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Recently, cardiologists have treated more complex patients and lesions with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, long-term efficacy and safety of the off-label use of these new devices is yet to be demonstrated. METHODS: The Drug-Eluting Stents in the Real World (DESIRE) registry is a prospective, nonrandomized single-center registry with consecutive patients treated solely with DES between May 2002 and May 2007. The primary end-point was long-term occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were clinically evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months and then annually up to 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 2,084 patients (2,864 lesions and 3,120 DES) were included. The mean age was 63.8 +/- 11.5 years. Diabetes was detected in 28.9% and 40.7% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Cyphertrade mark was the predominant DES in this registry (83.5%). Mean follow-up time was 2.6 +/- 1.2 years and was obtained in 96.5% of the eligible patients. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 3.3% of the patients. Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in only 0.7% of these patients and total stent thrombosis rate was 1.6% (n = 33). Independent predictors of thrombosis were PCI in the setting of MI (HR 11.2; 95% CI, 9.6-12.4, P = 0.001), lesion length (HR 4.6; 95% CI, 3.2-5.3, P = 0.031), moderate to severe calcification at lesion site (HR 13.1; 95% CI, 12.1-16.7, P < 0.001), and in-stent residual stenosis (HR 14.5; 95% CI, 10.2-17.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of DES in unselected population is associated with long-term safety and effectiveness with acceptable low rates of adverse clinical events.

On the coordination of highly dynamic human movements: an extension of the Uncontrolled Manifold approach applied to precision jump in parkour.

The human body generally has more degrees of freedom than necessary for generating a given movement. According to the motor abundance principle, this redundancy is beneficial as it provides the central nervous system with flexibility and robustness for the generation of movements. Under the hypothesis of the Uncontrolled Manifold, the additional degrees of freedom are used to produce motor solutions by reducing the variability that affects the motion performance across repetitions. In this paper, we present a general mathematical framework derived from robotics to formulate kinematic and dynamic tasks in human movement. On this basis, an extension of the Uncontrolled Manifold approach is introduced to deal with dynamic movements. This extension allows us to present a complex experimental application of the proposed framework to highly dynamic task variables in parkour movements. This experiment involves dynamic tasks expressed in terms of linear and angular momenta. The results show that the central nervous system is able to coordinate such skilled tasks which appear to be preferentially controlled and hierarchically organized. The proposed extension is promising for the study of motion generation in anthropomorphic systems and provides a formal description to investigate kinematics and dynamics tasks in human motions.

Drug-eluting stents vs bare metal stents for the treatment of large coronary vessels.

BACKGROUND: Lately drug-eluting stents (DES) have dramatically reduced restenosis rates and need for repeat revascularization in a wide subset of lesion and patients. However, their benefit for the treatment of large vessels (> 3.0 mm) has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether DES are superior to bare metal stents (BMS) in terms of clinical outcomes for the treatment of large coronary vessels. METHODS: This study assessed the long-term outcomes (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, and need for repeat intervention in the treated vessel) of patients treated with either a DES (Cypher and Taxus) or a BMS of > or = 3.5 mm in diameter. A total of 250 consecutive patients who underwent DES implantation were clinically followed for 1 year and compared to 250 patients who were treated with BMS. Interventions in the setting of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and treatment of bypass grafts were excluded. RESULTS: Cypher was the DES deployed in 70.8% of cases. Most of the enrolled patients were men (78%) with single vessel disease (65.6%). The left anterior descending artery was the culprit vessel in 34.2% of cases. Bare metal stent and DES cohorts had equivalent interpolated reference vessel diameter (3.19 +/- 0.3 mm for BMS vs 3.18 +/- 0.2 for DES; P = .1). Lesion was significantly longer in the group treated with DES (13.4 +/- 5.1 mm for BMS group vs 14.3 +/- 3.5 for DES; P = .0018). After 1 year of clinical follow-up, 95.2% of patients treated with DES and 91.2% of the patients who received BMS were free of major events (P = .2). A trend toward higher target-lesion revascularization was noticed in the group treated with BMS (4.8% vs 1.6%; P = .07). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of large coronary vessels carries a low risk of clinical events irrespective of the type of stent used.

Impact of PCI Appropriateness in the Long-Term Outcomes of Consecutive Patients Treated With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization were developed to deliver high-quality care; however, the prognostic impact of these criteria remains unclear. We sought to assess the outcomes of patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) classified according to the updated American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention AUC for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2013, a total of 1108 consecutive patients treated only with second-generation DES were categorized according to the AUC in three groups, using the new proposed terminology: appropriate ("A"); uncertain ("U"); and inappropriate ("I"). Major adverse cardiac event (MACE, defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization) and stent thrombosis up to 3 years were compared. RESULTS: PCI was categorized as A in 33.8%, U in 46.8%, and I in 19.4% of all cases. PCI-A patients had a higher prevalence of acute coronary syndromes, while PCI-I involved the treatment of more diabetics and patients with stable coronary disease. There were no differences in procedural complications among the three groups, with comparable rates of in-hospital MACE (9.3% for A vs 9.0% for U vs 7.0% for I; P=.70) and 2-year MACE (13.9% for A vs 9.0% for U vs 8.6% for I; P=.40). In the multivariable analysis, AUC classification was not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of patients treated with second-generation DES implantation, AUC did not impact 3-year clinical follow-up.

Volumetric analysis of in-stent intimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients treated with or without abciximab: results of the Diabetes Abciximab steNT Evaluation (DANTE) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In diabetic patients in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trial, abciximab reduced target vessel revascularization by approximately 50% compared with placebo. Whether this is a result of a lower restenosis rate caused by inhibition of intimal hyperplasia remains to be defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether abciximab at the time of stent implantation would reduce in-stent intimal hyperplasia measured by intravascular ultrasound at 6-month follow-up in type 2 diabetics. Ninety-six diabetic patients (96 lesions) who underwent elective stent implantation for a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery were randomly assigned to receive abciximab or no abciximab. In-stent intimal hyperplasia volume, expressed as percentage of stent volume, did not differ between groups: 41.3+/-21.0% for those treated with abciximab versus 40.5+/-18.3% for those treated without abciximab (P=0.9). There were also no significant differences in angiographic minimal luminal diameter at follow-up (1.74+/-0.69 versus 1.66+/-0.63 mm; P=0.5), late loss (1.03+/-0.63 versus 1.07+/-0.58 mm; P=0.7), restenosis rate (17.8% versus 22.9%; P=0.5), or cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months (19.1% versus 20.4%; P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis showed that abciximab, at the time of coronary stent implantation, was not associated with a reduction of in-stent intimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients.

Sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the safety and effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. The present investigation explored the potential of this technology to treat in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with in-stent restenosis were successfully treated with the implantation of 1 or 2 sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents in São Paulo, Brazil. Nine patients received 2 stents (1.4 stents per lesion). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained after the procedure and at 4 and 12 months. All vessels were patent at the time of 12-month angiography. Angiographic late loss averaged 0.07+/-0.2 mm in-stent and -0.05+/-0.3 mm in-lesion at 4 months, and 0.36+/-0.46 mm in-stent and 0.16+/-0.42 mm in-lesion after 12 months. No patient had in-stent or stent margin restenosis at 4 months, and only one patient developed in-stent restenosis at 1-year follow-up. Intimal hyperplasia by 3-dimensional IVUS was 0.92+/-1.9 mm(3) at 4 months and 2.55+/-4.9 mm(3) after 1 year. Percent volume obstruction was 0.81+/-1.7% and 1.76+/-3.4% at the 4- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. There was no evidence of stent malapposition either acutely or in the follow-up IVUS images, and there were no deaths, stent thromboses, or repeat revascularizations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety and the potential utility of sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Comparison between sirolimus-eluting stents and intracoronary catheter-based beta radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

