The Netherlands Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Registry: design and status update.

BACKGROUND: Clinical research on arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is typically limited by small patient numbers, retrospective study designs, and inconsistent definitions. AIM: To create a large national ACM patient cohort with a vast amount of uniformly collected high-quality data that is readily available for future research. METHODS: This is a multicentre, longitudinal, observational cohort study that includes (1) patients with a definite ACM diagnosis, (2) at-risk relatives of ACM patients, and (3) ACM-associated mutation carriers. At baseline and every follow-up visit, a medical history as well information regarding (non-)invasive tests is collected (e. g. electrocardiograms, Holter recordings, imaging and electrophysiological studies, pathology reports, etc.). Outcome data include (non-)sustained ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, heart failure, and (cardiac) death. Data are collected on a research electronic data capture (REDCap) platform in which every participating centre has its own restricted data access group, thus empowering local studies while facilitating data sharing. DISCUSSION: The Netherlands ACM Registry is a national observational cohort study of ACM patients and relatives. Prospective and retrospective data are obtained at multiple time points, enabling both cross-sectional and longitudinal research in a hypothesis-generating approach that extends beyond one specific research question. In so doing, this registry aims to (1) increase the scientific knowledge base on disease mechanisms, genetics, and novel diagnostic and treatment strategies of ACM; and (2) provide education for physicians and patients concerning ACM, e. g. through our website ( www.acmregistry.nl ) and patient conferences.

Echo response and clinical outcome in CRT patients.

BACKGROUND: Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (∆LVESV) is the most frequently used surrogate marker in measuring response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). We investigated whether ∆LVESV is the best measure to discriminate between a favourable and unfavourable outcome and whether this is equally applicable to non-ischaemic and ischaemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: 205 CRT patients (age 65 ± 12 years, 69 % men) were included. At baseline and 6 months echocardiographic studies, exercise testing and laboratory measurements were performed. CRT response was assessed by: ∆LVESV, ∆LV ejection fraction (LVEF), ∆ interventricular mechanical delay, ∆VO2 peak, ∆VE/VCO2, ∆BNP, ∆creatinine, ∆NYHA, and ∆QRS. These were correlated to the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between 6 and 24 months. RESULTS: MACE occurred in 19 % of the patients (non-ischaemic: 13 %, ischaemic: 24 %). ∆LVESV remained the only surrogate marker for CRT response for the total population and patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, showing areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.69 and 0.850, respectively. For ischaemic cardiomyopathy, ∆BNP was the best surrogate marker showing an AUC of 0.66. CONCLUSION: ∆LVESV is an excellent surrogate marker measuring CRT response concerning long-term outcome for non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. ∆LVESV is not suitable for ischaemic cardiomyopathy in which measuring CRT response remains difficult.

Clinical characterisation and risk stratification of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy ≥50 years of age.

PURPOSE: With the increased use of genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C), this disease is being increasingly recognised among elderly patients. However, elderly ARVD/C patients were underrepresented in prior cohorts. We aimed to describe the phenotypical characteristics and outcomes among ARVD/C patients surviving ≥50 years. METHODS: We assessed detailed phenotypical data of 29 patients who (1) presented at ≥50 years of age; and (2) fulfilled 2010 Task Force Criteria (TFC) for ARVD/C by last follow-up. Primary outcome was the occurrence of a major ventricular arrhythmia (sudden cardiac death, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia). RESULTS: The majority (55 %) of elderly ARVD/C subjects were male, with a mean age of 59.0 ± 5.8 years at presentation. Study participants fulfilled a median of six (IQR 5-8) TFC criteria by last follow-up, of which arrhythmia criteria were most frequent (97 %), followed by structural criteria (83 %), depolarisation criteria (72 %) and repolarisation criteria (69 %). By last follow-up, 15 (52 %) patients had experienced major ventricular arrhythmias. Most patients (n = 12) presented with this arrhythmia, while three experienced the event during 5.4 ± 3.2 years of follow-up. Compared with patients without an arrhythmic event, patients with major arrhythmias were more likely to be proband (p < 0.001) and male (p = 0.042). Likewise, survival free from sustained ventricular arrhythmia was lower among probands and males. CONCLUSION: Phenotypic characteristics of elderly ARVD/C patients are characterised by depolarisation abnormalities and structural cardiac changes. Ventricular arrhythmias in this elderly cohort are associated with male gender and proband status.

Measurements of electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony are both essential to improve prediction of CRT response.

INTRODUCTION: Predicting reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains challenging and different etiologies of heart failure might hamper identification of predictors. OBJECTIVE: Assess the incremental value of mechanical dyssynchrony besides electrical dyssynchrony for predicting CRT response. METHODS: 227 patients (51% ischemic) received CRT. Response was defined as ≥15% left ventricular end systolic volume decrease after six months. Prediction models were developed comprising clinical parameters and electrical dyssynchrony (Model A), subsequently complemented with mechanical dyssynchrony (Model B). Models were compared by area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) for the complete cohort, ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic (NICM) subpopulations. RESULTS: Model B performed significantly better than Model A supported by AUC, NRI and IDI. Furthermore, model B significantly better predicted response for NICM than ICM. CONCLUSION: Electrical dyssynchrony and mechanical dyssynchrony are essential to predict CRT response. Nevertheless, response prediction for ICM remains challenging.

A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The focus of the diagnostic process in chest pain patients at the emergency department is to identify both low and high risk patients for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The HEART score was designed to facilitate this process. This study is a prospective validation of the HEART score. METHODS: A total of 2440 unselected patients presented with chest pain at the cardiac emergency department of ten participating hospitals in The Netherlands. The HEART score was assessed as soon as the first lab results and ECG were obtained. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were (i) the occurrence of AMI and death, (ii) ACS and (iii) the performance of a coronary angiogram. The performance of the HEART score was compared with the TIMI and GRACE scores. RESULTS: Low HEART scores (values 0-3) were calculated in 36.4% of the patients. MACE occurred in 1.7%. In patients with HEART scores 4-6, MACE was diagnosed in 16.6%. In patients with high HEART scores (values 7-10), MACE occurred in 50.1%. The c-statistic of the HEART score (0.83) is significantly higher than the c-statistic of TIMI (0.75)and GRACE (0.70) respectively (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The HEART score provides the clinician with a quick and reliable predictor of outcome, without computer-required calculating. Low HEART scores (0-3), exclude short-term MACE with >98% certainty. In these patients one might consider reserved policies. In patients with high HEART scores (7-10) the high risk of MACE may indicate more aggressive policies.