Physiological characterization of gastric emptying using high-resolution antropyloroduodenal manometry.

Delayed gastric emptying (GE) has been associated with antral and pyloric dysmotility. We aimed to characterize differences in the antral, duodenal, and pyloric motility profiles associated with delayed GE, using high-resolution antropyloroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM). Patients referred for HR-ADM for dyspeptic symptoms performed a concurrent GE breath test (NCT01519180 and NCT04918329). HR-ADM involved 36 sensors 1 cm apart, placed across the pylorus. Interdigestive and postprandial periods were identified. Antral, pyloric, and duodenal motor profiles were analyzed recording the frequency, amplitude, and propagative nature of contractions for each period. Plots of patients with normal and delayed GE were compared. Sixty patients underwent both HR-ADM and GE tests. Twenty-five and 35 patients had delayed and normal GE, respectively. Antral and duodenal motor profiles were not different between the two groups during the interdigestive period. During the postprandial period, a lower frequency of antral contractions was associated with delayed GE (2.22 vs. 1.39 contractions/min; P = 0.002), but no difference in mean contraction amplitude was observed. The pyloric region was identified in all the patients and pylorospasms, defined as 3 min of repeated isolated pyloric contractions, were more frequent in patients with delayed GE (32.0% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.02) during the postprandial period. No difference in duodenal contraction profiles was observed. Manometric profile alterations were observed in 72% of the patients with delayed GE, with 56% having a low frequency of antral contractions. Using HR-ADM, patients with delayed GE displayed different postprandial antropyloric motility as compared with patients with normal GE.NEW & NOTEWORTHY High-resolution antropyloroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM) allows precise characterization of antral, pyloric, and duodenal motility, although its association with gastric emptying (GE) has been poorly investigated. Concurrent HR-ADM with GE measurement showed a lower frequency of antral postprandial contractions and an increased frequency of postprandial pylorospasms in patients with delayed GE. HR-ADM could, therefore, be useful in the future to better select patients for treatments targeting the pylorus.

Alterations in gastrointestinal motility assessed by high-resolution antroduodenal manometry in patients with severe disorders of gut-brain interaction.

INTRODUCTION: Data are limited regarding gastrointestinal motility disturbance in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). This study aimed to characterize antroduodenal motor alterations in patients using high-resolution antroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM). METHODS: HR-ADM was performed in patients with severe DGBI and compared with healthy volunteers (HV). HR-ADM used a commercially available probe composed of 36 electronic sensors spaced 1 cm apart and positioned across the pylorus. Antral and duodenal motor high-resolution profiles were analyzed, based on the frequency, amplitude, and contractile integral/sensor (CI/s) calculated for each phase of the migrating motor complex (MMC). RESULTS: Eighteen HV and 64 patients were investigated, 10 with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 24 with functional dyspepsia (FD), 15 with overlap IBS-FD, and 15 with other DGBI. Compared with HV, patients had a lower frequency of phase II duodenal contractions (27 per hour vs 51; p=0.002) and a lower duodenal phase II contraction amplitude (70 mmHg vs 100; p=0.01) resulting in a lower CI/s of phase II (833 mmHg.cm.s vs 1901; p<0.001) in the duodenum. In addition, the frequency of phase II propagated antroduodenal contractions was lower (5 per hour vs 11; p<0.001) in patients, as compared to HV. Interestingly, the antral CI/s of phase III was decreased in FD patients, but not in IBS patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe DGBI display alterations in antral and intestinal motility assessed using commercially available HR-ADM. Whether these alterations may explain symptom profiles in such patients remains to be confirmed. (NCT04918329 and NCT01519180).

Global Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Comorbidity With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interactions.

