Exploring the value of using patient-oriented MRI reports in clinical practice - a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Standard radiology reports (SRR) are designed to communicate information between doctors. With many patients having instantaneous access to SRRs on patient portals, interpretation without guidance from doctors can cause anxiety and panic. In this pilot study, we designed a patient-centred prostate MRI template report (PACERR) to address some of these challenges and tested whether PACERRs improve patient knowledge and experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients booked for clinical prostate MRI were randomly assigned to SRR or SRR + PACERR. Questionnaires included multiple-choice that targeted 4 domains (understanding, usefulness, next steps, emotional experience) hypothesized to improve with patient-centred reports and short answer questions, testing knowledge regarding MRI results. Clinical encounters were observed and recorded to explore whether adding PACERR improved communication. Likert scaled-responses and short-answer questions were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Of the 40 participants, the majority were MRI naïve (70%). Patients receiving a PACERR had higher scores in the categories of patient understanding (mean: 4.17 vs. 3.39, p=0.006), usefulness (mean: 4.58 vs. 3.07, p<0.001), and identifying next steps (mean: 1.89 vs. 3.03, p=0.003) but not emotional experience (mean: 4.18 vs. 3.79, p=0.22). PACERR participants found the layout and design more patient friendly (mean: 4.47 vs. 2.61, p<0.001) and easier to understand (mean: 4.37 vs. 2.38, p<0.001). In the knowledge section, overall, the PACERR arm scored better (87% vs. 56%, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: With the addition of prostate MRI PACERR, participants had better understanding of their results and felt more prepared to involve themselves in discussions with their doctor.

Lung transplantation and concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for end-stage lung diseases. In some cases, these patients may also have underlying cardiac disease which may require surgical intervention before or during transplantation. Concomitant cardiac surgery may often be preferred, as reduced lung function precludes these patients from pre-transplant surgery. Our meta-analysis sought to examine the impact of lung transplantation paired with concomitant cardiac surgery on long-term mortality. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Our primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in hospital and serious postoperative complication rates. We used a meta-analytic model to determine the differences in the above outcomes between patients who underwent lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Out of the 1876 articles screened, 7 met our pre-determined inclusion criteria. Lung transplantation with concomitant cardiac surgery was not associated with increased mortality compared to lung transplantation alone (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-1.31; I2 = 0%; p = .99). LOS in hospital was not significantly different between groups (standardized mean difference = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.91 to 1.55). Postoperative complication rates were also reported but not analyzed due to missing data. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mortality rates in patients undergoing lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years. However, postoperative complication rates were higher in the concomitant group. The decision to perform concomitant procedures should be tailored to each patient's clinical condition.

The Role of Natriuretic Peptides in Predicting Adverse Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review.

The increasing global burden of cardiovascular disease, particularly, in the aging population, has led to an increase in high-risk cardiac surgical procedures. The current preoperative risk stratification scores, such as the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Society for Thoracic Surgeons score, have limitations in their predictive accuracy and tend to underestimate the mortality risk in higher-risk populations. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the utility of natriuretic peptides, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its precursor prohormone (N-terminal prohormone BNP), as predictive biomarkers for adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. A comprehensive search strategy was performed, and 63 studies involving 40,667 patients who underwent major cardiac operations were included for data extraction. Preoperative levels of BNP and N-terminal prohormone BNP seemed to be associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term mortality, postoperative heart failure, kidney injury, and length of intensive care unit stay. However, their predictive value for postoperative arrhythmias and myocardial infarction was less established. Our findings suggest that natriuretic peptides may play an important role in risk prediction in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. The addition of these biomarkers to the existing clinical risk stratification strategies may enhance their predictive accuracy. However, this needs to be endorsed by data derived from wide-scale clinical trials.

Ceragenin-coated endotracheal tubes for the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a prospective, longitudinal, cross-over, interrupted time, implementation study protocol (CEASE VAP study).

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients are at high risk of acquiring ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which occurs in approximately 20% of mechanically ventilated patients. VAP results either from aspiration of pathogen-contaminated oropharyngeal secretions or contaminated biofilms that form on endotracheal tubes (ETTs) after intubation. VAP results in increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, increased risk of death and increased healthcare costs. Because of its impact on patient outcomes and the healthcare system, VAP is regarded as an important patient safety issue and there is an urgent need for better evidence on the efficacy of prevention strategies. Modified ETTs that reduce aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions with subglottic secretion drainage or reduce the occurrence of biofilm with a coating of ceragenins (CSAs) are available for clinical use in Canada. In this implementation study, we will evaluate the efficacy of these two types of Health Canada-licensed ETTs on the occurrence of VAP, and impact on patient-centred outcomes. METHODS: In this ongoing, pragmatic, prospective, longitudinal, interrupted time, cross-over implementation study, we will compare the efficacy of a CSA-coated ETT (CeraShield N8 Pharma) with an ETT with subglottic secretion drainage (Taper Guard, Covidien). The study periods consist of four alternating time periods of 11 or 12 weeks or a total of 23 weeks for each ETT. All patients intubated with the study ETT in each time period will be included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Outcomes will include VAP incidence, mortality and health services utilisation including antibiotic use and length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Queen's University. The results of this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05761613.

