In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease: a nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have been associated with worse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). With TAVR indications extending to a wider range of patient populations, it is important to understand the current implications of chronic renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes. We aim to determine the impact of CKD and ESRD on in-hospital outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample for TAVR performed between 2016 and 2020 using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision codes. We compared in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes between three groups: normal renal function, CKD and ESRD. The association between CKD/ESRD and outcomes was tested with multivariable logistic regression analyses, using normal renal function as baseline. RESULTS: In the five-year study period, 279,195 patients underwent TAVR (mean age 78.9 ± 8.5 years, 44.4% female). Of all patients, 67.1% had normal renal function, 29.2% had CKD, and 3.7% had ESRD. There were significant differences in age, sex, and prevalence of comorbidities across groups. In-hospital mortality was 1.3%. Compared to patients with normal renal function, patients with renal insufficiency had higher in-hospital mortality, with the highest risk found in patients with ESRD (adjusted odds ratio: 1.4 [95% confidence interval: 1.2-1.7] for CKD; adjusted odds ratio: 2.4 [95% confidence interval: 1.8-3.3] for ESRD). Patients with CKD or ESRD had a higher risk of cardiogenic shock, need for mechanical circulatory support, and vascular access complications, compared to those with normal renal function. In addition, patients with ESRD had a higher risk of cardiac arrest and periprocedural acute myocardial infarction. The incidence of conversion to open heart surgery was 0.3% and did not differ between groups. Post-procedural infectious and respiratory complications were more common among patients with CKD or ESRD. CONCLUSION: Patients with CKD and ESRD are at higher risk of in-hospital mortality, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular complications after TAVR. The risk of complications is highest in patients with ESRD and does not result in more frequent conversion to open heart surgery. These results emphasize the importance of individualized patient selection for TAVR and procedural planning among patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A nationwide analysis.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to elucidate the association between ECMO and mortality in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS in the nationwide setting. United States National Inpatient Sample was used to identify mechanically ventilated adults for COVID-19 with ARDS. We divided them into three groups according to the use of ECMO (i.e., no-ECMO, venovenous [VV]-ECMO, and venoarterial [VA]-ECMO). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the total costs during hospitalization. We performed a stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and severity. We included 68 795 (mean age [SD]: 63.5 [0.1]), 3280 (mean age [SD]: 48.7 [0.5]), and 340 (mean age [SD]: 43.3 [2.1]) patients who received no-, VV-, and VA-ECMO, respectively. The logistic regression analysis did not show significant associations between the use of VV-/VA-ECMO and mortality (adjusted odds ratio with no-ECMO as reference [95% confidence interval]: 1.03 [0.86-1.24] and 1.18 [0.64-2.15], respectively). While LOS was longest with VV-ECMO, the total costs were highest with VA-ECMO. In conclusion, our study found no association between the use of ECMO and mortality of COVID-19-associated ARDS in the nationwide setting.

Association of Remdesivir use with bradycardia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Remdesivir has been used for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia with oxygen requirements that do not require mechanical intubation, and several studies showed a reduction in disease duration. However, there is a concern about bradycardia as its side effect. We aimed to investigate the association between Remdesivir and bradycardia by integrating findings from prior studies. We queried PubMed and EMBASE in February 2023 and performed a meta-analysis of studies investigating bradycardia in patients who did or did not receive Remdesivir. The outcome of interest was the rate of bradycardia and in-hospital mortality. We identified eight studies involving 8993 patients, of which seven studies investigated bradycardia. Six studies were observational, one was a case-control, and one was a randomized trial. Incidence of bradycardia was 400/3480 patients (22.3%, 95% confidence interval, CI: [6.5-54.4], I2 = 99%) in the Remdesivir group and 294/5005 (9.8%, 95% CI: [2.8-29], I2 = 98.61) in the non-Remdesivir group. The odds ratio of bradycardia was 2.11 (95% CI: [1.65-2.71], I2 = 22%, p < 0.001) for the Remdesivir group. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Patients who received Remdesivir for COVID-19 were more likely to develop bradycardia. The effect of confounding factors should be considered to further clarify the possible association.

Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement misses paravalvular regurgitation: Incidence and echocardiographic distribution of missed paravalvular regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) may be missed intraoperatively with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) guided minimalist TAVR. We sought to determine the incidence and echocardiographic distribution of PVR missed on intra-op TTE, but detected on predischarge TTE. METHODS: From July 2015 to 2020, 475 patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis underwent TTE-guided minimalist TAVR. Missed PVR was defined as predischarge PVR that was ≥1 grade higher than the corresponding intra-op PVR severity. PVR was classified as anterior or posterior on the four standard TTE views; parasternal short-axis (PSAX), parasternal long-axis (PLAX), apical 3-chamber (A3C), and 5-chamber (A5C). Location-specific risk of missed PVR was then determined. RESULTS: Mild or greater PVR was seen in 55 (11.5%) cases intra-op and 91 (19.1%) at predischarge, with no severe PVR. Among the 91 patients with ≥mild predischarge PVR, missed PVR was present in 42 (46.2%). Compared to the corresponding anterior jets, missed PVR rate was significantly higher for posterior jets in PLAX (62.5% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.005), A5C (56.9% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.009), PSAX (66.7% vs. 24.3%, 0.001), but not A3C (58.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative TTE-guided minimalist TAVR either misses nearly half of ≥mild PVR or underestimates PVR by ≥1 grade when compared to predischarge TTE. Posterior PVR jets are more likely to be missed. Transesophageal echo guidance may help minimize missing PVR. Further studies are warranted.

Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is present in approximately 0.5%-2% of the general population, causing significant aortic stenosis (AS) in 12%-37% of affected individuals. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being considered the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic AS across all risk spectra. AIM: Aim Our study aims to compare TAVR outcomes in patients with BAV versus tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane trials. Studies were included if they included BAV and TAV patients undergoing TAVR with quantitative data available for at least one of our predefined outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed by the random-effects model using Stata software. RESULTS: Fifty studies of 203,288 patients were included. BAV patients had increased 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23 [1.00-1.50], p = 0.05), in-hospital stroke (OR = 1.39 [1.01-1.93], p = 0.05), in-hospital and 30-day PPI (OR = 1.13 [1.00-1.27], p = 0.04; OR = 1.16 [1.04-1.13], p = 0.01) and in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year aortic regurgitation (AR) (OR = 1.48 [1.19-1.83], p < 0.01; OR = 1.79 [1.26-2.52], p < 0.01; OR = 1.64 [1.03-2.60], p = 0.04). Subgroup analysis on new-generation valves showed a reduced 1-year all-cause mortality (OR = 0.86 [CI = 0.75-0.98], p = 0.03), despite higher in-hospital and 30-day PPI (OR = 0.1.21 [1.04-1.41], p = 0.01; OR = 1.17 [1.05-1.31], p = 0.01) and in-hospital AR (OR = 1.62 [1.14-2.31], p = 0.01) in the BAV group. The quality of included studies was moderate-to-high, and only three analyses presented high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: TAVR is associated with comparable outcomes in patients with BAV and TAV. Careful selection of BAV cases by preprocedural assessment of valve anatomy and burden of calcification, pre- and post-procedural dilation, and implementing newer generations of valves may improve the safety and efficacy of TAVR in BAV patients.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Loading Doses of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Elective PCI: a Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Effective platelet inhibition prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the risk of ischemic complications. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors are preferred agents over clopidogrel for patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of them over clopidogrel in elective PCI is unclear. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of loading strategies of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing elective PCI. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) up to June 2021 to compare the safety and effectiveness of different loading strategies of P2Y12 inhibitors before elective PCI. The endpoints of interest were overall mortality, rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding. Random effects model using the frequentist approach was used to perform a network meta-analysis using R software. RESULTS: Five trials with a total of 5194 patients were included in our analysis. For ischemic outcomes, including MI, stroke, and revascularization, prasugrel had the most favorable trend. However, clopidogrel had the highest probability of being most effective for major bleeding and all-cause mortality. None of these trends was statistically significant due to lack of power for each outcome. CONCLUSION: Although prasugrel and ticagrelor are known as more potent antiplatelet agents, their effects in preventing MI and stroke are marginal and do not translate into improved overall mortality and bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