INTRODUCTION: This study focused on defining the global prevalence of clinically relevant levels of psychological distress and somatic symptoms and the prevalence of coexistence between these symptoms and disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We also analyzed how clinically relevant psychological distress and somatic symptoms and coexistent DGBI are associated with health-related outcomes. METHODS: We included a representative sample of 54,127 adult participants (49.1% women; mean age of 44.3 years) from 26 countries worldwide. Participants completed an Internet survey (the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study) with validated self-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Clinically relevant psychological distress and/or somatic symptom severity was reported by 37.5% of the sample. These participants had 4.45 times higher odds to have at least one DGBI than individuals without psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms. Compared with participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms with vs without DGBI, participants with a DGBI reported increased healthcare and medication utilization (with OR from 1.6 to 2.8). Coexistent DGBI in participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms was the variable most strongly associated with reduced mental (ß = -0.77; confidence interval [-0.86 to -0.68]) and physical (ß = -1.17; confidence interval [-1.24 to -1.10]) quality of life. DISCUSSION: This global study shows that psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and DGBI are very common and frequently overlap. The coexistence between psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI seems to be especially detrimental to quality of life and healthcare utilization. Individuals with psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI coexistence seem to be a group vulnerable to psychosocial problems that should be studied further and would likely benefit from psychological/psychiatric interventions.

Identification of bacterial lipopeptides as key players in IBS.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies revealed that early-life adverse events contribute to the development of IBS in adulthood. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between prenatal stress (PS), gut microbiota and visceral hypersensitivity with a focus on bacterial lipopeptides containing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). DESIGN: We developed a model of PS in mice and evaluated, in adult offspring, visceral hypersensitivity to colorectal distension (CRD), colon inflammation, barrier function and gut microbiota taxonomy. We quantified the production of lipopeptides containing GABA by mass spectrometry in a specific strain of bacteria decreased in PS, in PS mouse colons, and in faeces of patients with IBS and healthy volunteers (HVs). Finally, we assessed their effect on PS-induced visceral hypersensitivity. RESULTS: Prenatally stressed mice of both sexes presented visceral hypersensitivity, no overt colon inflammation or barrier dysfunction but a gut microbiota dysbiosis. The dysbiosis was distinguished by a decreased abundance of Ligilactobacillus murinus, in both sexes, inversely correlated with visceral hypersensitivity to CRD in mice. An isolate from this bacterial species produced several lipopeptides containing GABA including C14AsnGABA. Interestingly, intracolonic treatment with C14AsnGABA decreased the visceral sensitivity of PS mice to CRD. The concentration of C16LeuGABA, a lipopeptide which inhibited sensory neurons activation, was decreased in faeces of patients with IBS compared with HVs. CONCLUSION: PS impacts the gut microbiota composition and metabolic function in adulthood. The reduced capacity of the gut microbiota to produce GABA lipopeptides could be one of the mechanisms linking PS and visceral hypersensitivity in adulthood.

Food Avoidance and Restriction in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Relevance for Symptoms, Quality of Life and Nutrient Intake.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Neither food intake nor the clinical characteristics of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients with severe food avoidance and restriction have been investigated. The aim of our study was to identify those patients and to characterize their symptoms, quality of life, and nutrient intake. METHODS: IBS patients who completed the IBS Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QOL) at our secondar and tertiary center were included. The 3 questions constituting the food domain were used to identify patients with reported severe food avoidance and restriction. The patients also completed validated questionnaires to assess stool form (Bristol Stool Form), gastrointestinal (GI) symptom severity (z score of IBS Severity Scoring System and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-IBS), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), GI-specific anxiety (Visceral Sensitivity Index), and somatic symptom severity (z score of Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Patient Health Questionnaire-15). A 4-day food diary was used to analyze food intake in 246 patients. RESULTS: We included 955 IBS patients (75 % women; mean age 38.3 ± 13.3 years). In total, 13.2 % of the patients reported severe food avoidance and restriction, and in these patients all aspects of quality of life were lower (P < .01) and psychological, GI, and somatic symptoms were more severe (P < .05). Reported severe food avoidance and restriction was associated with lower total energy intake (P = .002) and lower intake of protein (P = .001) and carbohydrates (P = .005). In a logistic regression analysis, loose stools were found to be independently associated with reported severe food avoidance and restriction (R2 = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: IBS patients with severe food avoidance and restriction constitute a subgroup with more severe symptoms overall, reduced quality of life, and reduced intake of nutrients. This needs to be acknowledged in the clinical management of these patients.

