Assessing the global prevalence of wild birds in trade.

Trade represents a significant threat to many wild species and is often clandestine and poorly monitored. Information on which species are most prevalent in trade and potentially threatened by it therefore remains fragmentary. We used 7 global data sets on birds in trade to identify species or groups of species at particular risk and assessed the extent to which they were congruent in terms of the species recorded in trade. We used the frequency with which species were recorded in the data sets as the basis for a trade prevalence score that was applied to all bird species globally. Literature searches and questionnaire surveys were used to develop a list of species known to be heavily traded to validate the trade prevalence score. The score was modeled to identify significant predictors of trade. Although the data sets sampled different parts of the broad trade spectrum, congruence among them was statistically strong in all comparisons. Furthermore, the frequency with which species were recorded within data sets was positively correlated with their occurrence across data sets, indicating that the trade prevalence score captured information on trade volume. The trade prevalence score discriminated well between species identified from semi-independent assessments as heavily or unsustainably traded and all other species. Globally, 45.1% of all bird species and 36.7% of globally threatened bird species had trade prevalence scores ≥1. Species listed in Appendices I or II of CITES, species with large geographical distributions, and nonpasserines tended to have high trade prevalence scores. Speciose orders with high mean trade prevalence scores included Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, Accipitriformes, Anseriformes, Bucerotiformes, and Strigiformes. Despite their low mean prevalence score, Passeriformes accounted for the highest overall number of traded species of any order but had low representation in CITES appendices. Geographical hotspots where large numbers of traded species co-occur differed among passerines (Southeast Asia and Eurasia) and nonpasserines (central South America, sub-Saharan Africa, and India). This first attempt to quantify and map the relative prevalence in trade of all bird species globally can be used to identify species and groups of species that may be at particular risk of harm from trade and can inform conservation and policy interventions to reduce its adverse impacts.

Análisis de la prevalencia mundial de aves silvestres en el mercado Resumen El mercado representa una amenaza importante para muchas especies silvestres y a menudo es clandestino y mal vigilado. Por ello, la información sobre las especies más presentes en el mercado y bajo amenaza potencial todavía está fragmentada. Utilizamos siete conjuntos de datos mundiales sobre aves comercializadas para identificar especies o grupos de especies bajo riesgo especial y evaluamos hasta qué punto eran congruentes en cuanto a las especies registradas en el comercio. Utilizamos la frecuencia con la que las especies se registraban en los conjuntos de datos como base para una puntuación de prevalencia del comercio que se aplicó a todas las especies de aves a nivel mundial. Para validar la puntuación de prevalencia del comercio, realizamos búsquedas bibliográficas y cuestionarios para elaborar una lista de especies que se sabe son objeto de comercio intenso. Modelamos la puntuación para identificar los predictores significativos del mercado. Aunque los conjuntos de datos muestrearon partes distintas del amplio espectro del mercado, la congruencia entre ellos fue estadísticamente robusta en todas las comparaciones. Además, la frecuencia con la que se registraron las especies dentro de los conjuntos de datos se correlacionó positivamente con su presencia en todos los conjuntos de datos, lo que indica que la puntuación de prevalencia del mercado captó información sobre el volumen de este. La puntuación de prevalencia del mercado distinguió entre las especies identificadas a partir de evaluaciones semiindependientes como objeto de comercio intenso o insostenible y todas las demás especies. A nivel mundial, el 45.1% de todas las especies de aves y el 36.7% de las especies de aves amenazadas mundialmente tenían puntuaciones de prevalencia del mercado ≥1. Las especies incluidas en los Apéndices I o II de CITES, las especies con una amplia distribución geográfica y los no paseriformes tendieron a tener puntuaciones elevadas de prevalencia del mercado. Los órdenes de especies con puntuaciones medias de prevalencia del mercado elevadas fueron Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, Accipitriformes, Anseriformes, Bucerotiformes y Strigiformes. A pesar de su baja puntuación media de prevalencia, los Passeriformes representaron el mayor número total de especies comercializadas de todos los órdenes, pero tuvieron una baja representación en los apéndices de CITES. Los puntos calientes geográficos en los que coexisten un gran número de especies comercializadas difieren entre los paseriformes (Sudeste Asiático y Eurasia) y los no paseriformes (centro de Sudamérica, África subsahariana e India). Este primer intento de cuantificar y cartografiar la prevalencia relativa en el comercio de todas las especies de aves a escala mundial puede utilizarse para identificar especies y grupos de especies que pueden correr un riesgo especial de sufrir daños a causa del comercio y puede servir de base para intervenciones políticas y de conservación destinadas a reducir sus efectos adversos.

Identifying species likely threatened by international trade on the IUCN Red List can inform CITES trade measures.

Overexploitation is a major threat to biodiversity and international trade in many species is regulated through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). However, there is no established method to systematically determine which species are most at risk from international trade to inform potential trade measures under CITES. Here, we develop a mechanism using the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species to identify species that are likely to be threatened by international trade. Of 2,211 such species, CITES includes 59% (1,307 species), leaving two-fifths overlooked and in potential need of international trade regulation. Our results can inform deliberations on potential proposals to revise trade measures for species at CITES Conference of the Parties meetings. We also show that, for taxa with biological resource use documented as a threat, the number of species threatened by local and national use is four times greater than species likely threatened by international trade. To effectively address the overexploitation of species, interventions focused on achieving sustainability in international trade need to be complemented by commensurate measures to ensure that local and national use and trade of wildlife is well-regulated and sustainable.

A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets.

In 2010, the international community, under the auspices of the Convention on Biological Diversity, agreed on 20 biodiversity-related "Aichi Targets" to be achieved within a decade. We provide a comprehensive mid-term assessment of progress toward these global targets using 55 indicator data sets. We projected indicator trends to 2020 using an adaptive statistical framework that incorporated the specific properties of individual time series. On current trajectories, results suggest that despite accelerating policy and management responses to the biodiversity crisis, the impacts of these efforts are unlikely to be reflected in improved trends in the state of biodiversity by 2020. We highlight areas of societal endeavor requiring additional efforts to achieve the Aichi Targets, and provide a baseline against which to assess future progress.