Grading Fractures on Foot and Ankle X-rays and MRI Scans in the Active Charcot Foot in Diabetes: How Strong Is the Agreement Between Modalities?

OBJECTIVE: To compare X-ray and MRI as diagnostic tests of active Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO) in diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: X-rays and MRI scans of 48 participants were rated for severity of fracture (0 = no fracture, 1 = fracture, 2 = collapse/fragmentation), and for absence/presence of bone marrow edema (BME) on MRI and absence/presence of bone injury on X-ray. The agreement between modalities was assessed with tests for symmetry, marginal homogeneity, and κ-coefficients. RESULTS: X-ray underscored MRI in grading fractures in the metatarsals (P = 0.05) and tarsals (P < 0.001) and reported as normal 79% of the bones with BME. The agreement between X-ray and MRI for grading severity of fracture was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.53; P < 0.001) and for detecting bone injury, slight to fair (κ = 0.17; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant underperformance of X-ray in the assessment of the hot, swollen foot in diabetes should be considered when confirming or refuting the diagnosis of active CNO.

Effect of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone (1-84) on Resolution of Active Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy in Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Fractures in Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) often fail to heal despite prolonged immobilization with below-knee casting. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) in reducing time to resolution of CN and healing of fractures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: People with diabetes and acute (active) Charcot foot were randomized (double-blind) to either full-length PTH (1-84) or placebo therapy, both in addition to below-knee casting and calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation. The primary outcome was resolution of CN, defined as a skin foot temperature difference >2°C at two consecutive monthly visits. RESULTS: Median time to resolution was 5 months (95% CI 4, 12) in intervention and 6 months (95% CI 2, 9) in control. On univariate mixed Cox and logistic regression, there was no significant difference in time to resolution between the groups (P = 0.64) or in the likelihood of resolution (P = 0.66). The hazard ratio of resolution was 0.84 (95% CI 0.41, 1.74; P = 0.64), and the odds ratio of resolution by 12 months was 0.80 (95% CI 0.3, 2.13; P = 0.66) (intervention vs. control). On linear regression analysis, there were no significant differences in the effect of treatment on fracture scores quantitated on MRI scans (coefficient 0.13 [95% CI -0.62, 0.88]; P = 0.73) and on foot and ankle X-rays (coefficient 0.30 [95% CI -0.03, 0.63]; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This double-blind placebo-controlled trial did not reduce time to resolution or enhance fracture healing of CN. There was no added benefit of daily intervention with PTH (1-84) to below-knee casting in achieving earlier resolution of CN.

The prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular morphology in young adults and its effect on functional hip scores.

Pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of forty five young adults were reviewed and the alpha angle was calculated. The patients were selected on the basis of an age of less than 40 years and the absence of any CT evidence of previous hip pathology. An alpha angle of >55º was considered positive for cam morphology. The non-arthritic hip score and the University of California Los Angeles activity score were completed by the selected group of patients. The mean age of the individuals was 33 years (range, 20 to 40). The mean alpha angle at the superoinferior position of the anterosuperior quadrant of the femoral neck was 50.1º on the right side and 49.6º on the left. The prevalence of cam morphology was found to be 20% in the right hip and 17.7% in the left hip. There was a relatively higher prevalence of cam morphology in men. We also compared the functional scores of patients with an alpha angle >55º and those with an alpha angle =55º. We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups for both scores.

Lymphangioma of the penis: a rare anomaly.

Lymphatic malformations are known to affect any part of the body. However, lymphangiomas involving the penile skin are rare. We report a case of a cutaneous lymphatic malformation of the penis.