Global prevalence and burden of meal-related abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND: Patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) report meal intake to be associated with symptoms. DGBI patients with meal-related symptoms may have more severe symptoms overall and worse health outcomes, but this subgroup has not been well characterized. We aimed to describe the global prevalence of meal-related abdominal pain and characterize this subgroup. METHODS: The data analyzed originated from the Internet survey component of the population-based Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study, completed in 26 countries (n = 54,127). Adult subjects were asked whether they had abdominal pain and how often this was meal-related. Respondents were categorized into "no," "occasional," and "frequent" meal-related abdominal pain groups based on 0%, 10-40%, and ≥50% of the pain episodes being meal-related, respectively. DGBI diagnoses, frequency of other GI symptoms, psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilization were compared between groups. Mixed linear and ordinal regression was used to assess independent associations between psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, quality of life, other GI symptoms, and meal-related abdominal pain. RESULTS: Overall, 51.9% of the respondents reported abdominal pain in the last 3 months, and 11.0% belonged to the group with frequent meal-related abdominal pain, which included more females and younger subjects. DGBI diagnoses were more common in subjects with frequent meal-related abdominal pain, and the frequency of several GI symptoms was associated with having more frequent meal-related abdominal pain. Having meal-related abdominal pain more frequently was also associated with more severe psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, and a poorer quality of life. The group with frequent meal-related abdominal pain also more often consulted a doctor for bowel problems compared to the other groups of meal-related abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Reporting frequent meal-related abdominal pain is common across the globe and associated with other GI and non-GI somatic symptoms, psychological distress, healthcare utilization, and a poorer quality of life. Individuals who frequently experience meal-related abdominal pain also more frequently fulfill the diagnostic criteria for DGBI. Assessing meal-related symptoms in all DGBI patients could be of major importance to improve and individualize symptom management.

Relationship Between Abuse History and Gastrointestinal and Extraintestinal Symptom Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the associations between the different abuse types, and gastrointestinal (GI) and extraintestinal symptom severity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and possible mediators of these relationships. METHODS: We assessed sexual and physical abuse in childhood and adulthood with the Drossman and Leserman abuse questionnaire, whereas GI and extraintestinal symptoms were assessed with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Symptom Check List-90 Revised. General linear models with bootstrapping tested the mediating role of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and GI-specific anxiety and rectal pain threshold. A path model analysis testing all relationships simultaneously was also performed. RESULTS: Among our 186 patients with IBS, an overall history of abuse (i.e., at least one type) was found in 37%. The effects of child and adult sexual abuse on GI symptom severity were fully mediated by GI-specific anxiety and rectal pain threshold (F = 21.540, R2 = 0.43, and F = 22.330, R2 = 0.44, respectively; p < .001 for both). The effect of adult sexual abuse and child physical abuse on extraintestinal symptom severity was fully mediated by GI-specific anxiety, depressive symptoms, and rectal pain threshold, whereas the effect of child sexual abuse was partially mediated (F = 14.992, R2 = 0.28; F = 15.065, R2 = 0.30; and F = 18.037, R2 = 0.32, respectively; p < .001 for all). When analyzed in a single path model, child sexual abuse and adult physical abuse only had a direct effect on extraintestinal symptom severity, whereas child physical abuse had an indirect effect through depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Abuse is associated with increased GI and extraintestinal symptom severity in IBS. These associations are mediated by levels of GI-specific anxiety, depressive symptoms, and rectal sensitivity.

Positive Effect of Bimodal Release Ondansetron in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: Relevance of Low-Grade Inflammation?

There is a clear unmet need for new treatments in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Ondansetron, an old 5-hydroxy-tryptamine3 antagonist, used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and with favorable side effect profile, has shown promising results in previous trials. In this issue, efficacy with a novel bimodal release ondansetron formulation was presented in IBS-D. The bimodal release ondansetron improved stool consistency, presumably by slowing transit time, and tended to improve other IBS symptoms as well. The authors proposed C-reactive protein levels as a tool to select responders because a better response was seen in patients with slightly elevated C-reactive protein levels. Future large-scale studies will determine the role of bimodal release ondansetron in IBS-D with and without low-grade inflammation.

Fructose malabsorption induces cholecystokinin expression in the ileum and cecum by changing microbiota composition and metabolism.

