How I treat brain metastases of melanoma.

Brain metastases are common in advanced melanoma and cause death in >50% of patients. Until recently, median survival was only ∼4 months. Improved systemic treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors, however, has significantly improved intracranial tumor response and survival. In addition, advances in radiation therapy have also improved the intracranial outcomes for advanced melanoma patients with brain metastases (MBM). There has long been concern that systemic treatment of the central nervous metastases would be ineffective due to inability of active agents to cross an intact blood-brain barrier. Recent studies have shown, however, that highly active systemic therapy can have significant benefit in these patients. When determining a patient's treatment, the important factors in predicting the likelihood of benefit including the presence of neurologic symptoms, the number and size of brain metastases, performance status/status of extracranial disease, and BRAF mutation status should all be considered. In this review, we will discuss the challenges and treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma and brain metastases.

Phase I study of high-dose continuous-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 and autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells in patients with metastatic or unresectable malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

The current study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) that could be administered as a continuous infusion in conjunction with autologous lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. All 55 patients in this study received a priming dose of rIL-2 of 1.0 mg/m2 per day given as a continuous infusion over 4.5 days. Patients later received (days 11-16) one of three doses of rIL-2 per day (1.0, 1.25, or 1.50 mg/m2) in conjunction with LAK cells given on days 11, 12, and 14. Because of unacceptable toxicity occurring early in the LAK cell phase of therapy at the rIL-2 dose level of 1.50 mg/m2, we concluded that the maximum tolerated dose of rIL-2 given as a continuous infusion with LAK cells is 1.25 mg/m2 per day.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of continuous infusion (6S)-folinic acid and bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer.

Twenty-seven patients with advanced cancer were entered in a phase I study of bolus i.v. 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 370 mg/m2/day for 5 days combined with a continuous i.v. infusion of (6S)-folinic acid for 5.5 days, starting 24 h in advance of the first 5-fluorouracil dose. The dose of (6S)-folinic acid was escalated in cohorts of patients from 250 mg/m2/day to a maximum of 1000 mg/m2/day. The pharmacokinetics of (6S)-folinic acid were studied in the 3 patients given 250 mg/m2/day and in 6 patients given 1000 mg/m2/day. The mean steady-state plasma concentrations of (6S)-folinic acid and its principal metabolite (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate at the 250 mg/m2/day dose were 2.7 and 5.1 microM, respectively. Both concentrations were comparable to the concentrations produced when (6S)-folinic acid was administered as half of a (6R,S)-folinic acid mixture (E. M. Newman et al., Cancer Res., 49:5755-5760, 1989). At the 1000 mg/m2/day dose of (6S)-folinic acid, the concentration of (6S)-folinic acid was 15.3 microM, more than the 4-fold increase predicted by linear pharmacokinetics, while the concentration of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate was only 16.5 microM. The change in the ratio of the parent compound to its metabolite was accounted for by a decrease in the nonrenal clearance of (6S)-folinic acid, probably indicating saturation of its metabolism. The toxicities observed in this phase I trial, including stomatitis, diarrhea, neutropenia, and anemia, did not differ in nature or severity from those produced by 5-fluorouracil and (6R,S)-folinic acid when administered on the same schedule. Finally, the degree of toxicity did not appear to depend on the dose of (6S)-folinic acid over the range of doses tested.

