Comparison of Stroke Care Costs in Urban and Nonurban Hospitals and Its Association With Outcomes in New Zealand: A Nationwide Economic Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although geographical differences in treatment and outcomes after stroke have been described, we lack evidence on differences in the costs of treatment between urban and nonurban regions. Additionally, it is unclear whether greater costs in one setting are justified given the outcomes achieved. We aimed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years in people with stroke admitted to urban and nonurban hospitals in New Zealand. METHODS: Observational study of patients with stroke admitted to the 28 New Zealand acute stroke hospitals (10 in urban areas) recruited between May and October 2018. Data were collected up to 12 months poststroke including treatments in hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, other health service utilization, aged residential care, productivity, and health-related quality of life. Costs in New Zealand dollars were estimated from a societal perspective and assigned to the initial hospital that patients presented to. Unit prices for 2018 were obtained from government and hospital sources. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted when assessing differences between groups. RESULTS: Of 1510 patients (median age 78 years, 48% female), 607 presented to nonurban and 903 to urban hospitals. Mean hospital costs were greater in urban than nonurban hospitals ($13 191 versus $11 635, P=0.002), as were total costs to 12 months ($22 381 versus $17 217, P<0.001) and quality-adjusted life years to 12 months (0.54 versus 0.46, P<0.001). Differences in costs and quality-adjusted life years remained between groups after adjustment. Depending on the covariates included, costs per additional quality-adjusted life year in the urban hospitals compared to the nonurban hospitals ranged from $65 038 (unadjusted) to $136 125 (covariates: age, sex, prestroke disability, stroke type, severity, and ethnicity). CONCLUSIONS: Better outcomes following initial presentation to urban hospitals were associated with greater costs compared to nonurban hospitals. These findings may inform greater targeted expenditure in some nonurban hospitals to improve access to treatment and optimize outcomes.

Intrinsic motivation.

The prevailing wisdom in neurological rehabilitation, and particularly for stroke, is that physical therapies are the key to improvements in function. Despite accepting the importance of 'the motivated patient', the lack of simple, proven ways to improve intrinsic motivation has hindered efforts to combine physical therapies with motivation. Now there is available a simple, free, well-validated approach to encourage intrinsic motivation ('Take Charge'). The benefits for people who have had a stroke are well-established but this could be applied to people with a range of neurological and other disorders. We provide the evidential support for this approach and suggest ways of incorporating it into daily practice.

Economic analysis of the 'Take Charge' intervention for people following stroke: Results from a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake an economic analysis of the Take Charge intervention as part of the Taking Charge after Stroke (TaCAS) study. DESIGN: An open, parallel-group, randomised trial comparing active and control interventions with blinded outcome assessment. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 400) discharged to community, non-institutional living following acute stroke. INTERVENTIONS: The Take Charge intervention, a strengths based, self-directed rehabilitation intervention, in two doses (one or two sessions), and a control intervention (no Take Charge sessions). MEASURES: The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved for the period between randomisation (always post hospital discharge) and 12 months following acute stroke. QALYs were calculated from the EuroQol-5D-5L. Costs of stroke-related and non-health care were obtained by questionnaire, hospital records and the New Zealand Ministry of Health. RESULTS: One-year post hospital discharge cost of care was mean (95% CI) $US4706 (3758-6014) for the Take Charge intervention group and $6118 (4350-8005) for control, mean (95% CI) difference $ -1412 (-3553 to +729). Health utility scores were mean (95% CI) 0.75 (0.73-0.77) for Take Charge and 0.71 (0.67-0.75) for control, mean (95% CI) difference 0.04 (0.0-0.08). Cost per QALY gained for the Take Charge intervention was $US -35,296 (=£ -25,524, € -30,019). Sensitivity analyses confirm Take Charge is cost-effective, even at a very low willingness-to-pay threshold. With a threshold of $US5000 per QALY, the probability that Take Charge is cost-effective is 99%. CONCLUSION: Take Charge is cost-effective and probably cost saving.