Current fructose consumption levels often overwhelm the intestinal capacity to absorb fructose. We investigated the impact of fructose malabsorption on intestinal endocrine function and addressed the role of the microbiota in this process. To answer this question, a mouse model of moderate fructose malabsorption [ketohexokinase mutant (KHK)-/-] and wild-type (WT) littermate mice were used and received a 20%-fructose (KHK-F and WT-F) or 20%-glucose diet. Cholecystokinin (Cck) mRNA and protein expression in the ileum and cecum, as well as preproglucagon (Gcg) and neurotensin (Nts) mRNA expression in the cecum, increased in KHK-F mice. In KHK-F mice, triple-label immunohistochemistry showed major up-regulation of CCK in enteroendocrine cells (EECs) that were glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)+/Peptide YY (PYY-) in the ileum and colon and GLP-1-/PYY- in the cecum. The cecal microbiota composition was drastically modified in the KHK-F in association with an increase in glucose, propionate, succinate, and lactate concentrations. Antibiotic treatment abolished fructose malabsorption-dependent induction of cecal Cck mRNA expression and, in mouse GLUTag and human NCI-H716 cells, Cck mRNA expression levels increased in response to propionate, both suggesting a microbiota-dependent process. Fructose reaching the lower intestine can modify the composition and metabolism of the microbiota, thereby stimulating the production of CCK from the EECs possibly in response to propionate.-Zhang, X., Grosfeld, A., Williams, E., Vasiliauskas, D., Barretto, S., Smith, L., Mariadassou, M., Philippe, C., Devime, F., Melchior, C., Gourcerol, G., Dourmap, N., Lapaque, N., Larraufie, P., Blottière, H. M., Herberden, C., Gerard, P., Rehfeld, J. F., Ferraris, R. P., Fritton, J. C., Ellero-Simatos, S., Douard, V. Fructose malabsorption induces cholecystokinin expression in the ileum and cecum by changing microbiota composition and metabolism.

Fructose and irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder characterised by recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort and transit disturbances with heterogeneous pathophysiological mechanisms. The link between food and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms is often reported by patients with IBS and the role of fructose has recently been highlighted. Fructose malabsorption can easily be assessed by hydrogen and/or methane breath test in response to 25 g fructose; and its prevalence is about 22 % in patients with IBS. The mechanism of fructose-related symptoms is incompletely understood. Osmotic load, fermentation and visceral hypersensitivity are likely to participate in GI symptoms in the IBS population and may be triggered or worsened by fructose. A low-fructose diet could be integrated in the overall treatment strategy, but its role and implication in the improvement of IBS symptoms should be evaluated. In the present review, we discuss fructose malabsorption in adult patients with IBS and the interest of a low-fructose diet in order to underline the important role of fructose in IBS.

Assessment of anal sphincter distensibility following the STARR procedure: a pilot study.

Aim: The STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection) procedure consists of a surgical correction of symptomatic rectocele refractory to medical treatment, involving anal dilatation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the STARR procedure on anal distensibility using EndoFLIP® device.Methods: All female patients with a minimal rectocele of 3 cm and with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) refractory to medical treatment were included prospectively. Patients with previous anal incontinence were not included. Wexner, ODS and Kess scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasounds and EndoFLIP® measurements were performed pre-surgery and 3 months following the STARR procedure. The distensibility index (DI) at 40 mL of inflation at rest was the primary study endpoint.Results: Seven patients (median age: 52.5, range: 44-62) were included between 2014 and 2017. The DI after surgery was the same as the pre-surgery DI. No patient developed symptoms of faecal incontinence or urge to defecate in the three months following the STARR procedure. All patients reported an improvement in their ODS and Kess scores three months after the STARR procedure. No anal sphincter defects were detected by endoanal ultrasound.Conclusion: Anal dilatation did not appear to alter anal distensibility in patients with a normal anal function before the STARR procedure.