In CV disease, clopidogrel reduces nonfatal MI and MACE vs. aspirin but not stroke or mortality.

SOURCE CITATION: Tasoudis PT, Kyriakoulis IG, Sagris D, et al. Clopidogrel monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2022;122:1879-87. 35577054.

Nationwide Analysis of the Outcomes and Mortality of Hospitalized Infants with Concomitant Diagnosis of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) generally causes milder illness in the pediatric population. However, infants represent a higher-risk population with evolving symptomatology and severity. There is a paucity of large population-based data on the impact of COVID-19 on hospitalized infants. STUDY DESIGN: In this large cohort study, the National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all infant hospital admissions between January and December 2020 in the United States, with and without a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on ICD-10-CM U07. The mortality and morbidity of infants with and without COVID-19 were evaluated. Parent-reported race and outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: A weighted total of 3,754,236 infants who were hospitalized were identified, of which 4,265 patients (0.11%) had a concomitant diagnosis of COVID-19. Infants with COVID-19 had similar mortality and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization. Infants with concomitant COVID-19 had a higher rate of respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, acute kidney injury, and coagulopathy. Compared with Caucasian infants and Asian infants, Hispanic and African American infants were more likely to have COVID-19 hospital admissions than hospitalizations without COVID-19 diagnosis. Patients with lower median household income represented the majority of the COVID-19 hospitalization. The infants with COVID-19 were more likely to have Medicaid or Medicare insurance and less likely to have private insurance. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of hospitalized infants with COVID-19, the infection was associated with complications, including respiratory failure and endotracheal intubations but not associated with a higher risk for mortality. Infants from racial minorities and lower socioeconomic strata carry the highest burden of COVID-19 infection. KEY POINTS: · Infants with COVID-19 represent a higher-risk group with evolving symptomatology and severity.. · Infants with COVID-19 had similar mortality rates and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization as those without COVID-19.. · Racial minorities and lower socioeconomic strata carry the highest burden of COVID-19 infection..

Impact of right ventricular impairment on morbidity and mortality in takotsubo syndrome-a meta-analysis of observational trials.

The impact of right ventricular impairment (RVI) on the morbidity and mortality of patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is well-debated. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the mortality and morbidity risk associated with RVI compared with those without RVI in patients with TTS. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed and Embase from inception to April 19, 2019. Our primary outcome of interest was in-hospital and long-term mortality. Other outcomes of interest were acute heart failure, left ventricular systolic function, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, and length of hospital stay (LOS). We are reporting our outcomes as a cumulative odds ratio (OR). After an initial search, 10 studies with 1210 subjects were included in the quantitative analysis. Mean follow-up was 31 months. The odds of in-hospital and long-term mortality in TTS patients with and without RVI were not significantly different (p = 0.13 and 0.40). In TTS patients without RVI, the odds of acute heart failure, and mitral and tricuspid regurgitation were significantly lower at an OR of 0.26 (p < 0.0001), 0.40 (p = 0.0001), and 0.52 (p = 0.02) respectively. TTS patients with RVI had significantly lower mean LVEF (34% vs 41%, p = 0.03) and numerically higher mean LOS (9.5 days vs 7.6 days, p = 0.52) compared with those without RVI. The presence of RVI represents a severe form of TTS disease spectrum, characterized by severely reduced LVEF, higher incidence of MR and presence of TR. Although there was a trend toward increased in-hospital and long-term mortality, RVI in TTS does not portend worse survival.

