Inclusion-body myositis associated with Sjögren's disease: clinical characteristics and comparison with other Sjögren-associated myositis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD) and inclusion-body myositis (IBM), and how they compare to SjD patients with other inflammatory myopathies (IM). METHODS: Patients were retrospectively recruited from 13 French centers and included if they met the ACR/EULAR criteria for SjD and for IM. They were categorized as SjD-IBM if sub-criteria for IBM were met, or as SjD-other IM if not. RESULTS: SjD-IBM patients (n = 22) were mostly females (86%), with a median [Q1; Q3] age of 54 [38.5; 64] years at SjD diagnosis, and 62 [46.5; 70] years at first IBM symptoms. Although most patients displayed glandular and immunological abnormalities, additional extra-glandular manifestations were uncommon, resulting in moderate disease activity at SjD diagnosis (ESSDAI 5.5 [1; 7.8]). Classic IBM features were frequent, such as progressive symptom onset (59%), asymmetrical (27%) and distal (32%) involvements, dysphagia (41%), low CPK (386.5 [221.8; 670.5] UI/l) and CRP (3.0 [3; 8.5] mg/l) levels. Immunosuppressants were reported as efficient in 55% of cases.Compared with SjD-IBM patients, SjD patients with other IM (n = 50) were significantly younger, displayed more frequent additional extra-glandular disease, higher ESSDAI score (11 [3; 30]), shorter delay between SjD diagnosis and myositis onset (0 [-0.5; 26]), more frequent CPK values over 1000 UI/l (36%), and less frequent classic IBM features. CONCLUSION: IBM can occur in SjD patients, with muscle features reminiscent of classic sporadic IBM characteristics, but mostly affecting women. In SjD patients with muscle involvement, extra-glandular manifestations, high ESSDAI score, elevated CPK values, and shorter delay after SjD diagnosis plead against IBM.

Myostatin in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Serum assessment and disease activity.

AIMS: In idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), disease activity is difficult to assess, and IIM may induce severe muscle damage, especially in immune-mediated necrotising myopathies (IMNM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). We hypothesise that myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass, could be a new biomarker of disease activity and/or muscle damage. METHODS: Prospective assessment of myostatin protein level in 447 IIM serum samples (dermatomyositis [DM], n = 157; IBM, n = 72; IMNM, n = 125; and antisynthetase syndrome [ASyS], n = 93) and 59 healthy donors (HD) was performed by ELISA. A gene transcript analysis was also carried out on 18 IIM muscle biopsies and six controls to analyse myostatin and myostatin pathway-related gene expression. RESULTS: IIM patients had lower myostatin circulating protein levels and gene expression compared to HD (2379 [1490; 3678] pg/ml vs 4281 [3169; 5787] pg/ml; p < 0.0001 and log2FC = -1.83; p = 0.0005, respectively). Myostatin-related gene expression varied accordingly. Based on the Physician Global Assessment, inactive IIM patients showed higher myostatin levels than active ones. This was the case for all IIM subgroups, except IMNM where low myostatin levels were maintained (2186 [1235; 3815] vs 2349 [1518; 3922] pg/ml; p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Myostatin protein and RNA levels are decreased in all IIM patients, and protein levels correlate with disease activity. Inactive ASyS and DM patients have higher myostatin levels than active patients. Myostatin could be a marker of disease activity in these subgroups. However, IMNM patients do not have significant increase in myostatin levels after disease remission. This may highlight a new pathological disease mechanism in IMNM patients.

Occurrence of focal myositis during Behçet's disease: The identification of a specific vasculitis-associated focal myopathy.