Pyloric distensibility measurement predicts symptomatic response to intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have reported that pyloric distensibility was altered in 30% to 50% of patients with gastroparesis, and this was correlated with gastric emptying and symptom severity. The aim of this study was to assess whether pyloric distensibility measurement was predictive of symptomatic response after intrapyloric botulinum toxin (BT) injection. METHODS: Pyloric distensibility was measured using the EndoFLIP system (Crospon, Galway, Ireland) before intrapyloric BT injection. Altered pyloric distensibility was defined as distensibility below 10 mm2/mm Hg. Total symptomatic score (TSS), dyspeptic symptoms, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and gastric emptying were investigated prospectively before and 3 months after BT injection. RESULTS: Nineteen of 35 patients had altered pyloric distensibility. In those patients, TSS decreased at 3 months from 13.5 to 10.5 (P < .01), whereas it remained unchanged in patients with normal pyloric distensibility (P = .7). Gastric fullness (from 3.5 to 2.5; P = .03) and bloating (from 3.0 to 2.0; P = .01) were the only symptoms that improved in patients with altered pyloric distensibility, whereas none of them was improved in patients with normal pyloric distensibility. GIQLI score increased from 59.5 to 76.5 in patients with altered pyloric distensibility (P = .02), whereas there was no statistical difference (P = .43) in patients with normal pyloric distensibility. In patients with altered pyloric distensibility, gastric emptying half time was 223 minutes before and 190 minutes 3 months after injection (P = .02), whereas it remained unchanged in patients with normal pyloric distensibility (P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: Pyloric distensibility measurement before intrapyloric BT injection predicted symptomatic and quality of life response 3 months after injection in patients with gastroparesis.

[Management of functional bowel disorders]. / Traitement des troubles fonctionnels intestinaux.

Management of functional bowel disorders. The better knowledge of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional bloating pathogenic mechanisms led to an increase of the possible therapeutic options, which are somewhat different, in IBS, between IBS-D and IBS-C Besides routine options (antispasmodics, alverine, laxatives, loperamide), low-dose antidepressants and non-pharmaceutical options are now recognized as validated and effective therapeutic choices. In addition, dietary advices (particularly indication of a low FODMAPs diet) and treatments acting on gut microbiota (probiotics, antibiotics) are more and more discussed and indicated. In functional bloating, treatment remains empirical. Dietary modifications, simeticone, prokinetics, low-dose antidepressants and microbiome modulation can be proposed.

Traitement des troubles fonctionnels intestinaux. Les progrès effectués dans la compréhension de la physiopathologie du syndrome de l'intestin irritable (SII) mais aussi du ballonnement fonctionnel ont conduit à une diversification des solutions thérapeutiques potentielles. Dans le SII, celles-ci sont fonction du sous-type de syndrome, diarrhéique et avec constipation. À côté des médicaments classiques (antispasmodiques, alvérine, laxatifs, lopéramide), les antidépresseurs à faibles doses et les alternatives non médicamenteuses trouvent désormais une place. Surtout, l'utilité d'un régime, notamment appauvri en FODMAP, et les solutions visant à agir sur la flore (probiotiques, antibiotiques) sont de plus en plus discutées. Dans le ballonnement fonctionnel, la prise en charge demeure empirique. Conseils diététiques, prokinétiques, antidépresseurs à faibles doses et agents actifs sur la flore peuvent être testés.

The effect of intravenous corticotropin-releasing hormone administration on esophageal sensitivity and motility in health.

Esophageal hypersensitivity is important in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients who are refractory to acid-suppressive therapy. Stress affects visceral sensitivity and exacerbates heartburn in GERD. Peripheral CRH is a key mediator of the gut stress response. We hypothesize that CRH increases esophageal sensitivity and alters esophageal motility in health. Esophageal sensitivity to thermal, mechanical, electrical, and chemical stimuli was assessed in 14 healthy subjects after administration of placebo or CRH (100 µg iv). Perception scores were assessed for first perception, pain perception threshold (PPT), and pain tolerance threshold (PTT). Esophageal motility was investigated by high-resolution impedance manometry, before and after CRH and evaluated by distal contractile integral (DCI) and intrabolus pressure (IBP). Pressure flow analysis assessed bolus clearance (impedance ratio), degree of pressurization needed to propel bolus onward (IBP slope), and pressure flow (pressure flow index, PFI). Stress and mood were assessed during the study. Sensitivity to mechanical distention was increased after CRH compared with placebo (PPT: P = 0.0023; PTT: P = 0.0253). CRH had no influence on the other stimulations. DCI was increased for all boluses (liquid, P = 0.0012; semisolid, P = 0.0017; solid, P = 0.0107). Impedance ratio for liquid (P < 0.0001) and semisolid swallows (P = 0.0327) decreased after CRH. IBP slope increased after CRH for semisolid (P = 0.0041) and solid (P = 0.0003) swallows. PFI increased for semisolid (P = 0.0017) and solid swallows (P = 0.0031). CRH increased esophageal sensitivity to mechanical distention, not to the other stimulation modalities. CRH increased esophageal contractility and tone, decreased LES relaxation, increased esophageal bolus pressurization, improved esophageal bolus clearance, and increased pressure flow.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to address the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) on esophageal sensitivity and alterations in motility in health. CRH administration increased esophageal sensitivity to mechanical distention. This effect is accompanied by an increase in esophageal contractility and tone and a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. CRH increased esophageal bolus pressurization, improved esophageal bolus clearance, and increased pressure flow. The changes in esophageal contractile properties may underlie the increased sensitivity to mechanical distention after CRH.

