Re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in octogenarian patients in age of evolving transcatheter therapies.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative results and long-term survival of re-sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in octogenarians in age of transcatheter therapies. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study (April 2000 to December 2019). Perioperative data were compared for re-sternotomy with isolated SAVR (Isolated redoSAVR) and re-sternotomy with SAVR and concomitant cardiac procedure (Associated redoSAVR). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-patient mortality. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared for groups. RESULTS: There were 163 patients (Isolated redoSAVR; 69, Associated redoSAVR; 94). Emergency/salvage cases were excluded. The median age was 83 (81-85) years and the median logEuroSCORE was 19.2 (13.0-26.7)%. The follow-up was 4.2 ± 3.5 years. Inpatient mortality was 4.9% (1.4% vs. 7.4% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR respectively, p = .08). TIA/stroke rate was 8% (9% vs. 7% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR, respectively, p = .78). COPD was a predictor of inpatient mortality (odds ratio: 8.86; 95% confidence interval: 1.19-66.11, p = .03). Survival was 88.7%, 86.4%, 70.1%, 49.5%, and 26.3% at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years. There was no survival difference between Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR (log rank p = .36, Wilcoxon p = .84). Significant adverse predictors of long-term survival were COPD, postoperative TIA/stroke, and length of stay. Survival was lower than age and gender-matched first-time SAVR and general population of the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: RedoSAVR in octogenarians is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Shared decision-making should consider emerging transcatheter therapies as a valuable option in selected patients.

Impact of valve size, predicted effective and indexed effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of manufacturer labeled prosthesis size and predicted effective orifice area (EOA) on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement is not clear although indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) has been associated with worse survival. METHODS: Data was retrospectively collected from Jan 2000-Dec 2019 for prosthesis type, model, and size for isolated aortic valve replacements. Stratified survival was compared between groups and subgroups for labeled valve size, EOA and predicted patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM). RESULTS: A total of 3444 patients were included. Moderate and severe PPM was 15.6% and 1.6%, respectively. Cumulative lifetime hazard was worse for biological valves (mortality: biological 77.7% vs. mechanical 64.8%, p = .001). Moderate prosthetic aortic stenosis (AS), (EOA = 1-1.5 cm2 ) was 12.1% and severe prosthetic AS (EOA ≤ 1 cm2 ) was 0.8%, respectively. Survival was 10.5 ± 0.4 years with moderate to severe prosthetic AS (EOA≤1.5 cm2 ) versus 12.6 ± 0.2 years with mild to no prosthetic AS (EOA>1.5 cm2 ), p = .001. Worse survival in the presence of moderate-severe prosthetic AS was seen with biological valves (9.7 ± 0.4 years vs. 11.2 ± 0.2 years, p = .001 for EOA≤1.5, >1.5 cm2 , respectively). Moderate to severe PPM was associated with worse survival (11.1 ± 0.4 years for iEOA ≤ 0.85 cm2 /m2 vs. 12.5 ± 0.2 years with iEOA > 0.85 cm2 /m2 , p = .001). Moderate to severe PPM predicted worse long term survival (hazard ratio: 3.56; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-9.25; p = .009). CONCLUSION: Predicted prosthetic moderate to severe AS and moderate to severe PPM adversely affect long term survival. Smaller valves are associated with reduced survival.

Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery without caval occlusion: Short and midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: The use of minimally invasive or transcatheter interventions rather than standard full sternotomy operations to treat tricuspid valve (TV) disease is increasing. The debate however is still open regarding venous drainage management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and wheatear or not superior and inferior vena cava should be occluded during the opening of the right atrium to avoid air entrance in the venous line. The aim of the present study is to report operative outcomes and midterm follow-up results of minimally invasive TV surgery performed without caval occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective outcome evaluation from institutional records was performed with prospective data entry. Considered were consecutive patients who underwent right mini-thoracotomy TV surgery isolated or combined with mitral valve surgery during the period from June 2013 to February 2020. A telephone and echocardiographic follow-up was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 68 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive TV surgery without occlusion of cava veins. The mean age was 69 ± 14 years and 48 (70%) were female. All operations were performed safely without air-lock during CPB. A perioperative cerebral stroke occurred in one patient. The survival at a 5- and 8-year follow-up was 100% and 79%, respectively. No severe tricuspid regurgitation was evident at echocardiographic follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results show that performing tricuspid surgery without caval occlusion is safe. The air was captured by the active vacuum drainage system without causing damage. Midterm follow-up data confirm that a minimally invasive approach does not alter the quality of surgery.

Type A aortic syndromes in COVID-19 positive patients: Case series from a UK multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) increases the respiratory complications and carries a higher mortality in the immediate postoperative period. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with type A acute aortic syndromes (AAS) diagnosed with COVID-19 in the perioperative period. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between March and August 2020 from 20 participating cardiac surgery centers in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Among 122 patients who underwent emergency surgical repair for type A AAS at the participating centers, 3 patients (2.5%) tested positive for COVID-19 in the preoperative screeing, and 4 cases turned to be positive in the postoperative period having been operated on an unknown COVID-19 status. Another patient was diagnosed of COVID-19 disease based on radiological features. These eight patients had increased postoperative complications, including respiratory failure, longer ventilation times, and Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) stay and increased mortality when compared with COVID-19 negative patients. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 disease in the perioperative period of type A AAS poses a challenge. Despite the increasing morbidity and mortality associated with the virus, the prognosis of the aortic disease is poorer and emergency surgery should not be contraindicated based on the COVID-19 diagnosis alone.

Central cannulation by Seldinger technique: a reliable method in ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement.

BACKGROUND: Extensive type A aortic dissections that involve peripheral great vessels can complicate the choice of a cannulation site for cardiopulmonary bypass. We started to employ direct cannulation of the true lumen on the concavity of the aortic arch by Seldinger technique and evaluated the efficacy of this access technique as an alternative arterial inflow target in aortic surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age: 59±14 years) underwent type A aortic dissection repair using selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Direct aortic cannulation was used in 14 cases, subclavian access in 6 patients, and femoral entry in 4 patients. Perioperative factors were evaluated to identify the reliability and eventual benefits of direct cannulation method at the aortic arch. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths and cumulative 30-day mortality rate was 25% (6). Permanent neurological deficits were not observed; in 1 patient transient changes occurred (4%). Time to reach circulatory arrest was the shortest in the direct access group, with mean 27±11 (CI: 20.6-33.3) min vs. 43±22 (28.0-78.0) min (p=0.058) and 32±8 (23.6-40.4) min (p=0.34) by femoral cannulation and subclavian entry, respectively. Direct arch cannulation resulted in the best renal function in the first 72 h after surgery and similar characteristics were observed in lactic acid levels. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided direct cannulation on the concavity of the aortic arch using a Seldinger technique is a reliable method in dissection repairs. Prompt antegrade perfusion provides not only cerebral but also peripheral organ and tissue protection, which is an advantage in this high-risk group of patients.

Left Internal Thoracic Artery versus Saphenous Vein Grafts to Left Anterior Descending Artery after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study compared perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) versus left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included patients with primary isolated CABG from January 2001 to July 2022. Baseline demographics were compared between SVG-LAD and LITA-LAD. Univariable and multivariable regressions were performed for predictors of in-hospital death. Propensity score matching was performed for LITA-LAD vs. SVG-LAD. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for comparison of survival. Cox proportional hazards model was used for predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 8237 patients (1602 SVG-LAD/6725 LITA-LAD) were included. Median age was 67.9 years (LITA-LAD; 67.1 years vs. SVG-LAD; 71.7 years, p < 0.01). A total of 1270 pairs of SVG-LAD were propensity-matched to LITA-LAD. In matched cohorts, in-hospital mortality (0.8% vs. 1.6%, LITA-LAD and SVG-LAD respectively; p = 0.07), deep sternal wound infection, new cerebrovascular events, renal replacement therapy and hospital stay >30 days were similar. SVG-LAD did not adversely affect in-hospital mortality (OR; 2.03, CI; 0.91, 4.54, p = 0.08). Median long-term survival was similar between the groups (13.7 years vs. 13.1 years for LITA-LAD and SVG-LAD respectively, log rank p < 0.31). SVG-LAD was not a predictor of adverse long-term survival. (HR; 1.06, 95% CI; 0.92, 1.22, p < 0.40). Long-term survival was better with LITA-LAD for LVEF <30% (log rank p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the propensity-matched cohorts for use of SVG vs. LITA to the LAD. Further contemporary long-term studies are needed for substantiation.

Frozen elephant use in type a dissection: fundamentals, innovations, and pitfalls.

