Five-year outcomes after iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for low-risk prostate cancer at three cancer centres in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of >1000 men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy at three large UK cancer centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1038 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤10 ng/mL, Gleason score 6, ≤T2b disease) were treated with LDR iodine 125 (I-125) brachytherapy between 2002 and 2007. Patients were treated at three UK centres. PSA and clinical follow-up was performed at each centre. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was reported for the cohort. RESULTS: The median (range) PSA follow-up for the whole group was 5 years (4 months to 9 years). A total of 79 patients had biochemical failure, defined by a rise in PSA level: 16 patients fulfilled the ASTRO definition of biochemical failure, 25 patients fulfilled the Phoenix definition and 38 patients fulfilled both definitions. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate was 94.1% by the ASTRO definition and 94.2% by the Phoenix definition. The absence of neoadjuvant hormone therapy was predictive of inferior biochemical control as defined by the Phoenix definition (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective multicentre series showed excellent bRFS with LDR I-125 brachytherapy for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Further work is necessary to define the role of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in combination with brachytherapy.

Biochemical outcomes for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with I-125 interstitial brachytherapy monotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Routine use of I-125 interstitial brachytherapy (BT) alone in intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer is controversial. It is often combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The biochemical outcome of a large cohort of only IR disease treated with BT monotherapy is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2007, 615 patients with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) defined IR disease (one risk factor only-T2b, or Gleason score (GS) 7, or raised initial PSA (iPSA) 10.1-20ng/ml) were treated with BT monotherapy. ASTRO (3 consecutive rises) and Phoenix (nadir plus 2) criteria defined biochemical failure. Potential prognostic factors (pre- and post-implant dosimetric indices, GS 3+4 versus 4+3, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)) were analysed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.0years. Forty-three patients had stage T2b, 180 had raised iPSA, 392 had GS 7 disease. ADT was received by 108 patients. The 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates are 87.3% (by ASTRO), 88.6% (by Phoenix). Stratification by risk factor (T2b, GS7, raised iPSA) demonstrated raised iPSA to have poorer outcome only by Phoenix criteria (p=0.0002). Other potential prognostic variables were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Good rates of biochemical control can be achieved in the medium term with BT monotherapy in IR disease. Raised iPSA correlated with a poorer outcome.

Development of a patient-reported questionnaire for collecting toxicity data following prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To improve a questionnaire used to collect patient-reported outcomes from patients with early stage prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy. A secondary aim was to adapt the Late Effects of Normal Tissue (LENT) subjective toxicity questionnaire for use to collect Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) data, the current preferred platform for assessing radiation toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were treated with permanent iodine-125 seed implant brachytherapy for early prostate cancer. Toxicity data were collected before and at nine time points post-treatment (0-36 months). Compliance rates for patients completing individual items and item-subsection correlation coefficients were calculated. A factor analysis was carried out to analyse responses to the questionnaire and identify less informative questions, which could be removed. Cronbach's α coefficient was used to measure reliability. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and eighty-eight questionnaires were analysed. There was poor compliance for questions specifically relating to operations and bowel medication. We found that the division of the questionnaire into subsections based on anatomical site was reasonable and that certain items could be safely removed. The high mean value for Cronbach's α across all questionnaires (0.752; 95% CI: 0.726-0.779) indicated that the questionnaire was reliable. Fifteen of the 44 questions were removed from the original questionnaires. Questions on urinary incontinence severity, management of urinary and bowel incontinence, effects of reduced flow of urine and the effects of symptoms on activity of daily living and change in sexual function were required to adapt the LENT subjective questionnaire for use to collect CTCAE data. CONCLUSIONS: A questionnaire, validated over 6 years to collect LENT subjective data were adapted and is a reliable approach for collecting CTCAE data after prostate brachytherapy.