Using voice to create hospital progress notes: Description of a mobile application and supporting system integrated with a commercial electronic health record.

We describe the development and design of a smartphone app-based system to create inpatient progress notes using voice, commercial automatic speech recognition software, with text processing to recognize spoken voice commands and format the note, and integration with a commercial EHR. This new system fits hospital rounding workflow and was used to support a randomized clinical trial testing whether use of voice to create notes improves timeliness of note availability, note quality, and physician satisfaction with the note creation process. The system was used to create 709 notes which were placed in the corresponding patient's EHR record. The median time from pressing the Send button to appearance of the formatted note in the Inbox was 8.8 min. It was generally very reliable, accepted by physician users, and secure. This approach provides an alternative to use of keyboard and templates to create progress notes and may appeal to physicians who prefer voice to typing.

Using voice to create inpatient progress notes: effects on note timeliness, quality, and physician satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the evaluation of a system to create hospital progress notes using voice and electronic health record integration to determine if note timeliness, quality, and physician satisfaction are improved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to measure effects of this new method of writing inpatient progress notes, which evolved over time, on important outcomes. RESULTS: Intervention subjects created 709 notes and control subjects created 1143 notes. When adjusting for clustering by provider and secular trends, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the time between when patients were seen on rounds and when progress notes were viewable by others (95% confidence interval -106.9 to 12.2 min). There were no significant differences in physician satisfaction or note quality between intervention and control. DISCUSSION: Though we did not find support for the superiority of this system (Voice-Generated Enhanced Electronic Note System [VGEENS]) for our 3 primary outcomes, if notes are created using voice during or soon after rounds they are available within 10 min. Shortcomings that likely influenced subject satisfaction include the early state of our VGEENS and the short interval for system development before the randomized trial began. CONCLUSION: VGEENS permits voice dictation on rounds to create progress notes and can reduce delay in note availability and may reduce dependence on copy/paste within notes. Timing of dictation determines when notes are available. Capturing notes in near-real-time has potential to apply NLP and decision support sooner than when notes are typed later in the day, and to improve note accuracy.