AIMS: This study aimed to report the association of focal myositis (FM) and Behçet's disease (BD) and to analyse the main characteristics of such an association. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study of patients with BD and FM (BD + FM+ group) and those without FM (BD - FM+ group). Clinical, laboratory, radiological, pathological, treatment and outcome data were analysed. RESULTS: The BD + FM+ group included 10 patients; the median [interquartile range] age at BD diagnosis was 25 [16-35] years, and at FM diagnosis, it was 30 [26-42] years. The diagnosis of BD preceded FM in the majority of cases (n = 8/10). FM occurrence was associated with BD flare-ups in three cases. The creatine kinase levels remained normal or slightly increased. Histological analyses identified relatively preserved muscle tissue, associated with vasculitis (n = 5/6). All patients required treatment; most patients relapsed (n = 9/10). The BD - FM+ group included 35 patients. A comparison of the groups identified a trend towards a younger median age at diagnosis of FM among those with BD (p = 0.063) and more frequent focal muscle swelling in the BD + FM+ group (p = 0.029). The pathological analysis identified significantly less frequent muscle alterations in the BD + FM+ group (muscle fibre size heterogeneity, p = 0.021; necrosis, p = 0.007; and fibrosis, p = 0.027). BD + FM+ patients had a higher frequency of relapse (p = 0.003) and systematic treatment (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: FM occurring during BD appears to be part of the systemic vasculitis process and presents as a vasculitis-associated focal myopathy with a specific clinico-histological pattern. Patients with this association require long-term follow-up and adapted management. This case series also highlights the need for research on BD diagnostic criteria in cases of FM.

Anti-PM-Scl antibodies-positive patients encompass three different groups with distinct prognoses.

OBJECTIVE: To help identify homogeneous subgroups among patients with anti-PM-scleroderma-antibodies (PM-Scl-Abs) positive auto-immune diseases regardless of diagnostic classifications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicentric (four hospitals) retrospective study collected all consecutive patients (from 2011 to 2021) with positive testing for anti-PM-Scl-Abs in a context of CTD. Subgroups of patients with similar clinico-biological phenotypes were defined using unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis of the features recorded in the first year of follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients with anti-PM-Scl-Abs were evaluated and 129 patients were included in the clustering analysis and divided into three clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 47) included patients with frequent skin thickening, digestive involvement and interstitial lung disease (ILD) with non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). They were more likely to develop progressive fibrosing ILD. Cluster 2 (n = 36) included patients who all featured NSIP with frequent organizing pneumonia-associated pattern and mechanic's hands. This subgroup had increased risk of relapse and ILD was characterized by a good functional outcome. Cluster 3 (n = 46) was characterized by predominant or isolated musculoskeletal involvement and frequently matched UCTD criteria. Although very frequent among anti-PM-Scl-Abs positive patients, muscle involvement was less discriminating compared with skin thickening and ILD pattern to classify patients into subgroups. CONCLUSION: Anti-PM-Scl-Abs associated auto-immune diseases are segregated into three subgroups with distinct clinical phenotype and outcomes. Skin thickening and NSIP are determinant predictors in segregation of theses populations.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: CT characteristics of interstitial lung disease and their association(s) with myositis-specific autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVES: Interstitial lung disease (ILD), one of the most common extramuscular manifestations of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), carries a poor prognosis. Myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positivity is a key finding for IIM diagnosis. We aimed to identify IIM-associated lung patterns, evaluate potential CT-ILD finding-MSA relationships, and assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility in a large IIM population. METHODS: All consecutive IIM patients (2003-2019) were included. Two chest radiologists retrospectively assessed all chest CT scans. Multiple correspondence and hierarchical cluster analyses of CT findings identified and characterized ILD-patient subgroups. Classification and regression-tree analyses highlighted CT-scan variables predicting three patterns. Three independent radiologists read CT scans twice to assign patients according to CT-ILD-pattern clusters. RESULTS: Among 257 IIM patients, 94 (36.6%) had ILDs; 87 (93%) of them were MSA-positive. ILD-IIM distribution was 54 (57%) ASyS, 21 (22%) DM, 15 (16%) IMNM, and 4 (4%) IBM. Cluster analysis identified three ILD-patient subgroups. Consolidation characterized cluster 1, with significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent anti-MDA5-autoantibody-positivity. Significantly more cluster-2 patients had a reticular pattern, without cysts and with few consolidations. All cluster-3 patients had cysts and anti-PL12 autoantibodies. Clusters 2 and 3 included significantly more ASyS patients. Intraobserver concordances to classify patients into those three clusters were good-to-excellent (Cohen κ 0.64-0.81), with good interobserver reliability (Fleiss's κ 0.56). CONCLUSION: Despite the observed IIM heterogeneity, CT-scan criteria enabled ILD assignment to the three clusters, which were associated with MSAs. Radiologist identification of those clusters could facilitate diagnostic screening and therapeutics. Interstitial lung disease in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy could be classified into three clusters according to CT-scan criteria, and these clusters were significantly associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies. KEY POINTS: • Cluster analysis discerned three homogeneous groups of interstitial lung disease (ILD) for which cysts, consolidations, and reticular pattern were discriminatory, and associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies. • Like muscle- and extramuscular-specific phenotypes, myositis-specific autoantibodies are also associated with specific ILD patterns in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

High risk of cancer in autoimmune necrotizing myopathies: usefulness of myositis specific antibody.

Cancer can occur in patients with inflammatory myopathies. This association is mainly observed in dermatomyositis, and myositis-specific antibodies have allowed us to delineate patients at an increased risk. Malignancy is also reported in patients with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies, but the risk remains elusive. Anti-signal recognition particle or anti-HMGCR antibodies have been specifically associated with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies. We aimed at screening the incidence of cancer in necrotizing autoimmune myopathies. A group of patients (n = 115) with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies with or without myositis-specific antibodies was analysed. Malignancy occurred more frequently in seronegative necrotizing autoimmune myopathies patients and in HMGCR-positive patients compared to anti-signal recognition particle positive patients. Synchronous malignancy was diagnosed in 21.4% and 11.5% of cases, respectively, and incidence of cancer was higher compared to the general population in both groups. No specific type of cancer was predominant. Patients suffering from a synchronous cancer had a decreased median survival time. Cancer screening is necessary in seronegative necrotizing autoimmune myopathies and in HMGCR-positive patients but not in anti-signal recognition particle-positive patients.

Effect of sirolimus on muscle in inclusion body myositis observed with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Finding sensitive clinical outcome measures has become crucial in natural history studies and therapeutic trials of neuromuscular disorders. Here, we focus on 1-year longitudinal data from quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) in a placebo-controlled study of sirolimus for inclusion body myositis (IBM), also examining their links to functional, strength, and clinical parameters in lower limb muscles. METHODS: Quantitative MRI and 31P MRS data were collected at 3 T from a single site, involving 44 patients (22 on placebo, 22 on sirolimus) at baseline and year-1, and 21 healthy controls. Assessments included fat fraction (FF), contractile cross-sectional area (cCSA), and water T2 in global leg and thigh segments, muscle groups, individual muscles, as well as 31P MRS indices in quadriceps or triceps surae. Analyses covered patient-control comparisons, annual change assessments via standard t-tests and linear mixed models, calculation of standardized response means (SRM), and exploration of correlations between MRI, 31P MRS, functional, strength, and clinical parameters. RESULTS: The quadriceps and gastrocnemius medialis muscles had the highest FF values, displaying notable heterogeneity and asymmetry, particularly in the quadriceps. In the placebo group, the median 1-year FF increase in the quadriceps was 3.2% (P < 0.001), whereas in the sirolimus group, it was 0.7% (P = 0.033). Both groups experienced a significant decrease in cCSA in the quadriceps after 1 year (P < 0.001), with median changes of 12.6% for the placebo group and 5.5% for the sirolimus group. Differences in FF and cCSA changes between the two groups were significant (P < 0.001). SRM values for FF and cCSA were 1.3 and 1.4 in the placebo group and 0.5 and 0.8 in the sirolimus group, respectively. Water T2 values were highest in the quadriceps muscles of both groups, significantly exceeding control values in both groups (P < 0.001) and were higher in the placebo group than in the sirolimus group. After treatment, water T2 increased significantly only in the sirolimus group's quadriceps (P < 0.01). Multiple 31P MRS indices were abnormal in patients compared to controls and remained unchanged after treatment. Significant correlations were identified between baseline water T2 and FF at baseline and the change in FF (P < 0.001). Additionally, significant correlations were observed between FF, cCSA, water T2, and functional and strength outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that quantitative MRI/31P MRS can discern measurable differences between placebo and sirolimus-treated IBM patients, offering promise for future therapeutic trials in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as IBM.

In inflammatory myopathies, dropped head/bent spine syndrome is associated with scleromyositis: an international case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Some myopathies can lead to dropped head or bent spine syndrome (DH/BS). The significance of this symptom has not been studied in inflammatory myopathies (IM). OBJECTIVES: To assess the significance of DH/BS in patients with IM. METHODS: Practitioners from five IM networks were invited to report patients with IM suffering from DH/BS (without other known cause than IM). IM patients without DH/BS, randomly selected in each participating centre, were included as controls at a ratio of 2 to 1. RESULTS: 49 DH/BS-IM patients (DH: 57.1%, BS: 42.9%) were compared with 98 control-IM patients. DH/BS-IM patients were older (65 years vs 53 years, p<0.0001) and the diagnosis of IM was delayed (6 months vs 3 months, p=0.009). Weakness prevailing in the upper limbs (42.9% vs 15.3%), dysphagia (57.1% vs 25.5%), muscle atrophy (65.3% vs 34.7%), weight loss (61.2% vs 23.5%) and loss of the ability to walk (24.5% vs 5.1%) were hallmarks of DH/BS-IM (p≤0.0005), for which the patients more frequently received intravenous immunoglobulins (65.3% vs 34.7%, p=0.0004). Moreover, DH/BS-IM patients frequently featured signs and/or complications of systemic sclerosis (SSc), fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for this disease in 40.8% of the cases (vs 5.1%, p<0.0001). Distribution of the myopathy, its severity and its association with SSc were independently associated with DH/BS (p<0.05). Mortality was higher in the DH/BS-IM patients and loss of walking ability was independently associated with survival (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In IM patients, DH/BS is a marker of severity and is associated with SSc (scleromyositis).

Sirolimus for treatment of patients with inclusion body myositis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion body myositis is the most frequent myositis in patients older than 50 years. Classical immunosuppressants are ineffective in treating inclusion body myositis, and to date there are no recommendations for pharmacological approaches to treatment. When used after organ transplantation, sirolimus can block the proliferation of effector T cells, while preserving T regulatory cells, and induce autophagy, all of which are processes that are impaired in inclusion body myositis. In this pilot study, we aimed to test the efficacy of sirolimus in patients with inclusion body myositis. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial was done at a single hospital in Paris, France. The study included men and women (aged 45-80 years) who had a defined diagnosis of inclusion body myositis according to established criteria. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily oral sirolimus 2 mg or placebo. Centralised balanced block randomisation (blocks of four) was computer generated without stratification. The study comprised a 15-day screening period (days -15 to 0) and a 52-week treatment period (day 0 to month 12). The primary endpoint was the relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 in maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments at months 6 and 12: 6-min walking distance, isometric muscle strength for hand grip (finger flexors), knee flexion and elbow flexion and extension, forced vital capacity, muscle replacement with fat measured by quantitative nuclear MRI, Inclusion Body Myositis Weakness Composite Index (IBMWCI), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Health Assessment Questionnaire without Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and analyses of T-cell subpopulations by mass cytometry. The primary analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02481453. FINDINGS: Between July 15, 2015, and May 13, 2016, we screened 285 patients, 44 of whom were randomly allocated to sirolimus (22 patients) or placebo (22 patients). We observed no difference in the primary outcome of relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 of the maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength (median difference 3·78, 95% CI -10·61 to 17·31; p=0·85). For secondary outcomes, differences between the groups were not significant for changes in strength of other muscle groups (grip, elbow flexion and extension, or knee flexion), IBMWCI, IBMFRS, and lower limb muscle fat fraction. However, we observed significant differences in favour of sirolimus between the study groups for HAQ-DI, forced vital capacity, thigh fat fraction, and 6-min walking distance. Ten (45%) of 22 patients in the sirolimus group had a serious adverse event compared with six (27%) of 22 patients in the placebo group. Four (18%) patients in the sirolimus group stopped their treatment because of adverse events (severe mouth ulcers, aseptic pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and peripheral lower limb oedema), which resolved after treatment discontinuation. Canker sores were the most frequent side-effect and were mainly mild or moderate in ten patients. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence for efficacy of sirolimus for treating inclusion body myositis based on maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength and other muscle strength measures, and the side-effects of treatment were substantial for some patients. However, we believe there was enough evidence of benefit in certain secondary outcomes to pursue a multicentre phase 3 trial to further assess the safety and efficacy of sirolimus. FUNDING: Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Direction générale de l'offre de soins, and Association Française contre les Myopathies.

