Another indication for liposuction: small facial lipomas.

The treatment of facial lipomas at times requires the use of incisions that are less than satisfactory in either size or location. In an effort to minimize scarring, the authors have been removing these lesions with liposuction. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' experience in treating small facial lipomas using liposuction. Over the last 10 years, the authors treated five patients with forehead lipomas by removal with liposuction through hair-bearing scalp incisions. All patients were evaluated after the procedure for bleeding, paresthesias, recurrence, scarring, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. All of these patients had lipomas that measured 4 cm or less at the time of surgery. No patient experienced hematoma, nerve injury, or recurrence. All patients were completely satisfied with their result and scar. The literature describes an advantage to using liposuction for the treatment of medium (4 to 10 cm) and large (>10 cm) lipomas. Because small lipomas (<4 cm) can be extracted through small incisions, the literature reports no advantage to removal with liposuction. However, favorable aesthetic results can be obtained by removing small facial lipomas with liposuction through strategically placed incisions.

Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth?

The purpose of this study was to examine the role for epinephrine augmentation of digital block anesthesia by safely prolonging its duration of action and providing a temporary hemostatic effect. After obtaining approval from the review board of the authors' institution, 60 digital block procedures were performed in a prospective randomized double-blinded study. The digital blocks were performed using the dorsal approach. All anesthetics were delivered to treat either posttraumatic injuries or elective conditions. Of the 60 digital block procedures, 31 were randomized to lidocaine with epinephrine and 29 to plain lidocaine. Of the procedures performed using lidocaine with epinephrine, one patient required an additional injection versus five of the patients who were given plain lidocaine (p = 0.098). The need for control of bleeding required digital tourniquet use in 20 of 29 block procedures with plain lidocaine and in 9 of 31 procedures using lidocaine with epinephrine (p < 0.002). Two patients experienced complications after plain lidocaine blocks, while no complications occurred after lidocaine with epinephrine blocks (p = 0.23). By prolonging lidocaine's duration of action, epinephrine may prevent the need for an additional injection and prolong post-procedure pain relief. This study demonstrated that the temporary hemostatic effect of epinephrine decreased the need for, and thus the potential risk of, using a digital tourniquet (p < 0.002). As the temporary vasoconstrictor effect is reversible, the threat of complication from vasoconstrictor-induced ischemia is theoretical.

Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin.

Possessing viscous and elastic rheological properties, skin is viscoelastic. Mechanical creep, defined as the elongation of skin with a constant load over time beyond intrinsic extensibility, has been described as the vehicle harnessed for wound closure with presuturing, intraoperative tissue expansion, skin-stretching devices, and skin retraction with undermining. Resulting from the generation of new tissue due to a chronic stretching force, biological creep plays a role in conventional tissue expansion.

Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited.

Digital block anesthesia with epinephrine, ring technique, and digital tourniquet have been implicated in causing finger gangrene. An extensive review of the literature provided no case of finger gangrene attributed solely to the adjunctive use of epinephrine with lidocaine for digital block. By causing vasoconstriction, epinephrine complements the local analgesic by prolonging the duration of action and providing a temporary hemostatic effect. Epinephrine augmentation of digital block anesthesia was used in the treatment of 23 finger injuries without a complication.

Tamoxifen downregulates TGF-beta production in keloid fibroblasts.

Keloids occur only in humans and are characterized by fibroblast overproduction of collagen types I and III. Keloid fibroblasts have been shown to make elevated levels of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), a growth factor known to promote extracellular matrix production and fibrosis. Thus, the pathophysiology underlying keloid formation may be driven by the biological activity of TGF-beta. Tamoxifen, a synthetic, nonsteroidal antiestrogen has been shown to inhibit keloid fibroblast proliferation and decrease collagen production. The purpose of this study was to determine if a mechanism by which tamoxifen decreases keloid collagen production is through a downregulation of TGF-beta. Through a luciferase TGF-beta bioassay we found that 4 microM of tamoxifen generated a 49% reduction in total TGF-beta activity and 8 microM generated an 85% reduction compared with controls. Thus we propose that one of the mechanisms by which tamoxifen decreases keloid fibroblast collagen synthesis is by decreasing TGF-beta production.