We report the outcomes of patients who had in-stent restenosis (IRS) that was treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. The benefit of IVBT for treating ISR is well documented. SES implantation decreases first-time ISR and, in preliminary reports, has been used to treat ISR. Fifty consecutive patients who had ISR were treated; the first 25 patients underwent SES implantation and the next 25 patients were treated with IVBT using a beta-Cath System (a 40-mm strontium-90/yttrium-90 source). Quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up were performed at 5.2 +/- 1.1 and 12.1 +/- 1.2 months; clinical follow-up was performed at 15 months. SES deployment and IVBT were successful in all patients. At 12-month follow-up, 8 patients who underwent IVBT had angiographic recurrence (4 in the stent and 4 at the stent edge); only 1 patient who underwent SES implantation developed recurrent ISR. At 12 months, in-stent late luminal loss was similar between the SES and IVBT groups (0.35 +/- 0.45 vs 0.34 +/- 0.46 mm, p = 0.9); however, in-stent net luminal gain was higher in the SES group than in the IVBT group (1.32 +/- 0.13 vs 0.57 +/- 0.19 mm, p <0.0001), and in-lesion late luminal loss was higher in the IVBT group (0.48 +/- 0.32 vs 0.16 +/- 0.42 mm, p = 0.004). At 12 months, intravascular ultrasound stent volume obstruction was higher after IVBT versus than after SES implantation (38.7% vs 6.7%, p <0.0001). At 15-month clinical follow-up, 64% and 96% (p <0.01) of patients who underwent IVBT and SES implantation, respectively, were free of major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion SES implantation for the treatment of ISR was effective and superior to catheter-based IVBT in preventing recurrent neointimal proliferation and angiographic restenosis at 1-year follow-up.

Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound findings of the late catch-up phenomenon after intracoronary beta-radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

We report one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) outcomes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) patients treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). The benefit of IVBT for treating ISR is well documented. However, few data exist on significant angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic in-stent lumen deterioration beyond the habitual 6-month analysis after the index radiation procedure or so-called late catch-up process in the treatment of ISR. Twenty-five consecutive patients with ISR were treated with IVBT using the Beta-Cath System (a 40 mm 90 Sr per 90 gamma source). Quantitative angiographic and IVUS analysis was performed in all of them at 6 and 12 months. IVBT was successful in all patients. Four patients (16%) developed recurrent angiographic binary restenosis at 6-month follow-up, all located within the adjacent reference segments, with 2 being associated with geographical miss. An additional 4 patients (16%) presented with recurrent ISR at 12-month follow-up, all within the stented segment. Significant in-stent lumen loss (0.16 +/- 0.42 mm to 0.34 +/- 0.46 mm; p = 0.008) and in-stent intimal hyperplasia growth (+11.2 +/- 0.48 mm3; p = 0.03) was observed between 6 and 12 months. Intracoronary beta-radiation for the treatment of ISR was associated with significant luminal deterioration (late catch-up) within the stents between 6 and 12 months due to an important late progression of in-stent intimal hyperplasia.

Adequação das práticas do laboratório de cateterismo durante a pandemia de COVID-19: o protocolo do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia / Adapted Catheterization Laboratory Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Protocol

Introdução A pandemia global da doença de coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) causada pelo novo vírus de síndrome respiratória aguda grave coronavírus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) começou em Wuhan, China, em dezembro de 2019 e afetou mais de 4,4 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo, com 302.169 mortes até o dia 16 de maio de 2020.1 Embora os sintomas respiratórios sejam a apresentação mais comum de COVID-19, o envolvimento cardíaco é uma característica proeminente dessa doença, ocorrendo em 20% a 30% dos pacientes hospitalizados e contribuindo para 40% dos óbitos.2-4 O envolvimento cardíaco relacionado à COVID-19 tem sido documentado por elevações em biomarcadores cardíacos e frequentemente apresenta alterações no segmento ST-T no eletrocardiograma (ECG) de 12 derivações, motivo pelo qual a equipe do laboratório de cateterismo é frequentemente ativada. Além disso, as atividades do laboratório de cateterismo devem continuar no atendimento a pacientes não COVID-19 que apresentam síndrome coronariana aguda (SCA) verdadeira, infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMCSST) e doença cardíaca isquêmica estável muito sintomática. Devido à escalada no número de casos de COVID-19 na cidade de São Paulo, epicentro da doença no Brasil, reformularam-se a logística e as práticas no laboratório de cateterismo cardíaco do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, que entraram em vigor em abril de 2020 e continuarão durante o período da pandemia. Os objetivos são fornecer atendimento otimizado à população que necessita de procedimentos cardíacos invasivos durante a pandemia, com a proteção adequada aos profissionais de saúde (PS), pacientes e seus familiares. Os protocolos aqui descritos representam os esforços multidisciplinares e dinâmicos do Departamento de Cardiologia Invasiva do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia validados pelo Comitê de Controle de Infecção da instituição. Essas práticas estão sujeitas a alterações em função do estado epidemiológico local, a fase da epidemia e a disponibilidade de equipamento de proteção individual (EPI). Estes protocolos podem não se aplicar a outras localidades sem casos (ou casos esporádicos) de COVID-19 ou a serviços que atendem diferentes perfis populacionais com logísticas e disponibilidade de EPI diversas.

