Discovery and validation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma outcome.

Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/angiogenesis pathway have been implicated previously in cancer risk, prognosis and response to therapy including in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prior esophageal adenocarcinoma studies focused on using candidate polymorphisms, limiting the discovery of novel polymorphisms. Here, we applied the tagSNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) approach to identify new VEGF pathway polymorphisms associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis and validated them in an independent cohort of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. In 231 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients of all stages/treatment plans, 58 genetic polymorphisms (18 KDR, 7 VEGFA and 33 FLT1) selected through tagging and assessment of predicted function were genotyped. Cox-proportional hazard models adjusted for important socio-demographic and clinico-pathological factors were applied to assess the association of genetic polymorphisms with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significantly associated polymorphisms were then validated in an independent cohort of 137 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among the 231 discovery cohort patients, 86% were male, median diagnosis age was 64 years, 34% were metastatic at diagnosis and median OS and PFS were 20 and 12 months, respectively. KDR rs17709898 was found significantly associated with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.90; P = 5.9E-3). FLT1 rs3794405 and rs678714 were significantly associated with OS (aHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04-1.99; P = 0.03 and aHR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.01-2.24; P = 0.045, respectively). No VEGFA polymorphisms were found significantly associated with either outcome. Upon validation, FLT1 rs3794405 remained strongly associated with OS (aHR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.04-2.44; P = 0.03). FLT1 rs3794405 is significantly associated with OS in esophageal adenocarcinoma, whereby each variant allele confers a 45-60% increased risk of mortality. Validation and evaluation of this association in other cancer sites are warranted.

Genetic polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in gynecological cancers: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have explored the potential role of genetic polymorphisms as predictive or prognostic biomarkers in gynecologic malignancies. A systematic review for all eligible polymorphisms has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to summarize the current status of the field and provide direction for future research. DESIGN: We searched literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane) from 2006 to April 2011 to identify studies evaluating the association between gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome in ovarian, endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Studies reporting relationships between polymorphisms and toxicity were also included. RESULTS: Sixty two studies met the inclusion criteria. The median sample size was 140. Most of the included studies (n=50, 81%) were conducted in ovarian cancer patients. Almost a third assessed potential predictive associations between gene polymorphism and outcome in ovarian cancer. The most commonly evaluated genes were ERCC1, VEGF, ABCB1 (MDR), and GSTP1. Most studies (n=44, 71%) were observational case-series. Only four studies (6%) included a validation arm and patient population ethnicity was explicitly stated only in 27% of included studies. CONCLUSION: No consistent association between any gene polymorphism and clinical outcome in gynecological cancers has been found across studies. There is incomplete adherence to the REMARK guidelines and inadequate methodology reporting in most studies. Moving forward, analysis of large trial-based clinical samples; adherence to the highest methodological standards, and focus on validation analyses are necessary to identify clinically useful pharmacogenomic biomarkers of outcome.

Improving oncology outcomes through targeted therapeutics will require electronic delivery systems.

Typically, chemotherapy selection takes into account patient demographic data, including disease symptoms, family history, environmental factors and concurrent medications. Although validated and approved genomics tests are available for targeted therapeutics, a major challenge facing healthcare is the ability to process the genomic data in the patient's context and to return clinically interpretable dosing guidance to the physician in a realistic time frame. Delivery of these targeted therapeutics, made possible by clinical decision support systems connected to an electronic health record may help drive both the acceptance and adaptation of an electronic health record system, as well as provide personalized information at point-of-care, as part of the routine workflow. The realization of targeted therapeutics will depend on the concerted efforts of stakeholder groups as they address political, ethical, socioeconomical and technical challenges to achieve personalized medicine adoption through real-world implementation.

ABCB1 (MDR 1) polymorphisms and progression-free survival among women with ovarian cancer following paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The human ABCB1 gene encodes P-glycoprotein, which transports a broad range of anticancer drugs, including paclitaxel. Although the functional consequences of ABCB1 polymorphisms have been the subject of numerous studies, few have assessed the association with clinical outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the association between the 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T, and 1236C>T ABCB1 polymorphisms and progression-free and overall survival in 309 patients from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin and subsequently tested significant observations in an independent validation set. RESULTS: Women who carried the minor T/A alleles at the 2677G>T/A polymorphism were significantly less likely to relapse following treatment compared with homozygote GG carriers (P(Log-rank)=0.001) in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study cohort. Subgroup analyses showed that this effect was limited to cases with residual disease 1 cm (P(Log-rank)=0.3). This effect was not confirmed in an independent validation set of carboplatin/paclitaxel-treated patients (n=278) using a higher residual disease cut point (T/A polymorphism on progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients who are treated with a taxane/carboplatin, which is dependent on the extent of residual disease, with a better prognosis for patients with the 2677T/A allele and minimal residual disease.

Irinotecan pharmacogenetics: influence of pharmacodynamic genes.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan is an important drug for the treatment of solid tumors. Although genes involved in irinotecan pharmacokinetics have been shown to influence toxicity, there are no data on pharmacodynamic genes. CDC45L, NFKB1, PARP1, TDP1, and XRCC1 have been shown to influence the cytotoxic action of camptothecins, including irinotecan. Polymorphisms in the drug target of camptothecins, topoisomerase I (TOP1), and downstream effectors may influence patient outcomes to irinotecan therapy. We undertook a retrospective candidate gene haplotype association study to investigate this hypothesis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Haplotype compositions of six candidate genes were constructed in European (n = 93), East Asian (n = 94), and West African (n = 95) populations. Haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNP) were selected based on genealogic relationships between haplotypes. DNA samples from 107 European, advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan-based regimens were genotyped for htSNPs as well as three coding region SNPs. Associations between genetic variants and toxicity (grade 3/4 diarrhea and neutropenia) or efficacy (objective response) were assessed. RESULTS: TOP1 and TDP1 htSNPs were related to grade 3/4 neutropenia (P = 0.04) and response (P = 0.04), respectively. Patients homozygous for an XRCC1 haplotype (GGCC-G) were more likely to show an objective response to therapy than other patients (83% versus 30%; P = 0.02). This effect was also seen in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 11.9; P = 0.04). No genetic variants were associated with diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive pharmacogenetic investigation of irinotecan pharmacodynamic factors, and our findings suggest that genetic variation in the pharmacodynamic genes may influence the efficacy of irinotecan-containing therapies in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Pharmacogenomics of taxane/platinum therapy in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Despite an initial high response to therapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low. The identification of pharmacogenomic markers to identify patients unlikely to respond or at risk for severe toxicity will assist in the goal of individualizing ovarian cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Most studies have assessed single nucleotide polymorphisms from genes involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs. RESULTS: Unfortunately, most markers identified have not been replicated in subsequent studies. CONCLUSIONS: Other mechanisms of variability, including epigenetic control of gene expression and copy number variation, may play important roles. In addition, nongenetic influences such as concurrent medications, and physiological and environmental factors could also affect individual responses to taxane and platinum therapy.

DNA methylotype analysis in colorectal cancer.

The methylation status of a gene promoter is considered to be an important mechanism for the development of many tumors, including colorectal cancer. Recent studies have shown that specific patterns of DNA methylation across multiple CpG loci in some human tumors are more informative than the detection of one single CpG locus in tumor genomes. In the present study, multiple CpG methylations of three genes (CDKN2A, DPYD and MLH1) were detected in DNA samples from patients with colorectal cancer using Pyrosequencing(R) technology. The bisulfite-converted DNA was amplified with a nested PCR and five or six CpG loci of each gene were assessed to determine DNA methylotype. Our data showed that 10/49 (20.4%), 6/48 (12.5%) and 14/49 (28.6%) of tumors were methylated with a DNA methylation level >0.2 in CDKN2A, DPYD and MLH1, respectively. Our study indicated a similar DNA methylation level across the multiple CpG loci for all three genes in the methylated tumor DNA samples, demonstrating a dichotomous trait in DNA methylation. The tumor DNA samples had unique DNA methylation patterns, which were high-degree and multiple-site methylation, but the normal DNA samples had no or a low-degree and dispersed single-site methylation. In addition, an inverse correlation in those methylated tumors was observed between DNA methylation and RNA expression for MLH1 (RS=-0.62, P=0.003), but not for CDKN2A and DPYD. In conclusion, distinctive DNA methylotypes exist in colorectal cancer and may depict a distinct biology in apparently homogeneous tumors.

Cancer pharmacogenetics.