INTRODUCTION: Type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD) is a great challenge for aortic surgeons. The establishment of a standardized surgical approach, particularly the determination of whether and when to address the aortic arch and the distal aorta in the same operation as the proximal aorta, is still unclear. AREAS COVERED: Frozen elephant trunk (FET) has emerged as a valuable treatment for TA-AAD over the last decade. Here, we discuss the fundamentals and pitfalls of frozen elephant trunk procedures and present the latest innovations. EXPERT OPINION: FET has the potential to simplify arch reconstruction in patients with complex arch tears and rupture, optimize perfusion in the distal true lumen for those with a compressed true lumen and malperfusion, address distal reentry tears, and promote false lumen thrombosis and late aortic remodeling. Nevertheless, FET is still associated with non-negligible mortality and morbidity rates. Patient selection, surgical expertise, and postoperative care remain crucial determinants in ensuring successful outcomes. Recent innovations in FET surgery involve the development of techniques to minimize or avoid hypothermic circulatory arrest and new FET devices with different arch branch configurations aiming to facilitate subsequent aortic reinterventions. We believe that both these advancements have the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Calcification of Gore-Tex Neochord After Mitral Repair: Electron Microscopy.

A 76-year-old woman presented with severe mitral valve regurgitation 6 years after mitral valve repair with Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, W.L. Gore & Associates Inc) neochords and ring annuloplasty. Echocardiography revealed a ruptured neochord. During successful mitral valve replacement, the explanted Gore-Tex neochords were found to be stiff and calcified, with a fracture. Electron microscopy was used to examine the explant and a control neochord. There was disruption of the microstructure with extensive calcium infiltration at the fracture point. Although this is a rare cause of late repair failure, it warrants yearly follow-up with echocardiography.

Reconsidered surgical aortic valve replacement after declined transcatheter valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for high surgical risk patients who declined transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and then reconsidered for conventional aortic valve replacement (rSAVR) for severe calcific aortic stenosis are not well known. METHODS: This single-centre, case-control study (rSAVR vs Conservative group) retrospectively analysed patients for rSAVR (2009-2019). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of composite of neurological sequelae/renal failure/deep sternal wound infection/re-exploration and death. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: TAVI was denied in 519/1095 patients, 114(10.4%) had rSAVR (cases) and 405 (37%) were managed conservatively (controls). Mean age for rSAVR was 80 years (IQR: 73.5-85 years). The commonest reason for declining TAVI was prohibitive high risk due to multiple comorbidities. Among rSAVR, hospital mortality was 2.2% and stroke was 4.4%. Median follow-up was conservative; 14.4 months versus rSAVR; 34.8 months. Five-year survival was conservative; 12.6% versus rSAVR; and 59.5% (overall conservative; 38.0% vs. rSAVR; 60.5%, p < 0.001). rSAVR was protective (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26, 0.51, p < 0.001) and high comorbidities had high hazard (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.07, p = 0.001). rSAVR had fewer hospital readmission episodes (Conservative; 13.6/patient-year vs. rSAVR; 6.9/patient-year, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: rSAVR may be considered in high surgical risk elderly patients who have been declined TAVI in centres with low operative mortality. rSAVR may be superior to conservative management in carefully selected patients.

Survival benefit from a second arterial conduit to the circumflex circulation persists in elderly after coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective propensity matched study investigated the impact of age on the survival benefit from a second arterial conduit to the left-sided circulation. METHODS: Data for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery were collected from October 2004 to March 2014. All patients with an internal mammary artery graft to left anterior descending artery and additional arterial or venous graft to the circumflex circulation were included. Propensity matching was used to balance co-variates and generate odds of death for each observation. Odds ratios (venous vs. arterial) were charted against age. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.12% (arterial) vs. 1.24% (venous) (p = 0.77). The overall 10-year survival was 74.6% (venous) vs. 82.6% (arterial) (p = 0.001). A total of 1226 patients were successfully matched to the venous or arterial (second conduit to circumflex territory after left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery) cohorts. Odds ratio for death (venous to arterial) showed a linear decremental overall survival benefit for the second arterial graft to circumflex circulation with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit of a second arterial graft persists through all age groups with a gradual decline with increasing age over the decades. Elderly patients should not be denied a second arterial graft to the circumflex circulation based on age criterion alone.

Surgery for Bentall endocarditis: short- and midterm outcomes from a multicentre registry.