Edematous myositis: a clinical presentation first suggesting dermatomyositis diagnosis.

AIMS: Edema of the limbs is uncommon in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The few reported cases have been associated with severe and refractory dermatomyositis (DM), sometimes in association with cancers. We aimed to determine if edematous myositis is a homogeneous subtype based on clinical, serological and pathological features. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study performed between 2008 and 2015 in the French national referral center for myositis. All adult patients with an inflammatory muscle biopsy and upper limbs edema were included as well as IIM cases without limb edema as controls. Clinical, biological and pathological features were collected. RESULTS: Seventeen edematous myositis were included and compared to 174 IIM without edema, including 50 DM controls. Edema was the first manifestation in 23% of patients. Muscle weakness was severe and symmetric, 71% of patients presented dysphagia and a restrictive ventilatory pattern was found in 40%. Fifty-two percent of patients had a typical DM skin rash and 23% had cancer within 3 years of diagnosing myositis. Fifty-three percent of patients presented a myositis specific antibody and only DM-specific antibodies were detected. Classic pathological DM features (perifascicular atrophy, perifascicular/perimysial perivascular inflammation) were uncommon but capillary C5b-9 deposition and MxA expression were seen in 79% and 73% of cases, respectively. A perimysial edema was found in 82% of cases. Seventeen percent of patients died (median follow up of 18 months). Edematous myositis demonstrated more marked capillary C5b-9 deposition compared to IIM controls. There was no clinical, biological or pathological difference with DM controls except for limb edema. CONCLUSION: Our study underlines that limb edema could be a symptom of IIM and that edematous myositis are mostly DM. The vasculopathy seems to play a key role in its pathophysiology. Limb edema associated with muscle impairment should suggest the diagnosis of DM in clinical settings.

Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Antisynthetase Syndrome-related Interstitial Lung Disease: An Observational Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Antisynthetase syndrome (AS)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a poor prognosis. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC) and rituximab (RTX) are the main treatments currently used for moderate to severe ILD. Here, we compare the efficacy of CYC followed by standard immunosuppressive treatment (IST) versus RTX in AS-related ILD. METHODS: This observational retrospective study was conducted between 2003 and 2016 in 3 tertiary care centers. All patients with AS-related ILD and treated with CYC or RTX with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Pulmonary progression-free survival (PFS), defined according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines, was assessed at 6 months and 2 years. All severe adverse events (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. Thirty-four patients received 2-12 monthly IV CYC pulses, followed by standard IST in 30 cases (88%). The RTX group included 28 patients. Following the initial Day 1 to Day 15 infusions, RTX was repeated every 6 months in 26 cases (93%) and 15 patients (54%) concomitantly received another IST. The median steroid dose was similar between both groups. Although RTX and CYC demonstrated similar PFS at 6 months (92% vs 85%, respectively), RTX was superior at 2 years (HR 0.263, 95% CI 0.094-0.732, P = 0.011). Interestingly, lower diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) at baseline was independently predictive of poor 2-year PFS [0.965 (0.936-0.995), P = 0.023]. Forced vital capacity and DLCO improved in both groups without significant differences. Serious AE were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite similar PFS at 6 months, RTX was associated with a better 2-year PFS compared to CYC in patients with AS-related ILD.

Granulomatosis-associated myositis: High prevalence of sporadic inclusion body myositis.