The 30-day readmission rate of same-day discharge protocol following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis from National Readmission Database.

AIMS: The effectiveness and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) for catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully elucidated using a large nationwide database. This study aimed to evaluate the all-cause readmission rates within 30-days among patients receiving CA for AF with an SDD protocol compared with a conventional overnight stay (ONS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the US Nationwide Readmission Database. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmission following discharge in patients receiving CA and a secondary outcome was requiring total healthcare cost. A 1 : 3 propensity score matching was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy within both SDD and ONS group. Among 30 776 patients [mean 67.2 ± 11.4 years, 12 590 female (41.5%)] who received CA from 2016 through 2018, 440 (1.42%) patients were discharged on the same-day following CA (SDD group), and the remaining 30 336 patients stayed at least one night in the hospital (ONS group). A propensity score analysis generated 1751 matched pairs (440 in the SDD group; 1311 in the ONS group). The 30-day readmission following discharge was not significantly higher in the SDD group than the ONS group (SDD vs. ONS: 12.7% vs. 9.7%; hazard ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.81, P = 0.47). Healthcare cost was significantly higher in the ONS group ($25 237 ± 14 036 vs. $30 749 ± 16 383; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide database study, there was no significant difference in the all-cause 30-day readmission following SDD for CA compared with ONS.

Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has progressed to be one of the most promising medication since its approval for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Recent data have suggested a superior blood pressure control with LCZ696. STUDY QUESTION: What is the antihypertensive efficacy and safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan? DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 against a placebo or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). RCTs were identified from a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY DESIGN: We used a change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, both sitting as well as ambulatory, to calculate relevant effect sizes with their standard errors from the available change in mean and SD data. In addition, we also collected categorical data for the reported adverse effects from these trials. We performed a series of pairwise meta-analyses between LCZ696 versus an active comparator or a placebo. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with a total of 6028 participants had the relevant data available. Our meta-analysis showed that LCZ696 is an effective and a safe treatment for hypertension. It outperformed ARBs in every category, and the results are consistent across the different dosages of LCZ696. Compared with ARBs, 200 mg of LCZ696 reduced systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 4.62 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 3.33-5.90, P < 0.001) and 2.13 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.57, P < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, 400 mg of LCZ696 reduced systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure by 5.50 mm Hg (2.94-8.07, P < 0.001) and 2.51 mm Hg (1.80-3.21, P < 0.001), respectively, in comparison with ARBs. The adverse effects with LCZ696 were not significantly higher compared with ARBs or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan is more effective for the management of hypertensive patients, compared with an ARB. Long-term prospective studies are required to identify whether this result translates into morbidity and mortality benefits.

Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after TAVR: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the predictors associated with increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: While TAVR has evolved as the standard of care for patients with severe aortic stenosis, conduction abnormalities leading to the need for PPMI is one of the most common postprocedural complications. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant trials from inception to May 2020. Summary effects were calculated using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for all the clinical endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-seven observational studies with 71 455 patients were identified. The incidence of PPMI following TAVR was 22%. Risk was greater in men and increased with age. Patients with diabetes mellitus, presence of right bundle branch block, baseline atrioventricular conduction block, and left anterior fascicular block were noted to be at higher risk. Other significant predictors include the presence of high calcium volume in the area below the left coronary cusp and noncoronary cusp, use of self-expandable valve over balloon-expandable valve, depth of implant, valve size/annulus size, predilatation balloon valvuloplasty, and postimplant balloon dilation. CONCLUSION: Fourteen factors were found to be associated with increased risk of PPMI after TAVR, suggesting early identification of high-risk populations and targeting modifiable risk factors may aid in reducing the need for this post TAVR PPMI.

Outcomes of robotic coronary artery bypass versus nonrobotic coronary artery bypass.