Huge Morgagni Hernia, a Rare Criterion to Favor TAVI Against SAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is now a validated treatment option for severe aortic stenosis in patients in whom surgical aortic valve replacement is recommended, especially those associated with an elevated surgical risk. Here, we discuss the surgical management of a case of severe aortic stenosis in a patient with huge Morgagni hernia. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

The Impact Of Active Chest Tube Clearance Technology On Surgical Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Active chest tube clearance technology (ACT) systems were introduced to improve the patency of chest tubes and to reduce the potential complications associated with inadequate mediastinal blood drainage after cardiac surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of ACT on the incidence of chest tube clogging, retained blood syndromes (RBS), re-exploration for bleeding, and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: A database search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Only articles comparing the use of ACT to conventional chest tube drainage after cardiac surgery were screened. Included articles were restricted to adult patients and English language only. RESULTS: Nine of the 841 articles screened were included in this review. Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and seven were observational studies. Pooled estimates showed RBS, surgical re-exploration rates, and POAF were significantly less common in the ACT group. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that the use of ACT may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications associated with inadequate drainage of mediastinal blood after cardiac surgery. However, more robust evidence is required to endorse these findings and support the routing use of ACT in clinical practice.

Development, multi-institutional external validation, and algorithmic audit of an artificial intelligence-based Side-specific Extra-Prostatic Extension Risk Assessment tool (SEPERA) for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension (ssEPE) is essential for performing nerve-sparing surgery to mitigate treatment-related side-effects such as impotence and incontinence in patients with localised prostate cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) might provide robust and personalised ssEPE predictions to better inform nerve-sparing strategy during radical prostatectomy. We aimed to develop, externally validate, and perform an algorithmic audit of an AI-based Side-specific Extra-Prostatic Extension Risk Assessment tool (SEPERA). METHODS: Each prostatic lobe was treated as an individual case such that each patient contributed two cases to the overall cohort. SEPERA was trained on 1022 cases from a community hospital network (Trillium Health Partners; Mississauga, ON, Canada) between 2010 and 2020. Subsequently, SEPERA was externally validated on 3914 cases across three academic centres: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) from 2008 to 2020; L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (Paris, France) from 2010 to 2020; and Jules Bordet Institute (Brussels, Belgium) from 2015 to 2020. Model performance was characterised by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), calibration, and net benefit. SEPERA was compared against contemporary nomograms (ie, Sayyid nomogram, Soeterik nomogram [non-MRI and MRI]), as well as a separate logistic regression model using the same variables included in SEPERA. An algorithmic audit was performed to assess model bias and identify common patient characteristics among predictive errors. FINDINGS: Overall, 2468 patients comprising 4936 cases (ie, prostatic lobes) were included in this study. SEPERA was well calibrated and had the best performance across all validation cohorts (pooled AUROC of 0·77 [95% CI 0·75-0·78] and pooled AUPRC of 0·61 [0·58-0·63]). In patients with pathological ssEPE despite benign ipsilateral biopsies, SEPERA correctly predicted ssEPE in 72 (68%) of 106 cases compared with the other models (47 [44%] in the logistic regression model, none in the Sayyid model, 13 [12%] in the Soeterik non-MRI model, and five [5%] in the Soeterik MRI model). SEPERA had higher net benefit than the other models to predict ssEPE, enabling more patients to safely undergo nerve-sparing. In the algorithmic audit, no evidence of model bias was observed, with no significant difference in AUROC when stratified by race, biopsy year, age, biopsy type (systematic only vs systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy), biopsy location (academic vs community), and D'Amico risk group. According to the audit, the most common errors were false positives, particularly for older patients with high-risk disease. No aggressive tumours (ie, grade >2 or high-risk disease) were found among false negatives. INTERPRETATION: We demonstrated the accuracy, safety, and generalisability of using SEPERA to personalise nerve-sparing approaches during radical prostatectomy. FUNDING: None.

Preoperative anemia and transfusion in cardiac surgery: a single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia and transfusion are associated with worse outcomes. This study aims to identify the prevalence of preoperative anemia, transfusion rates on surgery day, and predictors of transfusion in elective cardiac surgery patients at our centre. We also aim to evaluate our preoperative intervention program, and examine the intervention window for anemia before surgery. METHODS: This study included 797 adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery at a tertiary hospital. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of transfusion on surgery day. RESULTS: Preoperative anemia was present in 15% of patients. Anemic patients had a significantly higher transfusion rate at 53% compared to 10% in non-anemic patients. Hemoglobin concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body surface area (BSA), and total cardiopulmonary bypass time were predictive of transfusion on surgery day. Patients had a median of 7 days between initial visit and surgery day, however, referral to the blood conservation clinic was only done for 8% of anemic patients and treatment was initiated in 3% of anemic patients. Among the 3 anemic patients who received treatment, 2 did not require blood transfusion on surgery day. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia is present in 15% of patients at our centre and these patients have 53% transfusion rates on surgery day. Hemoglobin concentration, eGFR, BSA, and total cardiopulmonary bypass time were predictors of transfusion on surgery day. Patients had a median of 7 days between initial visit and surgery day. Referral and anemia treatment were infrequently initiated in preoperative anemic patient.