OBJECTIVE: To refine the predictive significance of muscle granuloma in patients with myositis. METHODS: A group of 23 patients with myositis and granuloma on muscle biopsy (granuloma-myositis) from 8 French and Belgian centers was analyzed and compared with (1) a group of 23 patients with myositis without identified granuloma (control-myositis) randomly sampled in each center and (2) a group of 20 patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) without identified granuloma (control-sIBM). RESULTS: All but 2 patients with granuloma-myositis had extramuscular involvement, including signs common in sarcoidosis that were systematically absent in the control-myositis and the control-sIBM groups. Almost half of patients with granuloma-myositis matched the diagnostic criteria for sIBM. In these patients, other than the granuloma, the characteristics of the myopathy and its nonresponse to treatment were similar to the control-sIBM patients. Aside from 1 patient with myositis overlapping with systemic sclerosis, the remaining patients with granuloma-myositis did not match the criteria for a well-defined myositis subtype, suggesting pure sarcoidosis. Matching criteria for sIBM was the sole feature independently associated with nonresponse to myopathy treatment in patients with granuloma-myositis. CONCLUSION: Patients with granuloma-myositis should be carefully screened for sIBM associated with sarcoidosis in order to best tailor their care.

Different phenotypes in dermatomyositis associated with anti-MDA5 antibody: Study of 121 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The predominance of extramuscular manifestations (e.g., skin rash, arthralgia, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) as well as the low frequency of muscle signs in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive (anti-MDA5+) dermatomyositis caused us to question the term myositis-specific antibody for the anti-MDA5 antibody, as well as the homogeneity of the disease. METHODS: To characterize the anti-MDA5+ phenotype, an unsupervised analysis was performed on anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83/121) and compared to a group of patients with myositis without anti-MDA5 antibody (anti-MDA5-; n = 190/201) based on selected variables, collected retrospectively, without any missing data. RESULTS: Within anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83), 3 subgroups were identified. One group (18.1%) corresponded to patients with a rapidly progressive ILD (93.3%; p < 0.0001 across all) and a very high mortality rate. The second subgroup (55.4%) corresponded to patients with pure dermato-rheumatologic symptoms (arthralgia; 82.6%; p < 0.01) and a good prognosis. The third corresponded to patients, mainly male (72.7%; p < 0.0001), with severe skin vasculopathy, frequent signs of myositis (proximal weakness: 68.2%; p < 0.0001), and an intermediate prognosis. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgia/arthritis, and sex permit the cluster appurtenance (83.3% correct estimation). Nevertheless, an unsupervised analysis confirmed that anti-MDA5 antibody delineates an independent group of patients (e.g., dermatomyositis skin rash, skin ulcers, calcinosis, mechanic's hands, ILD, arthralgia/arthritis, and high mortality rate) distinct from anti-MDA5- patients with myositis. CONCLUSION: Anti-MDA5+ patients have a systemic syndrome distinct from other patients with myositis. Three subgroups with different prognosis exist.

Responsiveness to Change of 5-point MRC scale, Endurance and Functional Evaluation for Assessing Myositis in Daily Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Manual muscle testing has been widely used for the evaluation of muscle strength in myositis, yet less attention has been devoted to the evaluation of muscle function and endurance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was therefore to compare the responsiveness to change of muscle strength, endurance and functional testing following induction therapy for severe myositis flare (requiring high-dose corticosteroids and combined immunotherapy) in patients with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, or overlap myositis. METHODS: Muscle status was assessed at baseline and after mean 6.4±1.9 months, using the MRC-5 scale, along with endurance (Barre and Mingazzini maneuvers) and functional evaluation (e.g. chair rise) and responsiveness to change was evaluated using the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) and Standardized Mean Difference. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients included, the strongest responsiveness to change was observed in the muscle testing of the psoas and deltoids (SRM: 1.23 and 1.16, respectively). Noticeably, endurance testing also demonstrated strong responsiveness (SRM: 1.05 and 0.96, respectively), compensating for the poor discriminatory ability of muscle testing and permitting to overcome its ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: Functional and endurance testing provide simple and reliable measures complementing the testing of select proximal muscle groups to evaluate responsiveness to intervention in myositis patients in daily clinical practice. Interest of functional and endurance testing should be evaluated prospectively as outcome measures in myositis clinical trials.

