Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is the recommended treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib to that of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: SARAH was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial done at 25 centres specialising in liver diseases in France. Patients were eligible if they were aged at least 18 years with a life expectancy greater than 3 months, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh liver function class A or B score of 7 or lower, and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage C), or new hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for surgical resection, liver transplantation, or thermal ablation after a previously cured hepatocellular carcinoma (cured by surgery or thermoablative therapy), or hepatocellular carcinoma with two unsuccessful rounds of transarterial chemoembolisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a permutated block method with block sizes two and four to receive continuous oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or SIRT with 90Y-loaded resin microspheres 2-5 weeks after randomisation. Patients were stratified according to randomising centre, ECOG performance status, previous transarterial chemoembolisation, and presence of macroscopic vascular invasion. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population; safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of sorafenib or underwent at least one of the SIRT work-up exams. This study has been completed and the final results are reported here. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01482442. FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2011, and March 12, 2015, 467 patients were randomly assigned; after eight patients withdrew consent, 237 were assigned to SIRT and 222 to sorafenib. In the SIRT group, 53 (22%) of 237 patients did not receive SIRT; 26 (49%) of these 53 patients were treated with sorafenib. Median follow-up was 27·9 months (IQR 21·9-33·6) in the SIRT group and 28·1 months (20·0-35·3) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 8·0 months (95% CI 6·7-9·9) in the SIRT group versus 9·9 months (8·7-11·4) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio 1·15 [95% CI 0·94-1·41] for SIRT vs sorafenib; p=0·18). In the safety population, at least one serious adverse event was reported in 174 (77%) of 226 patients in the SIRT group and in 176 (82%) of 216 in the sorafenib group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (20 [9%] vs 41 [19%]), liver dysfunction (25 [11%] vs 27 [13%]), increased laboratory liver values (20 [9%] vs 16 [7%]), haematological abnormalities (23 [10%] vs 30 [14%]), diarrhoea (three [1%] vs 30 [14%]), abdominal pain (six [3%] vs 14 [6%]), increased creatinine (four [2%] vs 12 [6%]), and hand-foot skin reaction (one [<1%] vs 12 [6%]). 19 deaths in the SIRT group and 12 in the sorafenib group were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION: In patients with locally advanced or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after unsuccessful transarterial chemoembolisation, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Quality of life and tolerance might help when choosing between the two treatments. FUNDING: Sirtex Medical Inc.

¹8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with whole-body computed tomographic angiography in critically ill patients with suspected severe sepsis with no definite diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Timely identification of septic foci is critical in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock of unknown origin. This prospective pilot study aimed to assess (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), combined with whole-body computed tomographic angiography (CTA), in patients with suspected severe sepsis and for whom the prior diagnostic workup had been inconclusive. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit with a suspected severe sepsis but no definite diagnosis after 48 h of extensive investigations were prospectively included and referred for a whole body FDG-PET/CTA. Results from FDG-PET/CTA were assessed according to the final diagnosis obtained after follow-up and additional diagnostic workup. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were prospectively included, all on mechanical ventilation and 14 under vasopressor drugs. The FDG-PET/CTA exam 1) was responsible for only one desaturation and one hypotension, both quickly reversible under treatment; 2) led to suspect 16 infectious sites among which 13 (81 %) could be confirmed by further diagnostic procedures; and 3) triggered beneficial changes in the medical management of 12 of the 17 study patients (71 %). The FDG-PET/CTA images showed a single or predominant infectious focus in two cases where CTA was negative and in three cases where CTA exhibited multiple possible foci. CONCLUSION: Whole-body FDG-PET/CTA appears to be feasible, relatively safe, and provides reliable and useful information, when prospectively planned in patients with suspected severe sepsis and for whom prior diagnostic workup had been inconclusive. The FDG-PET images are particularly helpful when CTA exhibits no or multiple possible sites.

Dynamic disorganization of synaptic NMDA receptors triggered by autoantibodies from psychotic patients.

The identification of circulating autoantibodies against neuronal receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders has fostered new conceptual and clinical frameworks. However, detection reliability, putative presence in different diseases and in health have raised questions about potential pathogenic mechanism mediated by autoantibodies. Using a combination of single molecule-based imaging approaches, we here ascertain the presence of circulating autoantibodies against glutamate NMDA receptor (NMDAR-Ab) in about 20% of psychotic patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and very few healthy subjects. NMDAR-Ab from patients and healthy subjects do not compete for binding on native receptor. Strikingly, NMDAR-Ab from patients, but not from healthy subjects, specifically alter the surface dynamics and nanoscale organization of synaptic NMDAR and its anchoring partner the EphrinB2 receptor in heterologous cells, cultured neurons and in mouse brain. Functionally, only patients' NMDAR-Ab prevent long-term potentiation at glutamatergic synapses, while leaving NMDAR-mediated calcium influx intact. We unveil that NMDAR-Ab from psychotic patients alter NMDAR synaptic transmission, supporting a pathogenically relevant role.