Randomized phase II trial of high-dose interleukin-2 either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine better the activity of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b (IFN; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the IL-2 Working Group initiated a randomized phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either IL-2 (Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 1.33 mg/m2 (approximately 600,000 IU/kg) alone or IL-2 0.8 mg/m2 and IFN 3 x 10(6) U/m2 administered by bolus intravenous injection every 8 hours, days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 (maximum, 28 doses). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and normal organ function. After 28 patients were entered onto each arm, the IL-2/IFN arm was closed because of a failure to meet predetermined efficacy criteria. An additional 43 patients (total, 71) were assigned to receive IL-2 alone. RESULTS: Toxicities were similar for both study arms. Hypotension requiring pressors was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity. Only 11 of 99 patients experienced severe toxicity; there were no irreversible side effects or treatment-related deaths. Responses were seen in three of 28 patients (11%) on IL-2/IFN (three partial responses [PRs] lasting 14, 7, and 7 months) and 12 of 71 patients (17%) on IL-2 alone (four complete responses [CRs] and eight PRs). Six of the partial responders on IL-2 and two on IL-2/IFN experienced greater than 90% reduction in tumor mass. Ten of the 12 responders to IL-2 have ongoing responses of 12+ to 26+ months in duration. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both IL-2 and IL-2/IFN therapy have activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In particular, therapy with high-dose IL-2 alone produces meaningful and durable responses with manageable and reversible toxicity. This study supports the contention that high-dose IL-2 represents the treatment of choice in selected patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II trial of cisplatin and alpha-interferon in advanced malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of combination cisplatin (CDDP) and alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) in advanced, measurable metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with metastatic melanoma were required to have bidimensionally measurable lesions and a Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%. Serum creatinine < or = to 1.5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance > or = 60 mL/min, adequate organ and bone marrow function, and radiologic proof of the absence of brain metastases were required. CDDP 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and day 8, and alpha-IFN 3 million units/m2 subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 were administered every 3 to 4 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered onto this phase II trial and were assessable for response and toxicity. Three patients achieved complete responses (CRs) that lasted 31+, 5, and 8+ months. Seven patients had partial responses (PRs) and a median response duration of 4.4 months. The overall objective response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 12% to 39%). Toxicities were mild. Only 11% of the courses required dose reduction of alpha-IFN, and three of 128 courses required CDDP dose reduction for reversible nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination of moderate-dose CDDP and alpha-IFN as administered in this schedule is well tolerated and possesses encouraging activity in metastatic melanoma.

Effective initial therapy of advanced breast cancer with fluorouracil and high-dose, continuous infusion calcium leucovorin.

PURPOSE: The use of leucovorin (LV) to modulate fluorouracil (FU)-mediated inhibition of thymidylate synthase has been shown both in vitro and in vivo to improve the antitumor activity of this drug. Based on our previous demonstration that this combination was active in heavily pretreated patients with prior FU exposure, we performed a phase II study of FU and high-dose intravenous calcium LV in patients with advanced breast cancer who had been exposed to no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one female patients with metastatic breast cancer were entered onto this trial. Patients with metastatic disease limited to soft tissue, lymph nodes, skin, and pulmonary nodules were allowed no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Those with metastases in the liver or a lymphangitic pattern on chest x-ray were allowed either a single prior regimen for advanced disease or no therapy for metastatic disease if less than 1 year had elapsed since the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. FU was given daily for 5 days at 400 mg/m2/d with calcium LV, 500 mg/m2/d, beginning 24 hours before and continuing 12 hours after the first and last FU doses, respectively. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate among 45 eligible patients was 36% (95% confidence interval, 22% to 51%). Fourteen of 31 patients in the soft tissue category responded (45%), and two of 14 in the visceral category experienced an objective response (14%). The median response duration was 5 months. Toxicities were moderate leukopenia and mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: FU plus LV is an active first-line regimen with antitumor efficacy comparable to that of the anthracyclines, which warrants further exploration in combination with other agents active in advanced breast cancer. FU plus LV in this schedule is also an excellent alternative for patients with medical contraindications to more intensive combination chemotherapy regimens.

Multiinstitutional phase II trial of intensive combination chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined high-dose cisplatin, dacarbazine (DTIC), and tamoxifen chemotherapy and high-dose bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and normal organ function were enrolled onto this multiinstitutional Cytokine Working Group trial. Patients received intensive chemoimmunotherapy consisting of cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and DTIC (350 mg/m2) intravenously (IV) on days 1 to 3 and 43 to 45, IL-2 600,000 IU/kg IV every 8 hours on days 12 to 16 and 26 to 30 (maximum, 28 doses), and tamoxifen 20 mg orally each day. Patients were evaluated for response at day 63 of each cycle, and responding patients were given a second cycle of therapy beginning on day 71 to 85. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were entered onto this study. Toxicities were as expected for the chemotherapy and immunotherapy components of this regimen. Overlapping toxicity consisted primarily of thrombocytopenia (76% of patients required platelet transfusions), neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and weight loss. Despite these cytopenias, bleeding and infectious complications were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR; 8%), and 13 achieved a partial response (PR). The overall objective response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 58%). Six additional patients had greater than 50% tumor reduction at day 63, which did not persist until a subsequent evaluation. The median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2 to 20+), and the median survival duration was 11 months. CONCLUSION: This intensive treatment regimen appears to possess activity in metastatic melanoma comparable, but not superior, to that of other less intensive cisplatin- and IL-2-based chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Although the toxicity and complexity of this regimen make it unsuitable for phase III testing and impractical for more widespread use, the results of this study support a potential favorable interaction between IL-2 and chemotherapy in this disease and highlight the need for appropriately designed phase III trials.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as therapy for primary induction failure for patients with acute leukemia.

