A comparative biomarker study of 514 matched cases of male and female breast cancer reveals gender-specific biological differences.

Male breast cancer remains understudied despite evidence of rising incidence. Using a co-ordinated multi-centre approach, we present the first large scale biomarker study to define and compare hormone receptor profiles and survival between male and female invasive breast cancer. We defined and compared hormone receptor profiles and survival between 251 male and 263 female breast cancers matched for grade, age, and lymph node status. Tissue microarrays were immunostained for ERα, ERß1, -2, -5, PR, PRA, PRB and AR, augmented by HER2, CK5/6, 14, 18 and 19 to assist typing. Hierarchical clustering determined differential nature of influences between genders. Luminal A was the most common phenotype in both sexes. Luminal B and HER2 were not seen in males. Basal phenotype was infrequent in both. No differences in overall survival at 5 or 10 years were observed between genders. Notably, AR-positive luminal A male breast cancer had improved overall survival over female breast cancer at 5 (P = 0.01, HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.26-0.87) but not 10 years (P = 0.29, HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.46-1.26) and both 5 (P = 0.04, HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.07-0.97) and 10 years (P = 0.04, HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.12-0.97) in the unselected group. Hierarchical clustering revealed common clusters between genders including total PR-PRA-PRB and ERß1/2 clusters. A striking feature was the occurrence of ERα on distinct clusters between genders. In female breast cancer, ERα clustered with PR and its isoforms; in male breast cancer, ERα clustered with ERß isoforms and AR. Our data supports the hypothesis that breast cancer is biologically different in males and females suggesting implications for clinical management. With the incidence of male breast cancer increasing this provides impetus for further study.

Phosphorylation of estrogen receptor beta at serine 105 is associated with good prognosis in breast cancer.

Estrogen receptor (ER) action is modulated by posttranslational modifications. Although ERalpha phosphorylation correlates with patient outcome, ERbeta is similarly phosphorylated but its significance in breast cancer has not been addressed. We investigated whether ERbeta that is phosphorylated at serine 105 (S105-ERbeta) is expressed in breast cancer and assessed potential clinical implications of this phosphorylation. Following antibody validation, S105-ERbeta expression was studied in tissue microarrays comprising 108 tamoxifen-resistant and 351 tamoxifen-sensitive cases and analyzed against clinical data. S105-ERbeta regulation in vitro was assessed by Western blot, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence. Nuclear S105-ERbeta was observed in breast carcinoma and was associated with better survival (Allred score > or =3), even in tamoxifen-resistant cases, and additionally correlated with ERbeta1 and ERbeta2 expression. Distinct S105-ERbeta nuclear speckles were seen in some higher grade tumors. S105-ERbeta levels increased in MCF-7 cells in response to 17beta-estradiol, the ERbeta-specific agonist diarylpropionitrile, and the partial ERbeta-agonist genistein. S105-ERbeta nuclear speckles were also seen in MCF-7 cells and markedly increased in size and number at 24 hours following 17beta-estradiol and, in particular diarylpropionitrile, treatment. These speckles were coexpressed with ERbeta1 and ERbeta2. Presence of S105-ERbeta in breast cancer and association with improved survival, even in endocrine resistant breast tumors suggest S105-ERbeta might be a useful additional prognostic marker in this disease.

Carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 6 predicts breast cancer recurrence following adjuvant tamoxifen.

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen remains therapy of choice for premenopausal estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer. However, resistance and recurrence are serious problems. Our previous work indicated that carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) was significantly up-regulated in tamoxifen-resistant (TAMr) MCF-7 derivatives. The aim of this study was to determine the functional role of CEACAM6 in endocrine-resistant breast cancer and to retrospectively test whether it was predictive of resistance in a large cohort of breast cancers with long-term follow-up. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: siRNA silencing of CEACAM6 was done in TAMr cells and effects on clonogenicity and endocrine sensitivity were determined. CEACAM6 immunohistochemistry was done on a tissue microarray comprising 108 relapsed primary human breast cancers and 243 tamoxifen-sensitive controls. RESULTS: siRNA-mediated silencing of CEACAM6 reduced both clonogenicity and anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent growth of TAMr cells. Importantly, CEACAM6 silencing restored sensitivity of TAMr cells to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and proliferative response to 17beta-estradiol. Immunohistochemistry showed significantly more CEACAM expression in the relapsed group compared with nonrelapsed controls [35 of 108 (33.3%) and 32 of 243 (13.2%), respectively; odds ratio, 3.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.83-5.47); P < 0.0001]. Additionally, we derived an outcome predictor model based on CEACAM expression that restratified patients in the Nottingham prognostic index intermediate-risk group into either higher-risk or lower-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support an important role for CEACAM6 in endocrine resistance, which can serve as a powerful predictor of future recurrence.

Investigating and critically appraising the expression and potential role of androgen receptor in breast carcinoma.

The potential role of the androgen receptor (AR) as a predictive or prognostic factor in breast cancer remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of AR in a cohort of breast carcinomas with long-term follow-up and to critically appraise this in the context of existing literature. Four hundred and eight cases of invasive breast cancer were incorporated into tissue microarrays (TMAs). All received tamoxifen and comprised 108 cases which relapsed and 300 cases which did not. Mean follow-up time for the former was 84 months (range 1-142, SD 38.8) and for the latter was 77 months (range 11-229, SD 49.7). TMAs were immunohistochemically stained with AR and scored as a continuous variable and using the Allred score. AR expression was significantly associated with grade, recurrence on tamoxifen, non-breast cancer death estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR). AR correlated significantly with better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using an Allred cut-off of 4 (log rank=0.0053 and 0.0044, respectively), and 20% positive tumor cells (log rank=0.0027 and 0.0059, respectively). AR expression was additionally associated with a reduced risk of recurrence following endocrine therapy. In summary, AR positive breast tumors have better OS and DFS and are less likely to recur following endocrine treatment.