OBJECTIVES: Endocarditis after the Bentall procedure is a severe disease often complicated by a pseudoaneurysm or mediastinitis. Reoperation is challenging but conservative therapy is not effective. The aim of this study was to assess short- and midterm outcomes of patients reoperated on for Bentall-related endocarditis. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with Bentall procedure-related endocarditis were recorded in the Italian registry. The mean age was 57 ± 14 years and 92% were men; preoperative comorbidities included hypertension (45%), diabetes (12%) and renal failure (11%). The logistic EuroSCORE was 25%; the EuroSCORE II was 8%. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 12% of the patients were in septic shock; left ventricular-aortic discontinuity was present in 63% and mitral valve involvement occurred in 12%. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (22%) and Streptococci (14%). Reoperations after a median interval of 30 months (1-221 months) included a repeat Bentall with a bioconduit (41%), a composite mechanical (33%) or biological valved conduit (19%) and a homograft (6%). In 1 patient, a heart transplant was required (1%); in 12%, a mitral valve procedure was needed. The hospital mortality rate was 15%. The postoperative course was complicated by renal failure (19%), major bleeding (14%), pulmonary failure (14%), sepsis (11%) and multiorgan failure (8%). At multivariate analysis, urgent surgery was a risk factor for early death [hazard ratio 20.5 (1.9-219)]. Survival at 5 and 8 years was 75 ± 6% and 71 ± 7%, with 3 cases of endocarditis relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is effective in treating endocarditis following the Bentall procedure although it is associated with high perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. Endocarditis relapse seems to be uncommon.

Open and closed distal anastomosis for acute type A aortic dissection repair.

OBJECTIVES: The current consensus favours an open distal anastomosis for aortic dissection repair. A small number of experiences have compared early and long-term outcomes between closed and open distal anastomosis in the setting of acute aortic dissection. METHODS: We reviewed our experience in 204 patients who underwent repair of spontaneous acute type A aortic dissection between January 2000 and December 2013. Open distal repair was performed in 109 patients, whereas 95 patients received a closed anastomosis. The clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics of aortic dissection, surgical techniques and the outcomes were analysed in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients (n = 100; open = 39, closed = 61) with Type 1 DeBakey dissection and a proximal intimal tear. Twenty-six preoperative and operative variables were studied to determine their impact on hospital mortality and postoperative neurological deficits. Imaging follow-up was available in 83 patients. RESULTS: A more extensive involvement of the aortic arch characterized the open repair group. No differences in terms of mortality, morbidity and survival rates were observed between the two groups of patients. Open repair with cerebral perfusion was associated with a better neurological outcome. Patients who underwent an open distal anastomosis showed a significant higher rate of complete thrombosis of the false lumen. CONCLUSIONS: An open repair does not increase the risk of early mortality and positively affect the evolution of the false lumen in distal unresected aortic segments. The use of cerebral perfusion reduces the risk of perioperative neurological injury.

Acute type A aortic dissection repair in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated our experience in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair in elderly patients. The role of clinical presentation and surgical strategies in determining patients' outcome was further assessed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients over 75 years who underwent emergency repair of ATAAD at our institution during 2000-13 was performed. Forty-five patients (mean age = 79 ± 3 years; 26 females) were identified. Aortic dissection was complicated in 17 (37%) patients with new neurological deficit (n = 5), cardiac tamponade (n = 12), acute myocardial infarction (n = 5) and acute renal failure (n = 2). The ascending aorta was replaced in all patients and hypothermic circulatory arrest was employed in 22 patients. The aortic replacement needed extension to the hemiarch in 11 patients and the aortic valve was replaced in 9 patients; in 3 cases, full root replacement was performed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 15% (n = 7). Preoperative acute neurological deficit was the only independent risk factor for mortality (P = 0.03). Age >80 years old per se was not associated with a poor outcome. Surgical strategies and extension of aortic wall resection did not affect the operative mortality. The postoperative course was complicated in 23 (52%) patients. During the median follow-up of 57 months, there were 4 late deaths. The cumulative 1-, 5- and 8-year survival rates were 82, 76 and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgical repair of ATAAD in elderly patients resulted in an acceptable early mortality rate and satisfactory intermediate survival. Preoperative acute neurological deficit predicts a worse outcome. Advanced age alone should not be considered as a contraindication to AAD repair.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIM: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) allows revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary (LAD) artery through a less traumatic surgical approach. However, the procedure is technically challenging and concern still exists, mainly based on graft patency. The purpose of this study is to critically evaluate short and long-term benefits of this surgical treatment. METHODS: Between June 1997 and July 2012, 306 patients underwent MIDCAB on LAD. The mean age was 62 ±â€Š10 years (range, 32-87 years) and 264 patients (86.3%) were men. Mean ejection fraction was 54%. Eighty-nine procedures (29.1%) were performed using a hybrid approach by means of MIDCAB and postoperative (60 patients, 67.4%) or preoperative (29 patients, 32.6%) percutaneous interventions on non-LAD vessels. A EuroScore more than 6 was found in 43 (14%) patients. The average follow-up time was 9.5 ±â€Š3.2 years and was 89% complete. RESULTS: Six patients (1.9%) required intraoperative conversion to sternotomy, whereas cardiopulmonary bypass institution after the sternotomy was necessary in one. Postoperative acute myocardial infarction occurring nine patients (2.9%), low output syndrome in four (1.3%). Postoperative mortality was 1.6% (n = 5), and perioperative stroke rate 0.6% (n = 2). Five and 10-year survival were 94.1 and 86.9%, respectively. Freedom from death due to cardiac events and major cardiac and cerebral events at 10 years was, respectively, 97.1 and 92.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the favorable short and long-term results of the MIDCAB procedure. MIDCAB, in experienced centers, can represent an alternative treatment option for LAD disease.

Cusp repair during aortic valve-sparing operation: technical aspects and impact on results.

AIMS: Aortic valve-sparing operations are nowadays considered safe and reliable procedures in terms of mid-term and long-term results. Although surgical techniques regarding the modality of grafts' implantation have been properly addressed, the modality of cusp repair, when needed, is still open to debate. We sought to review the literature to try to shed light on when the cusp repair is required and how it should be performed. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database using the keywords aortic valve-sparing operation, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation, valve-sparing aortic root replacement, aortic valve repair, and aortic cusp repair. Only studies that included and described in detail the technique of cusp repairs in adjunct to aortic valve-sparing operation were considered. RESULTS: Bicuspid aortic valve more often requires correction when compared with tricuspid valve. The range of the techniques varies from the 'simple' free margin plication to the more complex triangular resection with patch repair. Results in the literature seem to be encouraging, showing that, in most of the cases, cusp repair does not affect valve competence in the mid-term and long-term. CONCLUSION: Correction of the cusp is a delicate balance between undercorrection that could lead to residual prolapse and overcorrection that could lead to cusp restriction. Although complex repair of the aortic valve in addition to root replacement provided satisfactory results, it should be reserved for experienced centers with a large volume of patients.

Reoperation after acute type a aortic dissection repair: a series of 104 patients.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to analyze the causes, timing, and results of reoperation after primary repair for acute type A dissection. METHODS: One hundred and four consecutive patients underwent a reoperation after previous type A aortic dissection repair (1972 to 2008). Supracoronary ascending aorta replacement (SCAR) was commonly performed during primary repair and it was associated with aortic root replacement in 13 cases and with hemiarch replacement in 26 patients. Progression of aortic dilatation was seen in 91 patients (87%), aortic regurgitation in 21 (20%), and false aneurysm in 15 patients (14%). A redo Bentall procedure was performed in 34 cases, arch replacement in 42 patients, and thoracoabdominal aorta replacement in 20 patients. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (range 0.3 to 23.8 years). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality after redo surgery was 7.7%. The global survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 92%, 82%, and 58%, respectively. Proximal reoperations were more frequent in patients who had SCAR and flap extension into the aortic root. Patients with an unresected intimal tear and distal extension of dissection flap experienced a higher rate of aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aorta redo procedures. CONCLUSIONS: More extensive acute dissection repair results in a lower rate of reoperation. Mortality for redo surgery after type A acute dissection repair is acceptable. This finding should be taken into account in proposing a widespread of more complex and extensive surgery for type A acute dissection.

Postsurgical aortic false aneurysm: pathogenesis, clinical presentation and surgical strategy.

Postsurgical aortic false aneurysm occurs in less than 0.5% of all cardiac surgical cases and its management is a challenge in terms of preoperative evaluation and surgical approach. Although infections are well recognized as risk factors, technical aspects of a previous operation may have a role in pseudoaneurysm formation. The risk factors and clinical presentation of pseudoaneurysms and the surgical strategy are revisited in this article.

Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm following aortic valve prosthesis endocarditis.

A 63-year-old man underwent aortic valve replacement and an early reoperation for recurrent endocarditis. Sixteen months later he presented with persistent fever and a 64-slice computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a subannular left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. He underwent successful left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction and aortic valve prosthesis, partial root and ascending aorta replacement.