Gastrointestinal Peptides During Chronic Gastric Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Intractable Vomiting.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an alternative therapy to treat patients with intractable vomiting. A preclinical study has demonstrated the modulation of the gastrointestinal (GI) peptide ghrelin by GES but such mechanism has never been investigated in patients. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of GES on GI peptide levels in patients with intractable vomiting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients were randomized to receive either ON or OFF GES, 14 completed the study (10 ON, 4 OFF stimulation). Vomiting episodes, gastric emptying, and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) were assessed. Gastric and blood samples were collected before and four months after the ON period of gastric stimulation. mRNA and/or peptide levels were assessed in gastric biopsies for ghrelin, leptin, and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 and in duodenal biopsies for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) using RT-qPCR and multiplex technology. Ghrelin, leptin, GLP-1, PYY, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels also were quantified in blood samples. RESULTS: Among clinical parameters, vomiting episodes were slightly reduced by GES (p = 0.09). In tissue, mRNA or protein levels were not modified following chronic GES. In blood, a significant reduction of postprandial PYY levels (p < 0.05) was observed at M4 and a reduction of NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels in fasted patients (p < 0.05). Increased plasma leptin levels after GES were correlated with reduction of vomiting and improvement of GIQLI. CONCLUSIONS: GES reduces NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels under fasting conditions and postprandial PYY levels in patients suffering from nausea and/or vomiting refractory to pharmacological therapies.

Botulinum toxin: an endoscopic approach for treating fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Fecal incontinence is a common, distressing condition with limited therapeutic options. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections have been proposed as a treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. This study aimed to determine the short-term clinical outcomes of BTX-A injections in patients with fecal incontinence of varying etiology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with fecal incontinence were enrolled, 17 with their native rectum and 9 with a neo-reservoir following a proctectomy for rectal cancer. BTX-A was endoscopically injected into the rectum/reservoir. Scores for severity (CCS) and quality of life (FIQL) were recorded at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up visit. RESULTS: The CCS was significantly lower after 3 months (median 15, range 4 - 20 vs. 8, range 1 - 19; P = 0.001). The quality of life improved in three of the four FIQL domains. The improvement was maintained in 11 of 12 patients who received more than one injection because of recurrent symptoms. There was no significant predictive factor for the success of BTX-A injections. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrated that rectal/reservoir injections are an effective short-term treatment for fecal incontinence.

Translation of the nine item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) questionnaire in French (NIAS-Fr).

BACKGROUND: The Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Screen (NIAS) questionnaire is originally available in English. Given the significant overlap of ARFID-like symptoms in gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, ARFID screening becomes crucial in these patient populations. Consequently, the translation of the NIAS questionnaire into French is necessary for its utilization in French-speaking countries. METHODS: Clinical experts in neuro-gastroenterology and dietetics from four medical centres in two French-speaking countries (France and Belgium) took part in a well-structured questionnaire translation procedure. This process involved six steps before final approval: translation from English to French, backward translation, comparison between the original and retranslated versions, testing the translated version on patients, making corrections based on patient feedback, and testing the corrected version on an additional sample of patients. KEY RESULTS: The NIAS questionnaire in French (NIAS-Fr) was tested on 18 outpatients across the involved centres. For the majority of native French-speaking patients, the translated questionnaire was well understood and clear. After incorporating two relevant modifications suggested by the patients, the translated questionnaire was approved through testing on an additional sample of patients. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The involvement of two French-speaking countries was crucial for the harmonization and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. As a result, the NIAS-Fr is now available for use in 54 French-speaking countries, serving approximately 321 million French speakers across five continents for screening ARFID, for both clinical and research purposes.

