[Image of the month: Severe hydrocephalus in a child withcongenitalmyotonic dystrophy X]. / L'image du mois : Hydrocéphalie sévère chez un enfant avec dystrophie myotonique congénitale.

Severe hydrocephalus in a child with congenital myotonic dystrophy X A young patient with congenital myotonic dystrophy, or Steinert's disease, presented at the age of 4.5 months with an increase of his head circumference and signs of intracranial hypertension. The results of the radiological exams reveal a major hydrocephalus. The patient condition evolved favourably after ventriculoperitoneal bypass. While ventriculomegaly is common in congenital myotonic dystrophy, hydrocephalus with signs of intracranial hypertension is rare, hence the need of regular monitoring of head circumference.

Un jeune patient atteint de dystrophie myotonique congénitale, ou maladie de Steinert, présente, à l'âge de 4 mois et demi, un décrochage de son périmètre crânien et des signes d'hypertension intracrânienne. Le bilan radiologique révèle une hydrocéphalie majeure. L'enfant évolue favorablement après dérivation ventriculopéritonéale. Alors que la ventriculomégalie est fréquente lors d'une dystrophie myotonique congénitale, l'hydrocéphalie avec signes d'hypertension intracrânienne est rare, d'où la nécessité d'un suivi régulier du périmètre crânien.

[Acute neonatal osteomyelitis, an incidental life-changing diagnosis]. / Cas clinique. Une ostéomyélite aiguë néonatale, un diagnostic parfois fortuit qui peut changer une vie.

Acute neonatal osteomyelitis is a challenging disease and its diagnostic is important to avoid comorbidities. Staphylococcus aureus is the most often involved germ. The diagnostic challenge lies in its pauci-symptomatology in the premature infant in contrast to a more obvious clinical presentation in the term infant or child. The risk factors inherent to prematurity are invasive monitoring, repeated blood sampling, prolonged central catheterization, immature immune response and length of hospital stay. We report the case of an osteomyelitis secondary to staphylococcal sepsis in a preterm infant born at 25 weeks and 3 days of gestational age. The diagnosis was made incidentally on an abdominal x-ray. The low parental compliance for the child's follow-up does not allow us to affirm a future without sequelae even if the elements at our disposal at 8 months suggest a favorable outcome. Acute neonatal osteomyelitis remains a difficult but crucial diagnosis for the future development of the child.

L'ostéomyélite aiguë néonatale est un diagnostic rare, mais qui doit être posé pour en diminuer les comorbidités. Le staphylocoque doré est le germe le plus souvent en cause. La difficulté diagnostique réside dans sa pauci-symptomatologie, en particulier chez le prématuré. La voie de contamination la plus fréquente est hématogène. Les facteurs de risque inhérents à la prématurité sont le monitoring invasif, les prélèvements à répétition, le cathétérisme central prolongé, une réponse immunitaire immature et la durée d'hospitalisation. Nous rapportons le cas d'une ostéomyélite secondaire à un sepsis à staphylocoque doré chez un prématuré né à 25 semaines et 3 jours d'aménorrhée. Le diagnostic a été réalisé fortuitement sur une radiographie d'abdomen à blanc. La faible compliance parentale pour le suivi de l'enfant ne nous permet pas d'affirmer un futur sans séquelle, même si les éléments à notre disposition lors d'une consultation à 8 mois laissent penser une évolution favorable. L'ostéomyélite aiguë néonatale est un diagnostic difficile à poser, mais crucial pour le développement futur de l'enfant.

Rigid catheters reduced duration of less invasive surfactant therapy procedures in manikins.

AIM: Different catheters can be used for less invasive surfactant therapy (LIST): feeding tubes inserted with or without Magill forceps, different angiocatheters and centre specific devices, such as umbilical catheters affixed to a stylet. This study compared the effectiveness of LIST devices and endotracheal tubes (ETT). METHODS: Video recordings of 20 neonatologists simulating different LIST techniques on two manikin heads were analysed. Procedural effectiveness was evaluated by the duration of procedures and failure rates. Ease of use was scored. RESULTS: The median procedure time for the Neonatal Intubation Trainer was significantly longer with feeding tubes without Magill forceps. For the more difficult ALS Baby Trainer, successful procedures lasted a median of 24 (17-32) seconds with ETT, 24 (15-36) seconds with stylet-guided catheters and 34 (27-46) seconds and 37 (29-42) seconds with 13-cm and 30-cm angiocatheters, respectively. Both methods using feeding tubes were statistically slower than ETT intubation, lasting 32 (25-44) seconds and 39 (27-95) seconds with or without Magill forceps. Failure rates (7-20%) were no different between the LIST methods. Techniques using feeding tubes were rated as more difficult. CONCLUSION: Only rigid or stylet-guided catheters required tracheal catheterisation times similar to those of endotracheal intubation and neonatologists found them easier.

Diagnostic pitfall in antenatal manifestations of CPT II deficiency.

Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT2) deficiency is a rare inborn error of mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism associated with various phenotypes. Whereas most patients present with postnatal signs of energetic failure affecting muscle and liver, a small subset of patients presents antenatal malformations including brain dysgenesis and neuronal migration defects. Here, we report recurrence of severe cerebral dysgenesis with Dandy-Walker malformation in three successive pregnancies and review previously reported antenatal cases. Interestingly, we also report that acylcarnitines profile, tested retrospectively on the amniotic fluid of last pregnancy, was not sensitive enough to allow reliable prenatal diagnosis of CPT2 deficiency. Finally, because fetuses affected by severe cerebral malformations are frequently aborted, CPT2 deficiency may be underestimated and fatty acid oxidation disorders should be considered when faced with a fetus with Dandy-Walker anomaly or another brain dysgenesis.

Allelic loss on chromosome 11 in hereditary and sporadic tumors related to familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (FMEN1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by tumors of the parathyroid glands, pancreatic islets, and anterior pituitary. The gene for this disease maps to chromosome 11q12-11q13, and allelic loss in this region has been shown in both sporadic and FMEN1-related parathyroid tumors. FMEN1-related pancreatic islet tumors, and rarely in sporadic anterior pituitary tumors. We tested for allelic loss at 7 loci on chromosome 11 in 17 tumors outside the parathyroid. We found loss of heterozygosity in 2 of 2 FMEN1-related benign pancreatic islet tumors but in none of 8 informative sporadic islet tumors (P = 0.02) including 5 malignant gastrinomas. Of 3 islet tumors from patients who had some but not all features of FMEN1, one showed allelic loss for 5 of 5 informative restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and the other 2 retained heterozygosity for all informative markers. A bronchial carcinoid from an FMEN1 patient and 3 sporadic anterior pituitary tumors showed no allelic loss. These data provide new evidence that many sporadic pancreatic islet neoplasms, even when malignant, do not develop through homozygous inactivation of the MEN1 gene.

Review article: prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding with proton-pump inhibitors.

Stress-related gastric mucosal bleeding occurs in a substantial number of critically ill patients, with clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding prolonging intensive care stay and increasing mortality. This paper reviews the role of proton-pump inhibitors in the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding. Bleeding prophylaxis appears to be warranted in patients in intensive care units on mechanical ventilation or those who have coagulopathy. Intravenous histamine H2 receptor antagonists, particularly cimetidine, have demonstrated efficacy for the prevention of bleeding in critically ill patients. Standard delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors have not been extensively studied in this patient group, but there are some data to support their efficacy in increasing intragastric pH, and in the case of intravenous pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal bleeding. In a large, randomized controlled trial, immediate-release omeprazole [(IR-OME) Zegerid powder for oral suspension; Santarus Inc., San Diego, CA, USA] administered via gastric tube, was as effective as intravenous cimetidine in the prevention of clinically significant bleeding, and more effective in increasing gastric pH. Effective antisecretory therapy does not appear to increase the risk of nosocomial pneumonia. In conclusion, immediate-release omeprazole provides a safe and effective alternative to intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding in critically ill patients.

[Prostaglandins and the immune response at the intestinal submucosal level. A potential site for interference with the repeated use of paracetamol and ibuprofen at a young age?]. / Les prostaglandines et l'immunité du chorion sous-muqueux intestinal. Questions à propos de l'usage répété du paracétamol et de l'ibuprofène en bas âge.

Immune deviations have been shown to exponentially increase in young children. As a consequence, research investigating possible environmental reasons for this increase is considered a public health priority. An improved understanding of the immunity of the intestinal submucosal lamina propria has demonstrated the importance of prostaglandins (PGE2s) on its local development with general immune consequences further on. PGE2s appear at this intestinal submucosal level from the metabolism of arachidonic acid mediated by type-2 cyclooxygenases (COX2s) situated in the membranes of many immune cells. The potential risk of repeated inhibition of PGE2 synthesis at a young age has been demonstrated in experiments with animals systemically exposed to a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The repeatedly exposed animal cannot develop tolerance to food antigens and exhibits autoimmune deviations. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) and ibuprofen are analgesic and antipyretic medications given to children either alone or in combination, most often without medical prescription. Recently, it has been demonstrated that paracetamol, like ibuprofen, also carries, besides its central action, a non-selective inhibitory action on peripheral COXs. However, this inhibitory action only relates to physiological concentrations of arachidonic acid and explains the difference in their respective anti-inflammatory effects. Since recently published data have repeatedly reported an increase of immune deviations associated with paracetamol exposure at a young age, it appears important to better understand the possible negative impact of excessive and repetitive inhibitions of the physiological synthesis of prostaglandins by COX2s in childhood during which all immune mechanisms are built up at the intestinal submucosal level. Therefore, a well-designed prospective strategy for pharmacovigilance of these COX inhibitors repeatedly given during childhood is urgently needed.

Outcome of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) treatment in 125 patients with radiolucent gallstones. Factors influencing efficacy, withdrawal, symptoms and side effects and post-dissolution recurrence.

Of 125 patients with radiolucent gallstones in functioning gallbladders treated with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) between 1971 and 1977, 47 showed complete gallstone dissolution--an overall efficacy of 38%. However, a retrospective analysis of factors governing efficacy carried out in 1976 showed that in patients with stones less than 15 mm in diameter, treated with greater than 13 mg CDCA kg-1 day-1 for not less than one year who developed unsaturated bile (n = 27), efficacy rose to 78% complete and 93% partial plus complete gallstone dissolution. The usefulness of this selection/management approach was then confirmed prospectively in 42 comparable patients selected for treatment since 1977, efficacy (complete gallstone dissolution) reached 76%. The median duration of treatment for complete gallstone dissolution was 7.5 months for stones less than 5 mm in diameter, 12.0 for 5-10 mm stones; 22.0 for 10-15 mm stones and 28.5 for the only two patients (of 26) with large (greater than 15 mm) stones who ultimately showed complete gallstone dissolution. Seventy-eight patients withdrew from therapy, 21 within 6 months of starting CDCA (before their first follow-up cholecystogram): the remaining 57 withdrew because of: complications of gallstones (11 patients), inadequate treatment (dose and/or duration, 20 patients), inappropriate selection or unsuitable stones (19 patients) and resistance to CDCA (7 patients). Diarrhea, although common, was usually mild or transient. Biliary colic and non-specific dyspepsia tended to improve during therapy. To date, gallstone recurrence has been detected in 14 patients (30%), 3 months to 5 years after discontinuing treatment with CDCA.

The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects health-related quality of life. METHODS: We enrolled 533 adults with a history of heartburn symptoms for at least 6 months of moderate to severe heartburn in 4 of the 7 days before study entry. Patients were treated with ranitidine 150 mg twice a day for 6 weeks and Gelusil antacid tablets as needed. We measured physician-rated symptoms and the Medical Outcomes Study short-form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Baseline results were compared with normative data for the US population and for patients with selected chronic diseases. Treatment response was defined as no episode of moderate to severe heartburn for 7 days. Statistical significance was set at P <0.001. RESULTS: GERD patients reported significantly worse scores on all 8 SF-36 scales, physical function and well-being, and emotional well-being compared with the general population. Patients with GERD reported worse emotional well-being than patients with diabetes or hypertension. Treatment responders demonstrated significantly less pain and better physical function, social function, vitality, and emotional well-being compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD experience decrements in health-related quality of life compared with the general population. The impact of GERD is most striking on measures of pain, mental health, and social function. Successful treatment for GERD results in improvements in health-related quality of life.

Prospective study of the standard meal provocative test in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the proposed usefulness of a standard meal-stimulated gastrin provocative test in: (1) distinguishing Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) from antral syndromes; (2) localizing duodenal gastrinomas; or (3) suggesting that patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I) may have an increased incidence of antral syndromes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients with ZES referred to the National Institutes of Health were studied prospectively. The extent and location of gastrinomas, acid secretory studies, and the presence or absence of MEN-I were determined and correlated with the results of the gastrin response to standard meal provocative testing. RESULTS: For patients with fasting serum gastrin levels less than 1,000 pg/mL (n = 43), only 44% had a less than 50% increase over the pre-meal value, which is reported to be the typical response in ZES, and 40% had a 50% to 99% increase. Furthermore 16% had a 100% or greater increase, 9% a 150% or greater increase, and 5% a 200% or greater increase, which overlaps with values reported to be characteristic of 98%, 92%, and 46% of patients with antral syndromes. Results did not differ for patients with or without MEN-I, depend on the extent of the gastrinoma (duodenal versus pancreatic gastrinomas), the presence of previous gastric surgery or type of gastric surgery, or for patients with fasting serum gastrin concentrations greater than or equal to 1,000 pg/mL or less than 1,000 pg/mL. studies of four patients before and after resection of the gastrinoma, who prior to surgery had a greater than 100% increase in gastrin secretion after the meal, demonstrated that all patients had a less than 100% increase postoperatively even though no gastric resection was done. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients with ZES have a greater than 50% increase in serum gastrin concentration following a standard test meal and one fifth have a 100% or greater increase. Therefore, they cannot be distinguished on this basis from patients with antral syndromes. The increased serum gastrin level after the meal in these patients with ZES appears to be due to the gastrinoma. Furthermore, the current study provides no evidence for the proposals that antral syndromes are more common in patients with MEN-I, that gastric surgery affects the meal response in patients with gastrinomas, or that the meal test is useful in localizing duodenal gastrinomas.

Comparison of the effectiveness of ranitidine and cimetidine in inhibiting acid secretion in patients with gastric hypersecretory states.

The H2-histamine receptor antagonists ranitidine and cimetidine were compared for their abilities to control gastric acid hypersecretion on a short- and long-term basis in 22 patients with gastric acid hypersecretory states. Nineteen patients had Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, one patient had systemic mastocytosis, and two patients had idiopathic hypersecretion. The rates of onset of the action of cimetidine and ranitidine were the same. The actions of both drugs were increased by anticholinergic agents, and there was a close correlation between the daily maintenance dose of each drug needed to control acid secretion. However, ranitidine was threefold more potent than cimetidine both in acute inhibition studies and in the median maintenance dose needed (1.2 g per day for ranitidine and 3.6 g per day for cimetidine). Sixty percent of the males developed breast changes or impotence while taking cimetidine and in all cases these changes disappeared when cimetidine was replaced by ranitidine. Treatment with high doses of cimetidine (one to 60 months; median, 11 months) or ranitidine (two to 31 months; median, 14 months) was not associated with hepatic or hematologic toxicity or alterations of serum gastrin concentrations, but ranitidine therapy was associated with a significantly lower serum creatinine level than seen with cimetidine therapy. The results show that both drugs can adequately inhibit acid secretion in patients with gastric hypersecretory states. Both are safe at high doses, but ranitidine is threefold more potent and does not cause the antiandrogen side effects frequently seen with high doses of cimetidine.

Famotidine in the therapy of gastric hypersecretory states.

The histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist famotidine was compared with ranitidine and cimetidine in its ability to control gastric acid hypersecretion in 33 patients with gastric hypersecretory states (32 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and one patient with idiopathic hypersecretion). Equipotent doses of each drug were determined in nine patients and used to determine relative onset of action, duration of action, and potency. Each drug had a similar time course of onset with a maximal effect at three to four hours after oral ingestion. The duration of action of famotidine was 30 percent longer than that of either cimetidine or ranitidine. In terms of relative potency, famotidine was nine times more potent than ranitidine and 32 times more potent than cimetidine. Thirty-two patients underwent long-term famotidine treatment for up to 34 months (mean, 10 months) with a duration in 21 patients of at least six months, in nine patients of at least 12 months, and in six patients of at least 24 months. The mean daily maintenance dose with famotidine was 0.33 g per day (range, 0.05 to 0.8 g). Prior to famotidine therapy, 27 patients were taking ranitidine and the mean daily dose required was 2.3 g per day (range, 0.6 to 5.4 g), whereas six patients were taking cimetidine and the mean daily dose was 4.6 g per day (range, 1.2 to 9.0 g). Fourteen of the 32 patients required an anticholinergic agent in addition to ranitidine or cimetidine to maintain control, whereas only five patients required an anticholinergic agent with famotidine. Gastric acid hypersecretion was controlled in seven patients with less frequent dosing with famotidine than with cimetidine or ranitidine. Long-term treatment with famotidine was not associated with any hematologic or biochemical toxicity or clinical side effects. These results demonstrate that famotidine has a similar onset of action to other H2-receptor antagonists but has a 30 percent longer duration of action and is nine times more potent than ranitidine and 32 times more potent than cimetidine. Famotidine is safe and highly effective in the long-term treatment of gastric hypersecretory states.

Diagnosis and management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

With the recent widespread availability of gastrin radioimmunoassays, the development of increasingly effective medical therapy for gastric hypersecretion, and improved methods to localize gastrinomas in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, the diagnosis, treatment of the gastric acid hypersecretion, and approach to the tumor have changed significantly. Recent advances in each of these areas and the current management of a patient with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are reviewed.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Recognition and management of acid hypersecretion.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) should be suspected if a patient has severe peptic ulceration, ulcers and kidney stones, a family history of ulcers or endocrine diseases, watery diarrhoea or malabsorption with or without ulcers, or if hypergastrinaemia is found. Any patient in whom ZES is suspected, and certainly if diagnosed, should be given large doses of antisecretory medication immediately. This should never be stopped except under controlled conditions or unless acid outputs have been reduced surgically. Patients cannot be managed safely without measuring acid outputs. These should be lowered to < 10 mmol/h, or < 5 mmol/h in patients with a previous gastric resection or severe oesophageal disease. Acid secretion can be controlled acutely in 70% of patients with an infusion of ranitidine 1 mg/kg/h, while 4 mg/kg/h will control acid in all. The initial oral dosage of omeprazole or lansoprazole should be 60 mg/day. Doses should then be adjusted daily on the basis of acid outputs. Proton pump inhibitors in a dosage of 60 mg/day will control acid output in most patients and 60 mg every 12 hours will control acid output in all. Doses can then often be slowly and progressively reduced. A parietal cell vagotomy reduces acid secretion and reduces, but does not abolish, the need for antisecretory medication. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and hyperparathyroidism, a parathyroidectomy that results in normocalcaemia will reduce acid secretion and drug requirements. A total gastrectomy is rarely if ever needed nowadays. Given the high degree of safety of gastric antisecretory medications versus the risks of acid hypersecretion in patients with ZES, the mistakes in management of acid hypersecretion that must be avoided are those of giving insufficient medication and not measuring acid secretory rates.

Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use.

Antacids are commonly used self-prescribed medications. They consist of calcium carbonate and magnesium and aluminum salts in various compounds or combinations. The effect of antacids on the stomach is due to partial neutralisation of gastric hydrochloric acid and inhibition of the proteolytic enzyme, pepsin. Each cation salt has its own pharmacological characteristics that are important for determination of which product can be used for certain indications. Antacids have been used for duodenal and gastric ulcers, stress gastritis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, pancreatic insufficiency, non-ulcer dyspepsia, bile acid mediated diarrhoea, biliary reflux, constipation, osteoporosis, urinary alkalinisation and chronic renal failure as a dietary phosphate binder. The development of histamine H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors has significantly reduced usage for duodenal and gastric ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, antacids can still be useful for stress gastritis and non-ulcer dyspepsia. The recent release of proprietary H2 antagonists has likely further reduced antacid use for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Other indications are still valid but represent minor uses. Antacid drug interactions are well noted, but can be avoided by rescheduling medication administration times. This can be inconvenient and discourage compliance with other medications. All antacids can produce drug interactions by changing gastric pH, thus altering drug dissolution of dosage forms, reduction of gastric acid hydrolysis of drugs, or alter drug elimination by changing urinary pH. Most antacids, except sodium bicarbonate, may decrease drug absorption by adsorption or chelation of other drugs. Most adverse effects from antacids are minor with periodic use of small amounts. However, when large doses are taken for long periods of time, significant adverse effects may occur especially patients with underlying diseases such as chronic renal failure. These adverse effects can be reduced by monitoring of electrolyte status and avoiding aluminum-containing antacids to bind dietary phosphate in chronic renal failure. Antacids, although effective for discussed indications of duodenal and gastric ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, have been replaced by newer, more effective agents that are more palatable to patients. Antacids are likely to continue to be used for non-ulcer dyspepsia, minor episodes of heartburn (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease) and other clear indications. Although their wide-spread use may decline, these drugs will still be used, and clinicians should be aware of their potential drug interactions and adverse effects.

Current management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome require that management decisions be made to control the gastric acid hypersecretion and treatment directed at the gastrinoma itself. The advent of newer antisecretory drugs and increased knowledge of the natural history of this disease have led to major changes in the management of each of these two areas. Recent studies have demonstrated that treatment with the currently available histamine H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine) with or without an anticholinergic agent will control gastric acid secretion in almost all patients. These studies have also shown that most patients require higher doses than those used routinely to treat peptic ulcer, treatment is only successful if an adequate dose of antisecretory drug is used and must be monitored by measuring gastric acid hypersecretion, and established criteria to regulate the dose must be used. Newer more potent antisecretory drugs such as famotidine or omeprazole will facilitate management of gastric hypersecretion but are not yet currently available. Highly selective vagotomy should be considered in those patients who require high doses of cimetidine or ranitidine. Total gastrectomy should be reserved for those patients unwilling or unable to take oral medication. Although aggressive surgery is not warranted in most patients because overall prognosis is excellent, tumour status should be assessed in all patients by imaging studies (CT scan, ultrasound, selective angiogram). Patients without metastatic disease and without the MEN-1 syndrome (multiple-endocrine-neoplasia type 1) should undergo exploratory laparotomy by a surgeon experienced in treating this disease, with studies suggesting a cure rate of approximately 20%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Review article: the management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Awareness of the sometimes subtle features of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is important in order not to miss the diagnosis. Immediately after initial diagnostic tests, the patient should be given antisecretory medication, while tests for the type of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and tumour extent can be delayed. Acid output should be decreased to < 10 mmol/h to control symptoms and prevent complications. Histamine H2-antagonists remain the best available intravenous therapy but omeprazole is the most effective long-term oral therapy and has proved to be safe in nearly 10 years of continuous use. The management of the gastrinoma has changed in recent years since the discovery that the majority of gastrinomas arise outside the pancreas. Exploratory surgery with tumour resection is the treatment of choice in sporadic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome but there are few indications for surgery in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1. None of the available therapies for metastatic gastrinoma is very effective.

Role of acid suppressants in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Virtually all symptoms in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are due to acid hypersecretion, thus the control of acid secretion is the first and most important step in the management of patients with this syndrome. Antisecretory medication is prescribed as soon as the diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is made, as patients may bleed or perforate with little warning. Acid output is reduced to less than 10 mmol/h to heal mucosal lesions, but in patients with a Billroth I or II gastrectomy and those with severe oesophagitis and stricture formation, acid output is reduced to less than 5 or less than 1 mmol/h. Acid output and not symptomatic response is a reliable guide of the adequacy of therapy. In sufficient doses, all H2-receptor antagonists are useful; however, side effects associated with cimetidine therapy limit its use. The ratio of potencies of cimetidine:ranitidine:famotidine is 1:4:32. Ranitidine given as a 50-mg intravenous bolus, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg.kg/h, controls acid hypersecretion acutely in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Acid output is checked after 4 h, and the dose increased until acid output is less than 10 mmol/h. In 70% of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 1 mg.kg/h reduces acid output to less than 10 mmol/h; however, doses up to 4 mg.kg/h have been used. When patients are switched to oral ranitidine, a useful dosage conversion is to administer 1.5 times the total daily intravenous dose in four equal doses every 6 h. Four doses of oral drug are given before the infusion is stopped. Six hours after the first/last oral dose, acid output is checked. In our patients, the mean dose of ranitidine was 2100 mg/day (range, 450-9200 mg/day). No serious toxicity was observed. Omeprazole, which has a long duration of action and is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, has simplified management. Once-daily dosing is sufficient in most patients, and a reasonable starting dose is 60 mg daily. The dose may be increased to 120 mg once daily; if this dosage fails to control acid secretion, 60 mg is administered every 12 h. In our studies, the median dose was 90 mg/day (range, 20-120 mg/day). Omeprazole was more effective than H2-receptor antagonists in providing symptom relief and mucosal healing and did not cause significant toxicity. In particular, no gastric carcinoid tumours developed during four years of use. Omeprazole is, therefore, the treatment of choice for control of acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efficacy of omeprazole versus ranitidine for symptomatic treatment of poorly responsive acid reflux disease-a prospective, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: H2-receptor antagonists are widely used in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and are frequently continued when symptoms persist. AIM: To compare the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg once daily with that of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in relieving GERD symptoms, in patients who remained symptomatic following a 6-week course of ranitidine therapy. METHODS: Patients with heartburn on at least 4 days/week but who did not have endoscopy to assess oesophageal mucosa could participate. This two-phase, prospective trial included a 6-week open-label phase (phase I), followed by an 8-week double-blind phase (phase II). Patients still symptomatic following treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (phase I) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II) with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients with heartburn resolution during weeks 4 and 8 of phase II. RESULTS: Of the 533 patients with GERD who received ranitidine in phase I, 348 patients (65%) were still symptomatic. A total of 317 patients (59%) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II). At week 8, a significantly (P < 0.0004) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (70%) experienced no more than mild heartburn compared with ranitidine-treated patients (49%). Complete resolution of heartburn also occurred in a significantly (P < 0. 00001) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (46% vs. 16% of the ranitidine group at week 8). CONCLUSIONS: After 6 weeks of ranitidine treatment, the majority of patients with GERD were still experiencing moderate to severe heartburn. Omeprazole was significantly more effective than ranitidine in resolving heartburn in this group of patients.