DIEP flap perfusion assessment using microdialysis versus Doppler ultrasonography: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of buried free-tissue transfer procedures and the need for an objective method to evaluate vascular complications of free flaps has led to the development of new technologies. Microdialysis has been used to monitor free flaps using interstitial biological markers. Previous uses mainly focused on muscular flaps. Our aim is to compare external Doppler ultrasonography (EDU) evaluation versus microdialysis in the early follow-up of adipocutaneous flaps, and propose an efficient postoperative monitoring protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 68 consecutive DIEP flaps (50 patients) performed between January 2019 and March 2021. All flaps received standardized post-operative monitoring using clinical signs, EDU and microdialysis. Glucose and lactate concentrations were assessed using glucose <1 mmol/L and lactate >6 mmol/L as ischemic trend thresholds. We calculated Glucose/Lactate ratio as a new parameter for the assessment of flap viability. RESULTS: Among all the 68 flaps, two flaps returned to the operative theater when a combination of unsatisfactory microdialysis values and clinical/EDU signs identified vascular impairment; only one developed total flap necrosis. Reoperation rate was 2.94% with an overall flap success rate of 98.53%. External Doppler ultrasonography had 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity, while microdialysis had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Microdialysis values proved flap viability sooner than external Doppler ultrasonography, making it an excellent tool for post-operative monitoring. With the appropriate thresholds for glucose and lactate concentrations, and glucose/lactate ratio used as a new parameter, it can help potentially avoiding unnecessary re-explorations, and reducing flap ischemia times.

Prophylactic venous Supercharging in DIEP Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: DIEP flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction. METHODS: A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group(DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group(DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting. RESULTS: 154 patients were included in the study, divided into Case group(74 patients) and control group(80 patients). Median age at the time of surgery was 49,09 years (range 29 -68), slightly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. Mean BMI was 25,52 kg/m2(range 21,09-29,37), in particular 25,47 kg/m2 (range 23,44 -28,63) in Group 1 and 25,58 kg/m2(range 21,09-29,37) in Group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. Average operative times were 272,16 minutes in Group 1 (range 221 - 328) and 272,34 minutes in Group 2(range 221-327), with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia times(44,4 minutes in Group 1 (range 38 - 56) and 49,12 minutes in Group 2(range 41- 67). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the comparison of two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, in order to avoid flap venous congestion and rates of re-exploration.

Marking the nipple-areola complex in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty: a geometrical method.

Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty are well-established procedures used to address ptotic and hypertrophic breasts. A variety of methods have been described in the literature for managing the three main aspects of these procedures: skin excess, parenchyma, and the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Among these techniques, several have specifically addressed the markings of the NAC in procedures involving a preoperatively established NAC position. While many of these have proven effective over time, the literature lacks standardized and reproducible methods. In this paper, we introduce, step-by-step, a novel approach based on geometrical principles to address this limitation. This method involves the simple process of drawing two hemi circumferences on the vertical limbs of the skin resection pattern, which are commonly marked using the Bisemberg maneuver or similar techniques. The method we introduce is adaptable to virtually all NAC pedicles. Furthermore, as exemplified in the accompanying video, it can be incorporated to most skin resection patterns with a preoperatively defined NAC position. The clinical application, as evidenced in the case reported, appears to be promising. Although it has some limitations, this procedure shows the potential to reduce inaccuracy by minimizing variability factors. As a result, even inexperienced surgeons can achieve precise markings.

Pedicle stabilization with fibrin sealant in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Microsurgical procedures are nowadays routinely performed worldwide in reconstructive surgery. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction due to its excellent outcomes and lower donor site morbidity. However, complications, including flap failure, still occur in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Often, according to our experience, these complications result from pedicle disorders, which can be attributed to postoperative mobilization. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of using a fibrin sealant as a method for pedicle stabilization to prevent pedicle mobilization in the postoperative period. With our technique, after the flap insetting and microsurgical anastomosis, the pedicle was stabilized by applying a fibrin sealant (TISSEEL™) around and over the entire pedicle. Our study included a homogeneous series of 70 patients who received a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate this novel technique compared to the conventional method. In our experience, the fibrin glue allowed us to reduce the strain for correct pedicle positioning and all subsequent efforts to avoid displacements in the postoperative period. Our preliminary results suggest that this method may lead to a reduction in overall complications attributable to pedicle disorders.