An overview of biosimilars and non-biologic complex drugs in Europe, the United States, and Canada and their relevance to multiple sclerosis.

The advent of biological medicines has significantly transformed the landscapes of many disease spaces and improved the lives of millions around the world. However, the structural complexity and sensitivity of such products result in a high price tag, adding to already financially strained healthcare systems. As these and other expensive complex drugs lose market exclusivity, stakeholders eagerly await the arrival of lower cost alternatives, such as biosimilars and subsequent entry non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs). Nevertheless, stakeholders remain uncertain about key issues which have resulted in heterogeneous reimbursement policies and varying levels of biosimilar uptake and subsequent entry NBCD approval processes between different markets. With the imminent introduction of both subsequent entry NBCDs and biosimilars for multiple sclerosis (MS), it is important to get a better understanding of this new class of products and how healthcare systems have been adapting to their use. This article defines biosimilars and subsequent entry NBCDs and provides an overview of how these products have been introduced in Europe, the United States, and Canada from a regulatory, health technology, and reimbursement perspective. In addition, this article briefly explores the potential impact and outlook of biosimilar and NBCD products related to MS.

Development and Validation of a Small Animal Immobilizer and Positioning System for the Study of Delivery of Intracranial and Extracranial Radiotherapy Using the Gamma Knife System.

The purpose of this research is to establish a process of irradiating mice using the Gamma Knife as a versatile system for small animal irradiation and to validate accurate intracranial and extracranial dose delivery using this system. A stereotactic immobilization device was developed for small animals for the Gamma Knife head frame allowing for isocentric dose delivery. Intercranial positional reproducibility of a reference point from a primary reference animal was verified on an additional mouse. Extracranial positional reproducibility of the mouse aorta was verified using 3 mice. Accurate dose delivery was validated using film and thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements with a solid water phantom. Gamma Knife plans were developed to irradiate intracranial and extracranial targets. Mice were irradiated validating successful targeted radiation dose delivery. Intramouse positional variability of the right mandible reference point across 10 micro-computed tomography scans was 0.65 ± 0.48 mm. Intermouse positional reproducibility across 2 mice at the same reference point was 0.76 ± 0.46 mm. The accuracy of dose delivery was 0.67 ± 0.29 mm and 1.01 ± 0.43 mm in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. The planned dose delivered to a mouse phantom was 2 Gy at the 50% isodose with a measured thermoluminescent dosimeter dose of 2.9 ± 0.3 Gy. The phosphorylated form of member X of histone family H2A (γH2AX) staining of irradiated mouse brain and mouse aorta demonstrated adjacent tissue sparing. In conclusion, our system for preclinical studies of small animal irradiation using the Gamma Knife is able to accurately deliver intracranial and extracranial targeted focal radiation allowing for preclinical experiments studying focal radiation.

Look beyond budgets to the broader benefits.

The success of researchers in developing innovative and effective medicines has produced a healthier and older population, as well as an observable shift in expenditure towards pharmaceuticals. In contrast to drug expenditures, patented drug prices have actually shown an average annual decrease of 0.5% since 1988. While we agree cost-effectiveness evaluation is a useful input into the decision-making process of drug benefit managers, it is but one consideration, and it is imperative that governments look beyond drug budgets to the broader benefits of innovative drug therapy to Canadians, both economically and clinically. The lead paper makes a number of suggestions regarding clinical trials that would lead to an increased demand on the developers of innovative medicines, all of which would raise the development costs of drugs while reducing the spectrum of available agents. This commentary argues that focusing greater attention on ensuring the appropriate use of medicines, with less concentration on restricting Canadians' access to effective drugs available in other countries, will yield the greatest benefits to the health of our population. Patient health management is a strategy that deserves a closer look to achieve this goal.