Effects of Etomidate on Postintubation Hypotension, Inflammatory Markers, and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: An International, Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of etomidate with postintubation hypotension, inflammation, and mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: International, multicenter, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Critically ill patients hospitalized specifically for COVID-19 from three major academic institutions in the US and Europe. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Patients were allocated into the etomidate (ET) group or another induction agent (OA) group. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension. Secondary outcomes included postintubation inflammatory status, in-hospital mortality, and mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: 171 patients with a median age of 68 (IQR 58-73) years were included (ET, n = 98; OA, n = 73). Etomidate was associated with lower postintubation mean arterial pressure [74.33 (64-85) mm Hg versus 81.84 (69.75-94.25) mm Hg, p = 0.005] compared to other agents. No statistically significant differences were generally observed in inflammatory markers between the two groups at 7- and 14-days after admission to the intensive care unit. In-hospital mortality [77 (79%) versus 41 (56%), p = 0.003] and mortality at 30-days [78 (80%) versus 43 (59%), p = 0.006] were higher in the ET group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only etomidate (p = 0.009) and postintubation mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001) had a statistically significant effect on mortality, in contrast to stress-dose steroids (p = 0.301), after adjusting for creatinine (p = 0.695), blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.153), age (p = 0.055), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2) (p = 0.941), and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (p = 0.712). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single-bolus dose of etomidate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower postintubation mean arterial pressure and higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared to other induction agents.

Transection of lung as rare complication of pigtail catheter placement.

Pigtail catheters and chest tubes are commonly used for effective resolution of pneumothoraces and drainage of simple pleural effusions. Given their small calibers, better flexibility and more ease at the time of insertion, pigtail catheters are associated with lower risks of complications when compared to traditional chest tubes. Commonly reported complications of the pigtail catheters include the higher probability for clogging, kinking, and obstruction. Rare complications as air embolism, penetration of the heart and transection of the lungs are seldom reported in the literature. We present a case of an 81-year-old female presented with covid-19 pneumonia who developed bilateral spontaneous pneumothoraces requiring bilateral pigtail insertion. The patient developed worsening hypoxia and chest imaging revealed that the left pigtail was transected into the lung parenchyma. With this case report, we hope to bring to light a rare complication of pigtail placement.

Backstabbed: routine lumbar puncture complicated by retroperitoneal hematoma and hemorrhagic shock.

Lumbar punctures (LPs) are commonly performed procedures, serving diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. They are generally safe, and serious, life-threatening complications are rare. We report a case of a patient who underwent an LP and subsequently developed shock. Imaging studies revealed a retroperitoneal hematoma with an active bleed. Interrogation of the lumbar branches in the interventional radiology suite revealed an active arterial bleed at the level of L3-L4 which was successfully embolized. We present this case to highlight the possibility of a rare complication of an LP and to emphasize the importance of early detection and resuscitative intervention.

Patients' reasons for missing scheduled clinic appointments and their solutions at a major urban-based academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: Patients that do not show up for scheduled clinic appointments affect the quality of healthcare provided. This study aimed to recognize the reasons behind missing scheduled appointments and understand possible solutions from the patient's perspective. METHOD: We included 100 patients that attended the outpatient Medicine clinic in January 2020. Selection criteria were based on missing one or more of the scheduled clinic appointments in the last year. The participants answered a questionnaire to clarify the reasons for missing a scheduled clinic appointment and offer suggestions for a solution. The recruiter, in turn, answered several demographical questions. RESULTS: The study showed a statistically significant difference between the no-show rate in females at 60% compared to males at 40% (P = 0.0023). The no show rate was not significantly affected by the day of the week, time of appointment, or the weather. Forgetting about the appointment was the most common cause (36 subjects). Work-related issues were reported in 17 participants, making it the 2nd most common cause. Not notified about the appointment, Lack of transportation, childcare-related issues, along with other reasons, were less likely reported (Table 2). 11 out of 36 (30%) subjects suggested a reminder text message in their preferred language; meanwhile, 4 others suggested a weekend clinic. CONCLUSION: The patients should be aware of different appointment reminders options and have the freedom to choose a suitable reminder. Patients should be educated about the importance of calling to cancel the appointment since some of the reasons for no show are unpreventable.