The effect of the Take Charge intervention on mood, motivation, activation and risk factor management: Analysis of secondary data from the Taking Charge after Stroke (TaCAS) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To use secondary data from the Taking Charge after Stroke study to explore mechanisms for the positive effect of the Take Charge intervention on physical health, advanced activities of daily living and independence for people after acute stroke. DESIGN: An open, parallel-group, randomised trial with two active and one control intervention and blinded outcome assessment. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 400) discharged to community, non-institutional living following acute stroke. INTERVENTIONS: One, two, or zero sessions of the Take Charge intervention, a self-directed rehabilitation intervention which helps a person with stroke take charge of their own recovery. MEASURES: Twelve months after stroke: Mood (Patient Health Questionnaire-2, Mental Component Summary of the Short Form 36); 'ability to Take Charge' using a novel measure, the Autonomy-Mastery-Purpose-Connectedness (AMP-C) score; activation (Patient Activation Measure); body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP) and medication adherence (Medication Adherence Questionnaire). RESULTS: Follow-up was near-complete (388/390 (99.5%)) of survivors at 12 months. Mean age (SD) was 72.0 (12.5) years. There were no significant differences in mood, activation, 'ability to Take Charge', medication adherence, BMI or BP by randomised group at 12 months. There was a significant positive association between baseline AMP-C scores and 12-month outcome for control participants (1.73 (95%CI 0.90 to 2.56)) but not for the Take Charge groups combined (0.34 (95%CI -0.17 to 0.85)). CONCLUSION: The mechanism by which Take Charge is effective remains uncertain. However, our findings support a hypothesis that baseline variability in motivation, mastery and connectedness may be modified by the Take Charge intervention.

An audit of coagulation screening in patients presenting to the emergency department for potential stroke thrombolysis.

AIM: To assess time to coagulation screening results in patients presenting for potential stroke thrombolysis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients was assessed for thrombolysis for stroke at Wellington Hospital between January and June 2014. We assessed time from presentation to receipt of laboratory specimen, processing time and total time from presentation to result availability and whether times differed by receipt time. RESULTS: During the audit period, 97 unique patients, and 99 clinical episodes, were assessed for stroke thrombolysis; 20 patients received thrombolysis. In 11of 99 (11%) episodes, no coagulation sample was sent. Sample was unsuitable for processing in 16 episodes (18%), and in four, a further specimen was sent. Median (interquartile range) time from presentation to the emergency department to laboratory report during working hours (n = 55) was 61 (53-77) min and out of hours (n = 33) 64 (50-90) min; Hodges-Lehmann estimator (95% CI) of location shift -1 (-11 to 8) min, P = 0.90. No difference in reporting times was seen whether patients received thrombolysis or not. Seven patients were prescribed warfarin, and one had an international normalised ratio (INR) of 1.7 and was thrombolysed. INR in the other six patients ranged between 1.9 and 3.4. Two patients using dabigatran had prolonged thrombin times and so were not thrombolysed. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of laboratory specimens was unsuitable for testing, and overall samples took an unacceptably long time to process. Point-of-care testing may potentially allow quicker decisions regarding whether thrombolysis is contraindicated but is likely to affect only a small proportion of patients.

The impact of intensive blood pressure management in the post-thrombolysis setting: a real-world observational study.

AIM: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) >180mmHg following stroke thrombolysis has been associated with increased bleeding and poorer outcome. Aiming for the guideline SBP of <180mmHg often leads to SBP overshoot, as treatment is only triggered if this threshold is passed. We tested whether a lower target would result in fewer high SBP protocol violations. METHOD: This is a single-centre, sequential comparison of two blood pressure protocols. Between 2013 and 2017, the guideline-based post-thrombolysis SBP target of <180mmHg was compared with a new protocol aiming for 140-160mmHg. The primary outcome was rate of patients with SBPs >180mmHg. Secondary outcomes included rates of SBP <120 mmHg, antihypertensive infusion use, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Score [mRS] 0-2). Results were adjusted for age, baseline function and stroke severity using regression analysis. RESULTS: During the 23 months preceding and 18 months following the transition to the new protocol, 68 and 100 patients were thrombolysed respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The odds of one or more SBPs >180mmHg trended lower in the intensive group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-1.17; p=0.14). There was a higher rate of SBPs <120mmHg (aOR 3.09; 95% CI 1.49-6.40; p=0.002) in the intensive BP protocol group. sICH rate and 3-month mRS 0-2 were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The more intensive post-thrombolysis BP protocol was associated with a significant increase in sub-optimally low BP events, with a non-significant trend toward fewer high BP protocol violations and unaffected patient outcomes.

Taking Charge After Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of a Psychologically Informed Self-Management Intervention.