Cancer pharmacogenetics is a burgeoning field. There are now many published associations between genotype and outcome or toxicity from chemotherapy treatment. Performing pharmacogenetics studies in cancer requires careful consideration of the sample type to be used (germline vs tumor); the genotyping platform to be used (medium, low, or high throughput); and the analysis and reporting of associations and observations.

Connexin37 (GJA4) genotype predicts survival after an acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: GJA4 1019 C > T, MMP3 -1171delA, and SERPINE1 -668delG genotypes have been associated with the risk of incident myocardial infarction. We tested the hypothesis that these genotypes would predict long-term mortality after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We assembled a prospective cohort study on 726 patients with ACS admitted between March 2000 and October 2001. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models of 3-year mortality adjusted for age, race, ACS type, prior heart failure, diabetes, and revascularization were used to compare groups. RESULTS: The GJA4 1019 C > T genotype was significantly related to mortality over 3 years (8.3% vs 14%, for the C/C vs T allele carriers; P = .02), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.05-2.8, P = .03). This finding was consistent in both men and women (hazard ratio = 1.9 and 1.7, respectively) with no significant sex interaction (P = .8). The MMP3 -1171delA and SERPINE1 -668delG genotypes were not significantly related to mortality in the overall population (all P > .4). CONCLUSIONS: GJA4 1019 C > T genotype predicted risk of death after an ACS, whereas the MMP3 and SERPINE1 genotypes did not. The GJA4 1019 C > T polymorphism may warrant integration into comprehensive risk stratification algorithms for patients with ACS.

Pyrosequencing applications.

Genetics research has benefited tremendously from the release of the human genome sequence. Subsequent technology has been developed and adapted to accommodate the need for faster, easier throughput of genetic assays. Pyrosequencing is a unique system that allows the analysis of genetic variations including single-nucleotide polymorphisms, indels and short repeats, as well as assessing RNA allelic imbalance, DNA methylation status, and gene copy number. Advances in methodology, including multiplex and universal primer applications, have reduced assay cost and improved throughput. This chapter briefly reviews some of the many applications for Pyrosequencing technology.

Hoosier Oncology Group randomized phase II study of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and estramustine in combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer with pharmacogenetic survival analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of two docetaxel doublets in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients and to examine the prognostic role of polymorphisms in host genes important to docetaxel metabolism and transport. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-four chemotherapy-naive patients with HRPC were randomized to docetaxel and vinorelbine (D, 20 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; V, 25 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8) or docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (D, 60-70 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; E, 280 mg oral thrice daily days 1-5) administered q21d. Primary end point was clinically significant toxicity. A pharmacogenetic analysis of host genes was done in patients who received at least one cycle of docetaxel therapy. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 15.6% of DV patients and in 28.6% DE patients. Neither arm exceeded the threshold of clinically significant toxicity. In the DV arm, objective response rate was 33%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 20%, and median survival was 16.2 months. In the DE arm, objective response rate was 67%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 43%, and median survival was 19.7 months. Pharmacogenetic analyses showed a significant association between survival beyond 15 months and the ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism compared with the wild-type (C/C) genotype (66% versus 27%; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DV and DE doublets are active with a tolerable toxicity profile in patients with HRPC; however, efficacy does not seem superior to standard single-agent docetaxel. The ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism may be an important predictor of response and survival in HRPC patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

DNA repair pathway profiling and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ability to maintain DNA integrity is a critical cellular function. DNA repair is conducted by distinct pathways of genes, many of which are thought to be altered in colorectal cancer. However, there has been little characterization of these pathways in colorectal cancer. METHOD: By using the TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR, RNA expression profiling of 20 DNA repair pathway genes was done in matched tumor and normal tissues from 52 patients with Dukes' C colorectal cancer. RESULTS: The relative mRNA expression level across the 20 DNA repair pathway genes varied considerably, and the individual variability was also quite large, with an 85.4 median fold change in the tumor tissue genes and a 127.2 median fold change in the normal tissue genes. Tumor-normal differential expression was found in 13 of 20 DNA repair pathway genes (only XPA had a lower RNA level in the tumor samples; the other 12 genes had significantly higher tumor levels, all P<0.01). Coordinated expression of ERCC6, HMG1, MSH2, and POLB (RS>or=0.60) was observed in the tumor tissues (all P<0.001). Apoptosis index was not correlated with expression of the 20 DNA repair pathway genes. MLH1 and XRCC1 RNA expression was correlated with microsatellite instability status (P=0.045 and 0.020, respectively). An inverse correlation was found between tumor MLH1 RNA expression and MLH1 DNA methylation (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study provides an initial characterization of the DNA repair pathways for understanding the cellular DNA damage/repair system in human colorectal cancer.

