Racial and Sex Disparities in Catheter Use and Dialysis Access in the United States Medicare Population.

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to increase arteriovenous fistula and graft use, 80% of patients in the United States start hemodialysis on a central venous catheter (CVC). METHODS: To better understand in incident hemodialysis patients how sex and race/ethnicity are associated with time on a central venous catheter and transition to an arteriovenous fistula and graft, our observational cohort study analyzed US Renal Data System data for patients with incident ESKD aged ≥66 years who started hemodialysis on a CVC in July 2010 through 2013. RESULTS: At 1 year, 32.7% of 74,194 patients transitioned to an arteriovenous fistula, 10.8% transitioned to an arteriovenous graft, 32.1% stayed on a CVC, and 24.5% died. Women spent a significantly longer time on a CVC than men. Compared with white patients, patients who were black, Hispanic, or of another racial/ethnicity minority spent significantly more days on a CVC. In competing risk regression, women were significantly less likely than men to transition to a fistula and more likely to transition to a graft. Compared with white patients, blacks were significantly less likely to transition to a fistula but more likely to transition to a graft, Hispanics were significantly more likely to transition to a fistula, and other races/ethnicities were significantly more likely to transition to either a fistula or a graft. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients spend a longer time on a CVC and are less likely to transition to permanent access. Compared with white patients, minorities also spend longer time on a CVC, but are more likely to eventually transition to permanent access. Strategies to speed transition to permanent access should target groups that currently lag in this area.

Racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting for deceased donor kidney transplantation 1 year after implementation of the new national kidney allocation system.

The impact of a new national kidney allocation system (KAS) on access to the national deceased-donor waiting list (waitlisting) and racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting among US end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is unknown. We examined waitlisting pre- and post-KAS among incident (N = 1 253 100) and prevalent (N = 1 556 954) ESRD patients from the United States Renal Data System database (2005-2015) using multivariable time-dependent Cox and interrupted time-series models. The adjusted waitlisting rate among incident patients was 9% lower post-KAS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.93), although preemptive waitlisting increased from 30.2% to 35.1% (P < .0001). The waitlisting decrease is largely due to a decline in inactively waitlisted patients. Pre-KAS, blacks had a 19% lower waitlisting rate vs whites (HR: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82); following KAS, disparity declined to 12% (HR: 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.90). In adjusted time-series analyses of prevalent patients, waitlisting rates declined by 3.45/10 000 per month post-KAS (P < .001), resulting in ≈146 fewer waitlisting events/month. Shorter dialysis vintage was associated with greater decreases in waitlisting post-KAS (P < .001). Racial disparity reduction was due in part to a steeper decline in inactive waitlisting among minorities and a greater proportion of actively waitlisted minority patients. Waitlisting and racial disparity in waitlisting declined post-KAS; however, disparity remains.

Loss to Follow-up in Adolescent and Young Adult Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Patients' loss to follow-up (LFU) has significant impacts on outcomes and is a barrier to improving care, especially in adolescent and young adult (AYA) renal transplant recipients. There is limited information regarding the relationship between transfer of care from pediatric to adult transplant centers, age, and LFU among AYA renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We studied 16 386 individuals aged 10-29 years who received kidney transplants between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The primary outcome was LFU, which was defined as >1 year without follow-up in a transplant clinic/program. Death or graft failure within a year of the last follow-up was not classified as LFU. We performed a retrospective cohort study describing LFU using Pearson's chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the change in likelihood of LFU associated with recipient characteristics and institution transfer. RESULTS: In total, 22.26% (n = 3647) of our study population met criteria for LFU. About 11.17% (n = 1830) transferred institutions during the study period. LFU occurred in 50.18% of recipients who transferred institutions. LFU peaked at the age of 20 years, with 7.4% of 20-year-olds having LFU. The odds of LFU among renal transplant recipients who transferred institutions were 3.36 times greater (95% confidence interval, 3.1-3.6) than the odds of LFU among those who did not transfer institutions. CONCLUSIONS: LFU is a critical problem faced by AYA renal transplant recipients, and institution transfer is a significant risk factor for LFU. Additional studies investigating the interplay between age, institution transfer, and LFU in the AYA population are still needed.

A "Patch" to the NYU Emergency Department Visit Algorithm.

OBJECTIVE: To document erosion in the New York University Emergency Department (ED) visit algorithm's capability to classify ED visits and to provide a "patch" to the algorithm. DATA SOURCES: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. STUDY DESIGN: We used bivariate models to assess whether the percentage of visits unclassifiable by the algorithm increased due to annual changes to ICD-9 diagnosis codes. We updated the algorithm with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes added since 2001. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The percentage of unclassifiable visits increased from 11.2 percent in 2006 to 15.5 percent in 2012 (p < .01), because of new diagnosis codes. Our update improves the classification rate by 43 percent in 2012 (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our patch significantly improves the precision and usefulness of the most commonly used ED visit classification system in health services research.

New Kidney Allocation System Associated With Increased Rates Of Transplants Among Black And Hispanic Patients.

Before the 2014 implementation of a new kidney allocation system by the United Network for Organ Sharing, white patients were more likely than black or Hispanic patients to receive a kidney transplant. To determine the effect of the new allocation system on these disparities, we examined data for 179,071 transplant waiting list events in the period June 2013-September 2016, and we calculated monthly transplantation rates (34,133 patients actually received transplants). Implementation of the new system was associated with a narrowing of the disparities in the average monthly transplantation rates by 0.29 percentage point for blacks compared to whites and by 0.24 percentage point for Hispanics compared to whites, which resulted in both disparities becoming nonsignificant after implementation of the new system.