Rational design of base, sugar and backbone modifications improves ADAR-mediated RNA editing.

AIMers are short, chemically modified oligonucleotides that induce A-to-I RNA editing through interaction with endogenous adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes. Here, we describe the development of new AIMer designs with base, sugar and backbone modifications that improve RNA editing efficiency over our previous design. AIMers incorporating a novel pattern of backbone and 2' sugar modifications support enhanced editing efficiency across multiple sequences. Further efficiency gains were achieved through incorporation of an N-3-uridine (N3U), in place of cytidine (C), in the 'orphan base' position opposite the edit site. Molecular modeling suggests that N3U might enhance ADAR catalytic activity by stabilizing the AIMer-ADAR interaction and potentially reducing the energy required to flip the target base into the active site. Supporting this hypothesis, AIMers containing N3U consistently enhanced RNA editing over those containing C across multiple target sequences and multiple nearest neighbor sequence combinations. AIMers combining N3U and the novel pattern of 2' sugar chemistry and backbone modifications improved RNA editing both in vitro and in vivo. We provide detailed N3U synthesis methods and, for the first time, explore the impact of N3U and its analogs on ADAR-mediated RNA editing efficiency and targetable sequence space.

Longitudinal examination of urine pH, specific gravity, protein, culture, and antimicrobial resistance profiles in healthy dogs.

BACKGROUND: Urine is routinely evaluated in dogs to assess health. Reference ranges for many urine properties are well established, but the scope of variation in these properties over time within healthy dogs is not well characterized. OBJECTIVES: Longitudinally characterize urine properties in healthy dogs over 3 months. ANIMALS: Fourteen healthy client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this prospective study, dogs were evaluated for health; then, mid-stream free-catch urine was collected from each dog at 12 timepoints over 3 months. Urine pH, urine specific gravity (USG), protein, cultures, and antimicrobial resistance profiles were assessed at each timepoint. RESULTS: Urine pH varied within and between dogs over time (Friedman's test: within P = .03; between P < .005). However, USG, protein, and bacterial diversity of urine were consistent within dogs over time, and only varied between dogs (Kruskal-Wallis: between all P < .005). Antimicrobial resistant isolates were identified in 12 out of 14 dogs with 34 of 48 of the isolates demonstrating resistance to amoxicillin. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Urine pH should be assessed at multiple timepoints via pH meter before making clinical decisions. Mid-stream free-catch urine with high concentrations of bacteria (>105 CFU/mL) should not be considered the only indicator of urinary tract infection. Bacterial isolates from dogs in this study had widespread resistance to amoxicillin/oxacillin underscoring the need for antimicrobial stewardship.