The survival of patients with acute leukemia who do not achieve a remission with primary therapy is very poor. High-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has been shown to be effective therapy for patients with acute and chronic leukemia. Therefore, we determined the long-term disease-free survival of patients who did not achieve a remission and were then treated with high-dose therapy and bone marrow allografting from matched sibling donors. Twenty-one patients (median age, 28 years) who did not achieve a remission with induction chemotherapy were subsequently treated with allogeneic BMT. After BMT, 90% achieved a complete remission. Six died of complications of the therapy, and six patients relapsed between 27 and 448 days after BMT. Nine patients (43%; median age, 25 years) are alive between 556 and 4,174 days after BMT. The cumulative probability of disease-free survival at 10 years is 43%. This study suggests that allogeneic BMT can be an effective therapy to achieve long-term control of acute leukemia, even in those patients who do not achieve a remission with primary therapy.

Phase IB clinical trial of anti-CD3 followed by high-dose bolus interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma and advanced renal cell carcinoma: clinical and immunologic effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of an anti-CD3 antibody, OKT3, in combination with high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), and to determine whether OKT3 can enhance the expansion of CD3+, CD25+ (IL-2 receptor alpha [IL-2R alpha])-expressing T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma receiving high-dose IL-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phase IB trial of a murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) with high-dose IL-2 in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Fifty-four patients were enrolled, with cohorts of 10 or more patients receiving escalating doses of OKT3 at 75, 200, 400, and 600 micrograms/m2 on day 1 followed by IL-2 at an initial dose 0.45 and then 1.33 mg/m2 every 8 hours on days 2 through 6 and 16 through 20 (maximum, 28 doses). An additional cohort of 14 patients received high-dose IL-2 (1.33 mg/m2 per dose) alone. Circulating CD3+, CD25+ cells were monitored before therapy and following the initial week of IL-2. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were enrolled. The MTD for OKT3 was defined as 400 micrograms/m2 based on a reduction in the number of IL-2 doses that could be administered. Increases in CD3+, CD25+ cells were observed within all cohorts; however, the increase was not OKT3 dose-dependent. On the other hand, we found that 60% (nine of 15) of patients tested at OKT3 dose levels of 200, 400, and 600 micrograms/m2 had increases in serum sCD25 (soluble IL-2R alpha) to more than 100,000 U/mL, while none of 10 patients who received IL-2 alone or with OKT3 at the 75-micrograms dose had increases greater than 60,000 U/mL. Of 29 patients with renal cell carcinoma who received OKT3 with IL-2 (1.33 mg/m2), there were three objective tumor responses (all partial responses). In the 16 patients with melanoma who received OKT3 plus IL-2, there was a single objective response (complete response). CONCLUSION: The doses of OKT3 administered on this schedule failed to enhance significantly the number of circulating CD3+, CD25+ T cells and did not appear to increase the antitumor activity of IL-2 alone, which underscores the need for other approaches to enhance the efficacy of IL-2 therapy.

