Patient Engagement and Cost Savings Achieved by Automated Telemonitoring Systems Designed to Prevent and Identify Surgical Site Infections After Joint Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We designed two telemonitoring text and voice messaging interventions, EpxDecolonization (EpxDecol) and EpxWound, to improve management of orthopedic joint replacement patients at Washington University. We reviewed the use of these tools for a period of 88 weeks. METHODS: Cohorts of 1,392 and 1,753 participants completed EpxDecol and EpxWound, respectively. All patients who completed EpxDecol also completed EpxWound. We assessed patient use of and satisfaction with these interventions. A return on investment (ROI) analysis was conducted to determine the cost savings generated by EpxWound and EpxDecol. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who responded daily to EpxDecol and EpxWound were 91.9% and 77.7%, respectively, over the lengths of each intervention. The percent of daily responders declined <5% during each intervention. Ultimately, 88.4% of EpxDecol patients and 67.8% of EpxWound patients responded to ≥80% of all messages. Median patient survey responses (n = 1,246) were 9/9 (best possible) for care, 8/9 for improved communication, and 5/9 (perfect number) for number of messages received. ROI analysis for this 88-week period showed that using EpxDecol and EpxWound to engage patients (instead of nurses calling patients) saved the equivalent of 2.275 full-time nursing equivalents per week. We calculated net savings of $260,348 with an ROI of 14.85x for 1,753 patients over 88 weeks. One-year cost savings from these interventions were $153,800 with an ROI of 14.79x. CONCLUSIONS: EpxDecol and EpxWound may serve important roles in the perioperative process for orthopedic joint reconstruction surgery given high patient usage of and satisfaction with these interventions. Implementing EpxDecol and EpxWound for a large patient population could yield substantial cost savings and ROI.

Use of Short Message Service and Smartphone Applications in the Management of Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health and telemedicine are rapidly evolving fields used to provide healthcare remotely to patients. For surgical patients, telemedicine can improve patient education and remote monitoring of postoperative symptoms. We performed a systematic review of studies involving the use of short message service (SMS) and mobile application-based interventions in surgical patients to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each system, as well as of mobile interventions as a whole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched using relevant keywords from inception until November 2016. Studies involving SMS or mobile application-based communication protocols involving at least 25 preoperative or postoperative patients were included. Studies of systems involving communication exclusively between healthcare professionals were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 unique studies were identified through keyword search. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies were included in this review. Intervention modalities were SMS (8 studies), mobile application (4), combined SMS and application (1), automated phone call (1), and electronic transmission of pictures to the physician (1). Intervention methods were symptom monitoring (7), patient education (2), protocol adherence reminders (4), and combined symptom monitoring and protocol adherence reminders (2). Both mobile applications and SMS-based interventions increased adherence to medications and protocols and improved clinic attendance. Lower readmission rates and emergency room visits were reported. Satisfaction with automated communication systems was high for both patients and physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile interventions provide a sophisticated yet simple tool to improve perioperative healthcare. Future considerations to address include usage fatigue and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance concerns.

Spinal rod gripping capacity: how do 5.5/6.0-mm dual-diameter screws compare?

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pedicle screw gripping capacity from five suppliers, comparing single-diameter (S-D) systems using 5.5-mm-diameter rods to dual-diameter (D-D) systems accepting 5.5- and 6.0-mm-diameter rods with both cobalt chromium (CoCr) and titanium alloy (Ti) rods. D-D systems have become increasingly prevalent; however, these systems theoretically may compromise spinal rod gripping, particularly when a smaller-diameter rod is used within a D-D pedicle screw. METHODS: D-D pedicle screw systems from three suppliers (accepting 5.5- and 6.0-mm-diameter, Ti and CoCr rods), and S-D systems from two suppliers (accepting 5.5-mm-diameter, Ti and CoCr rods) were tested on an MTS MiniBionix machine. Axial load was applied in line with the rod to measure axial gripping capacity (AGC), and torsional load was applied to measure torsional gripping capacity (TGC) for each rod material and diameter. AGC and TGC were compared between D-D and S-D constructs, suppliers, rod diameters, and materials with subsequent classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: 5.5-mm rods within D-D screws were no weaker than 5.5-mm rods in S-D systems for AGC (dual > single, p = 0.043) and TGC (p = 0.066). As a whole, D-D systems had greater AGC than S-D systems (p = 0.01). AGC differed between suppliers (p < 0.001). No rod diameter (p = 0.227) or material (p = 0.131) effect emerged. With CART analysis, Supplier was the most significant predictor for greater AGC. As a whole, D-D systems had greater TGC than S-D systems (p = 0.008). TGC differed between suppliers (p < 0.001). Rod diameter was a significant predictor of higher TGC (6.0 > 5.5 mm, p = 0.002). CoCr rods had greater TGC than Ti (p < 0.001). CART analysis revealed that Supplier and CoCr material were significant predictors for increased TGC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite 30%-70% variability in gripping capacity due to rod supplier and material, overall D-D pedicle screw systems had similar AGC and TGC as S-D systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Low Infection-Related Re-Admission Rates in a Retrospective of 4725 Children with Appendicitis Using a Clinical Pathway in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Center.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of antibiotic management of appendicitis in tertiary care pediatric centers has been associated with improved outcomes. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego implemented an appendicitis clinical pathway in 2005. We evaluated infection-related re-admission risk factors since 2010, when an electronic medical record was established, with the aim to optimize the clinical pathway. METHODS: Between January 2010 and August 2015, 4725 children with a diagnosis of appendicitis were evaluated for demographic data, pathology diagnoses, culture results, and inpatient and oral step-down antibiotic therapy regimens. From children originally admitted for appendicitis, those who were re-admitted with infection were compared with those who were not re-admitted for infection. The populations were controlled by severity of infection using a pathology-defined appendicitis severity scale: Grade 0, no appendicitis; grade 1, simple acute appendicitis with gross and microscopic evidence of inflammation, but no perforation; grade 2, gangrenous/necrotizing/micro-perforated appendicitis with subserosal or serosal exudate, but no frank or visually appreciated perforation; and grade 3, frank perforation. RESULTS: Of 4725 children (total population, TP) admitted with a diagnosis of appendicitis, only 199 (4.2%) were re-admitted, with 125 of these admissions for infection (2.65% of the TP). Age, race/ethnicity, language preference, and body mass index were not found to correlate with re-admission for infection. Length of stay significantly differed between the no infection-related re-admission population and infection-related re-admission population (3.02 vs. 4.03 d, p < 0.001). There was a trend toward higher infection-re-admission rates as the pathology grade increased (odds ratio grade 1 vs. grade 3 = 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 5.03). CONCLUSIONS: Infection-related re-admission rates for children on the clinical pathway in our institution were infrequent. The greater association of all-cause and infection-related re-admission rates with pathology grade suggest that defining appendicitis by pathology and clinical severity may provide an evidence-based scoring system to support clinical observation in the use and duration of antibiotic therapy.