Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 2024 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI provides assessment of functional and structural parameters in kidney allografts. It offers a non-invasive alternative to the current reference standard of kidney biopsy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of MRI parameters in the assessment of allograft function in the first 3-months post-transplantation. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: 32 transplant recipients (54 ± 17 years, 20 females), divided into two groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3-months post-transplantation: inferior graft function (IGF; eGFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 10) and superior graft function (SGF; eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 22). Further categorization was based on the need for hemodialysis (C1) and decrease in s-creatinine (C2) at 1-week post-transplantation: delayed-graft-function (DGF: n = 4 C1, n = 10 C2) and early graft-function (EGF: n = 28 C1, n = 22 C2). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling, T1-mapping, and diffusion-weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT: Multiparametric MRI was evaluated at 1-week in all patients and 3-months after transplantation in 28 patients. Renal blood flow (RBF), diffusion coefficients (ADC, ΔADC, D, ∆ $$ \Delta $$ D, D*, flowing fraction f), T1 and ∆ $$ \Delta $$ T1 were calculated in cortex and medulla. The diagnostic and prognostic value of these parameters, obtained at 3-months and 1-week post-transplantation, respectively, was evaluated in the cortex to discriminate between DGF and EGF, and between SGF and IGF. STATISTICAL TESTS: Logistic regression, receiver-operating-characteristics, area-under-the-curve (AUC), confidence intervals (CIs), analysis-of-variance, t-test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, Pearson's correlation. P-value<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: DGF patients exhibited significantly lower cortical RBF and f and higher D*. The diagnostic value of MRI for detecting DGF was excellent (AUC = 100%). Significant differences between patients with IGF and SGF were found in RBF, ∆T1 , and ∆D. Multiparametric MRI showed higher diagnostic (AUC = 95.32%; CI: 88%-100%) and prognostic (AUC = 97.47%, CI: 92%-100%) values for detecting IGF than eGFR (AUC = 89.50%, CI: 79%-100%). DATA CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI may show high diagnostic and prognostic value in transplanted patients, yielding better results compared to eGFR measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

2.
An Sist Sanit Navar ; 47(2)2024 Aug 05.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39104332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common cause of renal failure, especially in patients with risk factors. This study analyses different renal biomarkers in patients undergoing computed tomography scans with iodinated contrast to identify the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of CI-AKI. METHODOLOGY: Prospective study that included patients with high risk of renal disease who received iodinated contrast (iohexol) for the computed tomography scans. Functional biomarkers (creatinine and cystatin C), inflammatory and oxidative stress markers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], interleukin-8 [IL-8], superoxide dismutase [SOD], F2-isoprostanes, and cardiotrophin-1), and cell cycle biomarkers (Nephrocheck®) were analysed before the iodinated contrast and 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-contrast, in relation to the incidence of IC-AKI. RESULTS: IC-AKI was observed in 30.6% of the 62 study participants and in 57.1% of the patients with diabetes and renal dysfunction. Factors associated with IC-AKI were a higher mean age (74.4 vs 64.9 years), pre-existing renal dysfunction (60 vs 16.7%), and higher adjusted mean volume of iohexol (42.9 vs 32.1%). As for non-functional biomarkers. No differences were found between patients with and without CI-AKI. The use of iodinated contrast was associated with a decrease in SOD antioxidant activity at 4 hours and an increase in IL-8 at 12 hours post-administration of the iodinated contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of iohexol in computed tomography scans in patients with high risk of renal disease results in an elevated percentage of CI-AKI, attributable to ischemia/reperfusion injury and/or direct toxicity of the iodinated contrast.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Biomarcadores , Meios de Contraste , Inflamação , Estresse Oxidativo , Humanos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/metabolismo , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inflamação/induzido quimicamente , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Iohexol/efeitos adversos
3.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(4): sfae049, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633840

RESUMO

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching from immediate-release (IR) to extended-release (ER) cysteamine in patients with nephropathic cystinosis (NC) in Spain. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentre study in NC patients who received IR cysteamine for at least 12 months, switched to ER cysteamine, and received it for at least 6 months before inclusion. Results: Data were collected from nine patients (four children, five adults) 36 months before and after the switch. Despite the highly selected population, an improvement in growth, particularly in children and a significant reduction in hospitalization days was observed. A decrease in halitosis, body odour and gastrointestinal effects was reported in most of the patients who suffered before the switch, and the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decreased in some patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable in patients with preserved kidney function. No significant changes in white blood cell (WBC) cystine levels were observed after the switch. There was no significant difference in the cysteamine dose received. However, some patients were receiving <50% of the recommended dose of cysteamine before and after the switch and showed elevated levels of WBC cystine. Conclusions: Switching from IR to ER cysteamine in clinical practice reduces hospital stays, improves nutritional status and growth in paediatric patients and could help to enhance treatment tolerability by reducing side effects. Furthermore, the dosing of ER cysteamine could promote therapeutic compliance and positively affect the quality of life of the NC population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA