Oestrous cycle affects emergence from anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine, but not propofol, isoflurane, or sevoflurane, in female rats.

BACKGROUND: Although sex differences in anaesthetic sensitivity have been reported, what underlies these differences is unknown. In rodents, one source of variability in females is the oestrous cycle. Here we test the hypothesis that the oestrous cycle impacts emergence from general anaesthesia. METHODS: Time to emergence was measured after isoflurane (2 vol% for 1 h), sevoflurane (3 vol% for 20 min), dexmedetomidine (50 µg kg-1 i.v., infused over 10 min), or propofol (10 mg kg-1 i.v. bolus) during proestrus, oestrus, early dioestrus, and late dioestrus in female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=24). EEG recordings were taken during each test for power spectral analysis. Serum was analysed for 17ß-oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. The effect of oestrous cycle stage on return of righting latency was assessed using a mixed model. The association between righting latency and serum hormone concentration was tested by linear regression. Mean arterial blood pressure and arterial blood gases were assessed in a subset of rats after dexmedetomidine and compared in a mixed model. RESULTS: Oestrous cycle did not affect righting latency after isoflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol. When in the early dioestrus stage, rats emerged more rapidly from dexmedetomidine than in the proestrus (P=0.0042) or late dioestrus (P=0.0230) stage and showed reduced overall power in frontal EEG spectra 30 min after dexmedetomidine (P=0.0049). 17ß-Oestradiol and progesterone serum concentrations did not correlate with righting latency. Oestrous cycle did not affect mean arterial blood pressure or blood gases during dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: In female rats, the oestrous cycle significantly impacts emergence from dexmedetomidine-induced unconsciousness. However, 17ß-oestradiol and progesterone serum concentrations do not correlate with the observed changes.

Electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area restores consciousness from sevoflurane-, dexmedetomidine-, and fentanyl-induced unconsciousness in rats.

BACKGROUND: Dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are crucially involved in regulating arousal, making them a potential target for reversing general anesthesia. Electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the VTA restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with drugs that primarily enhance GABAA receptors. However, it is unknown if VTA DBS restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with drugs that target other receptors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of VTA DBS in restoring consciousness after exposure to four anesthetics with distinct receptor targets. METHODS: Sixteen adult Sprague-Dawley rats (8 female, 8 male) with bipolar electrodes implanted in the VTA were exposed to dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, or sevoflurane to produce loss of righting, a proxy for unconsciousness. After receiving the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH-23390, or saline (vehicle), DBS was initiated at 30 µA and increased by 10 µA until reaching a maximum of 100 µA. The current that evoked behavioral arousal and restored righting was recorded for each anesthetic and compared across drug (saline/SCH-23390) condition. Electroencephalogram, heart rate and pulse oximetry were recorded continuously. RESULTS: VTA DBS restored righting after sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl-induced unconsciousness, but not ketamine-induced unconsciousness. D1 receptor antagonism diminished the efficacy of VTA stimulation following sevoflurane and fentanyl, but not dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical DBS of the VTA restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with mechanistically distinct drugs, excluding ketamine. The involvement of the D1 receptor in mediating this effect is anesthetic-specific.

D-Amphetamine Rapidly Reverses Dexmedetomidine-Induced Unconsciousness in Rats.

D-amphetamine induces emergence from sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in rats. Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist that is commonly used for procedural sedation, whereas ketamine is an anesthetic that acts primarily by inhibiting NMDA-type glutamate receptors. These drugs have different molecular mechanisms of action from propofol and volatile anesthetics that enhance inhibitory neurotransmission mediated by GABAA receptors. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that d-amphetamine accelerates recovery of consciousness after dexmedetomidine and ketamine. Sixteen rats (Eight males, eight females) were used in a randomized, blinded, crossover experimental design and all drugs were administered intravenously. Six additional rats with pre-implanted electrodes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) were used to analyze changes in neurophysiology. After dexmedetomidine, d-amphetamine dramatically decreased mean time to emergence compared to saline (saline:112.8 ± 37.2 min; d-amphetamine:1.8 ± 0.6 min, p < 0.0001). This arousal effect was abolished by pre-administration of the D1/D5 dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH-23390. After ketamine, d-amphetamine did not significantly accelerate time to emergence compared to saline (saline:19.7 ± 18.0 min; d-amphetamine:20.3 ± 16.5 min, p = 1.00). Prefrontal cortex local field potential recordings revealed that d-amphetamine broadly decreased spectral power at frequencies <25 Hz and restored an awake-like pattern after dexmedetomidine. However, d-amphetamine did not produce significant spectral changes after ketamine. The duration of unconsciousness was significantly longer in females for both dexmedetomidine and ketamine. In conclusion, d-amphetamine rapidly restores consciousness following dexmedetomidine, but not ketamine. Dexmedetomidine reversal by d-amphetamine is inhibited by SCH-23390, suggesting that the arousal effect is mediated by D1 and/or D5 receptors. These findings suggest that d-amphetamine may be clinically useful as a reversal agent for dexmedetomidine.