Purpose: Few interventions improve outcomes for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), particularly higher risk groups such as those admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). The aim of the study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a modified version of the Take Charge program in people after AECOPD and to determine the potential to improve self-reported limitations, health-related quality of life and reduce future hospitalizations. Patients and Methods: A prospective, parallel group randomized trial with blinded endpoint assessment. Participants had been discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of AECOPD and were randomized to receive either a single 60-90 minute session of "Take Charge for COPD" from a trained facilitator in their own home or usual care. Take Charge is a "talking therapy" that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy, mastery, and connectedness with others. The primary outcome was the rate of moderate or severe episodes of AECOPD in the subsequent 12 months. Results: Fifty-six people were randomized (study target 60): predominantly European (71%), female (61%), older (mean [SD] age 70 [11] years), and non-smokers (89%). Charlson Comorbidity Index mean (SD) score was 2.3 (1.6) indicating mild to moderate comorbidity severity. There were 85 moderate or severe AECOPD episodes in the 12 months after the index admission for the Take Charge participants and 84 episodes in the control group (relative rate 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 1.26). COPD Clinical Questionnaire (CCQ) scores were significantly lower (better) in the Take Charge group (mean difference -1.26; 95% CI -2.06 to -0.45). Conclusion: The Take Charge intervention proved feasible with a population of people recently discharged from hospital with AECOPD. The direction of change in the primary outcome and some secondary outcomes suggest that an adequately powered study is justified.

Prevention of Re-Hospitalization for Acute Exacerbations: Perspectives of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: Current guidelines for prevention of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) reflect clinical understanding of the causes of exacerbations but with a limited recognition of person-specific contributing factors. As part of a randomized trial of a person-centered intervention aiming to promote self-determination, we describe personal perspectives of those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on what they saw as the causes and best ways to stay well and prevent rehospitalization after an AECOPD. Patients and Methods: Twelve participants (mean age 69.3 years, six female, six male; eight New Zealand European, two Maori, one Pacific, and one other) were interviewed about their experiences of staying well and out of hospital. Data were collected via individual semi-structured interviews one year following an index hospital admission for AECOPD and focused on the participants' views and experiences of their health condition, their beliefs about staying well, and the causes of and factors preventing further exacerbations and hospitalizations. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory methods. Results: Three main themes were identified that described participants' views on what helped or hindered them to stay well and out of hospital: 1) Being Positive: The importance of having a positive mindset; 2) Being Proactive: Practical steps to reduce the risk of, and consequences from, episodes of AECOPD; and 3) Being in Control: Feeling in command of one's life and health. Each of these was affected by Being Connected: The influence of significant others, particularly close family. Conclusion: This research expands our understanding of how patients manage COPD and adds patient perspectives to current knowledge on how to prevent recurrent AECOPD. Programs which promote self-efficacy and positivity would be beneficial additions to AECOPD prevention strategies, as could the inclusion of family or significant others in wellbeing plans.

Ethnic differences in stroke outcomes in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national linkage study.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic differences in post-stroke outcomes have been largely attributed to biological and socioeconomic characteristics resulting in differential risk factor profiles and stroke subtypes, but evidence is mixed. AIMS: This study assessed ethnic differences in stroke outcome and service access in New Zealand (NZ) and explored underlying causes in addition to traditional risk factors. METHODS: This national cohort study used routinely collected health and social data to compare post-stroke outcomes between NZ Europeans, Maori, Pacific Peoples, and Asians, adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, socioeconomic deprivation, and stroke characteristics. First and principal stroke public hospital admissions during November 2017 to October 2018 were included (N = 6879). Post-stroke unfavorable outcome was defined as being dead, changing residence, or becoming unemployed. RESULTS: In total, 5394 NZ Europeans, 762 Maori, 369 Pacific Peoples, and 354 Asians experienced a stroke during the study period. Median age was 65 years for Maori and Pacific Peoples, and 71 and 79 years for Asians and NZ Europeans, respectively. Compared with NZ Europeans, Maori were more likely to have an unfavorable outcome at all three time-points (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3-1.9); 1.4 (1.2-1.7); 1.4 (1.2-1.7), respectively). Maori had increased odds of death at all time-points (1.7 (1.3-2.1); 1.5 (1.2-1.9); 1.7 (1.3-2.1)), change in residence at 3 and 6 months (1.6 (1.3-2.1); 1.3 (1.1-1.7)), and unemployment at 6 and 12 months (1.5 (1.1-2.1); 1.5 (1.1-2.1)). There was evidence of differences in post-stroke secondary prevention medication by ethnicity. CONCLUSION: We found ethnic disparities in care and outcomes following stroke which were independent of traditional risk factors, suggesting they may be attributable to stroke service delivery rather than patient factors.

Patient, carer and health worker perspectives of stroke care in New Zealand: a mixed methods survey.