BACKGROUND: Robotic coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has developed in recent decades, however, prior studies showed conflicting result of robotic CABG compared to nonrobotic CABG in terms of mortality, morbidity, and cost. Herein, we sought to analyze the in-hospital outcomes and health care utilization after robotic CABG compared to nonrobotic CABG, based on data from a nationally representative sample. METHODS: Patients who underwent CABG were identified using the national inpatient sample. Endpoints were in-hospital outcomes, length of stay, and total cost. Procedure-related complications were identified via international classification of diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 coding and propensity score matching analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,204,125 weighted adults underwent nonrobotic CABG and 7355 underwent robotic CABG in the United States between 2012 and 2017. The comparison of 7330 pairs after propensity score matching showed that in-hospital mortality was higher for those who underwent nonrobotic CABG compared to those who underwent robotic CABG (2.1% vs. 1.1%, p = .029). Similarly, the rates of acute kidney injury, transfusion, postoperative hemorrhage, length of stay, and total cost were higher for nonrobotic CABG compared to robotic CABG (all p < .05). The proportions of routine discharges with (34.5% vs. 40.0%) or without (39.7% vs. 45.0%) home health care were higher among those who underwent robotic, whereas the proportion of transfer to skilled nursing facility/nursing home was more frequent for cases of nonrobotic CABG (22.4% vs. 13.4%). CONCLUSION: Robotic CABG was associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, transfusion, postoperative hemorrhage, total cost, and shorter hospital stay compared to nonrobotic CABG.

Impact of weight on the efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: This study sought to determine the impact of weight and body mass index (BMI) on the safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was employed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane clinical trials with no language or date restrictions. Randomized trials or their substudies were assessed for relevant outcome data for efficacy that included stroke or systemic embolization (SSE), and safety including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Binary outcome data and odds ratios from the relevant articles were used to calculate the pooled relative risk. For SSE, the data from the four Phase III trials showed that DOACs are better or similarly effective with low BMI 0.73 (0.56-0.97), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58-0.91), overweight 0.87 (0.76-0.99), and obese 0.87 (0.76-1.00). The risk of major bleeding was also better or similar with DOACs in all BMI subgroups with low BMI 0.62 (0.37-1.05), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58-0.90), overweight 0.83 (0.71-0.96), and obese 0.91 (0.81-1.03). There was no impact on mortality in all the subgroups. In a meta-regression analysis, the effect size advantage of DOACs compared with warfarin in terms of safety and efficacy gradually attenuated with increasing weight. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a weight-based dosage adjustment may be necessary to achieve optimal benefits of DOACs for thromboembolic prevention in these patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Further dedicated trials are needed to confirm these findings. PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019140693. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42019140693.

Comparative Therapeutic Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) continues to prove to be an intriguing therapeutic option for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) especially in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Recent data have suggested that CA may be a viable first-line strategy for these patients. STUDY QUESTION: Is CA more effective in managing patients with AF with HFrEF compared to optimal medical treatment and anti-arrhythmic drugs? DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA, medical treatment, or antiarrhythmic drugs to each other or a placebo group for the treatment of AF in HFrEF. We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library to identify relevant RCTs. STUDY DESIGN: Our primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, and the percentage change in left ventricular ejection fraction. Also, we looked at functional outcomes such as Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and 6-minute walking distance. We used event rates for categorical variables and mean differences between the groups for the continuous variables. We used a frequentist approach employing a graph theory methodology to construct a network meta-analysis model. RESULTS: We ended up with 17 RCTs with 5460 participants and 5 different treatments in our network meta-analysis. Compared to optimal medical therapy, CA was effective in reducing all-cause mortality odds ratio (OR) 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.74; P-value: <0.001) and hospitalization for heart failure OR 0.41 (0.28-0.59; P-value: <0.001). CA also resulted in improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction OR 9.34 (7.13-11.55; P-value: <0.001), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire OR -7.75 (-13.98 to -1.52; P-value: <0.01), and 6MWT OR 27.30 (5.27-49.33; P-value: <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CA is the most effective and safe treatment for AF patients with HFrEF. We should consider this as a first-line therapy for the management of these patients.

