Introducing the First Distal Pharyngeal Airway.

Airway obstruction during anesthesia is a common occurrence with potentially serious outcomes. Increasingly, patients are older, heavier, and more likely to have obstructive sleep apnea-all heightened risk factors for airway complications. These patients undergo procedures where distal pharyngeal tissues can relax, obstructing the airway. As a result, there is a need for airway devices that can stent open distal pharyngeal tissues to maintain adequate ventilation. To physically address this problem, the new distal pharyngeal airway (DPA) prevents airway obstruction and enables providers to maintain ventilation.

An Analysis of the Evidence Underpinning the American Urologic Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs) underpinning the American Urologic Association (AUA) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: We searched the AUA for CPGs from 2015-2021. We extracted all SRs from the reference sections and two independent investigators evaluated eligible SR/meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) instruments. We compared SRs conducted by the Cochrane group to non-Cochrane SRs using a Mann-Whitney test. A multivariate regression was used to compare study characteristics. RESULTS: Eighteen CPG's met inclusion criteria. We extracted 120 unique SRs, which accounted for 5.1% (n = 120/2346) of all citations. Mean percent adherence to PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 was 65.4% -d 55.2% respectively. SRs conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration scored higher on AMSTAR-2 compared to non-Cochrane (z = -4.41, P <.01) and a positive correlation between PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 scores (r = 0.56, P <.001) was determined. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated the quality of SRs used to develop AUA CPGs across both PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 was variable. Despite higher evaluations, Cochrane SRs accounted for less than 15% of SRs underpinning CPG recommendations. Given the importance placed on CPGs within clinical practice, we recommended a synergistic relationship between the AUA and the Cochrane Collaboration to increase the number of quality urologic SRs.

Using Google Trends and Twitter for Prostate Cancer Awareness: A Comparative Analysis of Prostate Cancer Awareness Month and Breast Cancer Awareness Month.

Background We evaluated (1) whether the public interest in prostate cancer and prostate cancer screening increased following Prostate Cancer Awareness Month (PCAM) and (2) whether PCAM was as effective as Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM) at generating public interest. Methods  Using Google Trends, we measured search volume in PCAM and BCAM. We used the search volume in Google Trends as a proxy for changes in public interest from January 01, 2009 to December 31, 2018 worldwide, including the specific keywords: "Prostate Cancer"; "Prostate-Specific Antigen"; "Prostate Cancer Screening"; "Prostate Cancer Management"; "Breast Cancer"; "Breast Cancer Screening"; "Mammography"; and "Breast Cancer Management". Also, we measured tweets containing "prostate cancer" and "breast cancer". We used an autoregressive integrated moving algorithm (ARIMA) to forecast expected weekly search volumes during PCAM and BCAM. We then compared the Google Trends data from during PCAM and BCAM to the forecasted values and determined a "greater than expected" range. Results The mean pooled percent increase in tweets associated with "prostate cancer" during PCAM from 2012 through 2018 was 15.9% (95% CI, -1% - 33%). The mean pooled percent increase in tweets associated with "breast cancer" during BCAM from 2012 through 2018 was 318.5% (95% CI, 268% - 369%). BCAM was associated with a 302.6% greater effect on increasing tweets referencing the disease of interest than PCAM from 2012-2018. "Breast cancer" Google searches were found to be 36.7% (95% CI, 34% - 39%) more frequent than "prostate cancer" per month from 2009-2019. Google Searches for "breast cancer screening" were 29.6% (95% CI, 28% - 31%) greater than "prostate cancer screening". Conclusions Our results indicate that PCAM is not generating substantial internet interest, especially when compared to BCAM. The search volume for Google Trends search terms related to PCAM was less than BCAM in every comparison, and Twitter indicated only a slight increase of Tweets during the month of PCAM. Suggestions are provided to improve the effect of PCAM and men's health.

Airway Management for Deep Sedation: Current Practice, Limitations, and Needs as Identified by Clinical Observation and Survey Results.

Using deep sedation, adjunct airway devices such as oral or nasal airways are frequently required to maintain airway patency. Traditional oral airways (TOAs, made of rigid plastic) or nasal airways (made of pliable materials) can be associated with adverse effects, contributing to a trend of anesthesia providers placing nasal airways orally. A clinical observational study and an electronic provider survey were conducted to examine this emerging practice. The observation study objective was to investigate reported postoperative sore throat occurrence associated with use of either a nontraditional airway (nasal airway used orally) or TOA in deep sedation procedures (N = 243). Patients receiving nontraditional airways reported significantly less postoperative sore throat than those receiving TOAs (17% vs 40%, respectively; P < .001). These results prompted a broader exploration into airway practices of anesthesia providers via an electronic survey. Most respondents (n = 293) reported adverse effects, including gagging/coughing on insertion, oral cavity injury, and bleeding with TOAs. More than half (52.8%) reported using nasal airways orally. These results suggest a clinical void in current airway management options for deep sedation. Providers indicated the need for airway devices that provide a patent airway while mitigating adverse effects associated with commonly used airways.