PURPOSE: It is important to understand how consumers (person with stroke/family member/carer) and health workers perceive stroke care services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consumers and health workers from across New Zealand were surveyed on perceptions of stroke care, access barriers, and views on service centralisation. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics whilst thematic analysis was used for free-text answers. RESULTS: Of 149 consumers and 79 health workers invited to complete a survey, 53 consumers (36.5%) and 41 health workers (51.8%) responded. Overall, 40/46 (87%) consumers rated stroke care as 'good/excellent' compared to 24/41 (58.6%) health workers. Approximately 72% of consumers preferred to transfer to a specialised hospital. We identified three major themes related to perceptions of stroke care: 1) 'variability in care by stage of treatment'; 2) 'impact of communication by health workers on care experience'; and 3) 'inadequate post-acute services for younger patients'. Four access barrier themes were identified: 1) 'geographic inequities'; 2) 'knowing what is available'; 3) 'knowledge about stroke and available services'; and 4) 'healthcare system factors'. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of stroke care differed between consumers and health workers, highlighting the importance of involving both in service co-design. Improving communication, post-hospital follow-up, and geographic equity are key areas for improvement.Implications for rehabilitationProvision of detailed information on stroke recovery and available services in the community is recommended.Improvements in the delivery of post-hospital stroke care are required to optimise stroke care, with options including routine phone follow up appointments and wider development of early supported discharge services.Stroke rehabilitation services should continue to be delivered 'close to home' to allow community integration.Telehealth is a likely enabler to allow specialist urban clinicians to support non-urban clinicians, as well as increasing the availability and access of community rehabilitation.

Taking charge after stroke: promoting self-directed rehabilitation to improve quality of life--a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Few community interventions following stroke enhance activity, participation or quality of life. We tested two novel community interventions designed to promote self-directed rehabilitation following stroke. DESIGN: This was a randomized, controlled parallel group 2×2 trial. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Maori and Pacific New Zealanders, >15 years old, randomized within three months of a new stroke. INTERVENTIONS: A DVD of four inspirational stories by Maori and Pacific people with stroke and a 'Take Charge Session'--a single structured risk factor and activities of daily living assessment, designed to facilitate self-directed rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes were Health-related Quality of Life (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36)) 12 months from randomization. Secondary outcomes were Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index, Carer Strain Index and modified Rankin score. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two people were randomized with 139 (80.8%) followed up at 12 months post randomization. The effect of the Take Charge Session on SF-36 PCS at 12 months was 6.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 10.0) and of the DVD was 0.9 (95% CI -3.1 to 4.9). Participants allocated to the Take Charge Session were less likely to have a modified Rankin score of >2 (odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.89) and their carers had lower (better) Carer Strain Index scores (-1.5, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.1). CONCLUSION: A simple, low-cost intervention in the community phase of stroke recovery aiming to promote self-directed rehabilitation improved outcomes.

Geographic Disparities in Stroke Outcomes and Service Access: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: International evidence shows that patients treated at non-urban hospitals experience poorer access to key stroke interventions. Evidence whether this results in poorer outcomes is conflicting and generally based on administrative or voluntary registry data. The aim of this study was to use prospective high-quality comprehensive nationwide patient level data to investigate the association between hospital geography and stroke patient outcomes and access to best practice stroke care in New Zealand. METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre, nationally representative observational study involving all 28 New Zealand acute stroke hospitals (18 non-urban), and affiliated rehabilitation and community services. Consecutive adults admitted to the hospital with acute stroke between 1 May and 31 October 2018 were captured. Outcomes included functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift analysis), functional independence (mRS scores 0-2), quality of life (EQ5D-3L), stroke/vascular events, and death at 3, 6, and 12 months and proportion accessing thrombolysis, thrombectomy, stroke units, key investigations, secondary prevention, and inpatient/community rehabilitation. Results were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, stroke severity/type, co-morbidities, baseline function, and differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 2,379 patients were eligible (mean (standard deviation) age 75 (13.7); 51.2% male; 1,430 urban; 949 non-urban). Patients treated at non-urban hospitals were more likely to score in a higher mRS category (greater disability) at three (aOR=1.28, 1.07-1.53), six (aOR=1.33, 1.07-1.65) and twelve months (aOR=1.31, 1.06-1.62) and were more likely to have died (aOR=1.57, 1.17-2.12) or experienced recurrent stroke and vascular events at 12 months (aOR=1.94, 1.14-3.29 and aOR=1.65, 1.09-2.52). Fewer non-urban patients received recommended stroke interventions including endovascular thrombectomy (aOR=0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.49), acute stroke unit care (aOR=0.60, 0.49-0.73), antiplatelet prescriptions (aOR=0.72, 0.58-0.88), ≥60 minutes daily physical therapy (aOR=0.55, 0.40-0.77) and community rehabilitation (aOR=0.69, 0.56-0.84). DISCUSSION: Patients managed at non-urban hospitals experience poorer stroke outcomes and reduced access to key stroke interventions across the entire care continuum. Efforts to improve access to high quality stroke care in non-urban hospitals should be a priority.