Treatment and outcome of children and adolescents with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.

The objective of this study is to describe the treatment and outcome of children and adolescents with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) encephalitis. A retrospective study of children and adolescents with NMDA-R encephalitis was performed by the French Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndrome Reference Center between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess outcome. Thirty-six children and adolescents with NMDA-R encephalitis were studied. All of the patients received first-line immunotherapy (corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins or plasma exchange), and 81% received second-line immunotherapy (rituximab or cyclophosphamide). Median time between first-line and second-line treatment was 26 days. During the first 24 months, 30 of 36 patients (83%) achieved a good outcome (mRS ≤ 2) and 20 of 36 patients (56%) achieved complete recovery (mRS = 0). Median time to good outcome and to complete recovery was 6 and 24 months, respectively. Three patients (8%) relapsed, one patient died. In multivariate analysis, age >12 years was a predictor of good outcome and initial mRS ≤ 3 was a predictor of complete recovery. Despite a higher rate of patients who received second-line immunotherapy, the outcome of the patients in the present series was very similar to the outcome reported in previous series. The present study highlights the need for clinical trials to determine the optimal treatment of NMDA-R encephalitis.

Evidence of Cyclic Changes in the Metabolism of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms During Growth Phases: ¹8F-FDG PET Sequential Observational Study.

UNLABELLED: The rates of growth of medically treated abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are difficult to determine, and relationships with parietal inflammation and with metabolic parameters from (18)F-FDG PET remain unclear. This (18)F-FDG PET sequential observational study was aimed at analyzing the metabolic changes accompanying the growth phases of medically treated AAA. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (37 men; age [mean ± SD], 71 ± 12 y) exhibiting small and medically treated AAA (maximal diameter, 46 ± 3 mm) underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CT angiography at baseline and 9 mo later. Clinical and imaging parameter correlates of the 9-mo increase in maximal diameter were investigated; these included (18)F-FDG maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) averaged for slices encompassing the AAA volume. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients, 9 (23%) had a significant (≥2.5 mm) increase in maximal diameter at 9 mo, whereas the remaining 30 did not. The patients with an increase in maximal diameter at 9 mo exhibited lower SUVmax within the AAA at baseline than patients who did not have such an increase (1.80 ± 0.45 vs. 2.21 ± 0.52; P = 0.04); they also displayed a trend toward greater changes in SUVmax at 9 mo (difference between 9 mo and baseline: +0.40 ± 0.85 vs. -0.06 ± 0.57; P = 0.07). Similar levels were ultimately reached in both groups at 9 mo (2.20 ± 0.83 and 2.15 ± 0.66). SUVmax was a significant, yet modest, baseline predictor of the absolute change in maximal diameter during follow-up (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The enhancement in the maximal diameter of small AAA was preceded by a stage with a low level of (18)F-FDG uptake, but this low level of uptake was no longer documented after the growth phases, suggesting a pattern of cyclic metabolic changes.

Autoimmune N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis is a differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: For 60% of acute febrile encephalitis cases, the cause is unknown. Autoantibodies directed against different synaptic proteins or receptors in patients with autoimmune encephalitis have recently been described and could indicate a differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the presence of autoantibodies directed against synaptic proteins or receptors in patients with acute febrile encephalitis. Samples were collected in France in 2007 during a national prospective study. METHODS: A total of 253 patients with acute febrile encephalitis were enrolled in 2007. Clinical data were collected with a standardized questionnaire. When possible, cerebrospinal fluid CSF was collected and stored at -80 °C. A total of 108 CSF samples were available for retrospective autoantibody screening. Among the 108 patients, infectious etiology had been detected in 38 cases (35%); of these 38 patients, 29 (27%) had viral encephalitis, and 9 (8%) had bacterial encephalitis. No specific diagnosis was indicated for the other 70 patients (65%). Autoantibodies were detected using a cell-based assay in which HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids coding for different synaptic proteins or receptors. RESULTS: Two patients had anti-NMDA receptor antibodies (NMDAR-Abs), and all patients were negative for anti-Lgi1, CASPR2, GABABR, AMPAR, and mGluR5 antibodies. The two patients with NMDAR-Abs presented neurological and psychiatric symptoms typical of NMDAR-Abs encephalitis. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune etiology seems to be rare (less than 2%) in patients with acute febrile encephalitis. However, patients should be systematically screened for the presence of NMDAR-Abs, particularly patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms.