RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Keratin pearls are foci of central keratinization within concentric layers of squamous cells that can form under the clitoral prepuce and cause pain (clitorodynia); in-office removal of keratin pearls may reduce clitoral pain and improve sexual function. AIM: This study aims to investigate clitoral pain and sexual function in women with partial clitoral phimosis and keratin pearls before and after in-office lysis of clitoral adhesions with keratin pearl excision (LCA-KPE). METHODS: A pre-post interventional study evaluated patients who underwent LCA-KPE between January 2017 and February 2023 in 2 metropolitan gynecology clinics specializing in vulvar pain. Patients presenting with keratin pearls and partial clitoral phimosis identified through retrospective chart review were asked to complete postprocedure questionnaires and provide subjective responses on clitoral discomfort, sexual function, sexual distress, and their experience with in-office LCA-KPE. Bivariate analyses with paired t tests were conducted to determine the effect of LCA-KPE. Qualitative data were analyzed with thematic coding. OUTCOMES: An 11-point pain visual analog scale was utilized to determine pre- and postprocedure clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm. Female sexual dysfunction was measured with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. RESULTS: A total of 32 of 74 patients who met inclusion criteria completed postprocedure surveys (43% response rate). Mean clitoral pain for respondents was 6.91 at baseline and 2.50 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Mean difficulty with orgasm was significantly decreased from 5.45 at baseline to 3.13 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Participants had a mean FSFI total score of 17.68 after treatment compared with a mean total baseline FSFI of 12.12 (P = .017). The mean FSFI score for pain was 2.43 at follow-up compared with 1.37 at baseline (P = .049). There was no significant difference in the mean Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score before vs after the procedure (P = .27). Qualitative themes described the procedure as painful but worthwhile, with 77% of participants reporting the overall experience as positive. Recurrence rate overall was 28%, with a median of 2 repeat procedures. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Recognizing keratin pearls as a structural cause of clitoral pain and offering in-office treatment is an important tool in addressing clitorodynia and improving sexual function. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the largest study to date documenting the occurrence, identifying associated pain conditions, and evaluating procedural outcomes for clitoral keratin pearls. This study was limited by a relatively small sample size. CONCLUSION: In-office LCA-KPE significantly reduced clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm.
Assuntos
Clitóris , Queratinas , Humanos , Feminino , Clitóris/cirurgia , Clitóris/inervação , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Vulvodinia/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Inquéritos e Questionários , Dispareunia/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Comportamento SexualRESUMO
Primate brains typically have regions within the ventral visual stream that are selectively responsive to faces. In macaques, these face patches are located in similar parts of inferotemporal cortex across individuals although correspondence with particular anatomical features has not been reported previously. Here, using high-resolution functional and anatomical imaging, we show that small "bumps," or buried gyri, along the lower bank of the superior temporal sulcus are predictive of the location of face-selective regions. Recordings from implanted multielectrode arrays verified that these bumps contain face-selective neurons. These bumps were present in monkeys raised without seeing faces and that lack face patches, indicating that these anatomical landmarks are predictive of, but not sufficient for, the presence of face selectivity. These bumps are found across primate species that span taxonomy lines, indicating common evolutionary developmental mechanisms. The bumps emerge during fetal development in macaques, indicating that they arise from general developmental mechanisms that result in the regularity of cortical folding of the entire brain.
Assuntos
Face/anatomia & histologia , Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos/fisiologia , Lobo Temporal/anatomia & histologia , Animais , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Macaca mulatta , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Neuroimagem/métodos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Lobo Temporal/embriologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Background: Topical capsaicin has been used to treat vulvodynia but has been poorly studied for use in neuroproliferative provoked vestibulodynia (PVD); capsaicin decreases allodynia by blocking vanilloid receptors (TRPV1) on C-afferent nociceptors, but the therapy causes discomfort to the point of intolerance in some patients. Aim: The present study evaluated tolerability and efficacy of topical capsaicin to treat neuroproliferative PVD. Methods: Patients with neuroproliferative PVD prescribed 0.025% capsaicin compounded in VersaBase cream were identified through prescription records. Outcome measures included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised, and a 22-question questionnaire assessing patient experience and treatment tolerability. Outcomes: Among tolerant patients, capsaicin significantly decreased vestibular pain, but tolerance was highly variable. Results: Twenty-five patients responded to the follow-up questionnaire. The average age at presentation was 30 years (range, 18-52 years). Eighty percent of patients tolerated capsaicin application for the full 20 minutes within a median time of 1 to 2 weeks. Of the 16 patients reporting tolerance to 20-minute application, 12 (60%) experienced improvement in vestibular pain. On an 11-point numeric rating scale, the mean pain score was 8.96 and the median score was 10 with first application. Among all participants, 16 (64%) had reduction in pain during treatment. Fifty-six percent of patients would recommend capsaicin as a treatment for vulvar pain. Qualitative content analysis focused on categories of efficacy, value, and feasibility, which indicated that those able to tolerate the treatment experienced improvement while using the medication. The mean Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score was 35.96 at baseline compared with 25.09 at follow-up (P < .0001). On a numeric rating scale, the mean self-reported vulvar pain score was 8.2 at baseline compared with 5.35 when using capsaicin consistently (P < .0001). The mean FSFI pain domain score was 2.45 at baseline compared with 0.98 at follow-up (P = .005). While not statistically significant, the mean total FSFI score was 15.44 at baseline compared with 17.84 at follow-up (P = .3730). Clinical Implications: Capsaicin is helpful for some patients with PVD, but thorough counseling is important because of highly variable tolerance. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include examination of a poorly studied therapy and inclusion of narrative responses from patients to inform counseling. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective design, and low survey response rate. Conclusion: Patients should be appropriately selected and thoroughly counseled given high levels of intolerance, but capsaicin therapy may be considered for patients with neuroproliferative PVD who have failed conservative treatments and wish to avoid surgery.
RESUMO
Background: Chronic pain can occur in the vulva, one of the primary pleasure centers of the body; however, the associations between pleasurable vulvar experiences and chronic vulvar pain have not yet been explored. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate associations between vulvar pleasure and pain experiences in patients with chronic vulvar pain. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 547 patients (aged ≥17 years) presenting over 10 months to 2 urban outpatient gynecology clinics specializing in vulvar pain. Prior to the initial evaluation, patients completed online validated questionnaires of pain-related anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and sexual functioning, as well as a researcher-developed questionnaire evaluating vulvar pleasure. Patients were divided into groups based on their pleasure and pain experiences. Between-group analyses consisting of t-tests, analyses of variance, and multivariate analyses of variance were conducted. Outcomes: Outcomes consisted of total and subscale scores on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Female Sexual Function Index, and a researcher-developed vulvar pleasure questionnaire. Results: More than 70% of patients with chronic vulvar pain had experienced vulvar pleasure since the onset of their vulvar pain, with the clitoris as the most common source of pleasure. Average vulvar pleasure intensity was rated 7 (0, no pleasure; 10, extremely pleasurable). Masturbation ranked higher in pleasurable activities than vulvar stimulation by a partner or penetrative intercourse and was the most likely activity to lead to orgasm. When compared with patients who had not experienced vulvar pleasure since the onset of their vulvar pain, patients experiencing both pain and pleasure scored lower on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 total (P = .026) and fear subscale (P = .016), lower on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale total (P = .002) and all subscales (P = .008-.018), and higher on the Female Sexual Function Index total and all subscales (all P ≤ .001). Clinical Implications: Incorporating strategies for cultivating vulvar pleasure in patients with chronic vulvar pain may be useful in comprehensive management approaches. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this study include the novel examination of vulvar pleasure in a population with chronic vulvar pain and a large sample size. Limitations include the lack of a nonclinical comparator group and reliance on patient self-report. Conclusion: Results suggest that greater vulvar pleasure is associated with lower pain-related anxiety, lower pain catastrophizing, and higher sexual functioning in patients with chronic vulvar pain conditions.
RESUMO
Topical corticosteroids are often utilized as the first-line treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS). However, there is wide variability in dosing regimens, as well as a lack of consensus on maintenance dosing. Available guidelines on dosing frequency and regimen continuation for VLS are based on clinical expert opinion and do not necessarily reflect the pharmacokinetics of topical corticosteroids. Over the past few decades, there have been many advances in the techniques used to measure the local and systemic absorption of topical corticosteroids. These techniques have led to a greater understanding of the pharmacokinetics and bioavailabilities of these medications. However, it is not clear how this new information has been applied in evaluating dosing regimens and commonly cited risks when considering short- and long-term use in different vulvar dermatoses. This purpose of this review is to evaluate the available evidence on pharmacokinetics, absorption rates, and concentration levels of topical corticosteroids in lesional and nonlesional skin. Additionally, the evidence regarding commonly cited risks of topical corticosteroid use, including dermal thinning, adrenal suppression, systemic immunosuppression, and tachyphylaxis are reviewed. Differences in the effects of topical corticosteroids on the varied tissues of the vulva are specifically explored. Finally, these considerations are applied to evaluate the current treatment guidelines for VLS to provide direction in determining an evidenced-based dosing regimen and to inform future research in this area. Mautz TT, Krapf JM, Goldstein AT. Topical Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Recommended Dosing Frequencies. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:42-52.
Assuntos
Líquen Escleroso Vulvar , Administração Tópica , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of fractionated carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, trial conducted in a clinic specializing in vulvar disorders. The study participants were 40 women with active vulvar lichen sclerosus confirmed with biopsy who were abstaining from topical and systemic treatments for at least 4 weeks before enrollment. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either five sham laser treatments or five fractionated CO2 treatments in a 24-week period. Study participants, treating clinicians, and the evaluating pathologist were blinded. The primary endpoint was the change in the histopathology scale score between pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies. We estimated 20 per group for 80% power to detect a 40% reduction in the histopathology scale score with up to 10% attrition. A secondary endpoint was the change in the validated CSS (Clinical Scoring System for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus). RESULTS: From November 2018 to June 2020, 40 women were randomized to participate in the trial, and 37 women (19 fractionated CO2, 18 sham) were included in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Three women were excluded from the ITT analysis because they did not have posttreatment biopsies and, therefore, a posttreatment histopathology scale score could not be obtained. There was a 0.20 reduction (improvement) in histopathology scale score from baseline in the active treatment group (95% CI -1.1, 0.80, P=.74) and a 0.1 increase from baseline in the sham treatment group (95% CI -0.90, 1.0, P=.91). The change in histopathology scale score between the active and sham arm was not statistically significant (95% CI -1.14, 1.06, P=.76). CONCLUSION: Fractionated CO2 is not an effective monotherapy treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665584. FUNDING SOURCE: Additional funding for this study was supplied by El.En Group, Florence, Italy, the manufacturer of the laser used in this study. In addition, El.En Group supplied the laser used in the study.