Pharmaceutical cancer care for haematology patients on oral anticancer drugs: Findings from an economic, clinical and organisational analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical benefit of pharmaceutical cares in improving the quality-of-care outcomes is well demonstrated. Clinical pharmacy services are not systematically deployed in cancer units in the absence of economic data. The aim of this prospective, observational 1-year study was to evaluate the clinical, economic and organisational impacts of pharmaceutical care into a multidisciplinary day hospital for patients treated with oral cancer drugs. METHODS: All pharmacists' interventions (PI) were documented and their impact and the probability of adverse drug events were assessed using the clinical, economic and organisational tool. RESULTS: Among 360 admissions, an average of 1.81 PI per admission was accepted. Among 452 PI leading to a clinical benefit on the patient, 16.9% had a major impact, and 1.9% had an impact on survival. The large majority of PIs (87%) increased the quality-of-care organisation. The budget impact model showed a total cost savings and cost avoidance of €539,047 per year and a cost-benefit ratio of 7.07:1. The direct cost-benefit was €201,741, and the cost avoidance was €337,306. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary care and pharmaceutical care are key elements to improve cancer patients' outcomes and avoid evitable healthcare costs.

Endogenous endophthalmitis: New insights from a 12-year cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis (EE), determine factors associated with outcome and propose a management plan for EE. METHODS: Retrospective case series in two tertiary referral centers from 2010 to 2022. RESULTS: Sixty-four eyes of 53 patients were included. Bilateral involvement occurred for 11/53 patients (21%). Ocular symptoms were the only first manifestation of the disease in 36/53 (68%) of cases; signs of sepsis were evident in 17/53 (32%). Imaging tests detected at least one extraocular focus of infection in 34/53 patients (64%), with contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography showing relevant findings in 28/50 (56%) of cases. EE was microbiologically confirmed in 43/53 patients (81%); the organisms involved were: Gram-positive bacteria (19/53, 36%), Gram-negative bacteria (13/53, 25%) and Candida sp. (11/53, 21%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacteria (10/32, 31%). Blood cultures were positive in 28/53 patients (53%) and eye samples in 11/41 eyes (27%). All patients were treated with systemic antimicrobial therapy, 39/64 eyes (61%) received anti-infective intravitreal injection(s) and 17/64 eyes (27%) underwent vitrectomy. Four patients (8%) died due to uncontrolled systemic infection. Final visual acuity (VA) was < 20/400 in 28/57 eyes (49%) and ocular structural loss (bulbar phthisis or enucleation/evisceration) was reported in 18/64 eyes (28%). In multivariate analysis, initial VA was the only parameter associated with visual and/or structural loss of the eye (OR = 24.44 (4.33-228.09) and 5.44 (1.33-26.18) respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EE remains a severe infection with a poor ocular outcome. We propose a standard protocol to improve diagnosis and medical management.