Associations between postprandial symptoms, hydrogen and methane production, and transit time in irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal oroanal transit time (OATT) and visceral hypersensitivity are key pathophysiological factors in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The lactulose nutrient challenge test (LNCT) has been developed to assess the postprandial symptoms and gut microbial fermentation. We aimed to investigate associations between OATT, rectal sensitivity, and LNCT in IBS patients. METHODS: We included 263 IBS patients from two study cohorts, where the link between pathophysiology and symptoms was investigated. During the LNCT, severity of postprandial symptoms was graded, and breath hydrogen/methane concentrations were measured after ingestion of a combined lactulose nutrient drink every 15 min for 4 h. The patients underwent rectal sensitivity (rectal barostat) and OATT (radiopaque markers) investigations. Comorbid conditions (functional dyspepsia, anxiety, depression, and somatization) were assessed with questionnaires. KEY RESULTS: After controlling for comorbid conditions, rectal sensitivity was associated with abdominal pain (p < 0.05), and more rapid OATT was associated with higher severity of abdominal discomfort, rumbling, nausea, and urgency (p < 0.05 for all) both pre- and post-prandially. Postprandial nausea, urgency, and abdominal pain changed differently over time depending on OATT (p < 0.05 for all). OATT, but not rectal sensitivity, was associated with hydrogen and methane concentrations (p = 0.002 for both). Trajectories over time of postprandial symptoms and exhaled hydrogen/methane concentrations were correlated with different correlations depending on OATT. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: This study highlights the importance of oroanal transit and hydrogen and methane production in the pathophysiology of IBS and increases our understanding of pathophysiological factors involved in postprandial symptom generation. Treatments targeting oroanal transit and hydrogen and methane production may improve specific postprandial symptoms.

Interferential therapy for chronic constipation in adults: The CON-COUR randomizedcontrolled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation (CC) is a frequent condition, and the first-line treatment includes dietary rules, the use of laxatives, and biofeedback for evacuation disorders. However, almost half of the patients are dissatisfied with their current treatment. We report the first double-blind randomized multicenter trial assessing the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical stimulation by interferential therapy (IFT) in the treatment of CC in adults. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was conducted at 7 centers in France. The primary endpoint was 8-week efficacy as defined by the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements during the last 4 weeks of the 8-week stimulation period. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the effects of IFT on symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnair (PAC-SYM)), quality of life (QOL) (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life), Colonic transit time (CTT), anorectal manometry, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The proportion of 8-week responders was not significantly different between the two groups (73.2% in the IFT group vs. 67.1% in the sham group). After 8 weeks of stimulation, the mean overall PAC-SYM score and the mean reduction in the overall PAC-SYM score were significantly greater in the IFT group than in the sham group. No differences were observed concerning CTT, anorectal manometry, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, IFT can significantly alleviate the symptoms and improve the QOL of CC patients. It can be assumed that new treatments require different modes of evaluation and that the assessment of patient-reported outcomes may become a priority among therapeutic targets of CC. Trial registration number NCT02381665.

Quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome: Exploring mediating factors through structural equation modelling.

BACKGROUND: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) negatively influences mental and physical quality of life (QoL), but factors that explain this impact are still unclear. Increasing evidence has associated IBS severity, psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI)-specific anxiety with QoL in IBS. The aim of this study is to further explore these associations and to analyze potential mediating factors. METHOD: A total of 1017 IBS patients (69.3% female, mean age 40.6 years) who completed a QoL measure (SF-36) were included in this study. A proportion of these participants (N = 183; 72.7% female, mean age 41.7), who additionally completed psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and GI-specific anxiety measures, was included in the mediation analysis. This analysis was conducted via structural equation modelling to identify factors of importance for generic QoL, using a cross-sectional design. RESULTS: IBS patients reported lower QoL than what is observed in the general population, in particular regarding role limitations caused by health and emotional functioning, vitality, and social functioning. Female patients scored lower than male patients on most QoL dimensions. The effects of IBS severity on mental and physical QoL were mediated by GI-specific anxiety. In addition to GI-specific anxiety, depressive symptoms were also of importance for mental QoL, and somatic symptom severity for physical QoL. CONCLUSION: QoL is reduced in patients with IBS and GI-specific anxiety, depressive symptoms, and somatic complaints are particularly important for this outcome. Future trials should test the efficacy of psychological interventions specifically targeting these factors in improving QoL in IBS.