Medication Adherence and Asthma Control with Once-Daily Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone Furoate Breezhaler Digital Companion: 90-Day Analysis from Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled asthma therapy is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Digital companion paired inhaler devices record medication use and provide reminders, thereby improving treatment adherence and asthma outcomes. This analysis assessed the impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium/mometasone furoate (IND/GLY/MF) Breezhaler® digital companion on medication adherence and symptom control in adults with asthma from Germany. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included adults (≥ 18 years) with asthma and prescribed Breezhaler digital companion. Assessments included: mean medication adherence (number of puffs taken/prescribed × 100) and change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores [well controlled (≥ 20), not well controlled (15-20) and poorly controlled (≤ 15)] at 1 month after the first ACT (second ACT). The percent of patients with ≥ 80% medication adherence (days 16-30 and 76-90) and the change in ACT (baseline and ≥ 30 days) were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with 90 days data, ≥ 80% medication adherence was achieved in 82.8% and 72.4% of patients at months 1 and 3, respectively. Change in asthma control was examined in ~ 60% (n = 97) of patients who completed ≥ 2 ACTs through the application. At baseline, 33.0% of patients were well controlled and 53.6% were well controlled at second ACT. Furthermore, 43.3% patients reported very poor control at baseline which decreased to 22.7% at second ACT. CONCLUSION: The use of IND/GLY/MF (Breezhaler) with a digital companion (sensor + application) may be associated with improved symptom control and high level of controller medication adherence in patients with asthma.

Diagnostic Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm (Asthma/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD] Differentiation Classification) Tool Versus Primary Care Physicians and Pulmonologists in Asthma, COPD, and Asthma/COPD Overlap.

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a challenge in clinical practice and its misdiagnosis results in inappropriate treatment, increased exacerbations, and potentially death. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Asthma/COPD Differentiation Classification (AC/DC) tool compared with primary care physicians and pulmonologists in asthma, COPD, and asthma-COPD overlap. METHODS: The AC/DC machine learning-based diagnostic tool was developed using 12 parameters from electronic health records of more than 400,000 patients aged 35 years and older. An expert panel of three pulmonologists and four general practitioners from five countries evaluated 119 patient cases from a prospective observational study and provided a confirmed diagnosis (n = 116) of asthma (n = 53), COPD (n = 43), asthma-COPD overlap (n = 7), or other (n = 13). Cases were then reviewed by 180 primary care physicians and 180 pulmonologists from nine countries and by the AC/DC tool, and diagnostic accuracies were compared with reference to the expert panel diagnoses. RESULTS: Average diagnostic accuracy of the AC/DC tool was superior to that of primary care physicians (median difference, 24%; 95% posterior credible interval: 17% to 29%; P < .0001) and was noninferior and superior (median difference, 12%; 95% posterior credible interval: 6% to 17%; P < .0001 for noninferiority and P = .0006 for superiority) to that of pulmonologists. Average diagnostic accuracies were 73%, 50%, and 61% by AC/DC tool, primary care physicians, and pulmonologists versus expert panel diagnosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AC/DC tool demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared with primary care physicians and pulmonologists in the diagnosis of asthma and COPD in patients aged 35 years and greater and has the potential to support physicians in the diagnosis of these conditions in clinical practice.

Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning in Respiratory Medicine and Potential Role in Asthma and COPD Diagnosis.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, a subset of AI, are increasingly used in medicine. AI excels at performing well-defined tasks, such as image recognition; for example, classifying skin biopsy lesions, determining diabetic retinopathy severity, and detecting brain tumors. This article provides an overview of the use of AI in medicine and particularly in respiratory medicine, where it is used to evaluate lung cancer images, diagnose fibrotic lung disease, and more recently is being developed to aid the interpretation of pulmonary function tests and the diagnosis of a range of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. The development and validation of AI algorithms requires large volumes of well-structured data, and the algorithms must work with variable levels of data quality. It is important that clinicians understand how AI can function in the context of heterogeneous conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where diagnostic criteria overlap, how AI use fits into everyday clinical practice, and how issues of patient safety should be addressed. AI has a clear role in providing support for doctors in the clinical workplace, but its relatively recent introduction means that confidence in its use still has to be fully established. Overall, AI is expected to play a key role in aiding clinicians in the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases in the future, and it will be exciting to see the benefits that arise for patients and doctors from its use in everyday clinical practice.