Effect of low-dose prophylactic dopamine on high-dose cisplatin-induced electrolyte wasting, ototoxicity, and epidermal growth factor excretion: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the protective effect of low-dose dopamine given as continuous infusion in patients who undergo chemotherapy with the nephrotoxin cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who received high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy entered a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Twenty-one patients received dopamine, and 21 received placebo. Patients were to receive either infusional dopamine 2 micrograms/kg/min over 48 hours or placebo. Cisplatin 125 mg/m2 was administered 12 hours after initiating dopamine (group D) or placebo (group P). This schedule was repeated twice, 1 week apart. Measurements of serum creatinine, urinary electrolytes and creatinine, urinary excretion of epidermal growth factor (EGF), ototoxicity, parameters of hematopoietic recovery, and duration of hospitalization were analyzed. RESULTS: We observed an increase in serum creatinine level to a peak of 1.9 mg/dL (range, 0.8 to 7.8) in the dopamine group, in comparison to 1.4 mg/dL (range, 0.9 to 3.3) in the placebo group (P = .04). Urinary magnesium excretion increased and EGF excretion decreased in both groups. Urinary sodium, chloride, and potassium excretion were increased in both groups, but more so in the placebo group. Dopamine had no measurable effect on hearing loss, duration of hospitalization, or hematopoietic recovery. CONCLUSION: The use of prophylactic dopamine increased peak serum creatinine levels relative to placebo and failed to prevent cisplatin-induced renal toxicity or ototoxicity. Determination of whether dopamine could reverse chemotherapy-induced renal damage would require a randomized prospective trial.

A randomized phase II trial of continuous infusion interleukin-2 or bolus injection interleukin-2 plus lymphokine-activated killer cells for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Since 1985, multiple centers have demonstrated that interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells produce durable anticancer responses in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. High-dose recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) has been administered by intravenous bolus injection (Rosenberg SA, et al: N Engl J Med 313:1485-1492, 1985) and by continuous intravenous infusion (West WH, et al: N Engl J Med 316:898-905, 1987) combined with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, with both methods producing responses in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The Extramural IL-2/LAK Working Group has conducted a randomized phase II trial of two intravenous high-dose rIL-2 regimens (bolus three times daily or 24-hour continuous infusion) to determine if either one manifests greater anticancer activity or a more acceptable toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with measurable advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled on this study: 46 to the bolus injection arm and 48 to the continuous infusion arm. On both arms, patients underwent a priming phase of rIL-2 administration, four daily lymphocytaphereses to harvest mononuclear cells that were placed in 3- to 4-day culture for generation of LAK cells, and an rIL-2/LAK coadministration phase. Patients were then observed monthly for evidence of response to this therapy and were offered up to two additional courses of treatment every 3 months if evidence of response was detected. RESULTS: Twenty percent of patients on the bolus injection arm experienced objective responses (three complete responses and six partial responses); 15% of patients on the continuous infusion arm responded (two complete responses and five partial responses). Complete responses were durable, persisting for 310+ to 700+ days. The incidence of severe life-threatening toxicities typical of high-dose rIL-2 therapy was similar in both arms (eg, patients with hypotension requiring pressors: bolus 71%, continuous 63%; oliguria less than or equal to 200 mL/8 hours: bolus 65%, continuous 71%). More episodes of fever, infection, and serum alkaline phosphatase elevation were associated with the continuous infusion arm, while more thrombocytopenia occurred on the bolus injection arm. Four patients (three bolus injection, one continuous infusion) died of respiratory and circulatory failure while under treatment. No clinical or laboratory parameter accompanying treatment on either arm was, by univariate or multivariate analysis, associated with an increased likelihood of response. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of high-dose rIL-2/LAK cell administration produce nearly equivalent anticancer activity and toxicity in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The ability to predict responding patients based on patient or treatment characteristics is not possible.

Phase II study of carmustine, dacarbazine, cisplatin, and tamoxifen in advanced melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The combination of carmustine (BCNU), dacarbazine (DTIC), cisplatin (DDP), and tamoxifen (Tam) has been reported in small series to provide a response rate of 50%, but with significant myelosuppression and risk of thromboembolic complications. We performed this phase II study to assess the antitumor activity and important toxicities of this combination in the cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with BCNU 150 mg/m2/d, every 6 weeks, DTIC 220 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, DDP 25 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, and Tam 20 mg orally daily throughout treatment. Treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks in responding or stable patients for a maximum duration of 1 year. RESULTS: Twelve objective responses were achieved (response rate 15%, 95% confidence interval 8%-25%). Five responses were complete (CR) and seven were partial (PR). The median response duration was 8+ (range, 4-19+) months, (16+ [4-19+] for CR and 8+ [4-11] for PR), and the median survival of the entire group was 9 months. The toxicities were predominantly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Four patients developed thromboembolic events. Two patients died while on protocol therapy, one with complications of neutropenia, and the other with disease progression. CONCLUSION: The activity of this regimen is in the range reported for single agents or DTIC plus DDP, and the addition of BCNU and Tam appears to increase toxicity. We do not recommend this combination for routine treatment of advanced melanoma or as the control arm in randomized studies of combination therapy.

Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study.

PURPOSE: The Intergroup conducted this breast cancer adjuvant trial to compare an investigational 16-week regimen with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (5-FU; CAF). The 16-week regimen features greater doxorubicin and 5-FU dose-intensity than CAF and improved scheduling of antimetabolites with sequential methotrexate and 5-FU, as well as infusion 5-FU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 646 node-positive, receptor-negative patients were randomly assigned to receive either the 1 6-week regimen or six cycles of CAF. Breast cancer outcomes included recurrence as well as disease-free and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Treatment-related quality of life was assessed by the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) before, during, and 4 months after treatment in 163 patients. The trial was designed to use one-sided tests of significance for power calculations, but is now reported with both one-sided and the traditional two-sided tests of significance. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the estimated 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was 67.5% with the 16-week regimen versus 62.7% with CAF (P = .19, two-sided; P = .095, one-sided). The estimated 4-year survival rate was 78.1% with the 16-week regimen versus 71.4% with CAF (P = .10, two-sided; P = .05, one-sided). CAF produced significantly higher grades of leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as liver and cardiac toxicity, whereas the 16-week regimen produced significantly higher grades of anemia, nausea, stomatitis, and weight loss, as well as skin and neurotoxicity. There were three treatment-related deaths with CAF but none with the 16-week regimen. During treatment, quality of life declined significantly more with the 16-week regimen than CAF, but by 4 months posttreatment, there was no difference. CONCLUSION: The 16-week regimen produced marginally better breast cancer outcomes than CAF with similar toxicity but a greater reduction in during-treatment quality of life. The 16-week regimen should not be used instead of a standard-dose regimen without careful consideration of the 16-week regimen's pros and cons, which include its complicated schedule. It should probably not be tested further, but its antimetabolite schedules and frequent drug administration (ie, dose density) should be considered in the development of new regimens.

Therapy of renal cell carcinoma with interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells: phase II experience with a hybrid bolus and continuous infusion interleukin-2 regimen.

Forty-seven patients with metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma were treated with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK)-cell therapy, using a hybrid IL-2 regimen. IL-2 was administered initially by intravenous bolus (10(5) U/kg [Cetus Corp, Emeryville, CA] every 8 hours for 3 days) during the priming phase, and subsequently by continuous infusion (3 x 10(6) U/m2 for 6 days); during this second treatment period, in vitro-generated LAK cells were administered. Despite selection of patients for good performance status (PS) (29, PS 0; 18, PS 1) prior nephrectomy (43 of the 47 patients), and low tumor burden, the response rate was low (two complete [CRs] and two partial responses [PRs], for an overall objective response rate of 9%). Toxicity was comparable to that experienced with the high-dose bolus regimen. These results suggest that the dose and schedule of IL-2 administration may influence the likelihood of response to IL-2 in renal cell carcinoma.

Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: a phase II study.

Forty-seven patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were treated with two 5-day cycles of 100,000 U/kg recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) intravenously (IV) every 4 hours separated by 1 week. This dose and schedule of IL-2 were identical to those used in a previous combined IL-2 and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell phase II clinical trial of the IL-2/LAK Working Group. Patient eligibility criteria, and clinical management guidelines were similar to those used in the previous trial. Forty-six patients were assessable for response. Objective responses were observed in 10 of 46 patients (two complete responses [CRs], eight partial responses [PRs]) or 22% with responses occurring in lung and liver as well as lymph nodes and subcutaneous sites. The median response duration was 8 months. Toxicity was significant; three patients developed myocardial infarction, and one patient died during therapy. Overall the toxicity and response rate for single-agent IL-2 are similar to that observed with IL-2 administered in combination with LAK cells in the previous trial. These results suggest that single-agent therapy with IL-2 when administered in this schedule has significant antimelanoma activity in humans, and that LAK cells generated from peripheral blood add little to the antimelanoma activity of this dose and schedule of IL-2.

Metastatic malignant melanoma treated with combined bolus and continuous infusion interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells.