CD8+T-bet+ cells as a predominant biomarker for inclusion body myositis.

BACKGROUND: Myositis is a heterogeneous group of muscular auto-immune diseases with clinical and pathological criteria that allow the classification of patients into different sub-groups. Inclusion body myositis is the most frequent myositis above fifty years of age. Diagnosing inclusion body myositis requires expertise and is challenging. Little is known concerning the pathogenic mechanisms of this disease in which conventional suppressive-immune therapies are inefficacious. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to deepen our understanding of the immune mechanisms involved in inclusion body myositis and identify specific biomarkers. METHODS: Using a panel of thirty-six markers and mass cytometry, we performed deep immune profiling of peripheral blood cells from inclusion body myositis patients and healthy donors, divided into two cohorts: test and validation cohorts. Potential biomarkers were compared to myositis controls (anti-Jo1-, anti-3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase-, and anti-signal recognition particle-positive patients). RESULTS: Unsupervised analyses revealed substantial changes only within CD8+ cells. We observed an increase in the frequency of CD8+ cells that expressed high levels of T-bet, and containing mainly both effector and terminally differentiated memory cells. The senescent marker CD57 was overexpressed in CD8+T-bet+ cells of inclusion body myositis patients. As expected, senescent CD8+T-bet+ CD57+ cells of both patients and healthy donors were CD28nullCD27nullCD127null. Surprisingly, non-senescent CD8+T-bet+ CD57- cells in inclusion body myositis patients expressed lower levels of CD28, CD27, and CD127, and expressed higher levels of CD38 and HLA-DR compared to healthy donors. Using classification and regression trees alongside receiver operating characteristics curves, we identified and validated a frequency of CD8+T-bet+ cells >51.5% as a diagnostic biomarker specific to inclusion body myositis, compared to myositis control patients, with a sensitivity of 94.4%, a specificity of 88.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.97. CONCLUSION: Using a panel of thirty-six markers by mass cytometry, we identify an activated cell population (CD8+T-bet+ CD57- CD28lowCD27lowCD127low CD38+ HLA-DR+) which could play a role in the physiopathology of inclusion body myositis, and identify CD8+T-bet+ cells as a predominant biomarker of this disease.

Development of a New Classification System for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies Based on Clinical Manifestations and Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies.

Importance: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are heterogeneous in their pathophysiologic features and prognosis. The emergence of myositis-specific autoantibodies suggests that subgroups of patients exist. Objective: To develop a new classification scheme for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on phenotypic, biological, and immunologic criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational, retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of the French myositis network. Patients identified from referral centers for neuromuscular diseases were included from January 1, 2003, to February 1, 2016. Of 445 initial patients, 185 patients were excluded and 260 adult patients with myositis who had complete data and defined historical classifications for polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis were enrolled. All patients were tested for anti-histidyl-ARN-t- synthetase (Jo1), anti-threonine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL7), anti-alanine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL12), anti-complex nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase (Mi2), anti-Ku, anti-polymyositis/systemic scleroderma (PMScl), anti-topoisomerase 1 (Scl70), and anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies. A total of 708 variables were collected per patient (eg, cancer, lung involvement, and myositis-specific antibodies). Main Outcomes and Measures: Unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis to aggregate patients in subgroups. Results: Among 260 participants (163 [62.7%] women; mean age, 59.7 years; median age [range], 61.5 years [48-71 years]), 4 clusters of patients emerged. Cluster 1 (n = 77) included patients who were male, white, and older than 60 years and had finger flexor and quadriceps weakness and findings of vacuolated fibers and mitochondrial abnormalities. Cluster 1 regrouped patients who had inclusion body myositis (72 of 77 patients [93.5%]; 95% CI, 85.5%-97.8%; P < .001). Cluster 2 (n = 91) regrouped patients who were women and had high creatine phosphokinase levels, necrosis without inflammation, and anti-SRP or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (53 of 91 [58.2%]; 95% CI, 47.4%-68.5%; P < .001). Cluster 3 (n = 52) regrouped patients who had dermatomyositis rash and anti-Mi2, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), or anti-transcription intermediary factor-1γ (TIF1γ) antibodies, mainly corresponding with patients who had dermatomyositis (43 of 52 [82.7%]; 95% CI, 69.7%-91.8%; P < .001). Cluster 4 (n = 40) was defined by the presence of anti-Jo1 or anti-PL7 antibodies corresponding to antisynthetase syndrome (36 of 40 [90.0%]; 95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%; P < .001). The classification of an independent cohort (n = 50) confirmed the 4 clusters (Cohen κ light, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with 4 subgroups: dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome. This classification system suggests that a targeted clinical-serologic approach for identifying idiopathic inflammatory myopathies may be warranted.