The impact of ethnicity on stroke care access and patient outcomes: a New Zealand nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic inequities in stroke care access have been reported internationally but the impact on outcomes remains unclear. In New Zealand, data on ethnic stroke inequities and resultant effects on outcomes are generally limited and conflicting. METHODS: In a prospective, nationwide, multi-centre observational study, we recruited consecutive adult patients with confirmed stroke from 28 hospitals between 1 May and 31 October 2018. Patient outcomes: favourable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-2); quality of life (EQ-5D-3L); stroke/vascular events; and death at three, six and 12 months. Process measures: access to reperfusion therapies, stroke-units, investigations, secondary prevention, rehabilitation. Multivariate regression analyses assessed associations between ethnicity and outcomes and process measures. FINDINGS: The cohort comprised 2,379 patients (median age 78 (IQR 66-85); 51·2% male; 76·7% European, 11·5% Maori, 4·8% Pacific peoples, 4·8% Asian). Non-Europeans were younger, had more risk factors, had reduced access to acute stroke units (aOR=0·78, 95%CI, 0·60-0·97), and were less likely to receive a swallow screen within 24 hours of arrival (aOR=0·72, 0·53-0·99) or MRI imaging (OR=0·66, 0·52-0·85). Maori were less frequently prescribed anticoagulants (OR=0·68, 0·47-0·98). Pacific peoples received greater risk factor counselling. Fewer non-Europeans had a favourable mRS score at three (aOR=0·67, 0·47-0·96), six (aOR=0·63, 0·40-0·98) and 12 months (aOR=0·56, 0·36-0·88), and more Maori had died by 12 months (aOR=1·76, 1·07-2·89). INTERPRETATION: Non-Europeans, especially Maori, had poorer access to key stroke interventions and experience poorer outcomes. Further optimisation of stroke care targeting high-priority populations are needed to achieve equity. FUNDING: New Zealand Health Research Council (HRC17/037).

Barriers to optimal stroke service care and solutions: a qualitative study engaging people with stroke and their whanau.

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of people with stroke and their whanau on barriers to accessing best practice care across Aotearoa, and to brainstorm potential solutions. METHOD: We conducted ten focus groups nationwide and completed a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of the data collected from the focus groups identified five themes: (1) inconsistencies in stroke care; (2) importance of effective communication; (3) the role of whanau support; (4) the need for more person rather than stroke centred processes; and (5) experienced inequities. Participants also identified potential solutions. CONCLUSION: Key recommendations include the need for improved access to stroke unit care for rural residents, improved post-discharge support and care coordination involving the whanau, improved communication across the patient journey, and a concerted effort to improve culturally safe care. Next step is to implement and monitor these recommendations.

Ethnicity and functional outcome after stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is limited information on the influence of ethnicity on functional outcome after stroke. We examined functional outcomes among European New Zealanders, Maori, Pacific, and Asian people 6 months after stroke in a population-based context. METHODS: This was a prospective incidence and 6-month outcomes study of all new stroke patients (excluding subarachnoid hemorrhage) that occurred over 1 year in a defined geographical area in Auckland, New Zealand, during 2002 to 2003. Ethnicity was self-defined. Outcome measures included the Frenchay Activities Index, 36-item Short Form questionnaire, independence, death, composite of death and dependence, and living situation. RESULTS: Functional measures were available in 1127 patients 6 months after stroke. Frenchay Activities Index scores were associated with ethnicity on both univariable and multivariable analysis, with Asian and Pacific people having worse scores. Physical Component Summary score of the 36-item Short Form was associated with ethnicity on univariable (scores for Pacific, Maori, and Asian people were higher than those for Europeans) but not multivariable analysis. Asian people were less likely to be dead compared to Europeans, and Pacific people were more likely to be dependent on others for help than Europeans. Pacific people were more likely to be dead or dependent than Europeans. Asian and Pacific people were more likely to be living at home than Europeans. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity was associated independently with functional outcomes. The association was attenuated when adjusted for stroke severity and other covariates. The direction of the relationship was not consistent between measures for individual ethnic groups.

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for the Physical Component Summary of the Short Form 36 for patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score's minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for people with stroke. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of data from a large randomized controlled trial (N = 400) in the post-hospital discharge phase of stroke rehabilitation with outcome measurement 6 and 12 months following stroke. Three methods were used for estimating the MCID: two anchor and one distribution. Method 1 compared SF-36 PCS scores at 12 months for responses to the SF-36's Perceived Health Change (PHC) question. Method 2 compared the change in PCS score between 6 and 12 months for responses to the PHC question. Method 3 used Cohen's method to estimate the MCID from the PCS score distribution. RESULTS: Method 1: the mean PCS score increased by 3.0 units (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.9) for each unit change in the PHC question. Method 2: the mean change in PCS score increased by 2.1 units (95% CI 1.4-2.8) for each unit change in the PHC question. Method 3: the MCID was estimated to be 1.8 units. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimate of the MCID for the PCS in patients with stroke was 1.8 to 3.0 units.

Reducing Ethnic and Geographic Inequities to Optimise New Zealand Stroke Care (REGIONS Care): Protocol for a Nationwide Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke systems of care differ between larger urban and smaller rural settings and it is unclear to what extent this may impact on patient outcomes. Ethnicity influences stroke risk factors and care delivery as well as patient outcomes in nonstroke settings. Little is known about the impact of ethnicity on poststroke care, especially in Maori and Pacific populations. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to describe the protocol for the Reducing Ethnic and Geographic Inequities to Optimise New Zealand Stroke Care (REGIONS Care) study. METHODS: This large, nationwide observational study assesses the impact of rurality and ethnicity on best practice stroke care access and outcomes involving all 28 New Zealand hospitals caring for stroke patients, by capturing every stroke patient admitted to hospital during the 2017-2018 study period. In addition, it explores current access barriers through consumer focus groups and consumer, carer, clinician, manager, and policy-maker surveys. It also assesses the economic impact of care provided at different types of hospitals and to patients of different ethnicities and explores the cost-efficacy of individual interventions and care bundles. Finally, it compares manual data collection to routine health administrative data and explores the feasibility of developing outcome models using only administrative data and the cost-efficacy of using additional manually collected registry data. Regarding sample size estimates, in Part 1, Study A, 2400 participants are needed to identify a 10% difference between up to four geographic subgroups at 90% power with an α value of .05 and 10% to 20% loss to follow-up. In Part 1, Study B, a sample of 7645 participants was expected to include an estimated 850 Maori and 419 Pacific patients and to provide over 90% and over 80% power, respectively. Regarding Part 2, 50% of the patient or carer surveys, 40 provider surveys, and 10 focus groups were needed to achieve saturation of themes. The main outcome is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include mRS scores; EQ-5D-3L (5-dimension, 3-level EuroQol questionnaire) scores; stroke recurrence; vascular events; death; readmission at 3, 6, and 12 months; cost of care; and themes around access barriers. RESULTS: The study is underway, with national and institutional ethics approvals in place. A total of 2379 patients have been recruited for Part 1, Study A; 6837 patients have been recruited for Part 1, Study B; 10 focus groups have been conducted and 70 surveys have been completed in Part 2. Data collection has essentially been completed, including follow-up assessment; however, primary and secondary analyses, data linkage, data validation, and health economics analysis are still underway. CONCLUSIONS: The methods of this study may provide the basis for future epidemiological studies that will guide care improvements in other countries and populations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25374.

Taking Charge: A Proposed Psychological Intervention to Improve Pulmonary Rehabilitation Outcomes for People with COPD.

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an important, evidence-based treatment that improves outcomes for people with COPD. Individualized exercise programmes aim to improve exercise capacity; self-management education and psychological support are also provided. Translating increased exercise capacity into sustained behavioural change of increased physical activity is difficult. Other unresolved problems with PR programmes include improving uptake, completion, response and sustaining long-term benefit. We offer a different perspective drawn from clinical experience of PR, quantitative and qualitative studies of singing groups for people with COPD, and stroke rehabilitation research that gives psychological factors a more central role in determining outcomes after PR. We discuss Take Charge; a simple but effective psychological intervention promoting self-management--that could be used as part of a PR programme or in situations where PR was declined or unavailable. This may be particularly relevant now when traditional face-to-face group programmes have been disrupted by COVID-19 precautions.