Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P =0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR ( P <0.001 and P =0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR ( P <0.001, P =0.008, and P =0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P =0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P =0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Short-term Outcomes of Adjuvant Nivolumab After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: CheckMate 577 evaluated adjuvant nivolumab therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal cancers. However, the efficacy of this treatment in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. This study investigated the short-term outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 956 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy, 227 who exhibited ypN1-3 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Among 227 patients, 30 received adjuvant nivolumab and 197 received non-nivolumab adjuvant therapy. The nivolumab group displayed a higher number of lymph node metastases compared to the control group. Patients with ypN1-2 tended to have longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the nivolumab group than in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.095). In the propensity score-matched cohort, no differences in patient characteristics were observed. Adjuvant nivolumab therapy significantly prolonged RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.013). Patients with ypN1-2 in the nivolumab group had significantly longer RFS than their counterparts in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.001), but not in ypN3 (p=0.784). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rates were 59% for the non-nivolumab group and 24% for the nivolumab group (p=0.007). Nivolumab-related adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were mostly consistent across all grades, while the frequency of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels was relatively higher compared to CheckMate577. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant nivolumab was more likely to prolong 1-year RFS in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in those with ypN1-2, and had acceptable adverse events.

A striking elevation of CA19-9 after preoperative therapy negates prognostic benefit from radical surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients who can be spared nonbeneficial surgery is crucial, as pancreatic cancer surgery is highly invasive, with substantial negative effects on quality of life. The study objective was to investigate a useful indicator of patients who do not gain prognostic benefit from radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHOD: We compared factors among 609 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy during 2005-2019. Patients were divided into a poor-prognosis group (no surgery or postresection recurrence within a year) and a good-prognosis group (no recurrence or recurrence >1 year after resection). RESULTS: Patients who experience a recurrence within a year of resection (poor-prognosis group) did no better than patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and progressed but never made it to surgery. The value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was the most significant indicator to predict the poor prognosis group and the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (>200 U/mL) identified only poor prognosis group with high specificity of 96.6%. The overall survival of patients with more than 200 of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly very poor and their 2-year survival rate was only 41.4%. CONCLUSION: A striking elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a good indicator of poor prognosis. Patients with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >200 U/mL after neoadjuvant therapy should not undergo radical surgery.