Quality of Intervention Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Urology Journals.

We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) to find evidence that intervention reporting in urology randomized controlled trials is suboptimal. Action to improve intervention reporting is warranted and we advise extending TIDieR into Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials guidelines.

Addressing the Increased Incidence of Common Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States include genital herpes, HIV, and human papilloma virus. In 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report detailing a surge in chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections in the United States. The authors summarize current trends and discuss epidemiologic factors, disease burden, and patient care. It is important to be aware of the recent increases in these 3 STIs and to be prepared to screen for, diagnose, and manage these infections and their complications.

Withdrawal exposure with withdrawal regulation training for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although withdrawal processes form a key motivational basis for cigarette use, smoking cessation treatments appear to exert only modest effects on withdrawal. One treatment option for further reducing withdrawal severity would be to provide smokers with withdrawal regulation training. The objective of this study was to pilot a smoking cessation intervention comprising withdrawal exposure with withdrawal regulation training. METHODS: Adult smokers (N=80) were randomized to one of two conditions: 1) Withdrawal Exposure with Withdrawal Regulation Training (WT), which included the development and application of individualized withdrawal regulation strategies over four separate sessions that spanned the first four hours of abstinence; 2) or Relaxation Control (RC) training, which controlled for the therapeutic contact of WT. All sessions occurred before the quit date, after which differential treatment was discontinued and all participants received brief counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, and self-help literature. Biochemically-confirmed (CO≤3) seven-day point-prevalence abstinence was assessed at Months 2 and 3 after end-of-treatment. RESULTS: Treatment completion and ratings of credibility and efficacy were high and equivalent across conditions. 22.2% of participants in the WT condition were abstinent at both time points, whereas 0% and 4.2% of participants in the RC condition were abstinent at Months 2 and 3 (Month 3 OR=6.5 [0.73, 59.19]). In-session withdrawal ratings suggested WT improved regulation of withdrawal symptoms, which were in turn associated with abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: This small pilot study suggests that WT promotes abstinence by enhancing withdrawal regulation. Results warrant further investigation of this innovative treatment approach.

The practice of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the major trauma patient.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) without prophylaxis is as high as 80% after major trauma. Initiation of prophylaxis is often delayed because of concerns of injury-associated bleeding. As the effect of delays in the initiation of prophylaxis on VTE rates is unknown, we set out to evaluate the relationship between late initiation of prophylaxis and VTE. METHODS: Data were derived from a multicenter prospective cohort study evaluating clinical outcomes in adults with hemorrhagic shock after injury. Analyses were limited to patients with an Intensive Care Unit length of stay >or=7 days. The rate of VTE was estimated as a function of the time to initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with late initiation. RESULTS: There were 315 subjects who met inclusion criteria; 34 patients (11%) experienced a VTE within the first 28 days. Prophylaxis was initiated within 48 hours of injury in 25% of patients, and another one-quarter had no prophylaxis for at least 7 days after injury. Early prophylaxis was associated with a 5% risk of VTE, whereas delay beyond 4 days was associated with three times that risk (risk ratio, 3.0, 95% CI [1.4-6.5]). Factors associated with late (>4 days) initiation of prophylaxis included severe head injury, absence of comorbidities, and massive transfusion, whereas the presence of a severe lower extremity fracture was associated with early prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are reticent to begin timely VTE prophylaxis in critically injured patients. Patients are without VTE prophylaxis for half of all days within the first week of admission and this delay in the initiation of prophylaxis is associated with a threefold greater risk of VTE. The relative risks and benefits of early VTE prophylaxis need to be defined to better direct practice in this high-risk population.

Blindness in the intensive care unit: possible role for vasopressors?

Blindness caused by ischemic optic neuropathy in the hospital setting occurs perioperatively and in critically ill patients, but its etiology remains ill defined. We describe four critically ill patients who developed blindness within 1 mo of one another. Three cases occurred outside of the operative arena. Potential risk factors for the development of ischemic optic neuropathy, such as use of vasopressors, venous congestion, and hypotension, are described.