Necrosis in anti-SRP+ and anti-HMGCR+myopathies: Role of autoantibodies and complement.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize muscle fiber necrosis in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM) with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies and to explore its underlying molecular immune mechanisms. METHODS: Muscle biopsies from patients with IMNM were analyzed and compared to biopsies from control patients with myositis. In addition to immunostaining and reverse transcription PCR on muscle samples, in vitro immunostaining on primary muscle cells was performed. RESULTS: Creatine kinase levels and muscle regeneration correlated with the proportion of necrotic fibers (r = 0.6, p < 0.001). CD68+iNOS+ macrophages and a Th-1 immune environment were chiefly involved in ongoing myophagocytosis of necrotic fibers. T-cell densities correlated with necrosis but no signs of cytotoxicity were detected. Activation of the classical pathway of the complement cascade, accompanied by deposition of sarcolemmal immunoglobulins, featured involvement of humoral immunity. Presence of SRP and HMGCR proteins on altered myofibers was reproduced on myotubes exposed to purified patient-derived autoantibodies. Finally, a correlation between sarcolemmal complement deposits and fiber necrosis was observed (r = 0.4 and p = 0.004). Based on these observations, we propose to update the pathologic criteria of IMNM. CONCLUSION: These data further corroborate the pathogenic role of anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR autoantibodies in IMNM, highlighting humoral mechanisms as key players in immunity and myofiber necrosis.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Data from the French pulmonary hypertension registry and review of the literature.

Occurrence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) without extensive interstitial lung disease (ILD) has rarely been described in the medical literature. This study aimed to report all cases with association of PAH and IIM in the French Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) Registry, to identify IIM features associated with the presence of PAH, and to describe treatment modalities of these patients.All cases of IIM-PAH were retrieved from the French PH Registry, which gathers PH patients prospectively enrolled by 27 referral hospital centers across France. Patients were excluded if they had an extensive ILD or overlap syndrome. Characteristics of IIM-PAH patients were compared with a control group of IIM patients without PH.Among the 5223 PH patients in the Registry, 34 had a diagnosis of IIM. Among them, 3 IIM-PAH patients (2 females and 1 male) had no evidence of extensive ILD or overlap syndrome, and were included in this study. In these 3 patients, dermatomyositis (DM) was the only identified IIM. One patient had autoantibodies classically associated with IIM (anti-Ku). PAH had always developed after IIM onset, was severe in all cases, and led to a marked functional impairment.By pooling our cases with 6 patients previously reported in the literature, and comparing them with a control cohort of 35 IIM patients without PH, we identify several IIM characteristics possibly associated with PAH occurrence, including DM subtype (78% vs 46%; P = 0.02), skin involvement (P = 0.04), anti-SSA antibodies (P = 0.05), and peripheral microangiopathy (P = 0.06).Overall, IIM-PAH patients were managed by corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants, either alone or combined with PAH therapy. Patients did not seem to respond to IIM treatment alone.Our study reports for the first time the rare but possible association of PAH and IIM in a large prospective PH Registry. In that setting, PAH seems associated with DM, skin involvement, peripheral microangiopathy, and anti-SSA positivity. The best therapeutic strategy for IIM-PAH remains to be defined.