Comparing Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) can be surgically managed through open resections (OLR), laparoscopic resections (LLR), or robotic liver resections (RLR). However, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive approaches like LLR and RLR. This study aims to clarify these issues by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare outcomes across OLR, LLR and RLR for patients with CRLM. Following the PRISMA-NMA guidelines, the meta-analysis included 13 studies with a combined total of 6582 patients. Of these, 50.6% underwent LLR, 45.3% underwent OLR, and 4.1% underwent RLR. The analysis found no significant differences in R0 resection rates between LLR (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-1.26) and RLR (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.98-2.51) when compared to OLR. Additionally, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. Despite these findings, both LLR and RLR were associated with reduced postoperative complication rates (RLR: OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86; LLR: OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68). However, patients undergoing LLR were more likely to require conversion to open surgery compared to those undergoing RLR (OR: 12.46, 95% CI: 2.64-58.67). Furthermore, RLR was associated with a reduced need for blood transfusions (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.32), and LLR resulted in shorter hospital stays (mean difference: -6.66 days, 95% CI: -11.6 to -1.88 days). This study demonstrates the oncological safety of LLR and RLR approaches for CRLM relative to OLR, with enhanced perioperative outcomes anticipated following minimally invasive resections of CRLM.

Selective Necrosectomy for Infected Pancreatic Necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, a diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) warranted necrosectomy, which was associated with high morbidity and mortality rates greater than 20%. Preoperative percutaneous drainage delayed the need for necrosectomy with improved outcomes. METHODS: In 2008, this institution changed its approach to the management of such cases opting instead for percutaneous drainage with selective deferred necrosectomy. A total of 38 consecutive patients with IPN from January 2008 to December 2014 were included. RESULTS: All 38 underwent percutaneous radiological drainage, and selective necrosectomy was performed on 15 where the infected necrosis did not completely resolve. Twenty-three patients did not require surgery and were managed with pancreatic drain insertion, optimal nutritional support and critical care interventions. Median peak Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 10 (range 0-18) and 3 (range 0-10) prior to radiological intervention. Overall mortality was 5% (n = 2). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that radiological-guided drainage of infected pancreatic collections can, in most cases, prove curative and, if not, facilitates delayed surgical intervention with improved outcomes.

Open versus laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases: a meta-analysis of matched patient populations.

In recent years, the management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has evolved significantly. Laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being performed, despite a lack of major randomized controlled trial evidence or widespread international consensus. The objective of this review was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes following open and laparoscopic CRLM resection. A systematic review of comparative matched population studies was performed. Evaluated endpoints included surgical outcomes and survival outcomes. Twelve studies were included in this review, reporting on 3095 patients. R0 (negative margins) rates were higher in the laparoscopic CRLM group (89.3% versus 86.9%). In addition, laparoscopic resection was associated with less blood loss (486 mls versus 648 mls, p ≤ 0.0001*) and reduced blood transfusion rates (6.7% vs. 12.2%, OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.08-4.19, p = 0.03*). Major complication rates were higher in the open CRLM group (12.5% vs. 8.1%, OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30-2.33, p = 0.03*), as was overall hospital length of stay (median 7 versus 5.5 days, p = 0.001*). Perioperative mortality was similar between both groups, and there was no significance in 5-year overall survival for open or laparoscopic CRLM resection groups (58% and 61% respectively). Laparoscopic CRLM resection is associated with less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, major complications, and overall hospital length of stay with comparable oncological outcome.

Extension of hepatic necrosis secondary to current arcing to surgical clips: a potential complication of radiofrequency ablation.

The authors present a case report of a 67-year-old woman who underwent radiofrequency ablation of recurrent hepatic metastases. She was managed 2 years previously with a right hemi-hepatectomy. Subsequent to RF ablation she developed hepatic necrosis extending in a linear fashion to two of the metallic surgical clips at the free edge of the liver, consistent with current arcing.

Long-term quality of life following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study examined long-term quality of life in an unselected consecutive cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, both Whipple and total, for benign and malignant disease. METHODOLOGY: Forty consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy over a nine-year period formed the study group. The control group consisted of 58 age- and sex-matched patients undergoing open cholecystectomy during the same period. Quality of Life was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (core cancer module) and QLQ-PAN26 (pancreatic cancer module) questionnaires at a median of 42 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The Global Health Status of the study and control groups was similar, but significant differences were noted in certain individual scales. The benign group reported greater social and financial difficulties, and symptoms consistent with impaired exocrine function. The malignant group reported difficulties with daily physical and role functioning, concern for future health and individual symptoms such as fatigue, muscle weakness, and inability to gain weight. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the overall quality of life of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy compared favorably with that of a control group. Significant differences did exist in some individual scales, in both the benign and malignant sub-groups, suggestive of exocrine insufficiency.

Cystic duct remnant and the 'post-cholecystectomy syndrome'.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome refers to a wide spectrum of conditions that pose a challenging diagnostic dilemma. Cystic duct remnant, defined as a residual duct greater than 1 cm in length, may, in the presence of stones, cause post-cholecystectomy syndrome. In this report, 4 patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome due to cystic duct remnant are described. All underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and one was converted to open. The patients presented with pain 10 months to 9 years post-cholecystectomy and investigations demonstrated cystic duct remnant. All patients underwent successful resection with resolution of symptoms. In this era of laparoscopic surgery, where surgery favors a long cystic duct remnant, we should be aware of cystic duct stones as a possible cause of postcholecystectomy syndrome. This report highlights magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as the optimal method for evaluating the biliary tract in these cases.

Intraperitoneal pethidine versus intramuscular pethidine for the relief of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized trial.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely used and may be performed as an ambulatory procedure. We undertook a randomized comparison of the benefits of intraperitoneal pethidine compared with intramuscular pethidine for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A series of 100 consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients were randomly assigned to intramuscular pethidine (54 patients) or intraperitoneal pethidine (46 patients). Each was combined with intraperitoneal bupivacaine. The primary endpoints were the pain and nausea scores at intervals after operation. All recruited patients completed the study. Pain scores at rest and upon movement were significantly lower in the group receiving the intraperitoneal pethidine at each of the time periods examined (pain at rest at 4 hours: 1.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9 cm; p < 0.001; pain upon movement at 4 hours: 2.1 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.1 +/- 1.2 cm; p < 0.001). The total dose of pethidine administered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during the first 24 hours after surgery was also significantly lower in this group (total dose 50.9 +/- 3.9 vs. 55.9 +/- 4.4 mg; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the respiratory rate at any of the time periods. Intraperitoneal pethidine analgesia was superior to an equivalent dose of intramuscular pethidine for the relief of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This was achieved at the expense of increased nausea but no significant increase in vomiting. The accessibility of this route of analgesia administration has implications for patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, particularly with the recent trend toward increased use of ambulatory techniques.