Safety and immunogenicity of a fully liquid vaccine containing five-component pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus-inactivated poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines administered at two, four, six and 18 months of age.

OBJECTIVE: The safety, immunogenicity and lot consistency of a fully liquid, five-component acellular pertussis combination vaccine, comprised of diphteria, tetanus and acellular pertussis, inactivated polio vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-IPV-Hib [Pediacel, sanofi pasteur, Canada]) were assessed and compared with that of Hib vaccine reconstituted with the five-component acellular pertussis combination vaccine (DTaP-IPV//Hib, Pentacel [sanofi pasteur, Canada]). METHODS: Infants were recruited at vaccine study centres in Montreal, Quebec; Simon Fraser Health Region, British Columbia, and southern Alberta after the protocol had been approved by the relevant institutional ethics committees. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all subjects. At two months of age, the infants were randomly assigned to receive one of three consecutive production lots of DTaP-IPV-Hib by intramuscular injection. Reactions to vaccinations were assessed by parental observation and through telephone interviews conducted by study nurses. Blood samples were obtained at two, six, seven, 18 and 19 months of age for measurement of antibodies to vaccine antigens. RESULTS: Most injection site and systemic reactions were mild or moderate, and of brief duration. All infants were protected against tetanus, diphtheria and all three polio serotypes after both primary and booster vaccinations. Antibody responses to pertussis antigens were similar to those observed in Swedish infants, in whom the five-component vaccine was shown to be 85% effective. Proportions of infants with antipolyribosylribitol phosphate antibody of 0.15 mug/mL or greater and 1.0 mug/mL or greater, were 97.9% and 88.9%, respectively, following primary immunization, and 100% and 99% following booster vaccination. Safety and immunogenicity results with both reconstituted and fully liquid combination vaccines were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The fully liquid combination vaccine was comparable in terms of safety and immunogenicity with the reconstituted combination vaccine.

Safety and immunogenicity of a toddler dose following an infant series of a hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B vaccine administered concurrently or at separate visits with a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Combination diphtheria-tetanus-5 component acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B vaccine (DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB) administered either concurrently with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) or 1 month apart was generally safe and immunogenic at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. This study examined the effects of a booster dose at age 15 months. METHODS: Participants were randomized to DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB plus PCV7, DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB with PCV7 administered 1 month later or a pentavalent DTaP5-IPV/Hib plus HepB plus PCV7 at 15 months of age in a randomized, open-label, phase IIb clinical trial. Immunogenicity endpoints were rates of seroresponse to pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbriae types 2 and 3; rates of seroprotection against (Hib) polyribosylribitol phosphate capsular polysaccharide, hepatitis B surface antigen, diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3; and geometric mean titers to all vaccine antigens. Safety endpoints included solicited injection-site reactions and systemic and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Seroresponse/seroprotection rates for all antigens exceeded prespecified criteria in both groups that received the hexavalent DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB; in the group that received the currently licensed pentavalent vaccine, seroresponse/seroprotection rates exceeded the criteria for all antigens except filamentous hemagglutinin. Seroresponse rates were ≥88.9% for pertussis antigens and seroprotection rates against polyribosylribitol phosphate capsular polysaccharide, hepatitis B surface antigen, diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and poliovirus antigens were ≥95.1% in recipients of DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB. CONCLUSIONS: DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB administered concomitantly with PCV7 or 1 month apart at 15 months of age following the infant series was well-tolerated and elicited antibody responses to all vaccine antigens, with no significant interference from concomitant PCV7 administration (clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT00362427).

Safety and immunogenicity of a hexavalent vaccine administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with or without a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB, an investigational hexavalent combination vaccine, was evaluated for safety and immunogenicity, when administered to infants with heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7). METHODS: Infants were randomized to receive DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB plus PCV7, DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB with PCV7 administered 1 month later or DTaP5-IPV/Hib plus HepB plus PCV7 at 2, 4 and 6 months of age in an open-label, phase IIb trial. Vaccine responses were assessed by pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbriae types 2/3 seroconversion rates, Haemophilus influenzae type b polyribosylribitol phosphate capsular polysaccharide, hepatitis B surface antigen, diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 seroprotection rates and geometric mean titers. Solicited injection site and systemic reactions, serious adverse events, and other safety outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Seroprotection rates to polyribosylribitol phosphate, hepatitis B surface antigen, diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and poliovirus antigens across all groups met or exceeded predetermined acceptability criteria. Seroconversion rates to pertussis toxoid, pertactin and fimbriae types 2/3, but not filamentous hemagglutinin, met such criteria. Antidiphtheria antibodies were significantly lower when PCV7 was coadministered. Geometric mean titers to the other antigens of the hexavalent and PCV7 vaccines were all high and similar in the 2 groups. No safety signals were noted. CONCLUSIONS: DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age concomitantly with PCV7 was well tolerated and elicited robust antibody responses to all but the antidiphtheria antigens for which there may be evidence of immune interference. Only filamentous hemagglutinin did not meet seroconversion rate acceptability criteria.

Immune responses in adults to revaccination with a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine 10 years after a previous dose.