Influence of balloon pressure inflation in patients undergoing primary coronary stent implantation during acute myocardial infarction. A quantitative coronary angiography analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the influence of moderate- or high-pressure balloon inflation during primary coronary stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: After successful coronary stent implantation, 82 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the last balloon inflation pressure: group 1 (> or = 12 to < 16 atm) and group 2 (> or = 16 to 20 atm), each with 41 cases. All patients underwent late coronary angiography. RESULTS: In group 1, the mean stent deployment pressure was 13.58 +/- 0.92 atm, and in the group 2 it was 18.15 +/- 1.66 atm. Stents implanted with moderate pressures (> or = 12 to < 16 atm) had a significantly smaller post-procedural minimal lumen diameter, compared to with those with higher pressure, with lesser acute gain (2.7 +/- 0.4 mm vs 2.9 +/- 0.4 mm; p = 0.004), but the late lumen loss (0.9 +/- 0.8 mm vs 0.9 +/- 0.6 mm) and the restenosis (22% vs. 17.1%) and target-vessel revascularization rates (9.8% vs 7.3%) were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: During AMI stenting, the use of high pressures (> or = 16 atm) did not cause a measurable improvement in late outcome, either in the late loss, its index, and the net gain, or in clinical and angiographic restenosis rates.

Serial greyscale and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound assessment of plaque modification and vessel geometry at proximal and distal edges of bare metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the correlation between modifications in plaque composition at stent edges and the changes in vessel geometry. This study sought to evaluate, by serial greyscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and Virtual Histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS), the modifications in plaque composition at the edges of drug-eluting and bare metal stents and the correlation of these findings with changes in the measurements of vessel, lumen and plaque area at those segments. METHODS AND RESULTS: Single-centre, prospective and randomised (1:1) evaluation of 40 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with bare metal (Driver; Medtronic, Santa Clara, CA, USA; n=20 patients) or drug-eluting stents (Cypher; Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL, USA; n=20 patients). IVUS and VH-IVUS assessments were done post-procedure and at nine months. Primary endpoint included the modification in vessel, lumen and plaque area and in the composition of the plaque in the mean time between the baseline and follow-up procedure. At the proximal edge of the vessel treated with the Cypher stent, a trend toward positive vessel remodelling (D=+0.6 mm², p=0.06) was observed while at the distal edge, less plaque growth (D=+0.2 mm² vs. D=+1.1 mm², p<0.001), resulted in a larger lumen area at follow-up. By VH, there was a marked reduction in the percentage of fibrotic tissue and necrotic core at the edges of both stents and a positive correlation was seen between increase in percentage of fibro-fatty component and increase in plaque area (r=0.78, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) experienced less plaque growth, especially at the distal edge of the stents. Modifications in plaque composition, with increase in fibrofatty tissue component, may partially explain these findings.

Incidence and predictors of very late (>or=4 years) major cardiac adverse events in the DESIRE (Drug-Eluting Stents in the Real World)-Late registry.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to access the incidence of late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis (ST) in nonselected, complex patients followed for a period >/=4 years. BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in reducing repeated target lesion revascularization, concerns regarding the occurrence of late and very late ST have partially obscured the benefits of this novel technology. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated solely with DES between May 2002 and January 2005 were enrolled into this prospective, nonrandomized, single-center registry. The primary end point was long-term occurrence of MACE up to 7 years. Independent predictors of MACE, cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and ST were obtained by a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1,010 patients were enrolled. Most of them were men (77%) with a mean age of 63.7 years. Stent/patient rate was 1.4. Patients were kept in dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 and 6 months after Cypher (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Miami Lakes, Florida) and Taxus (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) stent implantation, respectively. Follow-up was obtained in 98.2% of the cohort (median 5.01 years). Survival free of MACE and cumulative incidence of definite/probable ST were 84.6% and 1.7%, respectively. Independent predictors of ST were percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, DES overlapping, treatment of multivessel disease, presence of moderate-to-severe calcification at lesion site, and in-stent residual stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The deployment of DES in complex, real-world patients resulted in a low rate of very long-term MACE and ST. However, ST still occurs very long after the index procedure.