Fifty patients with advanced melanoma received high-dose bolus and continuous infusion interleukin-2 (IL-2) with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells in an attempt to improve the therapeutic index of this active but toxic therapy. Treatment began with up to nine bolus doses of IL-2 administered over 3 days. After 1 day of rest, patients underwent daily leukapheresis for 4 days, and the leukocytes were cultured with IL-2 in vitro to prepare LAK cells. Continuous infusion IL-2 was begun 1 day after the last leukapheresis and continued for up to 148 hours; LAK cells were administered on days 1, 2, and 4 of the infusion. Responding patients were eligible to receive up to two additional cycles of therapy at 3-month intervals. Most patients completed each cycle without dose reduction. One patient had a complete response and six patients had partial responses (14% response rate). The complete responder and three of the partial responders (8%) remain free from disease progression with follow-up of 21 to 24 months. Of these four patients with durable remissions, one had extensive liver and lymph node metastases, one had lymph node, pleural, and parenchymal lung metastases, and two had disease limited to lymph nodes or subcutaneous tissues. Seventeen patients (34%) required pressors for hypotension, three patients (6%) developed hemodynamically significant arrhythmias, and six patients (12%) developed dyspnea at rest, but none required intubation and there were no treatment-related deaths. Unacceptable toxicity developed in two patients during bolus IL-2 administration and therapy was aborted; both returned to baseline status within 4 days of discontinuing IL-2. Fever, oliguria, and elevated creatinine or transaminase levels occurred frequently but were also transient. Despite less frequent severe toxicity with this modified regimen, these results confirm the ability of IL-2 and LAK cell therapy to induce durable remissions in some patients with advanced melanoma.

Interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cell therapy of solid tumors: analysis of toxicity and management guidelines.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Extramural IL2/LAK Working Group treated 93 patients with 114 cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells in three phase II trials. Thirty-six patients had metastatic melanoma, 35 had metastatic renal cell cancer, and 22 had colorectal cancer. All patients had a Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 80% and normal laboratory tests and organ function, and had received no more than one prior form of immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Objective responders were eligible to receive up to two additional courses of therapy at 12-week intervals. The most frequent toxicities were a capillary leak syndrome resulting in marked extravascular fluid shifts, and hypotension requiring treatment with large volumes of IV fluids and vasopressor agents. Laboratory and clinical evidence of hepatic and renal dysfunction were virtually universal. Intensive care-level support was routinely provided and the toxicity observations confirmed the need for this level of care. The life-threatening toxicities were cardiac and pulmonary. Five of the 27 patients who experienced significant respiratory compromise required intubation and mechanical ventilatory support. Twenty patients developed cardiac arrhythmias, the majority of which were supraventricular. There was a single episode of ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion. Four patients had transient cardiac ischemia, and an additional four had myocardial infarctions, one of which was fatal. With these exceptions, all toxicities were rapidly reversible. The occurrence of only a single therapy-related death and a very low incidence of other irreversible or life-threatening events is comparable to the level of toxicities often observed in other phase II trials. Although the intensity of this regimen limits this approach to a subset of cancer patients with excellent performance status and adequate organ function, because of the frequency and apparent durability of complete responses, this treatment warrants further investigation.

In vivo purging with high-dose cytarabine followed by high-dose chemoradiotherapy and reinfusion of unpurged bone marrow for adult acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a prospective study the efficacy of autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first remission, using a single course of high-dose Cytarabine (HD Ara-C) consolidation therapy as in vivo purging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive adult patients with AML in first complete remission (CR) were treated with HD Ara-C consolidation therapy as a method of in vivo purging before marrow collection. High-dose therapy consisted of fractionated total-body irradiation (FTBI) 12 Gy, intravenous etoposide 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 75 mg/kg, followed by reinfusion of cryopreserved marrow. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent consolidation treatment with HD Ara-C with the intent to treat with autologous BMT. Sixteen patients were unable to proceed to autologous BMT (10 patients relapsed, one died of sepsis, one developed cerebellar toxicity, two had inadequate blood counts, and two refused). Forty-four patients underwent autologous BMT and have a median follow-up time of 37 months (range, 14.7 to 68.7) for patients who are alive with no relapse. The cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS) at 24 months in the intent-to-treat group is 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 62%) and in those who actually underwent autologous BMT is 61% (95% CI, 46% to 74%). The probability of relapse was 44% (95% CI, 31% to 58%) and 33% (95% CI, 20% to 49%) for the intent-to-treat and autologous BMT patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This approach offers a relatively high DFS rate to adult patients with AML in first CR. The results of this study are similar to those achieved with allogeneic BMT.

Autologous bone marrow purging by in situ IL-2 activation of endogenous killer cells.

The major cause of treatment failure in hematologic malignancies is the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and the presence of clonogenic tumor cells in remission bone marrow. In the present study, we tested the optimal conditions for activation by interleukin-2 (IL-2) of endogenous bone marrow effector cells to develop cytotoxicity against solid tumor and leukemia cells and the effects of IL-2 treatment on eradication of malignant cells from the marrow product while preserving hematopoiesis. Normal donor bone marrow was contaminated with 10% A549 lung cancer cells, MCF-7 breast cancer, or EM2 leukemia cells, and then combined with peripheral blood-derived lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells which had been incubated in the presence of IL-2, 6000 IU/ml, for 5 days. Eradication (A549 and MCF-7) or >90% reduction in tumor cell number (EM2) was achieved upon exposure of the marrow to LAK cells but not to control, non-IL-2-exposed PBMC. The non-cross-resistance of chemotherapy and cell-mediated cytotoxicity were tested by using chemoresistant target cells for LAK cytotoxicity assays. Ara-C-resistant K562 cells were sensitive to LAK cytotoxicity, similar to sensitive controls. Similar effects were seen in daunomycin-resistant HL60 leukemia cells and VP-16-resistant K562 cells. The daunomycin-resistant K562 cells were also sensitive to LAK cell killing similar to sensitive controls. Activation of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) with IL-2, 6000 IU/ml for 24 h, significantly enhanced cytotoxicity against the NK-resistant, LAK-sensitive Daudi cell line. This procedure did not result in significant loss of total BMMC or hematopoietic colony-forming units. We then studied the possibility that the effector cell activity of the IL-2-activated BMMC which is diminished after removal of the IL-2 at 24 h could be recovered upon re-exposure of the marrow to IL-2. We found that the optimum conditions for preserving cytotoxicity were prolonged continuous exposures to IL-2 but that re-exposure of the 24-h IL-2-activated BMMC to IL-2 after a 1- or 2-week IL-2 withdrawal was associated with full recovery of cytotoxicity. These experiments also demonstrated that the overall recovery of viable cells from the BMMC was over 100%, possibly due to a proliferative effect of the IL-2 exposure on BMMC. These results demonstrate that the use of IL-2-activated marrow in patients with acute leukemia in remission undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (aBMT) may overcome the obstacles of clonogenic, drug-resistant minimal residual disease. The effector cell activity and hematopoietic capacity of the activated bone marrow product can also be maintained even if optimal clinical care requires an interruption in the in vivo exposure to IL-2. This therapeutic approach is currently being tested in acute leukemia patients undergoing IL-2-activated aBMT followed by prolonged IL-2 treatment before and after hematologic reconstitution.

High-dose cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin induction therapy for adult patients with de novo non M3 acute myelogenous leukemia: impact of cytogenetics on achieving a complete remission.

Cytogenetic abnormalities are used to define prognostic subgroups of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with respect to achieving complete remission (CR) and remaining disease free. These prognostic groups for obtaining CR were based on an induction regimen mainly using standard dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) + daunorubicin (DNR). We have reviewed our experience with 122 adult patients with de novo non-M3 AML who were treated with high-dose (HD) Ara-C 3 g/m2 given over 3 h every 12 h for a total of eight doses followed by DNR 60 mg/m2 daily for 2 days. CR was obtained in 80% while 16% had refractory disease and 4% died of sepsis during hypoplasia. CR rate for favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetic groups were 87%, 79% and 62%, respectively (P = 0.32). High white blood cell count, age, FAB subtype and LDH levels did not adversely affect CR rate. Eighty-five percent of patients achieved CR with one course of treatment and 87% of complete responders were able to receive post remission therapy. High-dose Ara-C/DNR appears to offer an excellent chance of achieving remission for patients with AML including those with poor risk cytogenetics, without an increase in early toxic deaths.