Maximizing Adherence and Gaining New Information For Your Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (MAGNIFY COPD): Study Protocol for the Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial Evaluating the Impact of Dual Bronchodilator with Add-On Sensor and Electronic Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Poor treatment adherence in COPD patients is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased healthcare burden. Personalized approaches for adherence management, supported with technology-based interventions, may offer benefits to patients and providers but are currently unproven in terms of clinical outcomes as opposed to adherence outcomes. METHODS: Maximizing Adherence and Gaining New Information For Your COPD (MAGNIFY COPD study), a pragmatic cluster randomized trial, aims to evaluate the impact of an adherence technology package (interventional package), comprising an adherence review, ongoing provision of a dual bronchodilator but with an add-on inhaler sensor device and a connected mobile application. This will compare time to treatment failure and other clinical outcomes in patients identified at high risk of exacerbations with historic poor treatment adherence as measured by prescription collection to mono/dual therapy over one year (1312 patients) versus usual care. Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence of one of the following: (1) moderate/severe COPD exacerbation, (2) prescription of triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist [ICS/LABA/LAMA]), (3) prescription of additional chronic therapy for COPD, or (4) respiratory-related death. Adherence, moderate/severe exacerbations, respiratory-related healthcare resource utilization and costs, and intervention package acceptance rate will also be assessed. Eligible primary care practices (N=176) participating in the Optimum Patient Care Quality Improvement Program will be randomized (1:1) to either adherence support cluster arm (suitable patients already receiving or initiated Ultibro® Breezhaler® [indacaterol/glycopyrronium] will be offered interventional package) or the control cluster arm (suitable patients continue to receive usual clinical care). Patients will be identified and outcomes collected from anonymized electronic medical records within the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. On study completion, electronic medical record data will be re-extracted to analyze outcomes in both study groups. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10567920. CONCLUSION: MAGNIFY will explore patient benefits of technology-based interventions for electronic adherence monitoring.

Effect of Inspiratory Maneuvers on Lung Deposition of Tobramycin Inhalation Powder: A Modeling Study.

Background: Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) and tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) are considered equally effective for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The impact of TIP inhalation maneuvers on distribution of tobramycin is unknown. We hypothesized that (1) fast TIP inhalations result in greater extrathoracic and reduced small airway concentrations compared with slow or uninstructed TIP inhalations; (2) slow TIP inhalations result in greater small airway concentrations than TIS inhalations. The aim of the study was to assess TIP and TIS deposition with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Methods: Uninstructed, instructed fast, and instructed slow TIP inhalations of CF patients on maintenance TIP therapy, and inhalations during nebulization of saline with PARI LC Plus® were recorded at home. Drug deposition was determined using TIP and TIS aerosol characteristics together with CFD simulations based on airway geometries from chest computed tomography scans. The drug concentration was assessed in extrathoracic, central, large, and small airways. Results: Twelve patients aged 12-45 years were included, and 144 CFD simulations were performed. In all individual analyses, the tobramycin concentrations were well above the threshold for effective dose of 10 times minimal inhibitory concentration throughout the bronchial tree. Extrathoracic concentrations were comparable between fast and uninstructed TIP inhalations, while slow inhalations resulted in reduced extrathoracic concentrations compared with uninstructed TIP inhalations (p = 0.024). Small airway concentrations were comparable between fast and uninstructed TIP inhalations, while slow TIP inhalations resulted in greater small airway concentrations than uninstructed TIP inhalations (p < 0.001). Small airway concentrations of TIS were comparable with those of slow TIP inhalations (p = 0.065), but greater than those of fast and uninstructed TIP inhalations (p < 0.001). Conclusion: All TIS and TIP inhalation maneuvers resulted in high enough concentrations, however, inhaling TIS or inhaling TIP slowly results in the greatest small airway deposition.

Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A real-world, open-label, crossover, interventional phase IV study was conducted in CF patients aged ⩾6 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ⩾25% to ⩽90% predicted. Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment arms in Cycle 1; all patients received TIP in Cycle 2. Each cycle consisted of 28 days on and 28 days off the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 27.6 (8.4) years] were allocated to three treatment arms [TIS/TIP ( n = 14); COLI/TIP ( n = 28); TIP/TIP ( n = 18)] in Cycle 1. The mean total administration time, which included device setup and cleaning, in Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2 for TIS/TIP, COLI/TIP, and TIP/TIP arms were 37.0 versus 5.0 min, 16.4 versus 3.8 min, and 4.2 versus 3.4 min, respectively. The difference in mean total administration time was significantly shorter in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1 for TIS/TIP ( p = 0.0112) and COLI/TIP ( p = 0.0016) arms. Overall, 12 patients were found to have contaminated devices across the two treatment cycles. In the TIP/TIP arm, no contamination of the T-326 inhaler was observed in either cycle. Treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and ACCEPT® questionnaire, was better overall for TIP compared with TIS and COLI. There were no unexpected adverse events and most were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: The T-326 inhaler used to deliver TIP was easy to use, required shorter total administration time, and was much less frequently contaminated than the nebulizers. The safety findings observed for TIP were generally consistent with its established safety profile.

Inhalation of tobramycin using simulated cystic fibrosis patient profiles.

INTRODUCTION: TOBI® Podhaler™ is a capsule-based drug-device combination (tobramycin inhalation powder [TIP] 28 mg capsules via unit-dose dry powder T-326 Inhaler [Podhaler™]) developed for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis (CF). We explored how inspiratory flow profiles and mouth-throat geometries affect drug delivery with the T-326 Inhaler. METHODS: Inspiratory flow profiles were recorded from 38 subjects aged 6-71 who had CF and varying degrees of lung function impairment. Ten of the inspiratory flow profiles were simulated in the laboratory using a custom breath simulator to determine delivered dose (DD) from the T-326 Inhaler. In vitro total lung dose (TLDin vitro ) was measured using four anatomical throat models, ranging from a child to a large adult. RESULTS: Aerosol performance was assessed across a range of inspiratory flow profiles. Mean DD ranged from 88.8% to 97.0% of declared capsule content. TLDin vitro ranged from 54.8% to 72.4% of capsule content between the flow profile/throat options tested, and the mean TLDin vitro across the range of flow profiles and anatomical throats tested was 63 ± 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the T-326 Inhaler provides reliable drug delivery at flow rates likely to be achieved by a broad spectrum of patients with CF. Importantly, forceful inhalation was not required to achieve a robust TLDin vitro . Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1159-1167. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mannitol Does Not Enhance Tobramycin Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Cystic Fibrosis Model System of Biofilm Formation.

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a human genetic disease that results in the accumulation of thick, sticky mucus in the airways, which results in chronic, life-long bacterial biofilm infections that are difficult to clear with antibiotics. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection is correlated with worsening lung disease and P. aeruginosa transitions to an antibiotic tolerant state during chronic infections. Tobramycin is an aminoglycoside currently used to combat lung infections in individuals with CF. While tobramycin is effective at eradicating P. aeruginosa in the airways of young patients, it is unable to completely clear the chronic P. aeruginosa infections in older patients. A recent report showed that co-addition of tobramycin and mannitol enhanced killing of P. aeruginosa grown in vitro as a biofilm on an abiotic surface. Here we employed a model system of bacterial biofilms formed on the surface of CF-derived airway cells to determine if mannitol would enhance the antibacterial activity of tobramycin against P. aeruginosa grown on a more clinically relevant surface. Using this model system, which allows the growth of robust biofilms with high-level antibiotic tolerance analogous to in vivo biofilms, we were unable to find evidence for enhanced antibacterial activity of tobramycin with the addition of mannitol, supporting the observation that this type of co-treatment failed to reduce the P. aeruginosa bacterial load in a clinical setting.