Desfechos clínicos tardios de pacientes diabéticos tratados com stents farmacológicos eluidores de sirolimus ou everolimus: uma análise do registro DESIRE / Late clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with sirolimus or everolimus drug-eluting stents: an analysis of the DESIRE registry

Stents farmacológicos (SF) de segunda geração demonstraram melhor desempenho clínico que os de primeira geração, sobretudo pela redução nas taxas de trombose, mas ainda não está claro se esse benefício se estende a diabéticos da prática diária. Objetivamos comparar o desempenho de pacientes diabéticos não selecionados tratados com SF eluidores de sirolimus (SES; primeira geração) vs. SF eluidoresde everolimus (SEE; segunda geração).Métodos: Entre 2007 e 2014, 798 diabéticos foram tratados com SES (n = 414) ou SEE (n = 384) e incluídosnesta análise. Seguimento clínico tardio foi obtido em 99,4% da população e os grupos foram comparados quanto à ocorrência de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores (ECAM) e trombose de stent. Resultados: A idade da população foi semelhante, com predomínio do sexo masculino. Em ambas as coortes, a apresentação clínica mais frequente foi a doença coronária estável. Número de vasos tratados (1,50 ± 0,62 vs. 1,52 ± 0,72; p = 0,88) e extensão total de stents (36,1 ± 20,4 mm vs. 37,7 ± 22,2 mm; p = 0,32) foram semelhantes. Os pacientes tratados com SEE apresentaram menores taxas de ECAM (15% vs. 6,8%; p < 0,001), sobretudo à custa de menor mortalidade cardíaca (5,3% vs. 1,3%; p < 0,001). Observou-se também menor ocorrência de trombose de stent definitiva/provável com SF de segunda geração (3,4% vs. 0,5%; p = 0,004).Conclusões: Nesta experiência unicêntrica, o uso de SEE em diabéticos mostrou-se com menor mortalidadecardíaca e trombose da endoprótese. Esse benefício se fez mais evidente no seguimento mais tardio...

Despite the better clinical performance of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES)when compared to first-generation DES in controlled trials, mainly due to reduction in thrombosis rate, it remains unclear whether this benefit extends to diabetic patients treated in the daily practice. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of unselected diabetic patients treated with either sirolimus eluting stents - SES (first-generation DES) or everolimus-eluting stents - EES (second-generation DES). Methods: Between January 2007 and October 2014 a total of 798 diabetic patients were treated with SES(n = 414) and EES (n = 384). Long-term clinical follow-up was achieved in 99,4% of the population andthe groups were compared regarding the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis. Results: In both cohorts age was similar, and most patients were male. Stable coronary disease was the most frequent clinical presentation. The number of treated vessels (1.50 ± 0.62 vs. 1.52 ± 0.72; p = 0.88)and the total stent length (36.1 ± 20.4 vs. 37.7 ± 22.2 mm; p = 0.32) were similar between groups. Patients treated with EES showed lower rates of MACE (15% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001), mainly due to a lower cardiac death(5.3% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). There was also less definitive/ probable thrombosis with the second generation DES (3.4% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.004)...

Desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios após tratamento de enxertos de veia safena com stents MGuardTM vs. stents farmacológicos / Early and late clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft treatment with MGuardTM stents vs. drug-eluting stents

Introdução: O stent MGuard™, revestido por malha polimérica microscópica, tem a finalidade de reduzir a embolização distal de fragmentos durante a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) em enxertos de veia safena (EVS). Avaliamos os desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios de pacientes submetidos à ICP de EVS com stents MGuard™ vs. stents farmacológicos (SF). Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, realizado em dois centros terciários, envolvendo uma coorte de pacientes com lesões em EVS, tratados de forma eletiva ou de emergência com stents MGuard™ ou SF. Resultados: Foram incluídos 271 pacientes, sendo 220 tratados com SF. O Grupo MGuard™ apresentou maior proporção de mulheres (25,5% vs. 10,5%; p=0,01), com média de idades de 65,0 ± 13,9 anos vs. 69,0 ± 9,6 anos (p = 0,06). O Grupo SF utilizou com maior frequência filtro de proteção distal (5,8% vs. 10,0%; p = 0,001). Sucesso angiográfico foi obtido na maioria dos casos (96,2% vs. 98,0%; p = 0,22). O Grupo MGuard™ teve menores taxas de eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores (ECAM) na fase hospitalar que o Grupo SF (1,9% vs. 13,6%; p = 0,01) devido exclusivamente à menor incidência de infarto periprocedimento. Entretanto, a taxa de ECAM em 1 ano foi maior no grupo MGuard™ (14,3% vs. 4,4%; p = 0,01) à custa de maior taxa de revascularização da lesão alvo (7,1% vs. 1,3%; p = 0,048). Conclusões: A utilização de stent MGuard™ resultou em redução de eventos na fase hospitalar, porém, no longo prazo, os SF foram superiores em reduzir desfechos maiores, sobretudo a necessidade de revascularização da lesão alvo

Background: The MGuard™ stent, which has a microscopic polymer mesh coating, is intended to reduce the distal embolization of fragments during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). This study evaluated the early and late clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI in SVG with MGuard™ stents vs. drug­eluting stents (DES). Methods: Observational, retrospective study conducted at two tertiary centers, involving a cohort of patients with SVG lesions submitted to elective or emergency treatment with MGuard™ stents or DES. Results: A total of 271 patients were included, of whom 220 were treated with DES. The MGuard™ group had a higher proportion of women (25.5% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.01), with a mean age of 65.0 ± 13.9 years vs. 69.0 ± 9.6 years (p = 0.06). The DES group more frequently used distal protection filter (5.8% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.001). Angiographic success was attained in most cases (96.2% vs. 98.0%; p = 0.22). The MGuard™ group had lower rates of early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than the DES group (1.9% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.01), due solely to the lower incidence of periprocedural infarction. However, the MACE rate at 1 year was higher in the MGuard™ group (14.3% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.01) at the expense of a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (7.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.048). Conclusions: The use of the MGuard™ stent resulted in a reduction of events during hospitalization; however, in the long term the DES were superior in reducing major outcomes, mainly the need for target lesion revascularization

Comparison of the very long term (>1 year) outcomes of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bare-metal and drug-eluting stent restenosis.

AIMS: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have become the first choice to treat BMS restenosis (ISR), replacing brachytherapy and all other available percutaneous approaches. Although markedly reduced, DES ISR still occurs and has been frequently treated with another DES, despite the lack of robust data supporting the safety and efficacy of this approach. We sought to compare the long term clinical outcomes of patients with BMS and DES ISR treated with another DES deployment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between May 2002 and January 2008 a total of 158 patients with BMS restenosis and 58 patients with DES restenosis were treated with a DES and enrolled in this registry. Primary endpoint included the cumulative occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE=cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target-vessel revascularisation) and stent thrombosis. Baseline clinical aspects did not significantly differ between the groups. There was a trend toward a higher incidence of DM in the DES cohort (36.1% vs. 32.9%, p=0.1). Mean time between first procedure and restenosis was significant longer in the DES population (178+/-61 days vs. 140+/-38 days, p=0.02). At the end of the follow-up period, 92.6% of the patients with BMS-ISR and 86.3% of those with DES-ISR were free of MACE (p<0.001). Patients with DES ISR had significant more recurrence of ISR but equivalent rates of cardiac death, MI and stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous treatment of BMS or DES ISR with the implant of a DES represents a simple and safe approach with sustained long term results. However, the relatively high rate of ISR recurrence among patients with prior DES ISR demand the developing of more effective strategies for that subset of individuals.

1-year results of the hydroxyapatite polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions: the VESTASYNC I trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel VESTAsync-eluting stent (MIV Therapeutics, Atlanta, Georgia) combining a stainless steel platform with a nanothin-microporous hydroxyapatite surface coating impregnated with a polymer-free low-dose of sirolimus (55 microg). BACKGROUND: Durable polymers in first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have been linked to local inflammatory reaction leading to a positive vessel remodeling, late incomplete stent apposition, and in some cases, stent thrombosis. The removal of the polymer from the DES system could increase the safety profile of this novel technology. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with 3.0- to 3.5-mm diameter and