Trends of utilization and outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement on chronic dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Trends of utilization and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients on chronic dialysis (CD) are not well described. We aimed to assess the trends in utilization and outcomes of TAVR and SAVR on CD. METHODS: Nationwide Readmission Databases from 2013 to 2017 was analyzed. International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification 9 and 10 codes were used to identify diagnoses and procedures. A multivariable regression model was used to compare the outcomes expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 5731 TAVR and 6491 SAVR were performed in patients with CD, respectively. The volume of TAVR increased by approximately four-folds and SAVR increased by approximately 33%. However, amongst patients with CD, the percentage of TAVR increased, whereas that of SAVR decreased (p < .001 for all). In 2016 and 2017, TAVR volume surpassed that of SAVR on CD. In-hospital mortality remained similar in TAVR (aOR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.07; p-trend = .23) whereas it increased significantly in SAVR (aOR: 1.14: 95% CI: 1.05-1.25, p-trend = .002). In 2017, in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission were significantly higher in TAVR among CD than non-CD patients. CONCLUSION: Despite increased use of TAVR among CD, there still is an opportunity for improvement in outcome of aortic valve replacement for those on CD.

Racial disparities in in-hospital outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of patients undergoing various cardiac surgeries demonstrated worse outcomes among African-American (AA) patients. It remains unclear if the race is a predictor of outcomes among left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. METHODS: Patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2017 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. The race was classified as Caucasians vs AA vs Hispanics, and endpoints were in-hospital outcomes, length of stay, and cost. Procedure-related complications were identified via the International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 coding and analysis performed via mixed-effect models. RESULTS: A total of 27 132 adults (5114 unweighted) underwent LVAD implantation in the U.S. between 2010 and 2017, including Caucasians (63.8%), AA (23.8%), and Hispanics (6%). The number of LVAD implantations increased in both Caucasians and AA during the study period. AA LVAD recipients were younger, with higher rates of females and mostly comorbidities, but lower rates of coronary artery disease and bypass grafting compared to Caucasians and Hispanics. Medicaid and median income at the lowest quartile were more frequent among AA LVAD recipients. We did not identify differences in stroke, bleeding complications, tamponade, infectious complications, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, and in-hospital mortality among racial groups. AA LVAD recipients had lower rates of routine discharge than Caucasians and Hispanics, longer length of stay than Caucasians, but similar cost of hospitalization. After adjustment for clinical comorbidities, race was not a predictor of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: We identified differences in clinical characteristics but not in in-hospital complications among LVAD recipients of a different races.

Prevention of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators-A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) offers a challenge with no set guidelines regarding which therapy offers a best safety and efficacy profile. STUDY QUESTION: Which therapeutic strategy, among antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA), offers the most effective and safe approach in patients with ICDs? DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic drugs or CA against a placebo group. RCTs were identified from a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. STUDY DESIGN: Our outcomes of interest were reductions in appropriate ICD shocks, inappropriate ICD shocks, and overall mortality. We used the event rates in both groups, and then using a frequentist approach employing a graph theory methodology, we constructed a network meta-analysis model. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 3815 participants and 6 different interventions treatments were included in our network meta-analysis. The most effective treatment for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia after ICD is amiodarone followed by CA. Amiodarone is most effective in the reduction of appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.74] and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.60), respectively. CA was effective in the reduction of appropriate ICD shocks (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.87), whereas sotalol was effective in the reduction of inappropriate ICD shocks (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95). There was no significant reduction in the overall mortality from any therapy. There was a trend of increased mortality associated with amiodarone therapy (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.92-6.26). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone remains the most efficacious therapy for the reduction of appropriate and inappropriate shocks in patients with ICD. No therapy resulted in mortality reduction, but amiodarone showed a trend toward increased mortality.