BACKGROUND: Although decennial adult boosters of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids are recommended in Canada and the United States, a second dose of pertussis vaccine during adulthood is not currently recommended. METHODS: This open-label, multicenter study compared the safety and immunogenicity of a first dose of an adult formulation of tetanus, diphtheria, and acelluar pertussis vaccine (Tdap) with a repeat dose of Tdap in adults who had received Tdap 10 years previously. RESULTS: A total of 769 participants ranging in age from 20 to 72 years took part in this study; 92.3% of naïve and 92.7% of repeat-dose participants had at least one solicited adverse event. Injection-site pain (84.4% and 87.8%), erythema (29.7% and 23.1%), and swelling (23.3% and 20.5%), and myalgia (53.5% and 60.1%), headache (37.6% and 40.6%), malaise (29.0% and 29.4%), and fever (4.9% and 4.2%) were the most common solicited adverse events reported in the naïve and repeat-dose groups, respectively. Postvaccination antibody levels ≥0.1 IU/mL were achieved by 99.7% of the naïve-group participants and all of the repeat-dose participants for tetanus and 96.1% of the naïve group and 98.5% of the repeat-dose group for diphtheria, both meeting the predefined noninferiority criteria. For pertussis antibodies, anti-PT (89.2 EU/mL vs. 116 EU/mL) was higher in the repeat-dose group, anti-FHA (249 vs. 214) and anti-PRN (216 vs. 266) were similar, and anti-FIM (1015 vs. 779) was higher in the naïve group. Noninferiority criteria were met for all antigens except for anti-FIM. CONCLUSION: A repeat dose of Tdap vaccine 10 years after the first dose was well tolerated and immunogenic in adults (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00712959).

Tolerability and antibody response in adolescents and adults revaccinated with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed (Tdap) 4-5 years after a previous dose.

BACKGROUND: Although decennial adult boosters of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids are recommended in Canada and the United States, a second dose of pertussis vaccine is not currently recommended for adults. METHODS: This open-label, postmarketing, multicenter study evaluated the tolerability and immunogenicity of a second dose of an adult formulation of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in adolescents and adults 5 years after a first dose. RESULTS: A total of 545 participants from previous Tdap vaccine studies, ranging in age from 15 to 69 years, participated in this study. Of these participants, 94.2% had at least one solicited adverse event after the booster dose such as injection-site erythema (28.6%), swelling (25.6%), or pain (87.6%) or a systemic adverse event such as myalgia (61.0%), headache (53.2%), malaise (38.2%), or fever (6.5%). These adverse events were slightly more frequent than after the initial dose. Postvaccination, 100% of participants had a tetanus antibody level ≥0.10IU/mL and 95% had a diphtheria antibody level ≥0.10IU/mL. For pertussis, 82.1% (pertussis toxoid), 96.7% (filamentous hemagglutinin), 95.6% (pertactin), and 99.8% (fimbriae) had a postvaccination antibody threshold of ≥50EU/mL. CONCLUSION: A second dose of Tdap vaccine 5 years after the initial dose was well tolerated and immunogenic in adolescents and adults.

A dose-ranging study of a subunit Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A vaccine with and without aluminum phosphate adjuvantation in adults > or =65 years of age.

We studied the safety and immunogenicity of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-A vaccine containing subunit antigens F, G and M in older persons, and its effect on influenza vaccine immunogenicity. In a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, blinded trial 561 adults > or =65 years of age at five Canadian sites were randomized to one intramuscular injection of either 100, 50 or 25 microg RSV-A-alum vaccine or 100 microg non-adjuvanted RSV-A vaccine, or alum-placebo. All participants were offered inactivated influenza vaccine on day 32. Immunization was well tolerated and reactogenicity was similar between the RSV and influenza vaccines and the alum-placebo. Only the 100 microg non-adjuvanted RSV vaccine achieved the primary immunogenicity outcome of eliciting a > or =4-fold rise in neutralizing antibody (NA) titres against RSV-A in > or =50% of participants at day 32. Geometric mean titres against RSV-A and -B at all points were comparable in 100 microg adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted groups. At day 32, a > or =4-fold haemagluttinin inhibition (HI) antibody response or HI > or =40 to Influenza (A-H3N2) was seen in >74% of participants; no difference was seen between groups. A subunit non-alum-containing RSV-A vaccine was well tolerated in a large population > or =65 years and did not interfere with influenza vaccine immunogenicity. This RSV-A-based vaccine demonstrated NA rise which could provide seasonal protection against severe RSV illnesses from RSV-A or -B and warrants further testing to determine its efficacy in the prevention of clinical illness in elderly persons.

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of concomitant and sequential administration of an adult formulation tetanus and diphtheria toxoids adsorbed combined with acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults.

The annual contact for influenza vaccination provides an opportunity to ensure that adults have received other recommended vaccines such as Tdap. Healthy 19-64 year-olds were randomized to receive concomitant administration of Tdap and influenza vaccines or influenza vaccine followed (in 4-6 weeks by) Tdap. 720 participants were enrolled. No clinically relevant between-group differences were observed in the rates or severities of erythema, swelling, or pain at the Tdap injection site. Injection-site pain was the most commonly reported adverse event (66.6% concomitant administration group versus 60.8% sequential administration group); most pain was graded as mild and resolved by day 3. Seroprotection and seroresponse rates for all influenza strains were comparable between the two groups. For diphtheria and tetanus, seroprotection rates and post-vaccination GMTs were non-inferior in the concomitant administration group compared to the sequential administration group. A trend for lower antibody responses to pertussis antigens PT, FHA, and FIM was observed after concomitant administration and, for PRN, this difference failed the non-inferiority criteria. While there is a small diminution in antibody response to tetanus and pertussis antigens, concomitant administration of Tdap and influenza vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic and may offer practical advantages including convenience, compliance, and cost-savings.