CpG island methylation of DNA damage response genes in advanced ovarian cancer.

We have determined the methylation frequencies of 24 CpG islands of genes associated with DNA damage responses or with ovarian cancer in 106 stage III/IV epithelial ovarian tumors. We have analyzed this data for whether there is evidence of a CpG island methylator phenotype or associations of CpG island methylation with response to chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Frequent methylation was observed for OPCML, DCR1, RASSF1A, HIC1, BRCA1, and MINT25 (33.3%, 30.7%, 26.4%, 17.3%, 12.3%, and 12.0%, respectively), whereas no methylation was observed for APAF-1, DAPK, FANCF, FAS, P14, P21, P73, SOCS-3, and SURVIVIN. The remaining genes showed only a low frequency of methylation, <10%. Unsupervised gene shaving identified a nonrandom pattern of methylation for OPCML, DCR1, RASSF1A, MINT25, HIC1, and SFRP1, supporting the concept of concordant methylation of these genes in ovarian cancer. Methylation of at least one of the group of genes involved in DNA repair/drug detoxification (BRCA1, GSTP1, and MGMT) was associated with improved response to chemotherapy (P = 0.013). We have examined the frequency of a polymorphism in the DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3b6, which has been previously reported to affect gene transcription and cancer risk. The genetic polymorphism in the DNMT3b6 gene promoter (at position -149) is not significantly associated with the concordant methylation observed, but is weakly associated with the overall frequency of methylation at the genes examined (P = 0.04, n = 56). This supports the hypothesis that genetic factors affecting function of DNMT genes may underlie the propensity of tumors to acquire aberrant CpG island methylation.

Validation of microRNA pathway polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma survival.

Polymorphisms in miRNA and miRNA pathway genes have been previously associated with cancer risk and outcome, but have not been studied in esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. Here, we evaluate candidate miRNA pathway polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis and attempt to validate them in an independent cohort of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among 231 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients of all stages/treatment plans, 38 candidate genetic polymorphisms (17 biogenesis, 9 miRNA targets, 5 pri-miRNA, 7 pre-miRNA) were genotyped and analyzed. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinicopathological covariates helped assess the association of genetic polymorphisms with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significantly associated polymorphisms were then evaluated in an independent cohort of 137 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among the 231 discovery cohort patients, 86% were male, median diagnosis age was 64 years, 34% were metastatic at diagnosis, and median OS and PFS were 20 and 12 months, respectively. GEMIN3 rs197412 (aHR = 1.37, 95%CI: [1.04-1.80]; P = 0.02), hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564 (aHR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.53-0.90]; P = 0.05), and KIAA0423 rs1053667 (aHR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.28-0.96]; P = 0.04) were found associated with OS. Furthermore, GEMIN3 rs197412 (aHR = 1.33, 95% CI: [1.03-1.74]; P = 0.03) and KRT81 rs3660 (aHR = 1.29, 95% CI: [1.01-1.64]; P = 0.04) were found associated with PFS. Although none of these polymorphisms were significant in the second cohort, hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564 and KIAA0423 rs1053667 had trends in the same direction; when both cohorts were combined together, GEMIN3 rs197412, hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564, and KIAA0423 rs1053667 remained significantly associated with OS. We demonstrate the association of multiple miRNA pathway polymorphisms with esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis in a discovery cohort of patients, which did not validate in a separate cohort but had consistent associations in the pooled cohort. Larger studies are required to confirm/validate the prognostic value of these polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Systems pharmacogenomics in yeast.

Evaluation of: Lee W, St Onge RP, Proctor M et al.: Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet. 1(2), e24 (2005). Despite intense study, the mechanistic and therapeutic differences in cellular responses to DNA-damaging agents are not fully understood. In order to expand knowledge of DNA damage, the authors of this study assayed the effects of 12 anticancer agents on the complete pool of approximately 4700 homozygous deletion strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The screens identified genes in well-characterized DNA, in addition to genes whose role in DNA-damage-response pathways had not previously been established.