A new fastening system for temporary pacing with active-fixation leads: effectiveness and safety.

AIMS: Temporary cardiac pacing with active-fixation leads (TPAFL) using a reusable permanent pacemaker generator has been shown to be safer than lead systems without fixation. However, TPAFL requires the off-label use of pacemaker leads and generators. We designed a fastening system to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure: the KronoSafe System®. To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the KronoSafe System® for temporary pacing in a series of patients receiving TPAFL. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort of 20 patients undergoing TPAFL between August 2019 and June 2020 was recruited in a Spanish region. The temporary pacemaker was implanted through jugular access and secured with the KronoSafe System®. R-wave detection, lead impedance, and capture threshold were assessed every 48 h. Complications associated with the procedure or occurring during TPAFL were recorded. There were no complications associated with temporary pacing, and the therapy was effective in all cases. TPAFL was used for a mean of 7.6 days (maximum 25 days), and 84.56% of the time in a cardiology ward. CONCLUSION: TPAFL secured using the KronoSafe system® provides safe and stable cardiac stimulation for patients requiring temporary cardiac pacing.

Effects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias in reduced ejection fraction patients under continuous remote monitoring of implantable defibrillator devices.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition decreased sudden cardiac death in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (rEFHF). The precise mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias compared to angiotensin inhibition in rEFHF patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and remote monitoring. METHODS: We prospectively included 120 patients with ICD and (1) New York Heart Association functional class ≥II; (2) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; and (3) remote monitoring. For 9 months, patients received 100% angiotensin inhibition with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, and mineraloid antagonist. Subsequently, ACEi or ARB was changed to sacubitril-valsartan in all patients, who were followed for 9 months. Appropriate shocks, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden, and biventricular pacing percentage were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were an average age of 69 ± 8 years and had mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 30.4% ± 4% (82% ischemic). Use of beta-blockers (98%), mineraloid antagonist (97%) and antiarrhythmic drugs was similar before and after sacubitril-valsartan. Sacubitril-valsartan significantly decreased NSVT episodes (5.4 ± 0.5 vs 15 ± 1.7 in angiotensin inhibition; P <.002), sustained ventricular tachycardia, and appropriate ICD shocks (0.8% vs 6.7% in angiotensin inhibition; P <.02). PVCs per hour decreased after sacubitril-valsartan (33 ± 12 vs 78 ± 15 in angiotensin inhibition; P <.0003) and was associated with increased biventricular pacing percentage (from 95% ± 6% to 98.8% ± 1.3%; P <.02). CONCLUSION: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition decreased ventricular arrhythmias and appropriate ICD shocks in rEFHF patients under home monitoring compared to angiotensin inhibition.

Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption (ROMPA): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of evidence in the efficacy of the coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. To fill this gap, we have designed the ROMPA study (Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption) to confirm whether treatment with an adequate dose of treated plasma by CPFA could confer a clinical benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our study is a multicentric randomised clinical trial with a 28-day and 90-day follow-up and allocation ratio 1:1. Its aim is to clarify whether the application of high doses of CPFA (treated plasma ≥0.20 L/kg/day) in the first 3 days after randomisation, in addition to the current clinical practice, is able to reduce hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) at 28 and 90 days after initiation of the therapy. The study will be performed in 10 ICUs in the Southeast of Spain which follow the same protocol in this disease (based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign). Our trial is designed to be able to demonstrate an absolute mortality reduction of 20% (α=0.05; 1-ß=0.8; n=190(95×2)). The severity of the process, ensuring the recruitment of patients with a high probability of death (50% in the control group), will be achieved through an adequate stratification by using both severity scores and classical definitions of severe sepsis/septic shock and dynamic parameters. Our centres are fully aware of the many pitfalls associated with previous medical device trials. Trying to reduce these problems, we have developed a training programme to improve the CPFA use (especially clotting problems). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of all the participant centres. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, as well as national and international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02357433; Pre-results.